Most Americans couldn't pass this financial literacy test. Can you?
From understanding inflation to how compound interest works, many consumers struggle with the financial basics. That's according to preliminary findings from a recent survey of more than 25,000 American consumers who were quizzed on their financial know-how by the FINRA Investor Education Foundation.
The nonprofit has conducted the study every three years since 2009. FINRA stands for Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, an organization that oversees brokerage firms.
Testing your financial literacy
Overall, less than a third of respondents answered at least five of the seven questions correctly. The findings released this month mirror the results of quiz-takers in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware, where between 27% and 29% correctly answered at least five questions.
One area of improvement? Notably, the group found consumers' knowledge about inflation has increased, with nearly 60% of quiz-takers overall answering the following question correctly, compared with 53% in 2021:
Imagine that the interest rate on your savings account was 1% per year and inflation was 2% per year. After one year, how much would you be able to buy with the money in this account?
More than today
Exactly the same
Less than today
Don't know
The correct answer is less than today.
Gary Mottola, the FINRA Foundation's research director, said that an improved understanding of inflation likely reflects the lived experiences of many over the past few years.
"People have had to live with inflation and read about it, and for young adults, this is probably the first time in their lives that they've encountered it," he said. "People now seem to have a more intuitive understanding of inflation."
You can click here to take the financial knowledge quiz yourself.
Meanwhile, this question on compound interest managed to stump 71% of quiz-takers:
Suppose you owe $1,000 on a loan and the interest rate you are charged is 20% per year, compounded annually. If you didn't pay anything off, at this interest rate, how many years would it take for the amount you owe to double?
Less than 2 years
2 to 4 years
5 to 9 years
10 or more years
Don't know
The correct answer is 2 to 4 years.
"Generally speaking, financial knowledge in the United States is on the low side, but there are some pockets of the country that are doing a little bit better," Mottola said. "There's a big opportunity here to make financial education a priority and give people the knowledge, skills and tools they need to make sound financial decisions throughout life."
Pushing for better education
If there's one thing most Americans can agree on, it's that financial literacy should be taught in high school. A whopping 87% of respondents said as much in a recently published American Bankers Association Foundation survey.
Many of those consumers (72%) believe they'd be better off financially had they learned the basics of personal finance at an earlier age.
It comes as Pennsylvania joins at least 25 other states that have enacted high school personal finance requirements.
Starting in the 2026-27 school year, Pennsylvania high schools must provide a financial literacy course that students will have to take to graduate.
Similar requirements vary by district in New Jersey and Delaware, according to Next Gen, a nonprofit that advocates for personal finance education.
Studies show requiring financial education improves credit scores, lowers loan delinquency rates and reduces the likelihood of falling behind on credit card payments.
Do you have a money question, a consumer issue, or a scam story you want to share? Email InYourCorner@cbs.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
China lifts a nearly 2-year ban on seafood from Japan over Fukushima wastewater
BEIJING (AP) — China has reopened its market to seafood from Japan after a nearly two-year ban over the discharge of slightly radioactive wastewater from the tsunami-destroyed Fukushima nuclear power plant. A notice from the customs agency said the ban had been lifted Sunday and that imports from much of Japan would be resumed. The ban, imposed in August 2023, was a major blow to Japan's scallop and sea cucumber exporters. China was the biggest overseas market for Japanese seafood. The decision to lift the ban coincides with efforts by China and Japan to improve ties as both face economic uncertainty because of the American tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. 'This is a major turning point for Japan, which sees seafood as an important source of exports,' said Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister Shinjiro Koizumi, the son of former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. The nuclear plant at Fukushima was heavily damaged by a deadly tsunami that followed a huge offshore earthquake in 2011. Water still must be pumped in to cool the radioactive fuel. The water is then stored in what was an ever-growing complex of tanks on the property. After years of debate, the utility won Japanese government permission to discharge the water gradually into the sea after treating it to remove most of the radioactive elements and diluting it with seawater. Japanese officials said the wastewater would be safer than international standards and have negligible environmental impact. China disagreed and imposed a ban, saying the discharge would endanger the fishing industry and coastal communities on its east coast. China still opposes the wastewater discharge, but based on scientific evidence and analysis, it is allowing imports on a conditional basis from parts of Japan that meet China's standards, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said. A ban remains in place for seafood from 10 of Japan's 47 prefectures, including Fukushima and nearby ones. Japanese seafood exporters will have to reapply for registration in China and all imports will have to include a health certificate, a certificate of compliance for radioactive substance testing and a certificate of origin, the Chinese customs agency said. He said it was unclear how quickly scallop and sea cucumber exporters would return to China, because they had sought out other markets since the ban. But he predicted sales of sea cucumbers, a prized delicacy in China, would recover to a certain degree.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Immigration raids leave crops unharvested, California farms at risk
