Tohoku University seeks 500 researchers mainly from U.S.
Tohoku University President Teiji Tominaga announced on June 6 that the university will invest 30 billion yen ($209 million) over the next five years to recruit about 500 top researchers in Japan and from abroad.
The university aims to attract U.S. researchers affected by President Donald Trump's administration making significant cuts in research spending.
Professors at acclaimed universities in the United States earn several times more than professors at Japanese universities, making a large amount of money necessary for recruiting them.
Tohoku University in Sendai is the first institution to receive government funding through the Universities for International Research Excellence project. It intends to take advantage of the substantial financial resources.
The Universities for International Research Excellence project is a system where the government designates universities to support by providing them with money with the aim of enhancing the country's research capabilities.
Designated universities can receive money from the investment profits of a 10 trillion yen government fund for a maximum of 25 years.
Currently, Tohoku University is the only designated university for the project. It will receive a total of 15.4 billion yen in fiscal 2025.
According to Tohoku University's plan, it will not set a salary cap for researchers. It also aims to strengthen ties with U.S. universities, including plans to establish research labs for quantum technology and semiconductors, conduct joint research and use these labs as a base for recruiting researchers.
The university intends to recruit 100 researchers in fiscal 2025, including early-career researchers, by investing 2.2 billion yen.
In May, senior officials of the university visited the United States and held information sessions there. This resulted in offering positions to 36 researchers based overseas that included professionals in the United States as well as 25 researchers based in Japan.
'Researchers' social status is higher and they earn better pay overseas than in Japan,' Tominaga said at a news conference on June 6. 'Japanese national universities have historically paid little attention to working conditions for researchers. However, to gain sufficient capabilities to compete globally, we intend to shift our focus to investing in researchers.'
Other Japanese universities, such as the University of Osaka and Ritsumeikan University, have also announced plans to accept researchers from U.S. universities affected by the Trump administration's actions.
(The article was written by Takahiro Takenouchi and Fumio Masutani.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
23 minutes ago
- Japan Today
Scrolling for truth: News for the swipe generation
By Jeff W. Richards In Japan, the media once shaped how the nation saw itself — through the nightly news, the front page of the morning paper or trusted commentators on TV. Today, a different kind of feed defines what people know. For younger generations, the news often comes in fragments: TikTok clips, Line summaries, Instagram reels. The swipe has replaced the scroll. For many, journalism is not really what they're looking for. A Tokyo commuter taps through TikTok, Instagram and Line headlines — catching hints of a scandal, a protest, the aftermath of war and a bit of government legislation all in under two minutes. She scrolls past memes, ii ne (liked) posts and push notifications — but has she really learned anything from the stories? The swipe feels efficient, but increasingly, it replaces depth with a dopamine fix. When headlines become habits A growing number of younger Japanese say their daily news consumption begins and ends on their phones. Image: O2O Creative/iStock Young people in Japan (and elsewhere) aren't avoiding the news, they're just consuming it in new ways. Much of it is filtered through platforms designed for speed and engagement, though, not accuracy or depth. Surveys show traditional TV news and newspapers are barely registering with people under 30. The trend is backed by international data. The Reuters Institute's 2024 Digital News Report found that younger Japanese are far more likely to stay informed through platforms like YouTube, social media or mobile aggregators than from legacy press. When news arrives as headlines, memes or stylish Instagram posts, though, it's harder to tell where journalism ends and something else begins. TikTok offers algorithmically curated outrage and summaries. News becomes a vibe, not a report. Instagram's slick carousel explainers often lack transparency about who makes them. Few are vetted and professionally fact-checked. Line News is a gateway for many Japanese users, but curated snippets rarely include the full context or link to complete stories. According to the DataReportal 'Digital 2025: Japan' and Digital Marketing for Asia's 'Social Media in Japan — everything you need to know,' platforms like TikTok, Line and Instagram are among the most commonly used sources of daily information for younger people in Japan. YouTube content creators sometimes provide in-depth commentary — but more often than not they blur the lines between reporting and opinion. Each platform imposes its own logic, its own computations. What gets surfaced then is what gets engagement — not necessarily what's important. It's the 'social' aspect of social media. Journalism, repackaged Platforms like Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and TikTok are increasingly shaping how news is encountered — if not always understood. Image: hapabapa/iStock With so much "news" being summarized, re-edited or reshared by 'experts,' influencers or anonymous accounts, traditional editorial gatekeeping is disappearing, even disregarded or just plain shrugged off. If there's no byline, no sourcing, no verification of facts — is it still journalism? Reporting is being replaced with repackaging. Japan's legacy media still struggles to connect with younger audiences. Trust hasn't disappeared — it's just migrated. Audiences now follow personalities over platforms. They value transparency and authenticity over institutional authority. That shift brings risks, but also opportunity. Taught to follow, not to question Despite near-universal tech access, few Japanese schools emphasize media literacy or critical engagement with digital content. Image: ferrantraite/iStock One reason the shift toward fragmented, feed-based news is so concerning in Japan is that critical media literacy has never been a strong suit — either in schools or in the public domain. Young people aren't being taught how to engage with news, whether online or off. Most education systems emphasize rote learning and memorization, not independent evaluation or questioning of sources. The result is a media landscape where audiences — especially younger ones — are increasingly consuming information in environments designed to entertain. There is little preparation or education for them to tell facts from spin. Without stronger support for news literacy — both in education and culture — it's not just journalism that suffers. It's the ability of an entire generation to ask better questions about the world around them. New voices, new platforms A new generation of journalists and creators are bringing serious topics to where audiences already are — online. Image: tdub303/iStock Some young and independent journalists are finding ways to bridge the gap — embracing social media without abandoning journalistic principles: Tansa, a nonprofit Tokyo-based newsroom, uses reader-supported funding to conduct long-term investigations and publish them accessibly online, while also training the next generation of journalists. Magdalena Osumi, reporting for The Japan Times, actively engages with digital audiences, including Reddit AMAs that break down complex issues like immigration in plain terms. Nithin Coca, a freelance journalist based in Japan and focused on climate and tech, offers transparency in sourcing and adapts to emerging platforms to expand reach while maintaining editorial integrity. These journalists are building trust not through institutional authority, but through accountability, direct engagement and clarity. They're showing that journalism can evolve while staying grounded. Meanwhile, Japan's major broadcasters and newspaper groups have been slow to respond. As we've reported here on Japan Today, many lack platform-specific strategies or fall back on simply reposting traditional content. A few experiments exist — TV Asahi has climbed on TikTok to reach younger audiences, offering news update snippets designed for mobile consumption, for instance — but the broader industry remains reactive rather than innovative. Paying attention — or just scrolling? For many, the feed never stops — and neither does the pressure to keep up, react and just keep scrolling. Image: praetorianphoto/iStock Even with a few bright spots — young journalists building trust and finding ways to get real stories out — there's a deeper concern: much of the audience may not be listening at all. Sure, journalism can evolve. Some are already doing the hard work of adapting it to new platforms, new expectations and new voices. Many users scroll through TikTok, Line or Instagram without ever following up. For some, the headline has become the entire story. Algorithms reinforce users' existing views, reducing the need for curiosity or critical thinking. It's not just Gen Z — millennials, too, are deep into this social-media-first news diet, including the misinformation vortex of Facebook. It feels like the feed has replaced reflection. The mobile screen becomes both window and mirror — constantly offering headlines, takes and vibes, but rarely asking for anything deeper in return. In the end, the danger may not just be misinformation. It's the creation of personal or peer group echo chambers that feel like the truth but aren't. When audiences stop looking beyond the end of their noses — or their screens — perspective and truth are easily lost. Tuning out the noise In a world of algorithm-fed fragments, choosing to slow down — and look up — may be journalism's last defense. Image: kyonntra/iStock The way Japan's younger generations consume news (if they do at all) is changing — fast. In some corners, so is the way journalism is being produced. Even the best reporting won't matter if no one takes the time to engage with it. The swipe is easy. The scroll is endless. But the truth? That still takes work. More from this series © Japan Today
Japan Today
23 minutes ago
- Japan Today
The hidden power of cultural exchanges in countering propaganda and fostering international goodwill
By Nicholas J Cull At a time when China is believed to spend about $8 billion annually sending its ideas and culture around the world, President Donald Trump has proposed to cut by 93% the part of the State Department that does the same thing for the United States. The division is called the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. Among its other activities, the bureau brings foreign leaders to the U.S. for visits, funds much of the Fulbright international student, scholar and teacher exchange program and works to get American culture to places all across the globe. Does this matter? As a historian specializing in the role of communication in foreign policy, I think it does. Reputation is part of national security, and the U.S. has historically enhanced its reputation by building relationships through cultural tools. Previous U.S. administrations have realized this, including during President Donald Trump's first term, when his team, led by Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs Marie Royce, raised the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs budget to an all-time high. Giving politics a human dimension Government-funded cultural diplomacy is an old practice. In 1889, President Benjamin Harrison's government hosted a delegation of leaders from Latin America on a 5,000-mile rail tour around the American heartland