
Investors dodge U.S. dollar and Treasuries, scared by Trump's trade war
The U.S. dollar is an early casualty of President Donald Trump's us-against-the-world trade war.
The dollar has lost almost 10 percent of its value since Inauguration Day with about half of that decline coming this month, after the president's decision to lift taxes on imported goods to their highest level since 1909.
The weaker dollar — now near a three-year low against the euro — is bad news for Americans traveling abroad and could also aggravate inflation by making foreign goods more expensive. U.S. exporters, however, should gain.
The drop is especially striking because countries that impose tariffs usually see their currency rise. But the wobbly rollout of Trump's tariff plans — with the president and his aides contradicting themselves about key details — left investors doubting the administration's competence.
'The administration's approach to policy and its lack of transparency in terms of motivations have all led to a distinct sense of unease in financial markets,' said David Page, head of macro research for Axa Investment Managers in London, which manages $1 trillion in investments. 'It doesn't look like what we have been used to in terms of well-thought-out policy.'
Those concerns last week sent investors fleeing from the dollar and U.S. government securities, historically a haven during financial crises.
In the hours before Trump's latest tariffs took effect April 9, long-term government securities behaved abnormally.
Investors typically rush to buy ultrasafe treasuries during a crisis, pushing their prices up and yields (which move opposite bond prices) down. Instead, at one point on Friday, the rate on the 30-year bond approached 5 percent, up from 4.4 percent one week earlier.
At the same time, the dollar also dropped, confounding traditional patterns and triggering talk of a historic break by observers including Lawrence Summers, a former treasury secretary.
On Monday, after markets quieted, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent dismissed those concerns. In an interview with Bloomberg Television, he said there was 'no evidence' that foreign investors were abandoning U.S. assets, saying they had been active participants in recent auctions of government debt.
Long-term yields on Monday eased, but remained elevated. Those higher U.S. rates could linger as they have in the United Kingdom after a bond market revolt in 2022 over the Conservative government's plan to borrow heavily to pay for tax cuts.
Higher yields would raise borrowing costs across the economy. Consumers would pay more for car loans and mortgages while businesses would find it tougher to secure loans to expand and hire. The federal government, meanwhile, would likely see its annual interest bill soar past $1 trillion.
'From 2022 onwards, it's been harder for U.K. citizens, businesses or households to get cheaper borrowing rates. That's definitely a risk [in the U.S.] given the uncertainty that we've seen over the last couple of weeks,' Page said.
The dollar retreat reflected in the bond market's gyrations is unlikely to threaten the greenback's status as the dominant global currency. Central banks hold almost $7 trillion worth of dollars in reserve, almost three times as much as the No. 2 reserve currency, euros.
The dollar also remains the most widely used currency in global payments. In March, financial institutions used dollars for almost 49 percent of cross-border transactions, close to a 12-year high, according to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication.
'The dollar is incredibly entrenched in the global financial system in ways that no other currency is. Importing, exporting, borrowing, hedging, using the dollar for collateral, all of these things that major actors in the international economic system use the dollar for, would be so difficult to modify,' said Paul Blustein, author of 'King Dollar: The Past and Future of the World's Dominant Currency.'
Foreign investors spent recent years moving into U.S. stocks and bonds, seeking to capitalize on the fastest economic growth in the developed world.
But with U.S. assets trading at high prices, many investors have been overdue to rebalance their portfolios. The United States at the beginning of 2025 accounted for approximately one-quarter of the global economy but about 65 percent of global stock market capitalization, according to Barclays. Clumsy U.S. policymaking this month provided the catalyst for that investment reshuffle.
'U.S. assets were outperforming. The U.S. economy was outperforming. So by definition, people were holding lots of dollars. What we're seeing today is a normalization of the overwhelming skew toward holding U.S. assets,' said Eric Robertsen, head of global research and chief strategist for Standard Chartered Bank in Dubai.
As the president's enthusiasm for tariffs made the United States look riskier, investments in other markets became more attractive.
In Europe, the German government last month abandoned a constitutional borrowing limit and made plans to spend heavily to spur the economy and fund a military buildup, raising growth prospects. China encouraged higher consumer spending to better balance its export-heavy economic model. And Japanese 10-year government debt offered its highest return in 15 years.
