logo
"We are the resistance": Cass Dems protest Micah Beckwith visit with own Abe Lincoln dinner

"We are the resistance": Cass Dems protest Micah Beckwith visit with own Abe Lincoln dinner

Yahoo05-03-2025

'It's standing room only in Logansport,' Dana Black said as she began her speech at the Cass County Democratic Party's Real Abe Lincoln Dinner: A Night of Unity and Justice.
The dinner, held in the Lounge at the Vibrant Event Center, was planned as a protest against the Cass County Republicans who invited the controversial Indiana Lt. Governor Micah Beckwith to be the guest speaker at their own annual Lincoln dinner. It was also a protest towards the Republican party's turn towards extremist values that do not reflect those held by Abraham Lincoln.
'Lincoln dinner and Micah Beckwith, there is nothing more contrarian than that,' said Lita Rouser, chair of the Cass County Democrats.
Beckwith is a self-professed Christian Nationalist who was elected as Governor Mike Braun's running mate by Indiana Republican delegates during the state's GOP Primary. Braun had wanted Julie McGuire as his running mate.
The Democrats invited Black to be their guest speaker. She is the host of the podcast 'Turn Left' and a contributor to the 'Indianapolis Business Journal' and WISH TV's 'All Indiana Politics.' She also served as the Deputy Chair and Engagement in the Indiana Democratic State Party.
The mood was jovial throughout the evening, though many Democrats showed their disgust toward Donald Trump's treatment of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House earlier in the day. Black called the incident 'the most embarrassing day of our American history.'
'We'll listen to the political pundits from all over the country and those of us who have an ounce of mental capacity will say that was disgraceful but [Trump's] spineless supporters will tell you that was a sign of strength,' she said.
Black opened her speech by saying that many Americans will say that the country has never seen anything like what is happening now.
She then reminded the audience of the Trail of Tears, Wounded Knee and the summer of violence towards Black Americans known as the Red Summer of 1919.
'Some parents will go home and have to talk to their kids about that horrible display in the White House but it will never be the same as when my father was talking to me at the kitchen table in 1977 and expressing his emotional disgust at what happened to Emmett Till in 1955,' she said.
Education in Indiana
Black touched on many topics during her speech but one of those in which she focused most on was education.
Black asked the audience if there were any charter schools in the city. After the they answered no, she asked about private schools.
'[Republicans] have decided that they will take a whole lot more money from public schools and give it to charter schools,' she said. 'And Logansport don't have any charter schools. So that means y'all have to do more with less…you still got to pay the teachers, you've got to keep the buildings updated, you've got to give [students] technology but they are giving your money to charter schools.'
She also noted Logansport would not benefit from universal school vouchers.
Black called Governor Mike Braun 'an orange man sycophant' who was out to bring local communities to their knees by making them do more with less.
Another example of the Republican's attack on public education that she referenced was House Bill 1501 which would have public schools sharing their school transportation with private schools.
'They're just taking your money and giving nothing back,' she said. 'There is a goal in defunding public education. The goal is 'if I keep you without the information then I can abuse you.''
Black said that was always the plan, that a less educated population was easier to lead astray.
How to help
Black said there were many ways to get involved and help fight the MAGA movement without having to stand up and give a speech.
She first suggested learning about marginalized communities that had been through state sanctioned oppression. She asked for those in attendance to learn about their resiliency and how they resisted their persecution.
Continuing to show up and be heard is also important.
'Once we become silent, they win,' she said. 'And remind them that this is a representative government. They are supposed to be talking with you so keep hounding them until they do. And then remind them, despite every effort they will put forth not to have an election in two years, we will have one.'
Black said those with cooking skills could bake food for marchers and protesters, those working phone banks or going door to door to raise awareness.
Those skilled in technology could help get the message out on the internet and those who were good with children could offer to babysit, especially for women candidates. Others could help read through bills and alert the community to which ones would help and what would hurt.
'This is our democracy,' she said. 'It's not pretty. It does not move in a linear way. It circles back and forth, round and round. We take two steps forward and sometimes we take one step back. Sometimes we take five steps back. We still keep moving forward. We are resilient.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'
State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State Department shifts $250 million from refugee aid to 'self-deportations'

