MP concerned over proposed change to South Devon cardiac care
He said: "For patients throughout South Devon, clearly Torbay is a lot closer than Exeter, particularly on a busy summer's day."I'm just concerned that delays in treatment can mean poorer outcomes and I'm looking for a briefing with the hospital to get some reassurances, but also to see if the trial does come out negatively, that they will reverse this decision."In an update to local MPs the Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust (TSD) said it hoped the temporary change would "demonstrate improved access and equity"."The agreement, which would see both trusts working together with a shared rota, follows input from clinicians and managers from TSD, Royal Devon, NHS Devon and Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT)," it added.
Eight-week trial
Darling said the proposal needed to be tested "a lot more"."I will not compromise on patient care in South Devon," he said.TSD said the full terms and conditions of the test of change were yet to be finalised and the project would not proceed until a rigorous review had taken place. It added: "However, executives at TSD, Royal Devon and NHS Devon, along with GIRFT leaders, have collectively approved the overarching approach, and the plan is to work towards a start date of 17 March for an eight-week period."Once the pilot has concluded, a full evaluation, including clinical outcomes and experiences of patients, will be externally commissioned to ensure the learning is captured thoroughly and presented back to all cardiology teams and executive colleagues for review."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
25-06-2025
- BBC News
Inspectors find 'widespread failings' in Torbay SEND service
Significant concerns have been raised by inspectors over special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) services in part of Devon.A report published on Wednesday by regulator Ofsted and the Care Quality Commission into the Torbay SEND local area partnership highlighted "widespread and/or systemic failings".Issues raised by the report included too many children and young people with SEND issues having to wait an "unacceptable time" to have their needs Council and NHS Devon, which are responsible for running services, said they were committed to addressing the issues raised by the report. 'Long-standing issues' The inspection, which was carried out in March, said those responsible for governance did not have an "accurate understanding" of the partnership's strategic SEND priorities."The resulting lack of strategic working and effective joint commissioning has resulted in poor communication and collaboration between the local area partnership and families," the report added leaders had not urgently of effectively addressed systemic and significant weaknesses highlighted in a previous inspection in report said: "Many long-standing issues, particularly the waiting times for assessment and diagnosis, parental dissatisfaction and the high proportion of children and young people with SEND being excluded and becoming NEET [not in education, employment or training], have remained unresolved issues."A monitoring inspection was set to be carried out within the next 18 months before a full reinspection in three years, the report partnership has been asked to prepare a priority action plan to address issues identified in the report, inspectors added. In a joint statement, Torbay Council and Nancy Meehan, director of children's services, and Su Smart, director of women and children's improvement at NHS Devon, said improvement work was already under said a number of areas were highlighted in the report as "doing well", including the work of the Mental Health in Schools Team, the strength of a neurodiversity support programme and early years statement added the partnership was committed to addressing the issues and called for "systemic reform at the national level" to help with meaningful and lasting statement said: "We are committed to ongoing improvement across all SEND provision and will continue to work with parents, carers and practitioners to develop and strengthen it."Our priority remains the wellbeing and success of our children and young people."The BBC has contacted the Department for Health and Social Care for comment.
BBC News
20-06-2025
- BBC News
NHS Devon scraps changes to cardiac care after objections
Planned trial changes to overnight heart attack services in south Devon have been Devon said it would not be going ahead with the proposals to drive out-of-hours heart attack patients to hospital in Exeter rather than Torbay to help cut costs and divert resources to cut treatment backlogs, said the Local Democracy Reporting signed a petition against the plan and two MPs said in the Commons the move could have endangered people. The service withdrew the plans in May to consider feedback and it now said it would develop a broader cardiology strategy for the region to be revealed next month. It said the strategy would be guided by clinical data and public feedback."Rather than only focusing on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, the scope will be expanded to include prevention such as cardiovascular disease, urgent and emergency care and elective care," it said."The priority remains the commissioning of safe, reliable and sustainable cardiology services that meet the needs of Devon's population now and in the future." Steve Darling, Liberal Democrat MP for Torbay, said the U-turn was "very good news" and showed people "won't stand by when vital services are at risk"."It's not a definitive victory but it feels like a step in the right direction, now it all depends on where this journey ends," he said."By campaigning we have achieved the outcomes that many people wanted, and we can have higher levels of confidence that we know where we are heading."
The Guardian
29-05-2025
- The Guardian
Second Lib Dem MP withdraws support for England and Wales assisted dying bill
A second Liberal Democrat MP has said they have changed their mind over the assisted dying bill and will vote against it at the next Commons stage, in another sign of a wider, if so far slight, ebbing away of support for the measure. In an email to constituents, Brian Mathew, the Melksham and Devizes MP, said that while he had backed the bill at its second reading vote, in April, scrutiny of the plans had left 'several concerns I feel have been inadequately answered'. His announcement follows comments last week by Steve Darling, the Torbay MP who is also the Lib Democrat work and pensions spokesperson. Darling said that while he had backed the bill in April he was now 'marginally against' it, but had not yet decided whether he would vote against it or abstain. About eight other MPs who either supported the private member's bill, led by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, at its second reading or did not vote have said they will now oppose it. However, at least two who abstained in April are now supporters, while the Runcorn and Helsby byelection earlier in May resulted in a Labour MP who opposed the plan replaced by a Reform UK one who backs it. Given the second reading of the bill was passed with a majority of 55, the numbers thus far indicate it should also get through the third reading, scheduled for 20 June. A week before, on 13 June, MPs will debate amendments to the bill for a second day. The first day of debates on amendments drawn up during a lengthy committee stage resulted in some changes being agreed, including an opt-out for all healthcare workers from being involved in assisted dying, extending the exemption from just doctors. That debate also featured angry complaints from some MPs opposed to assisted dying after the prominent campaigner Esther Rantzen argued many in their camp were fighting against the changes to the law because of secret religious views. In his message to constituents, Mathew said he had heard 'eloquent and challenging viewpoints' from all sides, and he changed his stance over the bill following the recent weeks of debates. 'I share the concerns of many constituents that individuals facing terminal illness will take the decision based on concerns that they have become a burden upon their family,' he wrote. 'This is a serious concern for me; I worry that in someone's final days, this question will loom heavy when it does not need to.' This was all the more the case, Mathew said, when the palliative care system as it stood was so bad. Speaking ahead of the first day of debates about amendments, Leadbeater warned that if MPs voted down her bill at third reading then 'the conversation ends' on the subject, with dreadful consequences for many terminally ill people. She dismissed the idea that if the bill was defeated, the subject could return as government legislation or a royal commission, noting the long gap between the last time assisted dying was debated in the Commons, in 2015, and her efforts. 'What worries me is, if the bill doesn't pass, the conversation ends, and that would be really dreadful for so many people, for so many reasons,' she said.