Recent gains by the Swiss franc, the euro, Japanese yen and gold, which is up more than 7 percent in the past five trading days, support the idea that investors are looking for new ways to ride out the turmoil unleashed by the president.
Yet for major institutional investors, giving up on the dollar is not feasible.
The $28 trillion treasury market is the world's largest and most liquid, meaning that investors can quickly sell their holdings if they need to raise cash. In contrast, there are only $1.4 trillion in German government bonds outstanding.
Alternative currencies likewise fall short. The Chinese yuan is assuming a greater role in global commerce. But the Chinese government does not allow capital to move freely across its borders, meaning investors could find their funds trapped.
The euro also is handicapped. Nations that use the euro share a central bank in Frankfurt, which governs the zone's monetary policy. But they lack a common fiscal authority akin to the U.S. Treasury and a common bond market.
'That lack of a fiscal union probably has been the Achilles' heel for the euro. You would need to see more fiscal and political integration in Europe for the euro to become a real credible alternative,' said Frederic Neumann, chief Asia economist for HSBC in Hong Kong.
It's too soon to say whether foreigners led last week's charge out of the dollar, said Marc Chandler, chief market strategist for Bannockburn Capital Markets in New York. Treasury Department data covering transactions through last week will not be available until midsummer.
Even if the era of global dollar supremacy survives the trade war, the currency's short-term outlook might be poor. Trump's imposition of widespread tariffs has made a recession more likely, economists say, which could hurt stock prices and prompt the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. That would make investing in dollar-based assets less appealing.
'I think the dollar's down trend is just beginning. But there's no need to panic,' Chandler said.
Meanwhile, investors who have been spooked by the president's unpredictable trade policy maneuvers worry about what's next.
The president has returned to his first-term practice of publicly jawboning Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell to cut interest rates, despite tariffs' likely inflationary effects. And some aides have spoken of deliberately weakening the dollar to make U.S. manufactured goods more competitive on world markets.
'I don't think we're quite out of the woods yet when it comes to bond market volatility,' Neumann said. 'And that, in the short term, doesn't help the U.S. dollar either.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Monday accused the Defense Department of 'lying to the American people' in justifying deploying National Guard troops to the state to quell Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, asserting that the situation intensified only when the Pentagon deployed troops. 'The situation became escalated when THEY deployed troops,' Newsom posted to X, referring to the Pentagon. 'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions. He clearly can't solve this, so California will.' Newsom was responding to a post from DOD Rapid Response on X, a Pentagon-run account, which claimed that 'Los Angeles is burning, and local leaders are refusing to respond.' President Trump on Saturday deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area amid the ICE protests, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying the decision was made due to 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' While protests have intensified in recent days, devolving at times into violence, the majority of gatherings have been largely peaceful. Still, California National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, with some 300 deployed on the ground later that day at three locations: Los Angeles proper, Paramount and Compton. White House officials have sought to highlight images of burning vehicles and clashes with law enforcement to make the case that the situation had gotten out of control. 'The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators. They're insurrectionists. They're bad people. They should be in jail,' Trump told reporters on Monday. In addition, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened to deploy approximately 500 U.S. Marines to the city, with U.S. Northern Command on Sunday confirming the service members were 'prepared to deploy.' The use of American troops has rankled California officials, who have said the federal response 'inflammatory' and said the deployment of soldiers 'will erode public trust.' Newsom also has traded insults with Hegseth, calling him 'a joke,' and that the idea of deploying active duty Marines in California was 'deranged behavior.' 'Pete Hegseth's a joke. He's a joke. Everybody knows he's so in over his head. What an embarrassment. That guy's weakness masquerading as strength. . . . It's a serious moment,' Newsom said in an interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen. The tit-for-tat continued when chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell then took to X on Monday to attack Newsom. 'LA is on FIRE right now, but instead of tackling the issue, Gavin Newsom is spending his time attacking Secretary Hegseth,' Parnell wrote. 'Unlike Newsom, [Hegseth] isn't afraid to lead.' Newsom, who has formally demanded the Trump administration pull the National Guard troops off the streets, has declared the deployment 'unlawful' and said California will sue the Trump administration over its actions. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,' David Sapp, Newsom's legal affairs secretary, wrote in a letter to Hegseth on Sunday. 'Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary.' In the past 60 years, a U.S. president has only on one occasion mobilized a state's National Guard troops without the consent of its governor to quell unrest or enforce the law. That was in 1965, when former President Lyndon Johnson sent Guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there.


