logo
Fee hike case: DPS Dwarka withdraws expulsion order against more than 30 students

Fee hike case: DPS Dwarka withdraws expulsion order against more than 30 students

Hindustan Times2 days ago

The Delhi Public School (DPS), Dwarka on Thursday informed the Delhi high court that it has withdrawn the order expelling more than 30 students for non-payment of hiked fees, just minutes before the court was to pronounce its verdict in the case.
The school had struck off the names of the students on May 9 and barred them from entering the premises on May 13, triggering protests by dozens of parents. The move escalated an ongoing standoff over fee hikes, with many parents refusing to pay the revised structure without the Directorate of Education's (DoE) approval. In response, the DoE passed an order on May 15 directing immediate reinstatement of the students.
As justice Sachin Datta assembled to deliver his ruling on the parents' plea, the school's counsel submitted that the expulsion order had been withdrawn, and that the students' names had been reinstated, subject to parents paying fees in line with an earlier order by the high court. That order, passed on May 22, directed students to pay 50% of the increased fees for the 2024–25 session, pending a final decision by DoE.
The school's lawyer also informed the bench that an affidavit to that effect had already been filed earlier in the week.
Taking note of the submission, justice Datta observed that the grievance no longer survived. 'I will take note of the fact that you have withdrawn the order. I will pass an appropriate order with observations and directions,' the judge said.
Delhi education minister Ashish Sood earlier announced the government's intent to bring in an ordinance to implement the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, aimed at curbing arbitrary fee hikes by private institutions.
DPS Dwarka had hiked the fees for the 2025-26 academic session, following which over 100 parents challenged the directive before the HC, demanding that the school be directed to collect only DoE-approved fees for both current and future academic years.
In their plea, the parents alleged that DPS Dwarka violated previous court orders prohibiting schools from harassing students over non-payment of unauthorised fees. They also claimed the school deployed bouncers to prevent students from entering, despite judicial restraint.
On April 16, the high court slammed the school for treating the students in a 'shabby and inhuman' manner by confining them to the library over failure to pay increased fees. Citing an inspection report by the district magistrate, justice Sachin Datta remarked that 'the school deserves to be shut down' and warned that inability to pay fees does not entitle schools to subject students to 'such indignity'.
The court had directed the school to immediately stop confining students to the library or denying them access to classes and facilities. It also instructed the DoE to conduct regular inspections to ensure compliance.
The school had submitted that the action followed proper procedure of issuing show cause notice, mails, messages and phone calls after unpaid dues of the students in question rose to approximately ₹42 lakh till the academic year 2024-25.
Senior advocate Pinaki Mishra, representing the school, informed the court that the action was taken before the commencement of the vacations to enable students to get admitted in another school and that the deployment of bouncers and security staff was imperative in the wake of various threats of kidnapping the students. He further submitted that fees collected from students was the only source of income for the school since it catered to various expenses, and the school had been operating with a deficit of ₹31 crores for over 10 years.
On May 16, the high court offered to stay DPS Dwarka's decision by stating that the hike was passed in defiance of the law that mandates schools to issue show cause notices (SCN) before taking such an action and asked if the school deprived 'sadistic pleasure' from such a decision.
The law, rule 35(4) of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, mandates schools to strike off the names of the students from their rolls after giving the parents or their guardian a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the proposed action.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

75 Delhi govt schools to get PM Shri tag, smart upgrades
75 Delhi govt schools to get PM Shri tag, smart upgrades

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

75 Delhi govt schools to get PM Shri tag, smart upgrades

The Delhi government will relaunch 75 of its schools as CM-Shri schools with state-of-the-art infrastructure and experiential learning models, chief minister Rekha Gupta said on Friday. The initiative aims to transform the quality of education in government schools by blending modern technology with improved facilities. The CM, addressing a meeting with school principals and education department officials in Shalimar Bagh, said the revamped schools will feature thousands of smart classrooms, 100 language labs, and 125 digital libraries by the end of the year. The city government currently runs 1,060 schools, and the 75 CM-Shri campuses will be chosen from among these, based on their readiness for infrastructure and technological upgrades. 'Every child in Delhi deserves quality education. Our aim isn't merely to build schools, but to create an education system that plays a vital role in nation-building. These 75 CM-Shri Schools are a step towards delivering learning that surpasses even private institutions,' Gupta said. The criteria for selecting the 75 schools are still being finalised, but will likely hinge on the existing infrastructure, an official said. The CM also directed that basic amenities like clean toilets, drinking water, proper lighting, and comfortable seating be upgraded across its 1,060 schools on a need basis. She instructed the PWD's horticulture wing to green campuses with landscaping initiatives. Each CM-Shri school will also be equipped with smart boards, science and computer labs, and other digital tools. Emphasising the importance of teacher quality, Gupta announced regular training programmes and exposure to modern teaching methods. The CM further directed officials to provide targeted support for meritorious, underperforming, and differently abled students, ensuring inclusive education. She also announced laptops for 1,200 students who excelled in Class 10 and 12 board exams, and said the government is actively seeking CSR partnerships to bolster the initiative. Meanwhile, the Directorate of Education (DoE) has opened applications for transfers to CM-Shri schools for the 2025-26 session. Post Graduate Teachers (PGTs), Trained Graduate Teachers (TGTs), Primary Teachers (PRTs), and other staff with at least five years remaining before retirement can apply by June 9 via email. Interviews will be held on June 11 (TGTs) and June 12 (PGTs and others). An official said the National Education Policy (NEP) will be implemented across CM-Shri schools, alongside the integration of AI tools and language labs. Gupta, meanwhile, took aim at the former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government, calling its education model 'artificial.' 'Despite the heavy propaganda, the ground reality was dismal. Even their most celebrated school buildings were poorly built — one constructed in 2018 deteriorated within two years. This exposes their so-called model as nothing more than a facade,' she said, adding that legal action would be initiated for irregularities in classroom construction flagged in the CAG report.