By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. State Department has moved $250 million to the Department of Homeland Security for voluntary deportations by migrants without legal status, a spokesperson said, an unprecedented repurposing of funds that have been used to aid refugees uprooted by war and natural disasters. The money has been transferred "to provide a free flight home and an exit bonus to encourage and assist illegal aliens to voluntarily depart the United States," the State Department spokesperson told Reuters. Historically, those funds have been used "to provide protection to vulnerable people" overseas and to resettle refugees in the U.S., said Elizabeth Campbell, a former deputy assistant secretary of state. The re-routing of the money comes as President Donald Trump pushes to reshape U.S. government agencies to serve his 'America First' agenda. The State Department's planned reorganization explicitly states that the agency's refugee bureau now largely will focus on efforts to 'return illegal aliens to their country of origin or legal status.' The funds came from Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) overseen by the Bureau of Population, Refugee and Migration. Its website says its mission is to "reduce illegal immigration," aid people "fleeing persecution, crisis or violence and seek durable solutions for forcibly displaced people." Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, citing the law authorizing the funding, said in a May 7 Federal Register notice that underwriting the repatriation of people without legal status will bolster the "foreign policy interests" of the U.S. He did not mention the $250 million transfer to DHS. The DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's administration is working to speed up deportations in a crackdown that the Republican president vowed during the 2024 campaign would expel millions of people illegally in the U.S. It has encouraged migrants to leave voluntarily by threatening steep fines and deporting migrants to notorious prisons in Guantanamo Bay and El Salvador. But the volume of deportations since he took office in January appears to be less than those overseen by his predecessor Joe Biden in the February-May period of 2024, about 200,000 people versus 257,000. On May 9, Trump announced Project Homecoming, an initiative overseen by DHS that offers $1,000 stipends and travel assistance to migrants who "self-deport." DHS said in a May 19 news release that 64 people had "opted to self deport" to Honduras and Colombia on a charter flight under the program. Some experts said that while legal, sending the money to DHS for deportation operations was an unprecedented use of MRA funds. The main purpose of the funds historically has been "to provide refugee and displacement assistance, refugee processing and resettlement to the U.S., and respond to urgent and emerging humanitarian crises - not to return those very people to the harm or persecution they fled,' said Meredith Owen Edwards, senior director of Policy and Advocacy at the Refugee Council USA.

Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze
Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Two top Democrats claimed the Republicans' budget reconciliation bill and its proposal to let enhanced Obamacare credits expire will cause the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., announced findings that an estimated 51,000 Americans could die each year due to Republican-led changes to the federal healthcare system and the broader reconciliation bill. The national debt — which measures what the U.S. owes its creditors — fell to $36,214,400,664,854.53 as of June 3rd, according to the latest numbers published by the Treasury Department. That is down about $1.4 billion from the figure reported the previous day. Wyden called the "stakes" of the 'big, beautiful bill' debate "truly life and death," as a statement from his office read that "a new analysis estimates that more than 51,000 people will die per year as a direct result of the Republican reconciliation bill, and their refusal to extend Affordable Care Act premium tax credits." "Taking away health insurance and benefits like home care and mental healthcare from seniors, people with disabilities, kids, and working families will be deadly," Wyden said. "This analysis shows the dire consequences of moving ahead with this morally bankrupt effort," he said, referring to a study he and Sanders asked the University of Pennsylvania and Yale to conduct. Read On The Fox News App Liberals Blame Big Beautiful Bill's Loss On Dying Dems The Democrats employed the Philadelphia college's Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, as well as the Yale School of Public Health's Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis. "Let's be clear," Sanders said in a statement, "The Republican reconciliation bill which makes massive cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for huge tax breaks for billionaires is not just bad public policy." "It is not just immoral. It is a death sentence for struggling Americans." "[N]ot only will some of the most vulnerable people throughout our country suffer, but tens of thousands will die. We cannot allow that to happen," Sanders added. Winners, Losers And Grab-bags From House Gop's Narrow Passage Of 'Big, Beautiful Bill' In a copy of the study posted on UPenn's website, economics and health-centric academics found 7.7 million people would be estimated to lose Medicaid or Obamacare coverage by 2034, and 1.38 million "dual-eligible beneficiaries" would find themselves "disenroll[ed]." In a statement, Wyden cited figures of 11,300 deaths from the loss of Medicaid or Obamacare coverage, 18,200 deaths from the loss of Medicaid coverage among low-income beneficiaries and 13,000 deaths of Medicaid enrollees in nursing homes due to the rollback of a "nursing home minimum staffing rule" from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Wyden attributed an additional projected 8,811 deaths per year to the "failure to extend the enhanced [Obamacare] premium tax credits," citing the academics' analysis. Fox News Digital reached out to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., -- who spearheaded the "big, beautiful bill" in the House -- for comment. A representative for UPenn told Fox News Digital the university sent the results of their analysis to Wyden and Sanders in response to a request on the matter. "The estimates of mortality that are contained in the letter were based on peer-review research that was done independently and well before their request," the UPenn representative said. "The senators' request was to take the research results and translate into the estimated number of deaths."Original article source: Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Republicans aren't following Elon Musk's lead anymore
Republicans aren't following Elon Musk's lead anymore

