Meta, OpenAI, Palantir Execs Join Army Reserve Tech Unit
Senior leaders from Meta (META, Financials), OpenAI, and Palantir (PLTR, Financials) have joined the U.S. Army Reserve as part of Detachment 201, a new Executive Innovation Corps aimed at bridging commercial tech with military modernization.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with META.
Sworn in as lieutenant colonels, Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI CPO Kevin Weil, Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar, and former OpenAI exec Bob McGrew will advise on projects to help the Army adopt scalable, dual-use tech.
The initiative supports the broader Army Transformation push, which prioritizes commercial off-the-shelf solutions and leaner battlefield systems.
Meta recently partnered with Anduril on XR tools for soldiers; OpenAI's generative AI is under DOD review; Palantir supplies software and AI hardware, including the TITAN platform.
Friday's announcement marks the start of the program; the Army has not said how large the detachment may grow.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Australia regulator and YouTube spar over under-16s social media ban
By Byron Kaye SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia's internet watchdog and YouTube exchanged barbs on Tuesday after the regulator urged the government to reverse a planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned video-sharing platform from its world-first teen social media ban. The quarrel adds an element of uncertainty to the December rollout of a law being watched by governments and tech leaders around the world as Australia seeks to become the first country to fine social media firms if they fail to block users aged under 16. The centre-left Labor government of Anthony Albanese has previously said it would give YouTube a waiver, citing the platform's use for education and health. Other social media companies such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok have argued such an exemption would be unfair. eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said she wrote to the government last week to say there should be no exemptions when the law takes effect. She added that the regulator's research found 37% of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on YouTube - the most of any social media site. "This is not a fair fight where our kids are concerned, vis-a-vis social media sites," Inman Grant told the National Press Club in Sydney. She said social media companies deployed "persuasive design features" like recommendation-based algorithms and notifications to keep users online and "YouTube has mastered those, opaque algorithms driving users down rabbit holes they're powerless to fight against". YouTube, in a blog post, accused Inman Grant of giving inconsistent and contradictory advice, which discounted the government's own research which found 69% of parents considered the video platform suitable for people under 15. "The eSafety commissioner chose to ignore this data, the decision of the Australian Government and other clear evidence from teachers and parents that YouTube is suitable for younger users," wrote Rachel Lord, YouTube's public policy manager for Australia and New Zealand. Inman Grant, asked about surveys supporting a YouTube exemption, said she was more concerned "about the safety of children and that's always going to surpass any concerns I have about politics or being liked or bringing the public onside". A spokesperson for Communications Minister Anika Wells said the minister was considering the online regulator's advice and her "top priority is making sure the draft rules fulfil the objective of the Act and protect children from the harms of social media".
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Most ChatGPT users make this one common mistake — try these 3 tips for better results
When it comes to prompting, many users (casual and expert) tend to write far more than is needed and start with the wrong wrongs. Many users are over-explaining to the already intelligent chatbot or adding details that simply do not belong. Like most users, when I first started using ChatGPT I added extra details or used complete sentences and proper grammar, just to ensure that the chatbot understood me. This is a rookie move because chatbots in general are really good at understanding context. Here's a little-known secret — an overly wordy prompt often causes the chatbot to miss the mark, it's why the 3-word-prompt is my go-to and works so well. Less is more when it comes to instructing your chatbot, with short, 5-to-7-word "command prompts" working the best most of the time. Wordy prompt: "Can you help me by writing an article about the best budget security cameras under $100, including some models that have night vision and work well for outdoor use?" Concise prompt: "Compare budget security cameras under $100." The result? Bloated, generic answers often miss the point entirely. According to the 2024 AI Index from Stanford and OpenAI: And in my own testing, short prompts consistently give sharper, more focused answers. Instead of a long-winded request, the best word choice for users to start with is a clear action. Among other power words, here are a few of my favorites: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. This tells ChatGPT exactly what you want, which eliminates the guesswork (and potential for error). Prompt 1: "Can you help me compare the best summer side dishes for a backyard barbecue? Prompt 2: "Compare easy side dishes for a backyard barbeque." You can see that the shorter, less-wordy prompt with a clear action produces better, more focused results. Users have become accustomed to chatting with their chatbot, which can lead to being overly verbose in their prompts. But for many uses, that is just not necessary. Rather than stuffing everything into one giant prompt, I build the answer step-by-step. First prompt: 'List 3 popular types of running shoes.'Follow-up: 'Now include only brands under $150.'Next: 'Summarize their best features.' This makes the conversation flow naturally — and makes it easier to refine on the fly. Avoid the common mistake of stuffing too much information into a prompt with this simple fix. Instead of this prompt:"Explain quantum computing like I'm 12, using metaphors but not oversimplifying, and include real-world applications." Try this prompt chain: "Define quantum computing in one sentence." "Now add a metaphor." "Give 3 use cases." By chaining simple prompts, I now get clearer, more accurate results — and avoid the dreaded 'As an AI, I can't...' replies. Of course, there are times when long prompts are worth it — especially for creative tasks: In these cases, the extra detail helps the AI adopt the right tone, perspective or persona. Since adopting these 3 simple rules, I've saved time on excess prompt rewrites and have gotten higher-quality responses with far fewer frustrations. There's nothing worse than when the response is incomplete or the AI gives off-topic replies. If you've ever gotten a response that refers to an earlier conversation and has nothing to do with the current one, you know what I'm talking about. This shorter prompt trick will fix that, too. Long story, uh, short, prompt by cutting to the chase. The chatbot will be able to handle your prompts if you start simple and build on your request. Then sit back and watch your results improve. What's the shortest prompt that ever gave you genius results? Share in the comments — I'd love to try it!
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
美國國會工作人員被要求刪除WhatsApp
據《Axios》周一報道，美國眾議院首席行政官(CAO)Catherine Szpindor通知國會工作人員，他們應該從其工作設備中刪除Meta(META)旗下WhatsApp。 報道引用的CAO電子郵件指出，網絡安全辦公室已將WhatsApp視為對使用者存在高風險，因為它在如何保護用戶數據方面缺乏透明度，沒有儲存的數據加密，以及使用時涉及潛在的安全風險。眾議院員工不得在任何國會設備上下載或保留WhatsApp應用程式，包括其產品的任何移動、桌面或網絡瀏覽器版本。 同時，據報道，Microsoft Teams、Wickr、Signal、iMessage 和FaceTime都被允許留下。此前，該辦公室禁止了DeepSeek、Microsoft Copilot和ByteDance的應用程式，並限制OpenAI的ChatGPT的使用。 (to/s)~ 阿思達克財經新聞 網址: Sign in to access your portfolio
