Majorities in Michigan support state-level DOGE, disapprove of Musk: Survey
Most Michigan voters would like to see a state-level agency tasked with making state government more efficient, a new survey found — but that doesn't mean they are fans of tech billionaire Elon Musk's efforts on the federal level through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
An MRG poll, released Tuesday, found that 55 percent of respondents have unfavorable views toward Musk and DOGE, while less than a third view them favorably. Of those surveyed, 53 percent said they would like to see a state-based agency dedicated to government efficiency.
'Results show voters like the idea of streamlining government, even if they disapprove of the specific federal approach,' MRG President Jenell Leonard said in a statement on the poll's findings.
Musk, a top ally and campaign donor to President Trump, owns at least six prominent tech companies, including the social platform X, electric vehicle maker Tesla and rocket manufacturer SpaceX. He's faced sharp backlash from critics as he has shifted gears to public service and led the effort to whittle away at government spending.
In a Fox News interview last week, Musk said his team is being thoughtful with the federal cuts, despite criticism.
'They may characterize it as shooting from the hip, but it is anything but that, which is not to say that …we don't make mistakes,' he said at the time. 'If we were to approach this with the standard of making no mistakes at all, that would be like saying someone in baseball's got to bat a thousand. That's impossible.'
The MRG poll found a deep divide in opinions on his efforts along party lines, with near-total disapproval among Democrats driving the overall negative numbers, Leonard noted. He added that the data indicates there is 'very little middle ground on Musk's approach.'
'Results are telling us it's not what he is doing, but how he is doing it when it comes to the way
people feel about Musk and his handling of DOGE,' she said. 'While voters are skeptical of
the current federal DOGE implementation, the underlying concept of a government efficiency
department resonates positively with a majority of Michiganders, particularly Republicans and
independents.'
A national Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll survey in February similarly found widespread support for the idea of an agency that oversees government efficiency, but reactions were split along party lines when asked about DOGE's access to sensitive information.
More than 70 percent of Republicans surveyed said DOGE employees be given all government spending data, while almost the same percentage of Democrats said access should be limited. Independents were split almost evenly over how much access DOGE should have, according to the results.
The latest MRG poll was conducted by phone March 24-28, among 602 likely Michigan voters. The margin of error is 4 percentage points.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
28 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Immigration raids are threatening businesses that supply America's food, farm bureaus say
VENTURA, Calif. — Large-scale immigration raids at packinghouses and fields in California are threatening businesses that supply much of the country's food, farm bureaus say. Dozens of farmworkers have been arrested recently after uniformed federal agents fanned out on farms northwest of Los Angeles in Ventura County, which is known for growing strawberries, lemons and avocados. Others are skipping work as fear in immigrant communities has deepened as President Donald Trump steps up his immigration crackdown, vowing to dramatically increase arrests and sending federal agents to detain people at Home Depot parking lots and workplaces including car washes and a garment factory. It also comes as Trump sent National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles following protests over his immigration enforcement operations. Demonstrations have since spread to other U.S. cities. Maureen McGuire, chief executive of Ventura County's farm bureau, said between 25% and 45% of farmworkers have stopped showing up for work since the large-scale raids began this month. 'When our workforce is afraid, fields go unharvested, packinghouses fall behind, and market supply chains, from local grocery stores to national retailers, are affected,' she said in a statement on Thursday. 'This impacts every American who eats.' California's farms produce more than a third of the country's vegetables and more than three-quarters of its fruits and nuts. While the state's government is dominated by Democrats, there are large Republican areas that run through farm country, and many growers throughout the state have been counting on Trump to help with key agricultural issues ranging from water to trade. Primitiva Hernandez, executive director of 805 UndocuFund, estimates at least 43 people were detained in farm fields in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties since Monday. The number is from both the Mexican consulate and the group's own estimates from talking with family members of people detained, she said. Elizabeth Strater, the United Farm Workers' director of strategic campaigns, said her group received reports of immigration arrests on farms as far north as California's Central Valley. Lucas Zucker, co-executive director of the Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy, said farmworker members reported that agents went to at least nine farms but were turned away by supervisors because they lacked a warrant. 'This is just a mass assault on a working-class immigrant community and essentially profiling,' Zucker said. 'They are not going after specific people who are really targeted. They're just fishing.' In response to questions about the farm arrests, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that the agency will follow the president's direction and continue to seek to remove immigrants who have committed crimes. On Thursday, Trump acknowledged growers' concerns that his stepped-up immigration enforcement could leave them without workers they rely on to grow the country's food. He said something would be done to address the situation, but he did not provide specifics. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he said on his social media account, adding: 'We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' The California Farm Bureau said it has not received reports of a widespread disruption to its workforce, but there are concerns among community members. Bryan Little, the bureau's senior director of policy advocacy, said the group has long pressed for immigration reform to deal with long-running labor shortages. 'We recognize that some workers may feel uncertain right now, and we want to be very clear: California agriculture depends on and values its workforce,' Little said in a statement. 'If federal immigration enforcement activities continue in this direction, it will become increasingly difficult to produce food, process it and get it onto grocery store shelves.' One worker, who asked not to be named out of fear, said he was picking strawberries at a Ventura County farm early Tuesday when more than a dozen cars pulled up to the farm next door. He said they arrested at least three people and put them in vans, while women who worked on the farm burst out crying. He said the supervisors on his farm did not allow the agents inside. 'The first thing that came to my mind is, who will stay with my kids?' the worker, who is originally from Mexico and has lived in the United States for two decades, said in Spanish. 'It's something so sad and unfortunate because we are not criminals.' He said he didn't go to work Wednesday out of fear, and his bosses told him to stay home at least one more day until things settle down. But that means fruit isn't getting picked, and he isn't getting paid. 'These are lost days, days that we're missing work. But what else can we do?' he said. Taxin and Pineda write for the Associated Press.
