Trump accused of 'selling out' to Big Tech with bold plan for a 'new private health tracking system' sparking data leak worries
In the East Room on Wednesday, Trump hosted a 'Making Health Technology Great Again' event that unveiled the proposal.
The Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services is securing commitments from top tech companies including Amazon, Apple, Google and OpenAI to start building a 'digital health ecosystem.'
The goal would be that Americans could upload their health records to an app that could be easily shared across doctors' offices.
'For decades America's healthcare networks have been overdue for a high tech upgrade - and that's what we're doing,' the president told the crowd. 'The existing systems are often slow, costly and incompatible with one another. But with today's announcement, we take a major step to bring healthcare into the digital age.'
Trump said this public-private partnership would move the country away from 'clipboards and fax machines into a new era of convenience, profitability and speed and, frankly, better health for people.'
Online, Americans were skeptical of the plan, voicing concern that the president was selling out to 'big tech.'
'More corruption and selling America out to big tech,' one X user posted.
Others feared a massive data breach.
'I can see the headlines now, Millions of users have personal health data leaked,' another said.
Lawrence Gostin, a Georgetown University law professor who specializes in public health told the Associated Press, 'There are enormous ethical and legal concerns.'
'Patients across America should be very worried that their medical records are going to be used in ways that harm them and their families,' Gostin said.
Officials at CMS argued that users would have to opt-in to use these services.
Helping sell the plan is Amy Gleason, an adviser to CMS and the Department of Health and Human Services, who's the acting administrator of the Department of Government Efficiency.
Gleason made headlines in March when it was revealed that she, not Elon Musk, was technically in charge of the Trump administration's DOGE efforts.
She starred in a CMS promotional video about the effort - and appeared on a panel alongside Trump, CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Wednesday afternoon.
Gleason spoke about her daughter Morgan who suffers from a rare disease.
She recalled how she carried a 'binder of paper records' to every doctor's appointment.
'And I truly believe that if one of those doctors had been able to see her whole history, they would have diagnosed her faster,' Gleason said.
She added that if her daughter had access to today's AI tools, a diagnosis may have come quicker as well.
'Today Morgan takes 21 pills a day, gets two infusions a month and has over 40 patient portals,' Gleason said. 'Her disease is very rare, but her experience is very common.'
Gleason then asked the audience to envision what healthcare could look like with this big tech-government partnership.
'So Morgan, in six months from now, might show up to her doctor's appointment,' she said. 'Instead of filling out a clipboard with her 21 medications, 12 doctors and her entire medical history, she can just pull out her phone and tap or scan a QR code and seamlessly transfer her digital insurance card, her verified medical record and a digital summary that can help her provider get up to speed faster.'
'We call this "kill the clipboard" as President Trump said,' Gleason said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
23 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Claude Code Sub Agents : Build AI Automation Agents in Minutes Without Coding
What if managing complex workflows could feel as seamless as delegating tasks to a highly skilled team? Imagine a system where every task—whether it's analyzing data, reviewing code, or generating unit tests—is handled by a specialized expert, working independently yet harmoniously within a larger framework. That's the promise of Claude Code sub-agents. These task-oriented components are transforming how we approach workflow automation, offering a level of precision and efficiency that traditional systems often struggle to match. Whether you're a developer juggling multiple projects or a team leader striving for streamlined operations, sub-agents could be the fantastic option you didn't know you needed. Prompt Engineering takes you through the core mechanics and practical applications of sub-agents, equipping you with the tools to harness their full potential. You'll uncover how these autonomous units manage their own context windows, use customized system prompts, and execute tasks with laser focus—all while preserving the integrity of the main workflow. But their true power lies in their flexibility: from parallel task execution to tailored configurations, sub-agents can adapt to your unique needs. As you read on, you'll discover not just how to use sub-agents, but how to design them to transform your