By Tim Reid, Pilar Olivares and Leah Douglas OXNARD, California (Reuters) -Lisa Tate is a sixth-generation farmer in Ventura County, California, an area that produces billions of dollars worth of fruit and vegetables each year, much of it hand-picked by immigrants in the U.S. illegally. Tate knows the farms around her well. And she says she can see with her own eyes how raids carried out by agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the area's fields earlier this month, part of President Donald Trump's migration crackdown, have frightened off workers. "In the fields, I would say 70% of the workers are gone," she said in an interview. "If 70% of your workforce doesn't show up, 70% of your crop doesn't get picked and can go bad in one day. Most Americans don't want to do this work. Most farmers here are barely breaking even. I fear this has created a tipping point where many will go bust." In the vast agricultural lands north of Los Angeles, stretching from Ventura County into the state's central valley, two farmers, two field supervisors and four immigrant farmworkers told Reuters this month that the ICE raids have led a majority of workers to stop showing up. That means crops are not being picked and fruit and vegetables are rotting at peak harvest time, they said. One Mexican farm supervisor, who asked not to be named, was overseeing a field being prepared for planting strawberries last week. Usually he would have 300 workers, he said. On this day he had just 80. Another supervisor at a different farm said he usually has 80 workers in a field, but today just 17. BAD FOR BUSINESS Most economists and politicians acknowledge that many of America's agricultural workers are in the country illegally, but say a sharp reduction in their numbers could have devastating impacts on the food supply chain and farm-belt economies. Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a Republican and former director of the Congressional Budget Office, said an estimated 80% of farmworkers in the U.S. were foreign-born, with nearly half of them in the country illegally. Losing them will cause price hikes for consumers, he said. "This is bad for supply chains, bad for the agricultural industry," Holtz-Eakin said. Over a third of U.S. vegetables and over three-quarters of the country's fruits and nuts are grown in California, according to the California Department of Food and Agriculture. The state's farms and ranches generated nearly $60 billion in agricultural sales in 2023. Of the four immigrant farmworkers Reuters spoke to, two are in the country illegally. These two spoke on the condition of anonymity, out of fear of being arrested by ICE. One, aged 54, has worked in U.S. agricultural fields for 30 years and has a wife and children in the country. He said most of his colleagues have stopped showing up for work. "If they show up to work, they don't know if they will ever see their family again," he said. The other worker in the country illegally told Reuters, "Basically, we wake up in the morning scared. We worry about the sun, the heat, and now a much bigger problem - many not returning home. I try not to get into trouble on the street. Now, whoever gets arrested for any reason gets deported." To be sure, some farmworker community groups said many workers were still returning to the fields, despite the raids, out of economic necessity. The days following a raid may see decreased attendance in the field, but the workers soon return because they have no other sources of income, five groups told Reuters. Workers are also taking other steps to reduce their exposure to immigration agents, like carpooling with people with legal status to work or sending U.S. citizen children to the grocery store, the groups said. ICE CHILL Trump conceded in a post on his Truth Social account this month that ICE raids on farm workers - and also hotel workers - were "taking very good, long-time workers away" from those sectors, "with those jobs being almost impossible to replace." Trump later told reporters, "Our farmers are being hurt badly. They have very good workers." He added, "They're not citizens, but they've turned out to be great." He pledged to issue an order to address the impact, but no policy change has yet been enacted. Trump has always stood up for farmers, said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly in response to a request for comment on the impact of the ICE raids to farms. "He will continue to strengthen our agricultural industry and boost exports while keeping his promise to enforce our immigration laws," she said. Bernard Yaros, Lead U.S. Economist at Oxford Economics, a nonpartisan global economics advisory firm, said in a report published on June 26 that native-born workers tend not to fill the void left by immigrant workers who have left. "Unauthorized immigrants tend to work in different occupations than those who are native-born," he said. ICE operations in California's farmland were scaring even those who are authorized, said Greg Tesch, who runs a farm in central California. "Nobody feels safe when they hear the word ICE, even the documented people. We know that the neighborhood is full of a combination of those with and without documents," Tesch said. "If things are ripe, such as our neighbors have bell peppers here, (if) they don't harvest within two or three days, the crop is sunburned or over mature," said Tesch. "We need the labor."
Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: White House announces AI education pledge
The White House is announcing an "AI Education Pledge" on Monday with commitments from more than 60 companies to provide AI education materials to K-12 students the next four years, per an announcement shared exclusively with Axios. The big picture: The education pledge aligns with the Trump administration's full-throated embrace of AI and AI companies in contrast with the Biden administration, which focused on safety rather than encouraging education and technology uptake. Driving the news: Tech companies will provide resources like funding, education materials, technology, curriculum and professional development as part of President Trump's executive order on AI and education. The pledge is meant to "spark curiosity in the technology and prepare the next generation for an AI-enabled economy," per the White House announcement. What they're saying: "Fostering young people's interest and expertise in artificial intelligence is crucial to maintaining American technological dominance," OSTP director Michael Kratsios said in a statement. "These initial pledges from American organizations will help create new educational and workforce development opportunities for our students." Some companies signing the pledge include: Adobe, Amazon, Booz Allen, Cisco, Dell, Google, Intel, MagicSchool, McGraw Hill, Microsoft, NVIDIA, OpenAI, Oracle and Workday. What we're watching: The White House is gearing up for a big month focused on AI policy.