San Francisco Chronicle
13 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest
President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States took effect Monday. Demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport held signs protesting the ban affecting citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. At Miami International Airport, passengers moved steadily through an area for international arrivals. Tensions are escalating over the Trump administration's campaign of immigration enforcement. The new ban applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ampere Analysis Breaks Down The Threat U.S. Tariffs Would Pose To European Film & TV
Speaking at NEM in Croatia, Ampere Analysis Co-Founder Guy Bisson ran the rule over the so-called plan to save Hollywood from Jon Voight and associates, and assessed the potential impact on the European film and TV biz. 'A 120% tariff on incentives to cancel out global schemes is patently ridiculous and obviously very damaging, potentially, to the European industry,' he said. 'Tax treaties, local tax treaties in the U.S., and incentive schemes, just like we use in Europe, clearly, are the way to go if you want to re-enliven your industries.' More from Deadline Donald Trump's Tariffs Deemed Unlawful & Blocked By Trade Court; White House Appeals Instantly Life After Peak TV: "It's A New World Order... There's A Rethink Required" - Berlin Streamer Content Spend To Top Commercial Broadcasters For First Time In 2025 - Report A draft of Voight's Make Hollywood Great Again plan, obtained by Deadline, included a mixture of production incentives and a 120% tariff on the value of a foreign incentive received. After he presented the plan to Donald Trump, the President public proposed a 100% tariff on all U.S. film imports, including productions that shoot in other countries. The NEM confab and sales market is held annually in Dubrovnik. The latest edition kicked off, Monday, with Bisson's session, which was entitled: 'Content Trends in the Era of Trump: Protectionism, Production and International Markets'. The Ampere executive set the scene by showing how the European content business has benefitted from the U.S. studios widening their production bases and streamers setting up shop in several parts of the continent, resulting in orders for thousands of hours of first-run programming. He also said international markets are key to those same U.S. giants monetizing their series and movies with, for example, 54% of the total box office for U.S. films coming from international markets, according to Ampere. Getting into the weeds on the suggested measures, he said a 120% tariff on any incentive received overseas is 'one of the most concerning aspects of the proposal, effectively closing the door on U.S. producers making use of any overseas incentive.' He went on to break down what might happen if the proposed measure were introduced with a slide that pinpointed the UK and Spain as the two biggest potential losers in Europe, given the volumes of U.S. production in both countries. 'Obviously the big European markets – the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Germany – are on that list, but so is Poland, for example, and Turkey, and the Scandinavian markets. They have been the [among] biggest beneficiaries of that 'runaway' production.' Speaking about the notion of tax treaties with certain countries for films substantially produced in U.S., Bisson said the idea is interesting: 'While you still have to make a majority, or spend a majority of the budget, in the U.S., you can effectively stack or double dip incentive schemes through those treaties.' He also said any re-introduction of rules that prohibit networks (and now, SVODs) fully owning shows 'would remove one of the things that's annoyed producers so much, which is streamers taking all rights in perpetuity.' Trump has said that he would meet with industry officials, and the White House said no final decisions have been made regarding the plan. Voight, Sylvester Stallone and a group that included studios and unions later wrote a letter to Trump emphasizing the need for production incentives While punchy, the NEM presentation was, thusly, analyzing what are currently theoretical scenarios. Bisson said that the best hope for the European biz is that theory never becomes practice. 'None of this is actually happening or being put in place yet, it's just a suggestion,' he said. 'Who can predict what Trump will do next. You may have heard the nickname that Trump has been given: TACO; Trump, Always Chickens Out on tariffs. That's what we can hope will happen again when it comes to our industry and the suggested protectionism being placed on film and TV.' Ted Johnson contributed to this report. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery Tony Awards: Every Best Musical Winner Since 1949 Tony Awards: Every Best Play Winner Since 1947