productivity. What could this level of precision and adaptability unlock for your projects? What Are Sub-Agents? Sub-agents are autonomous, task-oriented entities within Claude Code's multi-agent framework. Each sub-agent operates independently, using its own context window and customized system prompts to handle specific tasks without interfering with the main orchestrator. For example, one sub-agent might specialize in code review, another in unit test generation, and yet another in data analysis. This modular design ensures that tasks are executed with precision, reducing errors and improving overall efficiency. The architecture of sub-agents allows them to function as specialized units, each tailored to a particular purpose. This separation of responsibilities not only enhances performance but also simplifies the management of complex workflows by isolating tasks into distinct, manageable components. Key Benefits of Sub-Agents Sub-agents offer a range of advantages that can significantly enhance your productivity and streamline operations: Improved Context Management: By isolating tasks, sub-agents prevent interference with the main context, making sure clarity and focus for each operation. By isolating tasks, sub-agents prevent interference with the main context, making sure clarity and focus for each operation. Enhanced Tool Selection: Each sub-agent can be equipped with tools specifically designed for its purpose, improving accuracy and relevance in task execution. Each sub-agent can be equipped with tools specifically designed for its purpose, improving accuracy and relevance in task execution. Specialized Expertise: Sub-agents excel at their designated tasks due to their focused design, allowing higher-quality results. Sub-agents excel at their designated tasks due to their focused design, allowing higher-quality results. Reusability: Sub-agents can be reused across multiple projects or customized for specific users, offering flexibility and scalability. These benefits make sub-agents an invaluable resource for managing complex workflows, particularly in environments where precision and efficiency are critical. How to use Claude Code Sub‑Agents : Quick Guide Watch this video on YouTube. Gain further expertise in Claude Code by checking out these recommendations. How to Create Sub-Agents Creating sub-agents in Claude Code involves defining their configurations through structured markdown files. These files specify essential details such as the sub-agent's name, purpose, tools, and system prompts. Claude Code simplifies this process by providing built-in assistance for generating these configurations, making sure that even users with minimal experience can create sub-agents effectively. Sub-agents can be created at both the project level and the user level, allowing for tailored customization to meet specific needs. This flexibility enables you to design sub-agents that align closely with your operational requirements, whether you're working on a single project or managing multiple workflows. Using Sub-Agents Effectively Once configured, sub-agents can be invoked explicitly or automatically selected based on the task description. For instance, if a task involves generating unit tests, the system can route it to the appropriate sub-agent. The results are then returned to the main orchestrator, making sure that the primary context remains uncluttered and focused. Sub-agents also support advanced workflows, such as sequential task execution, where tasks are completed in a specific order, and parallel task execution, where multiple tasks are handled simultaneously. These capabilities enable efficient coordination of operations, making sub-agents a powerful tool for managing complex, multi-step processes. Practical Applications Sub-agents are highly versatile and can be applied to a wide range of use cases. Some common applications include: Code Review: A sub-agent can analyze code for errors, suggest improvements, and ensure compliance with best practices, saving time and reducing the risk of oversight. A sub-agent can analyze code for errors, suggest improvements, and ensure compliance with best practices, saving time and reducing the risk of oversight. Unit Test Generation: Another sub-agent can focus on creating and validating unit tests for specific modules, making sure robust and reliable software development. Another sub-agent can focus on creating and validating unit tests for specific modules, making sure robust and reliable software development. Data Analysis: Sub-agents equipped with data science tools can process and interpret datasets efficiently, providing actionable insights for decision-making. Customization is a key strength of sub-agents. You can define specific tools, instructions, and permissions to align with your project's unique requirements, making sure that each sub-agent is optimized for its intended purpose. Considerations for Optimal Use While sub-agents offer numerous benefits, their effective use requires