'Black rocky hills have started to appear' - Experts witness the devastating toll of climate change on Mount Everest in eye-opening fly-by
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Want to see Mount Everest in all its glory? You might need to go sooner rather than later due to the devastating effects of climate change on the world's tallest mountain.
In a recent fly-by, Nepali lawmakers and experts from across the globe witnessed a drastic reduction in snow coverage on Everest and other Himalayan peaks.
The aerial survey was organized by Nepal's Minister for Forests and Environment Ain Bahadur Shahi Thakuri, to highlight the grave effects of climate change in the region.
Alongside a reduction in snow coverage, passengers witnessed rapidly retreating glaciers as they passed multiple major Himalayan peaks, including Everest, Shishapangma, Makalu, and Lhotse.
"In the past, wherever you looked, you would see snow-covered mountains. But now, black rocky hills have started to appear. The mountains that once looked completely white now appear as black peaks," Thakuri told the Asia News Network.
"This mountain flight has shown the direct impact of climate change on the Himalayas. Foreign experts and guests, too, observed it first hand."
The Himalayan region has experienced a dramatic drop in snowfall in recent years. This year alone, snow persistence (the time snow stays on the ground) in the Himalayas has reached a 23-year low.
A report published in April by the International Center for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) found "a significant decline in seasonal snow across the Hindu Kush Himalaya region, with snow persistence 23.6% below normal - the lowest in 23 years".
The reduction is seriously bad news for the two billion people who rely on Himalayan snowmelt to feed their water sources. The melting cycle fills 12 major river basins that provide water for multiple heavily populated countries like China, Pakistan, and Thailand.
"This trend, now in its third consecutive year, threatens water security for nearly two billion people," explains author Sher Muhammad.
"All twelve major river basins, including the Indus, Ganges, and Brahmaputra, experienced below-average snow cover, with the Mekong and Salween basins losing over 50%."
Climate change in the Himalayan region poses multiple other significant risks, including the destruction of invaluable habitats and dangerous climbing conditions for Everest hopefuls.
The best crampons: tested for sure-footed traction on frozen terrain
The best ice axes: for tackling frozen terrain
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Where does the universe's gold come from? Giant flares from extreme magnetic stars offer a clue
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists have finally gathered direct proof of how the universe forges its heaviest elements, a process that has remained a mystery for over half a century. A team from the Flatiron Institute in New York City calculated that giant flares emitted by magnetars — highly magnetic types of collapsed stars known as neutron stars — could be the long-sought cosmic forge that creates the universe's heavy elements. Just one of these giant flares could produce a planet's worth of gold, platinum, and uranium. "It's pretty incredible to think that some of the heavy elements all around us, like the precious metals in our phones and computers, are produced in these crazy extreme environments," Anirudh Patel, a doctoral candidate at Columbia University and lead author on a study of these elements, said in a statement. "Magnetar giant flares could be the solution to a problem we've had where there are more heavy elements seen in young galaxies than could be created from neutron star collisions alone." Lighter elements such as hydrogen, helium, and lithium were forged in the Big Bang, while heavier ones were formed through nuclear fusion in stellar cores during stars' lives — or in the aftermath of their explosive deaths. But just how neutron-rich elements that are heavier than iron are made has remained an open question. These elements are thought to form through a series of nuclear reactions known as the rapid neutron capture process, or r-process, which was long theorized to occur only under extreme conditions such as those in supernovas or neutron star mergers. In 2017, astronomers confirmed the r-process for the first time during the observed merger of two neutron stars. However, such collisions are so rare that they cannot fully account for the abundance of heavy elements in the universe and neutron star mergers happen too late in the universe's history to explain the earliest gold and other heavy elements. But the extreme neutron star flares that can forge these elements are much older. "The interesting thing about these giant flares is that they can occur really early in galactic history," Patel added. To study these processes, the NYC scientists turned to magnetars, whose magnetic fields are trillions of times stronger than Earth's. These stars occasionally produce "flares" — bursts of energy caused by the sudden release of magnetic energy, typically triggered by the rearrangement or decay of their magnetic fields. The team calculated that a magnetar's giant flare could create the right conditions for r-process elements to form, producing highly unstable radioactive nuclei that decay into stable heavy elements such as