&w=3840&q=100)
Ben-Gvir's al-Aqsa visit sparks global backlash, over 27 killed at aid site
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir's visit to the al-Aqsa mosque compound in Jerusalem on Sunday has triggered strong criticism from several countries for violating international norms.
Ben-Gvir, accompanied by around 1,250 people and police, entered the holy site and reportedly offered prayers. This move is seen as a breach of a long-standing and sensitive 'status quo' agreement, under which Jews are allowed to visit the al-Aqsa compound—but not pray there. The site is administered by a Jordanian Islamic authority.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Saudi Arabia condemns visit
Saudi Arabia sharply condemned the visit, calling it a violation of international law. 'The Kingdom strongly condemns the repeated provocative actions by Israeli officials against al-Aqsa mosque,' the Saudi Foreign Ministry said in a statement on social media platform X.
Israel says status quo remains unchanged
In response to the criticism, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said there has been no change in Israel's policy. 'Israel's commitment to maintaining the status quo on the Temple Mount remains unchanged,' the statement read.
Despite this assurance, Ben-Gvir's visit drew more criticism, particularly because he prayed at the site, which is also sacred to Jews as the Temple Mount—something explicitly restricted under the current arrangement.
Jordan calls it a provocation
Jordan, the official custodian of the site, also condemned the visit. Its Foreign Ministry described Ben-Gvir's actions as a 'blatant violation of international law' and an 'unacceptable provocation and escalation.' The ministry said the visit undermines the historic and legal status of the compound.
At least 27 people were killed by Israeli forces while attempting to access food in Gaza on Sunday, according to Palestinian officials. Additionally, six others reportedly died due to starvation or malnutrition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Back to Cold War era? Russia ends nuclear treaty as Trump sends nuke submarines into position
Synopsis Russia has formally dropped its self-imposed restrictions under the 1987 INF Treaty, blaming the West for escalating tensions. Once a Cold War milestone, the INF deal curbed the deployment of mid-range nuclear missiles. Now, with the US redeploying submarines and preparing missile stations in Europe and Asia, Moscow says the conditions that kept the treaty alive no longer exist. Amid nuclear posturing and diplomatic threats, a new era of arms competition is quietly but rapidly taking shape. TIL Creatives Representative AI Image Russia has now officially abandoned its last pretence of observing the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. In a statement released on Monday, the Foreign Ministry made it clear: Moscow "no longer considers itself bound" by its "previously adopted self restrictions" under the treaty. It cited the deployment of US intermediate-range weapons in Europe and the Asia-Pacific as a direct threat to Russian treaty, signed in 1987 by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, was supposed to end one of the most dangerous chapters of the Cold War. It banned ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometres. Over 2,600 missiles were dismantled. At the time, it was hailed as a major arms control optimism didn't last. The US formally withdrew from the INF in 2019 under President Donald Trump, who argued that Russia had been breaking the rules for years by developing and deploying the 9M729 missile system (known to NATO as the SSC-8). Moscow denied the claim, but the accusations dated back to at least 2014, during Barack Obama's the US withdrawal, Russia kept its own moratorium, on paper. In practice, its actions in Ukraine suggested November, Russia reportedly used an Oreshnik missile, a weapon with a range that breaches the now-defunct treaty, against a Ukrainian city. That missile, which President Vladimir Putin has confirmed is now in service, is capable of carrying nuclear warheads and is already being deployed to Belarus. A troubling development, considering Belarus borders three NATO members. Russia's decision to end its observance of the treaty comes just days after former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev issued a nuclear threat online. In response, Trump ordered two US nuclear submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions.' He later told Newsmax, 'When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared… and we're totally prepared.'Trump added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.'Medvedev, who now serves as deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, hasn't been subtle. He posted on X, 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps.'His claim: NATO's "anti-Russian policy" has triggered the end of the missile moratorium. It's a familiar message from Moscow, one that frames every escalation as a defensive nuclear rhetoric has become a regular feature in Russia's propaganda arsenal. It's part sabre-rattling, part information a bigger context to all this. The United States plans to begin 'episodic deployments' of intermediate-range missiles to Germany from 2026. Typhon missile launchers have already appeared in the Philippines. US weapons testing during Australia's Talisman Sabre military exercise also raised Moscow's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, speaking to RIA Novosti last December, said the unilateral moratorium was 'practically no longer viable.' He blamed the US for ignoring joint