logo
Kim Jong Un's Sister Rejects South Korean President's Outreach, Slams Relations with US

Kim Jong Un's Sister Rejects South Korean President's Outreach, Slams Relations with US

NDTV28-07-2025
The influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un rebuffed overtures by South Korea's new liberal government, saying Monday that its 'blind trust' in the country's alliance with the US and hostility toward North Korea make it no different from its conservative predecessor.
Kim Yo Jong's comments imply that North Korea — now preoccupied with its expanding cooperation with Russia — sees no need to resume diplomacy with South Korea and the US anytime soon. Experts say she likely hopes to drive a wedge between Seoul and Washington.
'We clarify once again the official stand that no matter what policy is adopted and whatever proposal is made in Seoul, we have no interest in it and there is neither a reason to meet nor an issue to be discussed,' Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by state media.
It's North Korea's first official statement on the government of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, which took office in early June with a promise to improve badly frayed ties with North Korea.
Lee's government has halted anti-Pyongyang frontline loudspeaker broadcasts, taken steps to ban activists from flying balloons with propaganda leaflets across the border and repatriated North Koreans who were drifted south in wooden boats months earlier.
North Korea has shunned talks with South Korea and the US since leader Kim Jong Un's high-stakes nuclear diplomacy with President Donald Trump fell apart in 2019 due to wrangling over international sanctions. North Korea has since focused on building more powerful nuclear weapons targeting its rivals and declared a hostile 'two-state' system on the Korean Peninsula to terminate relations with South Korea.
Kim Yo Jong called Lee's steps 'sincere efforts' to develop ties, but said the new government still 'stands in confrontation' with North Korea. She mentioned the upcoming summertime South Korea-US military drills, which North Korea views as an invasion rehearsal.
South Korea's Unification Ministry responded that it will steadfastly seek reconciliation with North Korea to realize peaceful co-existence. Spokesperson Koo Byoungsam told reporters that the statement shows North Korea closely monitors the Lee government's North Korea policy despite deep mistrust.
Moon Seong Mook, an analyst for the Seoul-based Korea Research Institute for National Strategy, said Kim Yo Jong's statement shows North Korea is holding out for South Korea to abandon the US alliance.
Moon said that Kim likely sees little upside in engaging with the South since it cannot restart economic projects that previously benefited the North as long as international sanctions remain in place.
North Korea built cooperation with Russia, sending troops and conventional weapons to support its war in Ukraine, and likely receiving economic and technological assistance in return.
Since beginning his second term in January, Trump has repeatedly boasted of his personal ties with Kim Jong Un and expressed intent to resume diplomacy with him. But North Korea hasn't publicly responded to Trump's overture.
Leif-Eric Easley, professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, said that Kim Yo Jong's statement had a domestic audience.
'Kim Yo Jong's comments are an effort to advance national pride by portraying North Korea in a superior position, despite its economic struggles and international pariah status,' Easley said. 'She also seeks to justify Pyongyang's weapons programs and divide Seoul and Washington by criticising upcoming military exercises.'
Still, there is a limit on what North Korea can get from Russia, and Pyongyang could change course at a major upcoming meeting of the ruling Workers' Party, likely to be held in January, said Kwak Gil Sup, the head of One Korea Center, a website specialising in North Korea affairs.
"I think North Korea may formulate a Plan B and Plan C in relations for South Korea and the US,' Kwak said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No longer bound': Russia abandons nuclear treaty with US amid Trump's submarine move
‘No longer bound': Russia abandons nuclear treaty with US amid Trump's submarine move

Indian Express

time4 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘No longer bound': Russia abandons nuclear treaty with US amid Trump's submarine move

Russia has said that it would no longer abide by a nuclear arms treaty and renew the deployment of short and intermediate range nuclear missiles amid tensions with the United States, as President Donald Trump earlier ordered two nuclear submarines to 'be positioned in the appropriate regions'. Russia's former President Dmitry Medvedev on Monday accused NATO countries for the abandonment of the moratorium on the nuclear treaty and said that the Kremlin would take further steps in response. Moscow said it no longer considers itself bound by its self-imposed freeze on the deployment of the missiles. The Russian Foreign Ministry in a statement said that Moscow 'no longer considers itself bound' by its 'previously adopted self restrictions' under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, while highlighting that the US has already moved to deploy intermediate-range missiles in Europe and Asia. The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy. This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps. — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) August 4, 2025 In a post on X, Medvedev, who is Russia's Deputy Chair of the Security Council said 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps.' The development comes after the US president earlier said he was repositioning two US nuclear submarines in response to nuclear threats from Medvedev. Trump said he acted 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances'. The nuclear treaty, also known as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF), was signed between the United States and the then USSR during the Cold War era. The treaty was signed in 1987 by US President Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, the last Soviet leader. The treaty led to the elimination of an entire class of weapons, ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres. More than 2,600 Soviet and US missiles were eliminated as part of the treaty, New York Times reported. However, President Trump withdrew from the Cold War era treaty accusing Russia of several violations. Moscow, at the time in 2019, had said it would not deploy missiles as long as Washington did not do so.