gold. Excitingly, the NYC team was able to link their calculations to a mysterious observation made in 2004 of a bright flash of light from the magnetar SGR 1806–20. Initially, the event didn't seem unusual — until researchers realized the flare's total energy was roughly a thousand times greater than that of typical bursts. "The event had kind of been forgotten over the years," said Brian Metzger, a senior research scientist at the CCA and a professor at Columbia University. "But we very quickly realized that our model was a perfect fit for it." "I wasn't thinking about anything else for the next week or two," Patel said in a NASA statement. "It was the only thing on my mind." By combining observations of SGR 1806–20's 2004 flare with their model, Metzger, Patel, and their colleagues estimated that the event likely produced around 2 million billion billion (you read that right) kilograms of heavy elements — roughly the mass of Mars or 27 moons! While such flares could account for about 10% of all heavy elements in our galaxy, the researchers note that the origins of the remaining 90% remain uncertain. "We can't exclude that there could be third or fourth sites out there that we just haven't seen yet," Metzger said. RELATED STORIES: — What happens inside neutron stars, the universe's densest known objects? — James Webb Space Telescope finds neutron star mergers forge gold in the cosmos: 'It was thrilling' — The most powerful explosions in the universe could reveal where gold comes from Eager to push their discovery further, the team plans to hunt for more magnetar flares using NASA's Compton Spectrometer and Imager mission, slated for launch in 2027 — a mission that could reveal even more secrets about the cosmic origins of gold and other heavy elements. "It's a pretty fundamental question in terms of the origin of complex matter in the universe," Patel said. "It's a fun puzzle that hasn't actually been solved." The team's research was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How an odd star in the 'Gaia Sausage' could help solve one of astronomy's most enduring mysteries
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Astronomers have discovered an exceptionally rare star that may help to solve one of astronomy's enduring mysteries: where the universe's heaviest elements came from. The star, named LAMOST J0804+5740, resides in the Gaia Sausage (also called Gaia Enceladus), the ancient remnants of a dwarf galaxy that merged with the Milky Way roughly 8 billion to 11 billion years ago. This type of star, known as an actinide-boost star, has a high abundance of radioactive elements known as actinides. "The actinides are the heaviest group of elements on the periodic table," Anirudh Patel, a doctoral candidate in the Theoretical High Energy Astrophysics group at Columbia University who was not involved in the study, told "They include thorium and uranium, for example, and are produced by the r-process." The r-process, short for "rapid neutron capture process," is a series of nuclear reactions that occur in extreme astronomical environments, like during neutron star mergers or certain types of supernovas, where atomic nuclei rapidly absorb neutrons before they have a chance to decay, becoming heavier elements. "This is how approximately half of the elements in our universe heavier than iron are synthesized," Patel explained. "The r-process requires more extreme astrophysical environments than your typical nuclear fusion reactions that take place in the cores of massive stars. However, a complete understanding of the astrophysical origin of the r-process has remained elusive for decades." Direct observations of the r-process in action are rare. So far, astronomers have identified two likely cosmic sites where it occurs. One is the merger of neutron stars, and more recently, Patel and colleagues reported evidence that it may also occur within extremely magnetized neutron stars called magnetars. Although these discoveries are steps in the right direction, they still fall short of explaining how most of the universe's heavy elements came to be. Known r-process sites alone can't fully account for the observed abundance of heavy elements like uranium, thorium and gold. This is because they are too rare or infrequent to produce the sheer quantity of heavy elements we observe today, suggesting that other, yet-undiscovered sources must be contributing. Observations of J0804+5740, the first actinide-boost star identified in the Gaia Sausage, provide an exciting new piece of the puzzle. "The study reports a comprehensive set of chemical data, identifying a new r-process enriched star," Patel said. "This, along with other data and theoretical models, will play a role in [pinning down] the origin of the r-process elements in the universe." To determine which elements are present in a star and uncover the processes that produced them, astronomers use a technique known as atomic spectroscopy. "The idea is that electrons occupy different energy levels in atoms," Patel said. "The spacing between these energy levels can be different inside atoms of different elements. If an atom is sitting in the atmosphere of a star, it can absorb the light from the star, and its electrons can transition between the internal energy levels. Different elements have different atomic structure[s], so they will absorb different frequencies of light during these transitions." Using