Is the first OpenAI device a pair of earphones? Here's what legal filings reveal
In a declaration submitted to court, io co-founder Tang Tan said that the prototype of the OpenAI device 'is not an in-ear device, nor a wearable device.' The former Apple executive's remarks came up in legal filings that were submitted to court earlier this month by lawyers representing OpenAI and io.
Since unveiling their partnership in a launch video featuring Sam Altman and Jony Ive earlier this month, both OpenAI and io have kept the form factor and other details about the device tightly under wraps. 'I think it is the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen,' Altman said in the nine-minute video.
However, the video as well as other promotional material related to OpenAI's $6.5 billion acquisition of Jony Ive's io startup have since been taken down in compliance with a court order that was issued in a recent trademark dispute lawsuit filed by iyO, a Google-backed hardware startup that makes custom-molded earpieces which can be connected to other devices.
The legal proceedings in the trademark case have shed light on new details about the mass-market AI hardware device being developed by OpenAI, io, and Jony Ive.
'Our intent with this collaboration was, and is, to create products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces,' Altman said in a court declaration dated June 12. The legal documents also revealed that OpenAI and io executives deeply researched in-ear hardware devices. They bought at least 30 pairs of headphones from various manufacturers to see what is currently available on the market.
Tang Tan and Peter Welinder, OpenAI's VP of Product, also met with Jason Rugolo, the CEO of iyO to learn more about the startup's in-ear products. However, they were disappointed with iyO's custom-fit earpiece as the product failed repeatedly during demonstrations. Emails showed that Rugolo tried to forge a deeper relationship between iyO, io, and OpenAI but failed.
He pitched iyO's device as an early 'developer kit' for OpenAI's final device. He further sought investment from OpenAI and even offered to sell his entire company for $200 million, as per the filings. Tan said that they rejected all of Rugolo's offers.
In addition, Marwan Rammah, a former Apple engineer now working at io, urged Tan to acquire a large database of three-dimensional ear scans from The Ear Project as it could give them a 'helpful starting point on ergonomics.' It is not confirmed whether such a deal has taken place.
It appears that OpenAI and io have now moved on from the idea of an in-ear product. io is not working on a 'custom-molded earpiece product,' Evans Hankey, the chief product officer of the OpenAI subsidiary, said in a court declaration.
The ChatGPT-maker is exploring a wide range of devices, including 'desktop-based and mobile, wireless and wired, wearable and portable,' according to OpenAI's lawyers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Brutal CEO cut 80% of workers who rejected AI - 2 years later he says he would do it again
When most leaders cautiously tested AI, Eric Vaughan, the CEO of IgniteTech, took a gamble that shocked the tech world. The IgniteTech CEO replaced nearly 80% of his staff in a bold move to make artificial intelligence the company's foundation. His decision, controversial yet transformative, shows the brutal reality of adapting to disruption. Vaughan's story shows that businesses must change their culture, not just their technology, to thrive in the AI era. In early 2023, IgniteTech CEO Eric Vaughan faced one of his toughest decisions. Convinced that artificial intelligence was not just a tool but an existential shift for every business, he dismantled his company's traditional structure. ALSO READ: Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe Why did IgniteTech face resistance to AI? Live Events When Vaughan first pushed the company to use AI, he spent a lot of money on training. Mondays turned into "AI Mondays," which were only for learning new skills, trying out new tools, and starting pilot projects. IgniteTech paid for employees to take AI-related courses and even brought in outside experts to help with adoption, as per a report by Fortune. However, resistance emerged rapidly. It was surprising that the most pushback came from technical employees, not sales or marketing. A lot of people were doubtful about what AI could do, focusing on what it couldn't do instead of what it could do. Some people openly refused to take part, while others worked against the projects. Vaughan said that the resistance was so strong that it was almost sabotage. His experience is backed up by research. According to a 2025 report on enterprise AI adoption, one in three workers said they were against or even sabotaging AI projects, usually because they were afraid of losing their jobs or were frustrated with tools that weren't fully developed, as per a report by Fortune. ALSO READ: Apple iPhone 17 Air and Pro get surprise release date change — here's the new timeline How did Vaughan rebuild the company? Vaughan came to the conclusion that believing in AI was not up for debate. Instead of making his current employees change, he started hiring new people who shared his vision. He called these new hires "AI innovation specialists." This change affected every department, including sales and finance, as per a report by Fortune. Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu, IgniteTech's new chief AI officer, was a key hire. Vaughan reorganized the company so that every division reported to AI after he joined. This centralization stopped things from being done twice and made it easier for people to work together, which is a common problem when companies use AI. The change was expensive, disruptive, and emotionally draining, but Vaughan says it had to said, "It was harder to change minds than to add skills,' as per a report by Fortune. What can other companies learn from this? Even though it hurt, IgniteTech got a lot of benefits. By the end of 2024, it had released two AI solutions that were still in the patent process. One of them was Eloquens AI, an email automation platform. Revenue remained in the nine-figure range, with profit margins near 75% Ebitda. During the chaos, the company even made a big purchase. ALSO READ: Alien Attack in November? Harvard scientists warn mysterious space object could be advanced technology Vaughan's story teaches us a crucial lesson: using AI is as much about culture as it is about technology. While companies like Ikea focus on augmenting workers instead of replacing them, Vaughan chose radical restructuring to ensure alignment. Both methods show how hard it is for businesses to find a balance between trust and innovation. FAQs Why did Eric Vaughan fire so many people at IgniteTech? He thought that people who didn't want to use AI would hurt the company's future, so he decided to rebuild with people who shared his vision. What happened after IgniteTech changed its AI? The company introduced new AI products, set up a central AI division, and made more money, even though the change was hard.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Google Flow hits 100 million videos; Whisk expands to 77 more countries