Anti-Bengal DVC's ‘flood mgmt' drowning state: Mamata
Anti-Bengal DVC's ‘flood mgmt' drowning state: Mamata

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Anti-Bengal DVC's ‘flood mgmt' drowning state: Mamata

Kolkata: Criticising DVC for allegedly discharging 11 times the volume of water it had released last year, CM Mamata Banerjee called Bengal's floods "man-made catastrophe". She claimed that the volume of water released was 30 times more than that of 2023 and that this was an attempt to trigger more flood-like situations in the state. Banerjee took to X to write: "A staggering 11-fold increase in DVC's water discharge in 2025, compared to 2024, has shaken us. It is 30 times higher than 2023! There is a systematic attempt to trigger more and more flood-like situations across South Bengal. This is not a natural disaster. It's a man-made catastrophe." Her post came hours before her scheduled visit to flood-affected parts of Arambag and Ghatal on Tuesday. "The huge increase in water released this year to flood Bengal is deeply disturbing and shocking. I detect a deep conspiracy in this! This must stop at once!" Banerjee wrote. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Accusing DVC of being "anti-Bengal", the CM wrote: "DVC's flood mismanagement record this year has surpassed its own dismal accounts of previous years. DVC has failed Bengal this year to an unprecedented degree. Clearly, the centrally administered agency is becoming more and more anti-Bengal, in keeping with the ecosystem that the central establishment is trying to generate all over India today." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like I thought my dad was 'boring'. Now, I'm learning that boring stuff is often what matters most CNA Read More Undo In her post Monday, Banerjee went on to say: "Outflow from DVC during June and July 2024: 4,535 lakh cubic meters. Outflow from DVC during June and July 2025: 50,287 lakh cubic meters. This massive, sudden, unprecedentedly high release during peak monsoon this year has devastated our districts, destroying huge crops, breaching a large number of embankments, damaging numerous roads, and forcing thousands to evacuate," she wrote. Last Sept, the CM had targeted DVC, saying "the state does not want an organisation that releases water and kills people." The CM has been repeatedly claiming that DVC officials had been releasing water in Bengal without taking into account its impact. "What is the use of the office when the central govt's water resource department is taking all the decisions? There are some babus who are sitting on comfortable chairs in Kolkata while DVC is causing a man-made flood across Bengal," Banerjee had said last year.

Geneva meet: Talks on Global Plastics Treaty resume today
Geneva meet: Talks on Global Plastics Treaty resume today

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Geneva meet: Talks on Global Plastics Treaty resume today

STARTING TUESDAY, over 190 countries will get into a huddle in Geneva, Switzerland, to break an impasse and reach an agreement over the next fortnight on the first-ever Global Plastics Treaty that will create a legally binding framework to end plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. This will be the second installment of the fifth meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5) of the UN. Countries will push to address plastic pollution right from the production stage, which uses polluting oil and gas, to the challenges of plastic waste disposal and recycling. Negotiators will pick up from the previous meeting in Busan, South Korea, last December, where talks had collapsed over critical and unresolved issues. These issues and disagreements were over the draft treaty's provisions on putting a cap on production of polymers, elimination of harmful chemicals from plastic production and phasing out of harmful plastic products. As per the Centre for International Environmental Law, a US-based non-profit, the current draft text issued during Busan contains 370 brackets, which indicate areas of no agreement between countries. It was in 2022 in Nairobi that a resolution was adopted at the United Nations Environment Assembly to develop global rules to end plastic pollution. If successfully adopted, the treaty would be the most consequential one on environmental issues since the 2015 Paris climate agreement. The exponential growth in plastic production is one of the key drivers of plastic pollution. Globally, annual production has doubled, soaring from 234 million tonnes in 2000 to 460 million tonnes in 2019, while plastic waste has more than doubled from 156 Mt in 2000 to 353 Mt in 2019, as per a report of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Production is likely to triple in a business-as-usual scenario by 2060, as per the UN EP. The talks on the global treaty will resume in the backdrop of a new Lancet report which said that 'plastics cause disease and death from infancy to old age and are responsible for health-related economic losses exceeding $1.5 trillion annually'. Civil society and environmental campaigners have termed the negotiations a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to end plastic pollution and have called on countries to ensure significant cuts in plastic production. An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change. Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store