specialized instruments, scientists observe less light at specific colors where elements absorb it due to their internal energy levels. This helps them measure how much of those elements are in the star's atmosphere. The study's scientific team was excited that, after conducting an elemental analysis, they found that J0804+5740 represents a rare example of an actinide-boost star at relatively high metallicity — the overall abundance of elements heavier than helium in a star. Actinide-boost stars typically only show an unusually high number of actinides, like thorium and uranium, relative to other heavy elements produced by the r-process, but this boost usually appears in stars that are metal-poor or have low metallicity. This makes J0804+5740 a bit of an oddball. "Like most r-process enhanced stars, the abundance pattern of most heavy neutron-capture elements in J0804+5740 agrees well with the solar r-process, indicating that the main r-process produced these elements in the early universe," the team wrote in a paper published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. "However, some elements exhibit deviations from [a typical] solar r-process abundance pattern." It follows the expected pattern for very heavy elements, but it also shows an unexpectedly high abundance of lighter r-process elements, like barium, lanthanum and cerium. "[Their abundance] in the star J0804+5740 is a few times larger than in our own solar system," Patel said. "This implies that there exist multiple types of r-process sites — in particular, one that could produce a relatively high abundance of these light r-process elements." To better understand the odd star's origins, the team analyzed the motions of J0804+5740 and similar stars. They found that actinide-boost stars are twice as likely to have come from outside the Milky Way, suggesting they were born in smaller galaxies that were later pulled into ours. This points to an important clue: The actinide-boost phenomenon may be more common in older, smaller galaxies. Theoretical models indicate that one possible source could be a rare and powerful explosion known as a magneto-rotationally driven supernova. These extreme events could create the kind of neutron-rich environments needed to produce actinides, particularly in galaxies like the Gaia Sausage. RELATED STORIES: —The most powerful explosions in the universe could reveal where gold comes from —Nearby asteroid may contain elements 'beyond the periodic table,' new study suggests —Where does the universe's gold come from? Giant flares from extreme magnetic stars offer a clue "The theoretical models are promising, but they are not without their uncertainties," Patel said. "More observational constraints are needed to assess how well these models reproduce what actually happens in nature." Regardless, these elemental deviations in J0804+5740 suggest a more complex nucleosynthetic origin — possibly involving multiple types of r-process events or contributions from other processes beyond the main r-process. "This means we don't yet have the complete picture," Patel said. "Future observations […] will reveal more about the nature of r-process sites in the universe," Patel said. "Along with new and advanced theoretical models, this will be essential to resolving the r-process mystery and completing our understanding of the origin of the elements."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What if the Big Bang wasn't the beginning? New research suggests it may have taken place inside a black hole
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The Big Bang is often described as the explosive birth of the universe — a singular moment when space, time and matter sprang into existence. But what if this was not the beginning at all? What if our universe emerged from something else — something more familiar and radical at the same time? In a new paper, published in Physical Review D, my colleagues and I propose a striking alternative. Our calculations suggest the Big Bang was not the start of everything, but rather the outcome of a gravitational crunch or collapse that formed a very massive black hole — followed by a bounce inside it. This idea, which we call the black hole universe, offers a radically different view of cosmic origins, yet it is grounded entirely in known physics and observations. Today's standard cosmological model, based on the Big Bang and cosmic inflation (the idea that the early universe rapidly blew up in size), has been remarkably successful in explaining the structure and evolution of the universe. But it comes at a price: it leaves some of the most fundamental questions unanswered. For one, the Big Bang model begins with a singularity — a point of infinite density where the laws of physics break down. This is not just a technical glitch; it's a deep theoretical problem that suggests we don't really understand the beginning at all. To explain the universe's large-scale structure, physicists introduced a brief phase of rapid expansion into the early universe called cosmic inflation, powered by an unknown field with strange properties. Later, to explain the accelerating expansion observed today, they added another "mysterious" component: dark energy. Related: 5 fascinating facts about the Big Bang, the theory that defines the history of the universe In short, the standard model of cosmology works well — but only by introducing new