More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey
About a quarter of the respondents said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures. ST PHOTO: LIM YAOHUI
More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey
SINGAPORE - More than a third of retail investors, or 37 per cent, experienced difficulties in exercising their rights, according to a new survey out on June 25.
The survey, which was commissioned in 2024 by the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, included the responses of 197 people in a bid to track the progress of investors' rights in Singapore and see what more needs to be done.
Sias is the main investor-led organisation dedicated to investor education and the advocacy of retail investors' rights. It engages companies and regulators to improve corporate governance and transparency.
The survey was also conducted with support from the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS).
Of the respondents who said they faced difficulties, 41 per cent felt their voices were not heard enough when companies made decisions.
Another 24 per cent said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures.
Some 22 per cent also reported encountering difficulties when voting at shareholder meetings because of unclear procedures and a lack of information.
Lastly, 13 per cent said they experienced delays in receiving dividends and other things that shareholders are entitled to.
SIT Associate Professor of Accounting Kevin Ow Yong said: 'From an accounting and finance perspective, it is imperative that there are adequate safeguards to protect investors so as to improve and maintain investor confidence towards Singapore Exchange-listed companies.'
The report observed that there is room for further reforms to plug gaps in investor protection under the existing framework.
The opportunity for reform has also cropped up, with the ongoing review by the Equities Market Review Group, which was set up in 2024 to boost Singapore's equities market.
'While it is important for regulation to be right-sized in order to improve and increase the quality of listings in Singapore, this should not be at the expense of investor protection, which is important to support both retail and institutional investment in Singapore's equities market,' the report said.
Among the things investors wanted include having better mechanisms for investor redress and dispute resolution, and ensuring fair and equal access to information.
Investors also said they want more transparency in corporate governance practices and to strengthen safeguards against insider trading and market manipulation.
Strengthening shareholders' voting rights was also important to investors.
The largest proportion of investors felt that more can be done to make information more accessible.
The report noted: 'These respondents elaborated that they felt their rights were compromised due to a lack of communication about significant changes in business strategy and insufficient disclosure on company investments.'
For instance, one company did not inform investors about a major strategy shift, particularly after being inactive in one of its primary businesses for several years.
Shareholders then raised these concerns at annual general meetings, demanding clearer communication about the company's intentions.
'In this instance, the feedback led to improved communication, with the company directly addressing their concerns, leading to enhanced transparency and investor confidence,' the report said.
It noted that the fact that some respondents want greater transparency in corporate governance practices also indicates a growing demand for greater openness, accountability and clarity in how companies are managed and directed.
SUSS School of Law lecturer Lance Ang said: 'The recommendations in the study are particularly pertinent in light of the shift towards the 'disclosure-based regime' announced by the Equities Market Review Group in its ongoing review of the regulatory framework to attract listings.'
He added that a disclosure-based approach that forms the basis of informed investor decision-making must be supported by private and public enforcement of disclosure breaches.
These can enable investors to get compensation for losses, as well as ensure shareholders have access to information and investor education, he said.
SUSS School of Business senior lecturer Tan Eng Joo noted that the findings suggest that enforcement alone is not enough to empower investors, but that it is also encouraging that 'no single area stands out as particularly deficient'.
'This reflects a balanced approach within existing investor protection mechanisms, supporting efforts to build a resilient and inclusive capital market where all investors feel heard, engaged, and safe,' Dr Tan said.
Sias president David Gerald said that over the past decade, the organisation has seen a shift in Singapore where more investors are more proactive in asserting their rights.
'Through our persistent advocacy, constructive dialogue with regulators and listed companies, and empowering investors with knowledge, Sias has helped shape a more engaging investing community,' he said.
'This journey reflects our unwavering belief that protecting investor rights is fundamental to building trust and resilience in our capital markets.'