warnings from Moscow and Beijing.'The United States arrogantly ignored warnings from Russia and China and, in practice, moved on to deploying weapons of this class in various regions of the world.'Putin himself has warned that the collapse of the INF Treaty would 'significantly erode the global security framework.'The Kremlin, however, played down Trump's submarine comments. Dmitry Peskov, Putin's spokesman, told reporters:'In this case, it is obvious that American submarines are already on combat duty. This is an ongoing process… of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric.'Tensions between Moscow and Washington are running high. Trump has issued an ultimatum: Putin must agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine by August 9 or face sweeping new sanctions, including penalties against oil buyers like India and China. Meanwhile, Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, is expected in Moscow this Putin doesn't look ready to fold. Last week, he claimed that while peace talks had shown 'some positive progress,' Russia has the 'momentum' in the war. That doesn't sound like a man ready to pull this really means is that the arms control era that started in the 1980s is over. Dead, buried, and now being actively INF Treaty wasn't perfect. It didn't cover sea- or air-launched weapons. It didn't include China. And enforcement was always shaky. But it worked as a firebreak. Without it, there are fewer guardrails. More room for miscalculation. And a growing temptation to escalate, decision to scrap its remaining commitments marks a shift from strategic ambiguity to open rearmament. The US won't be far so, nearly four decades after the Cold War began to cool, the world is once again talking about nuclear missiles in Europe. Not as history, but as breaking news.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Back to Cold War era? Russia ends nuclear treaty as Trump sends nuke submarines into position
Russia has now officially abandoned its last pretence of observing the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty . In a statement released on Monday, the Foreign Ministry made it clear: Moscow "no longer considers itself bound" by its "previously adopted self restrictions" under the treaty. It cited the deployment of US intermediate-range weapons in Europe and the Asia-Pacific as a direct threat to Russian security. This treaty, signed in 1987 by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, was supposed to end one of the most dangerous chapters of the Cold War. It banned ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometres. Over 2,600 missiles were dismantled. At the time, it was hailed as a major arms control achievement. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program That optimism didn't last. The US formally withdrew from the INF in 2019 under President Donald Trump, who argued that Russia had been breaking the rules for years by developing and deploying the 9M729 missile system (known to NATO as the SSC-8). Moscow denied the claim, but the accusations dated back to at least 2014, during Barack Obama's presidency. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo Despite the US withdrawal, Russia kept its own moratorium, on paper. In practice, its actions in Ukraine suggested otherwise. Missiles in the shadows Last November, Russia reportedly used an Oreshnik missile, a weapon with a range that breaches the now-defunct treaty, against a Ukrainian city. That missile, which President Vladimir Putin has confirmed is now in service, is capable of carrying nuclear warheads and is already being deployed to Belarus. A troubling development, considering Belarus borders three NATO members. Live Events Russia's decision to end its observance of the treaty comes just days after former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev issued a nuclear threat online. In response, Trump ordered two US nuclear submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions.' He later told Newsmax, 'When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared… and we're totally prepared.' Trump added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Medvedev's fire and fury Medvedev, who now serves as deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, hasn't been subtle. He posted on X, 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps.' His claim: NATO's "anti-Russian policy" has triggered the end of the missile moratorium. It's a familiar message from Moscow, one that frames every escalation as a defensive necessity. Medvedev's nuclear rhetoric has become a regular feature in Russia's propaganda arsenal. It's part sabre-rattling, part information warfare. Why now? There's a bigger context to all this. The United States plans to begin 'episodic deployments' of intermediate-range missiles to Germany from 2026. Typhon missile launchers have already appeared in the Philippines. US weapons testing during Australia's Talisman Sabre military exercise also raised Moscow's suspicions. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, speaking to RIA Novosti last December, said the unilateral moratorium was 'practically no longer viable.' He blamed the US for ignoring joint warnings from Moscow and Beijing. 