ingredients we have never observed directly. Meanwhile, the most basic questions remain open: where did everything come from? Why did it begin this way? And why is the universe so flat, smooth, and large? Our new model tackles these questions from a different angle — by looking inward instead of outward. Instead of starting with an expanding universe and trying to trace back how it began, we consider what happens when an overly dense collection of matter collapses under gravity. This is a familiar process: stars collapse into black holes, which are among the most well-understood objects in physics. But what happens inside a black hole, beyond the event horizon from which nothing can escape, remains a mystery. In 1965, the British physicist Roger Penrose proved that under very general conditions, gravitational collapse must lead to a singularity. This result, extended by the late British physicist Stephen Hawking and others, underpins the idea that singularities — like the one at the Big Bang — are unavoidable. The idea helped win Penrose a share of the 2020 Nobel prize in physics and inspired Hawking's global bestseller A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. But there's a caveat. These "singularity theorems" rely on "classical physics" which describes ordinary macroscopic objects. If we include the effects of quantum mechanics, which rules the tiny microcosmos of atoms and particles, as we must at extreme densities, the story may change. In our new paper, we show that gravitational collapse does not have to end in a singularity. We find an exact analytical solution — a mathematical result with no approximations. Our maths show that as we approach the potential singularity, the size of the universe changes as a (hyperbolic) function of cosmic time. This simple mathematical solution describes how a collapsing cloud of matter can reach a high-density state and then bounce, rebounding outward into a new expanding phase. But how come Penrose's theorems forbid out such outcomes? It's all down to a rule called the quantum exclusion principle, which states that no two identical particles known as fermions can occupy the same quantum state (such as angular momentum, or "spin"). And we show that this rule prevents the particles in the collapsing matter from being squeezed indefinitely. As a result, the collapse halts and reverses. The bounce is not only possible — it's inevitable under the right conditions. Crucially, this bounce occurs entirely within the framework of general relativity, which applies on large scales such as stars and galaxies, combined with the basic principles of quantum mechanics — no exotic fields, extra dimensions or speculative physics required. What emerges on the other side of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our own. Even more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the two separate phases of accelerated expansion — inflation and dark energy — driven not by a hypothetical fields but by the physics of the bounce itself. One of the strengths of this model is that it makes testable predictions. It predicts a small but non-zero amount of positive spatial curvature — meaning the universe is not exactly flat, but slightly curved, like the surface of the Earth. This is simply a relic of the initial small over-density that triggered the collapse. If future observations, such as the ongoing Euclid mission, confirm a small positive curvature, it would be a strong hint that our universe did indeed emerge from such a bounce. It also makes predictions about the current universe's rate of expansion, something that has already been verified. This model does more than fix technical problems with standard cosmology. It could also shed new light on other deep mysteries in our understanding of the early universe — such as the origin of supermassive black holes, the nature of dark matter, or the hierarchical formation and evolution of galaxies. These questions will be explored by future space missions such as Arrakihs, which will study diffuse features such as stellar halos (a spherical structure of stars and globular clusters surrounding galaxies) and satellite galaxies (smaller galaxies that orbit larger ones) that are difficult to detect with traditional telescopes from Earth and will help us understand dark matter and galaxy evolution. These phenomena might also be linked to relic compact objects — such as black holes — that formed during the collapsing phase and survived the bounce. RELATED STORIES —When will the universe die? —Universe may revolve once every 500 billion years — and that could solve a problem that threatened to break cosmology —Scientists may have finally found where the 'missing half' of the universe's matter is hiding The black hole universe also offers a new perspective on our place in the cosmos. In this framework, our entire observable universe lies inside the interior of a black hole formed in some larger "parent" universe. We are not special, no more than Earth was in the geocentric worldview that led Galileo (the astronomer who suggested the Earth revolves around the Sun in the 16th and 17th centuries) to be placed under house arrest. We are not witnessing the birth of everything from nothing, but rather the continuation of a cosmic cycle — one shaped by gravity, quantum mechanics, and the deep interconnections between them. This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