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans aren't following Elon Musk's lead anymore

Months ago, Elon Musk helped tank a government funding bill. Now, Republicans are mostly shrugging off his criticism of their "Big Beautiful Bill." "I don't think it's gonna move the needle in any direction," one House Republican told BI. Elon Musk says President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" is a "disgusting abomination." Republicans on Capitol Hill are making clear that they don't really care. "I think he's flat wrong," House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Wednesday. "I think he's way off on this." "We have a difference of opinion," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters on Tuesday. "He's entitled to that opinion, we're going to proceed full speed ahead." It's a far cry from December, when Musk, then the incoming de facto leader of the White House DOGE Office, helped generate an online pressure campaign that swiftly tanked a government funding bill. That episode was a dramatic sign of the tech titan's burgeoning influence in Washington, suggesting that GOP lawmakers would be taking his cues — perhaps as much as they took Trump's — in the months to come. Now no longer leading DOGE, Musk has returned to being another outside voice. Fiscal hawks who agree with him don't mind getting a little backup. Other Republicans are happy to brush him off. "Elon, of course, is the wealthiest man in the world, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's wrong or he's right. He has an opinion, just like the rest of us," Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee told BI. "I don't think it's gonna move the needle in any direction." Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has continued to pressure Republicans to support the bill, and the White House has said that those who vote against it should face primary challenges. Trump himself has not yet responded to Musk, though Johnson told reporters that the president is "not delighted that Elon did a 180" on the bill. Musk's broadside against the bill, according to him, is about its impact on the debt. Multiple forecasters who have analyzed the bill, including the Congressional Budget Office and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, have estimated that the current version of the bill would add more than $2 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Musk has argued that this undermines DOGE, which has been trying to significantly reduce federal spending. Republicans were already arguing about this amongst themselves. Fiscal conservatives like Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin say that the version of the bill that passed the House last month adds too much to the debt, and they're now seeking to amend it. Most Republicans, however, have argued that outside projections about the bill's impact on the debt are flawed and don't account for potential economic growth as a result of the bill's eventual passage. Even those who agree with Musk don't seem to believe that his comments will strengthen their hand that much. "Sure, it helps bolster the case," Sen. Ron Johnson told reporters of Musk's tweet. "But again, the President wants to balance the budget as well." Perhaps the biggest reason why Musk's comments are unlikely to tank the bill: It's the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, and it's simply too important to them. The bill includes a permanent extension of tax cuts that Trump and Republicans first enacted in 2017, contains new funding for border security and immigration enforcement, and is chock full of other GOP priorities that they're not going to give up simply because of Musk's concern about the deficit. "All the things that are in this bill are so important for the US economy, it's going to be jet fuel for the US economy," Speaker Johnson told reporters on Wednesday. "The risk of not getting it done is enormous, not just for the Republican Party, but for the country. We've got to do this." The government funding bill that Musk helped tank in December, on the other hand, was a bipartisan piece of legislation that included all kinds of provisions that Republicans don't agree with. Plenty of fiscal conservatives planned to vote against it anyway, and Musk's involvement strengthened their case, eventually making it untenable for Speaker Johnson to move forward with it. Republican Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland, the chairman of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, voted "present" when the "Big Beautiful Bill" passed the House last month. He told reporters on Wednesday that he hopes senators keep Musk's criticism "in mind" as they make changes to the bill, but he didn't predict that it would change much. "He doesn't have to change the dynamic," Harris told BI. "I'm glad that he reminded people that the federal deficit is of grave concern." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store