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Google's AI-powered video creation tool, Flow, has generated 100 million videos since its debut at Google I/O 2025, the company's chief executive Sundar Pichai posted on a blog post, the company said it has doubled the AI credits for Google AI Ultra subscribers, bringing the monthly allocation from 12,500 to 25,000 to allow users to generate more videos on the platform. The tech giant added that the existing AI Ultra subscribers will see changes reflect the first time their plan renews, whereas workspace users can expect the increase over the next few credits could also be used with Google's experimental AI-powered image generation tool, Whisk, which the company will roll out to 77 more countries starting August 20. The tool was initially launched in the US via Google Labs in December to subscribers of Google AI Pro and Ultra in the United States, Flow integrates several of Google DeepMind's advanced models, such as Veo, Imagen, and Gemini, to build cinematic scenes from textual inputs. The company had also collaborated with filmmakers Dave Clark , Henry Daubrez and Junie Lau to assess how Flow can be integrated into their workflow and improve it using their AI Pro offers key Flow features and 100 generations per month. The Google AI Ultra gives users the highest usage limits and early access to Veo 3 with native audio generation, bringing environmental sounds and character dialogue directly into video allows camera control with the ability to control the motion, angles and perspectives when creating a video. Users can edit and extend the frame to reveal more elements or transition to the next scene.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Free GPT-5 access heats up AI rivalry: Who wins, who loses?
The past fortnight has been incredible in terms of the buzzing AI space, particularly the open source AI domain. First with the coming of Perplexity Comet, and now with the release of GPT 5, the sector is literally taking neckbreak competition to another level. OpenAI has unveiled GPT-5, its most sophisticated artificial intelligence model yet, and the best part is that it's now available for free to all ChatGPT users—albeit with some usage the first time, free-tier users can access a reasoning-capable AI model—GPT-5—unlocking advanced capabilities such as multi-step reasoning, better understanding of complex prompts, and significantly improved accuracy. When users hit their usage cap, the system seamlessly pivots to a lighter but still capable version called GPT-5 Mini. Plus-tier subscribers can enjoy elevated limits, while Pro and Team users gain unlimited access, including access to GPT-5 Pro, a version tailored for deep, intricate reasoning tasks. GenAI race gets hotter "This is a very happening space. Sam Altman sees the GPT-5 as a step toward ethical AI but warns against over-reliance. Elon Musk, on the other hand, warns of OpenAI's growing influence, citing geopolitical risks. There are other leaders who call it solid but overhyped, exposing LLM limits and pushing hybrid AI approaches," says Gopi Thangavel, Group CIO at Larsen & Toubro, commenting on the development. "This can be the way to crush the competition -- a strategy used by most. For example, Perplexity is free for India. Moreover, OpenAI has removed other models as they see GPT-5 as more stable and advanced compared to previous models. If you see, they timed it well -- giving previous lighter models as free as OSS 20b and 120b and then launched GPT-5. Besides, GPT 5 is much better than previous models in coding," says Gaurav Rawat, an AI leader with a leading financial sector company and who has experience across the auto and pharma sectors as well. Designed on the GPT 4 model, GPT-5 is able to offer better detailed and thoughtful answers by analysing intricate tasks such as science questions, coding, information synthesis, or financial analysis. It's also able to return more accurate as well as faster responses as compared to its past models. The new model has the potential to work on various data forms, including images and text, all at the same time. This primarily translates into the fact that somebody can ask the model a question, put up a picture, or even share a document. The GPT 5 can comprehend as well as respond without the need of separate tools. Such a capability wasn't there before. Free GPT5 sustainable? "This development is reflective of the competition in this space, which is huge. Other than a few, LLMs are struggling to make money. They spend a lot developing them but are unable to get it back," says Avik Sarkar, Senior Research Fellow & Visiting Faculty at Indian School of Business. "Nothing is ever truly free — when it's free, you are the product. OpenAI's decision to make GPT‑5 accessible to everyone is a smart play: offer a preview, gauge user engagement, shape future pricing, grow the customer base — and at the same time, turn up the competitive heat. It's the same psychology as letting readers preview a few Kindle pages before buying the book — just at an AI scale. This move will fortify Microsoft's ecosystem and influence. But make no mistake — GPT‑5's capabilities will reshape the competitive landscape. The real question: Which rival will be the first to reveal what they've been hiding under the hood?" comments Rajendra Deshpande, former CIO at Intelenet Global Services.