careful planning and management. Overusing sub-agents or misconfiguring them can lead to excessive token consumption, which may impact system performance and increase costs. To mitigate these risks, consider the following strategies: Regularly monitor token usage to identify and address unnecessary resource consumption. Plan workflows strategically to ensure that sub-agents are only deployed when their specialized capabilities are genuinely needed. Configure sub-agents with clear and concise prompts to maximize their efficiency and minimize errors. By implementing these practices, you can optimize the performance and cost-effectiveness of your sub-agent workflows, making sure that they deliver maximum value without unnecessary overhead. Unlocking the Potential of Sub-Agents Claude Code sub-agents are powerful tools for managing complex workflows, preserving context, and enhancing task-specific operations. By isolating tasks into specialized instances, they enable greater flexibility, precision, and efficiency. Whether you're conducting code reviews, generating unit tests, or analyzing data, sub-agents can be tailored to meet your specific needs. With thoughtful planning, careful configuration, and regular monitoring, you can unlock the full potential of sub-agents, transforming them into an indispensable component of your workflow. By using their capabilities effectively, you can achieve greater productivity, reduce errors, and streamline operations, making sure success in even the most demanding environments. Media Credit: Prompt Engineering Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Renewables and fossil fuels not ‘either-or', says Reeves after Trump comments
Renewable and non-renewable energy sources are not an 'either-or', Rachel Reeves has said after Donald Trump described North Sea oil as a 'treasure chest'. On a visit to Lossiemouth on the North Sea coast in Moray, the Chancellor described oil and gas as 'incredibly important for the UK and our energy security'. Her appearance in Scotland followed a five-day visit from the US president, who called on the UK Government to 'incentivise the drillers, fast'. Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'North Sea oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense.' Asked whether she would 'unlock' the 'treasure chest', Ms Reeves told the PA news agency: 'Oil and gas are incredibly important for the UK and our energy security. 'And oil and gas is going to play an important role in our energy mix for decades to come. 'It's why, alongside the private sector, we're investing in carbon capture and storage, which is absolutely essential for supporting energy intensive industries. 'But it's not either-or. 'At the same time, we're investing in clean homegrown energy, including at Berwick Bank in Scotland, which will create thousands of new jobs and power millions of homes. 'And that's what we need to do to make sure that our economy has this energy security that we need, that we bring down bills and bring more good jobs to Scotland.' Berwick Bank in the North Sea has this week received a green light from the Scottish Government. The proposed wind farm, off the coast of East Lothian, could add more than 4.1 gigawatts of capacity, which according to developer SSE Renewables is enough electricity to power more than six million homes annually. But Mr Trump criticised existing wind farms during his visit, when he said: 'When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen, the height of a 50-storey building.' Gesturing with his hands, he added: 'You can take 1,000 times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big.' Conservative shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie has written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, calling for a review of policies affecting the oil and gas industry. 'As President Trump has said, the UK's 'very high' tax on oil and gas companies is a deterrent to investment,' he wrote. 'The extension of the energy profits levy (EPL), coupled with uncertainty around future licensing and investment signals, has created a climate of instability that threatens jobs, innovation and the region's economic resilience. 'President Donald Trump's remarks during your visit – calling Aberdeen the 'oil capital of Europe' and urging the UK to 'bring it back' – reflect a sentiment shared by many in the region. 'May I urge you to consider the president's call to 'incentivise' domestic production of hydrocarbons? 'Oil and gas still have a vital role to play in our energy mix and economic future; British people would rather see the UK benefit from domestic exploration and drilling than import more from Norway and Qatar.' The West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine MP added: 'Will you urgently call a meeting in Downing Street to conduct the review in partnership with industry leaders, our world-leading supply chain business, and the local workforce to ensure a coherent and sustainable path forward?'