Paul Weiss Loses Ex-US Attorney Williams After Trump Deal
Paul Weiss Loses Ex-US Attorney Williams After Trump Deal

Mint

time6 hours ago

  • Mint

Paul Weiss Loses Ex-US Attorney Williams After Trump Deal

A former federal prosecutor who joined Paul Weiss in the month leading up to President Trump's second term left for Jenner & Block. New York-based partner Damian Williams will co-chair Jenner's litigation department and investigations, compliance and defense practice, according to the firm's announcement on Friday. He leaves a firm that struck a controversial deal with the Trump administration to avoid punitive sanctions to a firm that sued Trump to block a similar attack. Williams' departure comes only months after he re-joined Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison. Paul Weiss announced Williams' arrival in January, and said he began his legal career as a Paul Weiss associate in 2009. 'Damian led the Southern District with excellence and integrity, and we are excited to welcome him to Jenner as part of our firm's long tradition of hiring former public servants who are zealous and effective advocates,' said Jenner's chair Tom Perrelli, former Associate US Attorney General. A representative for Paul Weiss thanked Williams for his contributions to the firm and wished him well. Paul Weiss roused controversy within the legal community as the first of nine firms to pledge a collective $940 million in free legal services to Trump-approved causes in exchange for avoiding punitive White House sanctions. The firm drew Trump's anger as the former professional home to Mark Pomerantz, who left the firm in 2021 to assist with the Manhattan District Attorney's investigation into Trump's finances. Along with other Trump-targeted firms Perkins Coie, WilmerHale and Susman Godfrey, Jenner sued the Trump administration to reclaim security clearances and access to federal buildings that were threatened by a Trump executive order. Williams served as the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York from 2021 to 2024, when he left to join Paul Weiss. He oversaw the high-profile prosecutions of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and US Senator Bob Menendez. He was the first Black US Attorney in the history of the New York Southern District. Jenner's announcement said Williams will be a 'driving force' in the firm's litigation and white-collar work. 'Jenner & Block fearlessly advocates for its clients and provides outstanding strategic counsel through their most difficult challenges,' Williams said. 'I've seen firsthand how this firm expertly tackles the toughest cases and lives its values. I'm excited to join a team with an extraordinary depth of legal talent that doesn't shy away from hard fights—and delivers results that matter.' Paul Weiss has sustained a string of partner exits in the wake of the announcement of its deal with the Trump administration. Litigation department co-chair Karen Dunn, an outside counsel to Google and former campaign adviser to Kamala Harris, left with three partners last month to start a new litigation boutique. Dunn and colleagues have represented Apple Inc. and Facebook. Their exits followed Jeh Johnson, Homeland Security Secretary under President Barack Obama, and Steve Banks, who oversaw the firm's pro bono practice. Trump issued an executive order against the firm March 14, which he rescinded within a week when firm chairman Brad Karp said the firm would devote $40 million in free legal services to mutually-agreed upon causes during Trump's presidency. Karp's pledge was expanded upon by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's March 28 deal with the president, which saw the firm promise $100 million in free legal services. Within a month, seven other firms, including Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins, made similar pledges, some as high as $125 million. The firms, as part of their deals, also promised not to engage in 'illegal DEI' activities and commit to 'merit-based' hiring. Skadden also faced departures in the wake of its deal with Trump, one being Kathleen Rubenstein, executive director of the Skadden Foundation, resigning from the public interest law group. To contact the reporter on this story: Justin Henry in Washington DC at jhenry@ To contact the editors responsible for this story: Chris Opfer at copfer@ John Hughes at jhughes@ Alessandra Rafferty at arafferty@ This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

"Children Deserve Compassion...": Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta On School Hiring Bouncers
"Children Deserve Compassion...": Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta On School Hiring Bouncers

NDTV

time8 hours ago

  • NDTV

"Children Deserve Compassion...": Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta On School Hiring Bouncers

Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta condemned school hiring bouncers to intimidate parents and students, emphasizing children deserve compassion, not coercion. New Delhi: Amid "alarming" reports of schools employing bouncers to intimidate parents and students, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Friday asserted that children deserve compassion and not coercion. "There have been alarming reports of schools employing bouncers to intimidate parents and students. Education is a right, not a business." "Our children deserve compassion, not coercion. Schools must remain spaces of learning, values and nation-building," she said. The Delhi government has already announced that it will bring an ordinance to implement the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, to control arbitrary fee hikes by private schools. The chief minister's post on X came a day after the Delhi High Court called out Delhi Public School, Dwarka, for using "bouncers" to block the entry of students in its premises over a fee dispute. Noting such a practice had no place in an institution of learning, Justice Sachin Datta said public shaming and intimidation of a student due to financial default not only constitute mental harassment but also undermine the psychological well-being and self-worth of a child.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store