as a curtain raiser for the first Pan-American conference. The visitors met a variety of American icons, from wordsmith Mark Twain to gunsmiths Horace Smith and Daniel B. Wesson. President Teddy Roosevelt initiated the first longer-term cultural exchange program by spending money raised from an indemnity imposed on the Chinese government for its mishandling of the Boxer Rebellion, during which Western diplomats had been held hostage. The program, for the education of Chinese people, included study in the U.S. In contrast, European powers did nothing special with their share of the money. During World II, Nelson Rockefeller, who led a special federal agency created to build links to Latin America, brought South American writers to the U.S. to experience the country firsthand. In so doing, he invented the short-term leader visit as a type of exchange. This work went into high gear during the 1950s. The U.S. sought to stitch postwar Germany back into the community of nations, so that nation became a particular focus. Programs linked emerging global leaders to Americans with similar interests: doctor to doctor; pastor to pastor; politician to politician. I found that by 1963, one-third of the German federal parliament and two-thirds of the German Cabinet had been cultivated this way. Visits gave a human dimension to political alignment, and returnees had the ability to speak to their countrymen and women with the authority of personal experience. From jazz to promoting peace The globally focused International Visitor Leadership Program built early-career relationships between U.S. citizens and young foreign leaders who later played a central role in aligning their nations with American policy. Nearly 250,000 participants have traveled to the U.S. since 1940, including about 500 who went on to lead their own governments. Future Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Britain visited as a young member of Parliament; F.W. De Klerk came from South Africa and saw the post-Jim Crow South before he helped lead his country to dismantling apartheid; and Egypt's Anwar Sadat visited the U.S. and began to build trust with Americans a decade before he became leader of his country and partnered with President Jimmy Carter to advance peace with Israel. Cultural work more broadly has included helping export U.S. music to places where it would not normally be heard. The Cold War tours of American jazz musicians are justly famous. Work bringing together the world's sometimes persecuted writers for creative sanctuary at the International Writing Program at the University of Iowa is less well known. The Reagan administration arranged citizen-to-citizen meetings with the Soviet Union to thaw the Cold War. Reagan's theory was that ordinary citizens could connect: He imagined a typical Ivan and Anya meeting a typical Jim and Sally and understanding each other. Current programs include bringing emerging highfliers in tech, music and sports to the U.S. to connect to and be mentored by Americans in the same field and then go home to be part of a living network of enhanced understanding. Such programs are in danger of being cut under Trump. Personal experience conquers stereotypes How exactly does this work advance U.S. security? I see these exchanges as the national equivalent to the advice given to a diplomat in kidnap training: Try to establish a rapport with your hostage-taker so that they will see the person and be inclined to mercy. The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is the part of the Department of State that cultivates empathy and implicitly counters the claims of America's detractors with personal experience. Quite simply, it is harder to hate people you really know. More than this, exchanged people frequently become the core of each embassy's local network. Of course, an exchange program is just one part of a nation's reputational security. Reputation flows from reality, and reality is demonstrated over time. Historically, America's reputation has rested on the health of the country's core institutions, including its legal system and higher education as well as its standard of living. U.S. reputational security has also required reform. In the 1950s, when President Dwight Eisenhower faced an onslaught of Soviet propaganda emphasizing racism and racial disparities within the U.S., he understood that an effective response required that the U.S. not only showcase Black achievement but also be less racist. Civil rights became a Cold War priority. Today, when the U.S. has no shortage of international detractors, observers at home and abroad question whether the country remains a good example of democracy. As lawmakers in Washington debate federal spending priorities, building relationships through cultural tools may not survive budget cuts. Historically, both sides of the political aisle have failed to appreciate the significance of investing in cultural relations. In 2013, when still a general heading Central Command, Jim Mattis, later Trump's secretary of defense, was blunt about what such lack of regard would mean. In 2013 he told Congress: 'If you don't fund the State Department fully, then I need to buy more ammunition, ultimately.' Nicholas J Cull is Professor of Communication, USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. External Link © The Conversation
Japan Today
23 minutes ago
- Japan Today
Are there any skilled workers in the United States who are willing to do the job for a monthly pay of $400? The idea of making iPhones in the United States is an illusion.
Yuqing Xing, professor of international economy at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo, saying it is not viable to shift iPhone production to the United States. U.S. President Donald Trump is vigorously seeking to restore America's manufacturing might by imposing unprecedented steep tariffs on imports from nations around the world. He cited Apple's iPhone, which is composed of countless parts and components made across the globe, as an example. © Asahi Shimbun