Sue-Ann Tan is a business correspondent at The Straits Times covering capital markets and sustainable finance.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Mystery $42 billion Chinese medical fortune collapses in days
Hong Kong – When Mr Au Yat-Gai was worth US$33 billion (S$42 billion) on paper, he was not in his Hong Kong office. One week later, when his net worth plunged to US$10.1 billion, he wasn't around either. Shares of Regencell Bioscience Holdings, the Nasdaq-listed company he founded, have plunged to US$20.19 as at June 27 from a high of US$78 on June 17. Officers at the headquarters of Regencell Bioscience Holdings said both times that Mr Au only takes short visits there, before turning away reporters. The Cayman Islands-incorporated traditional Chinese medicine company, occupies the whole ninth floor of a tower in Hong Kong's bustling Causeway Bay, including a reception area with a large table-tennis table. Little is still known about the tiny, money-losing company whose shares exploded 82,000 per cent higher and suddenly made Mr Au, its chief executive officer with an 86 per cent stake, richer on paper than some of the city's tycoons like Li Ka-shing. The fleeting nature of its rip-roaring rally has captivated and mystified observers from the United States to Hong Hong. Morning Brew, a popular business account on X, flagged it's stock move and wondered: 'Is there something I'm missing?' Regulators in the US, which closely monitor wild swings in stock prices, might soon be asking the same question, according to experts. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra), the watchdog for broker-dealers, has repeatedly warned that small, cheap stocks are more susceptible to fraud. These companies can be targets for pump-and-dump schemes in which fraudsters inflate the stock price and quickly sell their shares. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), meanwhile, has been increasingly wary about companies listed on US exchanges that are based overseas – and Regencell checks both boxes. The regulator on June 4 called on the public to weigh in on whether the agency needed to amend the definition of what's called a foreign private issuer, potentially limiting the number of companies that qualify for special status that lets them avoid filing quarterly financial reports or disclosing when executives buy or sell company shares. 'This is an example of very unusual movements in share prices,' said Richard Harris, founder and chief executive of Port Shelter Investment Management in Hong Kong. 'These movements could certainly trigger interest by investigators.' The SEC and Finra declined to comment on whether they were monitoring Regencell's moves. Regencell didn't respond to emails and phone calls for comment on its stock performance and its founder's fortune. Founded in 2014, Regencell's main line of business is marketing and licensing traditional treatments for ADHD and autism spectrum disorder developed by the founder's father, Au Sik-Kee. It has exclusive rights over his traditional medicinal formulas, trademarked under the name Brain Theory. The firm posted net losses of US$4.4 million and US$6.1 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended June 2024 and 2023, according to filings. Its chief medical officer position has been vacant since the last doctor to hold the job resigned in 2022. The younger Au attended the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley and worked at Deutsche Bank in the late 1990s. He suffered from learning disorders and speech problems, had poor grades and an uncontrollable temper, according to a video post on the company's Instagram account. Regencell's mission is to 'improve and save lives using a natural and holistic TCM formula to treat ADHD and ASD,' according to the same video. The company's official Instagram account has more than half a million followers. BeOne Medicines, the largest healthcare firm listed in Hong Kong, has just over 2,500. Regencell built out a following with the help of social-media campaigns on the platform that offered free tickets for Taylor Swift concerts in the US and Asia. The company's second-largest shareholder is Digital Mobile Venture, a firm ultimately owned by Taiwan's Samuel Chen and his wife Fiona Chang. Mr Chen was an investor whose early investments in Zoom Video Communications made him a fortune when the company's stock soared almost 1,500 per cent during the Covid-19 pandemic. Mr Chen, Ms Chang and their children own a 55 per cent stake in Taipei-based Polaris Group, a biotechnology company developing anti-cancer drugs. He's also the biggest shareholder of Sonix Technology, a provider of integrated circuits listed in Taipei. On June 18, two men and a woman arrived at Regencell's Hong Kong office seeking information about treatment for ADHD and dementia. They said they read about the stock's surge before arriving. The visitors were also turned away. An employee said its staff were not doctors, and directed them to the company's website. 'Early stage pharma companies can jump from a dollar to four dollars in 90 seconds if there's some news about one of their drugs under development doing well in a clinical trial,' Erik Gordon, professor at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, said. In this case, 'what's interesting is there's no news.' BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


Singapore Law Watch
19 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey
More than a third of retail investors in S'pore face problems exercising their rights: Survey Source: Straits Times Article Date: 26 Jun 2025 Author: Sue-Ann Tan About a quarter of the respondents said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures. More than a third of retail investors, or 37 per cent, experienced difficulties in exercising their rights, according to a new survey out on June 25. The survey, which was commissioned in 2024 by the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, included the responses of 197 people in a bid to track the progress of investors' rights in Singapore and see what more needs to be done. Sias is the main investor-led organisation dedicated to investor education and the advocacy of retail investors' rights. It engages companies and regulators to improve corporate governance and transparency. The survey was also conducted with support from the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS). Of the respondents who said they faced difficulties in exercising their rights, 41 per cent felt their voices were not heard enough when companies made decisions. Another 24 per cent said they met challenges in accessing company financial reports and disclosures. About 22 per cent also reported encountering difficulties when voting at shareholder meetings because of unclear procedures and a lack of information. Lastly, 13 per cent said they experienced delays in receiving dividends and other things that shareholders are entitled to. SIT associate professor of accounting Kevin Ow Yong said: 'From an accounting and finance perspective, it is imperative that there are adequate safeguards to protect investors so as to improve and maintain investor confidence towards Singapore Exchange-listed companies.' The report observed that there is room for further reforms to plug gaps in investor protection under the existing framework. The opportunity for reform has also cropped up, with the ongoing review by the Equities Market Review Group, which was set up in 2024 to boost Singapore's equities market. 