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Texas's redistricting is a Republican power grab at the hands of Trump
When Texas Republicans redrew their congressional map this month at the urging of Donald Trump, they faced a difficult task. They needed to find a way to pick up five seats that the president wanted ahead of the midterm elections next year without spreading their voters too thin and jeopardizing the 25 seats they already held. Republicans unveiled their plan to pick up the seats on Wednesday, revealing a map that could dilute Hispanic voting power. Under the new proposed districts, they would be favored in five new seats, giving them a hold on 30 of Texas's 38 congressional districts. Had the district been in place for the 2024 election, Trump would have won all 30 by at least 10 points. Republicans accomplished their goal by shifting district boundaries in three different parts of the state. In south Texas, they shifted boundaries of congressional districts where Trump performed well in the 2024 elections, but are held by two Democrats, Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez. Trump won Cuellar's district by seven points and Gonzalez's districts by about four points in 2024. Had the proposed districts been in place in 2024, he would have won each by about 10 points. In central Texas, the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, and Houston, Republicans eliminated three separate Democratic congressional districts with a similar approach. They packed Democratic voters into one or two districts and then attached the rest to newly drawn, heavily Republican areas. It's an aggressive approach that gives Republicans a shot at picking up five seats, but doesn't necessarily guarantee they will get all five. Analysts believe that Cuellar – who faces federal bribery charges – and Gonzalez, are established enough incumbents that they could win in the new configurations of their districts. 'They didn't make the newly targeted, or the new seats targeted for pickups, as red as they could have,' said David Wasserman, a well-respected analyst at the Cook Political Report. 'Had Republicans drawn an uglier map, they could have basically guaranteed themselves five [seats].' Here are the results of the 2024 presidential race in south-central Texas. The circles represent results by precinct – the bigger the circle, the bigger the margin of victory for either Democrats or Republicans. Here are two of the congressional seats Democrats hold in the area. Kamala Harris easily carried both of them in November. Republicans' new map packs Democrats into district 37 in Austin and another heavily Democratic district in San Antonio. It cracks the remaining Democrats in San Antonio into new GOP-friendly district 35 that Donald Trump would have won in November by 12 points. Democrats hold three congressional districts in Dallas Fort Worth, here are two of them. The proposed map packs Democratic voters into district 33 and another heavily Democratic district in Dallas. The remaining democrats are cracked into rural far-flung district 32 that Trump would have won by nearly 18 pts. Guardian graphic. Sources: Redistricting Data Hub, Texas Legislative Council. Republicans are redrawing the map amid a four-year legal battle over the districts that are already in place. That suit, filed by a coalition of Latino voting organizations, advocacy groups and voters, argues that Texas's current congressional map diminishes the influence of non-white voters, who accounted for 95% of the state's population growth. 'The current map is already egregiously gerrymandered,' said Marina Jenkins, the executive director of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which opposes the redraw in Texas. 'The proposed new gerrymander, and even more extreme gerrymander, adds even more insult to that injury, Black voters and Latino voters will have even less opportunity to have their political will considered on an equal basis.' The new map replaces several districts where Hispanic and other non-white voters had been electing Democrats with majority-Hispanic districts that favor Republicans. It would increase the number of districts where white people comprise a majority from 22 to 24, according to an analysis by the Texas Tribune. It would also create an additional Hispanic-majority district, and two new Black-majority districts. 'The gambit by Republicans here is to actually increase the number of Hispanic majority districts in terms of population share, but to diminish the opportunities of Hispanic voters to elect their candidates of choice,' Wasserman said. 'Because there are a number of Hispanic majority districts where Democratic-leaning Hispanic voters will be outnumbered by a coalition of conservative Hispanic voters and white voters.' Simply adding additional majority-Hispanic districts isn't enough to evade scrutiny under the Voting Rights Act, said Thomas A Saenz, the president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is representing plaintiffs challenging the existing maps. If certain conditions are met, the Voting Rights Act requires states to draw districts that give minority groups the chance to elect their preferred candidates. 'When a line drawer draws majority Latino district but in such a way that it knows will not actually elect the candidates of choice of the Latino community that may be a violation of the Voting Rights Act,' he said, speaking generally about the map. 'You can do that by picking areas with large Latino voting population but that historically has a lower voter turnout right others with large Latino population.' 'Pointing to the number of quote unquote majority Latino district does not remotely answer the question of whether you have violated the Voting Rights Act.'