New York Times
33 minutes ago
- New York Times
Who are the lawmakers who were shot?
The lawmakers who were shot on Saturday morning in Minnesota were State Representative Melissa Hortman, the top Democrat in the House, and State Senator John A. Hoffman, a fellow Democrat and longtime lawmaker. Ms. Hortman, who was assassinated at her home in Brooklyn Park, Minn., was a lawyer by training and a legislator for about 20 years who served as the speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives from 2019 to 2025. She represented a reliably Democratic district and routinely won re-election by more than 20 percentage points. She played a key role in passing a trove of bills during the 2023 session, when Democrats held a slim majority in the Legislature, including legislation that expanded abortion rights, legalized recreational marijuana and required employers to offer paid family and medical leave. This year, under Ms. Hortman's leadership, Democrats in the House boycotted the early weeks of the legislative session amid a fight for control of the chamber. Voters last year left Democrats and Republicans with an equal number of seats in the House, but challenges to two of the elections won by Democrats created a period of uncertainty around which party would control the chamber. When those challenges were settled, Ms. Hortman agreed to let the top Republican in the House, Representative Lisa Demuth, serve as speaker. Colleagues have long praised Ms. Hortman's work ethic, negotiation skills and pragmatism. Jerry Gale, Ms. Hortman's campaign manager, said in an interview that she was a tireless campaigner who was passionate about recruiting fellow Democrats to run for office. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Worried about Social Security cuts in the future? 5 changes to make to your retirement plan now
Americans are increasingly concerned about Social Security. The program will likely have to cut benefits around 2033 unless the federal government shores up funding for the program, which would affect more than 70 million people who receive Social Security benefits each month. Recent cuts to funding levels at the Social Security Administration and Tesla CEO Elon Musk's recent unsubstantiated claims of fraud are dragging down the public's confidence that the government will safeguard the program's payouts. Americans who think Social Security will eventually be cut may want to take action in their own finances to secure their retirement plan. Here are five things you can do to improve your retirement plan, replace potentially missing Social Security income, and safeguard your future. A 401(k) plan is one of the best tools that everyday Americans have for saving for retirement, since it lets you sock away so much each year via an easy-to-use paycheck deduction. Plus, many employers sweeten the deal by matching your contributions, turbocharging your savings. In 2025, all workers can contribute up to $23,500, while those age 50 and older can put in an additional $7,500 as a catch-up contribution. Those who are ages 60–63 can add even more, topping up their account with a super catch-up contribution of $11,250 in lieu of the regular one. Your 401(k) plan offers you a great way to save on a tax-advantaged basis, letting you contribute to a traditional plan on a pre-tax basis or an after-tax basis via a Roth 401(k). They're some of the best ways to grow your private assets and offset a potential Social Security shortfall. Your retirement plan's asset allocation is what financial advisors are referring to when discussing what portion of your investments are in stocks versus bonds, which are the two major asset classes. Your asset allocation is important because it determines how much your portfolio will grow over time. Portfolios with a heavy weighting toward stocks tend to deliver higher returns than those with a heavy weighting toward bonds, though stocks are more volatile in the short term. Allocating more of your assets to stocks can help you grow your 401(k) more over time than sticking with a bond-heavy portfolio. If you have a long time until you need to access your funds, you can afford to be more aggressive — that is, have more in stocks — than if you have a shorter time frame. By revising your asset allocation, you can make more money over time without contributing more to the account — but you don't want to get too aggressive with your 401(k). Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Dividend-paying stocks are one of the best picks for those looking for true passive income, and the best dividend stocks make a sizable payout quarterly and then grow that over time. Dividend stocks are a boon for retirees, offering regular, sustainable income to use in your golden years. If you don't want to do the heavy lifting of buying individual dividend stocks, it's easy to buy dividend stock funds, which are available in many 401(k) plans and most of the best IRA accounts. The best dividend funds allow you to own dozens or even hundreds of companies, reducing your risk through diversification, and they pay a solid dividend that should grow over time. Dividend stocks are a great way to offset any income that could be lost to Social Security cuts. An annuity is another way to generate a stream of income in retirement, and some even allow you to set up lifetime income for you and a spouse, offering a solution to a Social Security funding shortfall. Annuities offer a ton of different features, such as lifetime income (though that can increase the cost of these contracts), and they may make sense in your financial situation. The downside of annuities is that they're costly, complex and illiquid. Annuities have built-in fees that can eat up a huge chunk of your potential returns, and complex annuity contracts are tough to understand, so it may not always be clear what your rights are. Finally, it's difficult to cancel an annuity without paying a hefty fee, meaning accessing your money may be tough to do. Still, an annuity can help the right person to generate steady income, but working with a fee-only financial advisor can help you determine whether it makes sense in your situation. Learn more: 5 important questions to ask your financial advisor A financial advisor can help you make the smartest financial decisions and avoid some of the mistakes that trip up others. A great advisor can help you navigate the best time to take Social Security based on your needs, make smart investment decisions and avoid bad decisions. You'll want to work with an advisor who's incentivized to make decisions in your best interest, and that means working with a fee-only fiduciary advisor. You pay the advisor from your own pocket, but that helps ensure that you're always getting the best financial advice. As the old saying goes, he who pays the piper calls the tune. Learn more: How to choose the right financial advisor for you Savers with a long time until they need to access their retirement funds need to make relatively small changes to their retirement accounts to counter the effects of a potential cut to Social Security, while those with less time need to be more aggressive. However, neither group should delay in making changes, since time is your biggest ally in building wealth and a secure future. Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation.