'While it is important for regulation to be right-sized in order to improve and increase the quality of listings in Singapore, this should not be at the expense of investor protection, which is important to support both retail and institutional investment in Singapore's equities market,' the report said. Among the things investors wanted are having better mechanisms for investor redress and dispute resolution, and ensuring fair and equal access to information. Investors also said they wanted more transparency in corporate governance practices and to strengthen safeguards against insider trading and market manipulation. Strengthening shareholders' voting rights was also important to investors. The largest proportion of investors felt that more can be done to make information more accessible. The report noted: 'These respondents elaborated that they felt their rights were compromised due to a lack of communication about significant changes in business strategy and insufficient disclosure on company investments.' For instance, one company did not inform investors about a major strategy shift, particularly after being inactive in one of its primary businesses for several years. Shareholders then raised these concerns at annual general meetings, demanding clearer communication about the company's intentions. 'In this instance, the feedback led to improved communication, with the company directly addressing their concerns, leading to enhanced transparency and investor confidence,' the report said. It noted that the fact that some respondents want greater transparency in corporate governance practices also indicates a growing demand for greater openness, accountability and clarity in how companies are managed and directed. SUSS School of Law lecturer Lance Ang said: 'The recommendations in the study are particularly pertinent in the light of the shift towards the 'disclosure-based regime' announced by the Equities Market Review Group in its ongoing review of the regulatory framework to attract listings.' He added that a disclosure-based approach that forms the basis of informed investor decision-making must be supported by private and public enforcement of disclosure breaches. These can enable investors to get compensation for losses, as well as ensure shareholders have access to information and investor education, Mr Ang said. SUSS School of Business senior lecturer Tan Eng Joo noted that the findings suggest that enforcement alone is not enough to empower investors, but that it is also encouraging that 'no single area stands out as particularly deficient'. 'This reflects a balanced approach within existing investor protection mechanisms, supporting efforts to build a resilient and inclusive capital market where all investors feel heard, engaged and safe,' Dr Tan said. Sias president David Gerald said that over the past decade, the organisation has seen a shift in Singapore where more investors are more proactive in asserting their rights. 'Through our persistent advocacy, constructive dialogue with regulators and listed companies, and empowering investors with knowledge, Sias has helped shape a more engaging investing community,' he said. 'This journey reflects our unwavering belief that protecting investor rights is fundamental to building trust and resilience in our capital markets.' Sue-Ann Tan is a business correspondent at The Straits Times covering capital markets and sustainable finance. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
SBF proposes 1-2 year extension of compliance deadline for SGX-listcos' climate-related disclosures
[SINGAPORE] The Singapore Business Federation (SBF) has proposed extending the deadline for Singapore Exchange (SGX)-listed companies' compliance with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)-based climate-related disclosures by possibly one to two years. This is one of the four recommendations released by the SBF on Thursday (Jun 26), in relation to the disclosure. Under the SGX Regulation (SGX RegCo)'s prevailing sustainability reporting regime, all listed companies have to make climate-related disclosures for financial years (FY) commencing on or after Jan 1 this year, using the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards. Data was collected by SBF and SGX RegCo in April and May from 40 SGX-listed companies on the mainboard and Catalist boards through a roundtable discussion and a survey, which showed that only 4 per cent were confident about meeting this timeline, even though all the engaged listed companies were already preparing for ISSB disclosures. More than 90 per cent of them also said extending the timeline for mandatory ISSB disclosures, for example by one or two years, would be useful for them to prepare higher-quality ISSB reports. They also added that a time extension would not detract them from the work that they had already begun. The four recommendations from SBF are: A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Grant small- and mid-cap listed companies more time to comply, for example, by one to two years; Make disclosure requirements proportionate for small- and mid-cap listed companies; Provide Singapore-relevant cross-sector and sector-specific guidance; and Designate a central platform for digital reporting of climate-related disclosures. These recommendations apply to the small- and mid-sized listcos which make up 84 per cent of SGX-listings, since not all listings (including secondary-listed issuers) are subject to sustainability-reporting requirements. Kok Ping Soon, chief executive of SBF, said: 'Our key recommendation is to extend their compliance deadline, after engaging close to 40 small- and mid-cap listed companies. This does not represent a step back from Singapore's climate-reporting ambitions, but is a practical measure to provide smaller listed companies more time to strengthen internal capabilities and incorporate best practices after larger listed companies make their ISSB disclosures for FY2025.' While preparations for ISSB climate reporting are underway, a deadline extension would enable small- and mid-cap companies to, for example, prepare subsidiaries which may be based overseas. It would also strengthen data collection systems and enable these smaller businesses to take guidance from the FY2025 ISSB reports by larger listed companies. Extending the deadline would also enable small- and mid-cap listed companies to be eligible for the Sustainability Reporting Grant (SRG) by the Economic Development Board and Enterprise Singapore, given that the SRG is awarded only to reports filed before compliance for mandatory climate-related disclosures kicks in. He also stressed SBF's recommendation of increasing awareness and application of proportionality mechanisms, with more guidance within and across sectors relevant to the city-state. 'These will help smaller listed companies in Singapore take full advantage of any compliance deadline extension to more effectively transition their business,' Kok said.