'The United States arrogantly ignored warnings from Russia and China and, in practice, moved on to deploying weapons of this class in various regions of the world.' Putin himself has warned that the collapse of the INF Treaty would 'significantly erode the global security framework.' The Kremlin, however, played down Trump's submarine comments. Dmitry Peskov, Putin's spokesman, told reporters: 'In this case, it is obvious that American submarines are already on combat duty. This is an ongoing process… of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric.' A dangerous countdown Tensions between Moscow and Washington are running high. Trump has issued an ultimatum: Putin must agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine by August 9 or face sweeping new sanctions, including penalties against oil buyers like India and China. Meanwhile, Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, is expected in Moscow this week. But Putin doesn't look ready to fold. Last week, he claimed that while peace talks had shown 'some positive progress,' Russia has the 'momentum' in the war. That doesn't sound like a man ready to pull back. What this really means is that the arms control era that started in the 1980s is over. Dead, buried, and now being actively reversed. The INF Treaty wasn't perfect. It didn't cover sea- or air-launched weapons. It didn't include China. And enforcement was always shaky. But it worked as a firebreak. Without it, there are fewer guardrails. More room for miscalculation. And a growing temptation to escalate, fast. Russia's decision to scrap its remaining commitments marks a shift from strategic ambiguity to open rearmament. The US won't be far behind. And so, nearly four decades after the Cold War began to cool, the world is once again talking about nuclear missiles in Europe. Not as history, but as breaking news.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Israel Eyes Full Gaza Occupation Amid Ceasefire Collapse, Hostage Deadlock: Report
Last Updated: As Israeli troops are already occupying 75 per cent of the area, the new orders call for the seizure of the remaining pockets, including areas where hostages are held Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly instructed the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) to take full control of the Gaza Strip in a significant escalation of the ongoing conflict, according to reports. The directive is seen as a move to intensify pressure on Hamas to secure the release of Israeli hostages still held inside the enclave. With Israeli troops already occupying about 75 per cent of the territory, the new orders call for the seizure of the remaining pockets, including areas where hostages are believed to be held. The Jerusalem Post reported that Netanyahu's office delivered the directive directly to IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, with an ultimatum: implement the order or resign. The push for full military control of Gaza comes amid a complete breakdown in ceasefire talks and rising frustration within Israel's leadership over the ongoing captivity of hostages held by Hamas since the start of the conflict. Notably, Netanyahu's reported directive to occupy the remainder of the Gaza Strip signals a dramatic escalation in the war effort. According to The Times of Israel, several ministers have confirmed that Netanyahu has privately used the term 'occupation of the Strip" — marking a stark shift from the government's earlier resistance to re-entering the enclave's densely populated areas. The Israeli Security Cabinet is expected to convene on Tuesday to formalise the next phase of operations in Gaza, as pressure builds both from within the military ranks and from a public increasingly distressed by the plight of hostages and the absence of a resolution. Hamas Releases Hostage Video The development follows the release of disturbing videos by Hamas and Islamic Jihad, showing two Israeli hostages — Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David — in visible distress. In the footage, Braslavski says he can no longer walk due to injuries, while David is seen digging what he calls his own grave, stating he has gone days without food. 'When I see these, I understand exactly what Hamas wants," Netanyahu said in a televised address on Sunday. 'They do not want a deal. They want to break us using these videos of horror." Meanwhile, reports from Israeli Army Radio suggest growing tensions within the military leadership. Chief of Staff Zamir is said to be frustrated with the lack of long-term strategy from the political leadership, expressing concern over a potential war of attrition with Hamas. Public discontent also surged over the weekend, as tens of thousands of Israelis rallied on Saturday night calling for an immediate ceasefire and a deal to bring the hostages home. The mass protest, one of the largest in recent weeks, was driven by the harrowing hostage footage circulating online. Netanyahu also met with officials from the International Committee of the Red Cross, urging them to push for humanitarian access to the hostages — a request that Hamas has consistently denied throughout the conflict. Humanitarian Crisis Deepens As military operations intensify, the humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate. The United Nations estimates that nearly 1,400 Palestinians have died since May while attempting to access aid, many near distribution sites operated by an American contractor with Israeli backing. While the IDF denies deliberately targeting civilians, it acknowledges using warning fire to control crowds near aid trucks. From March to May, Israel enforced a full blockade on Gaza, halting all deliveries of food, medicine, and humanitarian supplies. Although restrictions have since eased slightly under international pressure, conditions remain dire for the enclave's estimated two million residents. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : gaza israel netanyahu view comments Location : Israel First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
