VEU Vs. VXUS: Which Of These Vanguard ETFs Is Best For Those Looking To Diversify?
Both VEU and VXUS are excellent international ETFs with unique benefits depending on your investment ... More priorities and existing portfolio composition.
Investor concerns over the breakout of a global tariff war have eased after the White House announced a 90-day pause on new duties and negotiations with over 75 countries on trade deals. If successful, these negotiations could prevent trade reduction, supply-chain disruptions, and a rise in consumer prices. These negotiations underscore why international diversification is essential to reduce reliance on a single market.
For investors seeking to diversify their portfolios with an international ETF, VEU and VXUS, both offered by Vanguard, are top contenders. These funds both offer international exposure, void of U.S. holdings, but they differ in their strategy, national exposure and number of holdings. By understanding the key differences between these funds and in which situations either would be preferable, investors can choose the right fund for their portfolio.
In this guide, you'll learn how VEU and VXUS differ by market exposure, expense ratio, holdings and more, as well as how to make the final determination of which fund is right for you.
VEU and VXUS are both ETFs made up of international stock holdings from Vanguard, the firm known for revolutionizing low-cost investing with Vanguard index funds, intended to offer investors exposure to non-U.S. stocks. Both funds can be used to diversify your portfolio with international stocks, each with unique strategies to accomplish this goal.
VEU tracks the FTSE All-World ex-US Index which provides broad exposure to developed and emerging markets outside of the United States. VEU has over 3,000 holdings from Europe, Asia and Latin America providing significant exposure to international markets. VEU makes it easy to gain international exposure while avoiding overlap with U.S. stocks, including the best stocks for 2025.
This ETF is ideal for investors seeking broad diversification in international markets with a focus on large and mid-cap stocks. VEU is more focused on developed markets than emerging markets and its large positions include Taiwan Semiconductor, Tencent, SAP, Alibaba, and Novo Nordisk. VEU has a low expense ratio of just 0.04% and net assets of $59.54B.
VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex-US Index which includes small, mid and large-cap stocks from across the world with the exception of the United States. This ETF provides broader exposure to international stocks than VEU with more exposure to small-cap stocks and emerging markets than VEU. With holdings of over 7,000 stocks, VXUS is ideal for investors seeking more granular market exposure.
VXUS' primary holdings overlap with VEU including Taiwan Semiconductor, Tencent, SAP, Alibaba, and Novo Nordisk but with slightly lower percentage holdings in these than VEU as it has more total holdings. Like VEU, VXUS' primary sector holdings include Financial Service, Industrials, Technology, Consumer Cyclical and Healthcare. VXUS has higher net assets than VEU of $455.42B and a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.05%
VEU and VXUS both provide international exposure but they differ in their strategies and holdings. VEU's holdings are concentrated in mid and large-cap stocks in developed and emerging markets. This ETF excludes U.S. stocks and also has fewer holdings.
VXUS provides more broad exposure with small-cap holdings in addition to mid and large-cap stocks. This fund composition provides more diversification to investors and is ideal for investors seeking more complete international exposure. While its inclusion of small-cap stocks can increase volatility, it also can offer greater potential for growth.
Datawrapper link: https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/Jmn1O/1/
VEU has holdings of over 3,000 stocks from more than 45 countries with the exception of the U.S. This fund has more concentrated holdings in developed markets with heavy weightings in Europe and Asia. While it does provide emerging market exposure, it provides less than VXUS.
VXUS has holdings of over 7,000 stocks with broader exposure across emerging markets than VEU with more diversity in market capitalizations of its holdings. These attributes make VXUS more ideal for investors seeking full international exposure.
In light of recent tariff news, VEU's limited allocation to small cap stocks, many in emerging markets, may serve as a risk if trade deals aren't reached with specific trading partners like the EU for example. VXUS' broader inclusion of small caps and emerging market holdings may reduce the effect of any one region's tariffs.
VEU and VXUS both boast low expense ratios with VEU charging just a 0.04% expense ratio and VXUS charging 0.05%. While both funds are cost-effective, VEU's marginally lower cost may appeal to more investors seeking to minimize fees. For investors seeking broader diversification, VXUS' higher fee may be worthwhile.
VEU maintains lower trading volume than VXUS which may result in wider bid-ask spreads. Long-term investors won't be as affected by this difference but it is relevant for traders who need higher liquidity from their ETFs. VXUS offers greater liquidity and higher trading volume than VEU, making it also more ideal for institutional investors.
Both VEU and VXUS offer attractive dividend yields with VXUS edging out VEU with a 3.15% yield versus 3.03%. For investors seeking more income from funds in their portfolio, VXUS may be preferable. Dividend yields can change year to year due to payouts from holdings.
VEU and VXUS have had similar performance over the last 10 years due to similar holdings and primary exposure to the same markets. Despite this common trend, VEU has outperformed VXUS in both the short and longer term. VEU's 1-year return is 7.02% while VXUS' 1-year return is 6.62%.
Likewise, VEU's 3-year return is 5.00% while VXUS returned 4.58%. In comparison, VOO, Vanguard's S&P 500 ETF had a 1-year return of 6.93% and a 3-year return of 8.81%. Despite VOO's outperformance in the 3-year return, VEU and VXUS can offer valuable diversification for domestic-heavy portfolios.
For more information on two of the primary U.S. ETFs offered by Vanguard to consider, read this helpful guide: VTI vs VOO.
Investors should choose VEU or VXUS based on their investing objectives, portfolio composition and risk tolerance. If you want a fund with a history of higher performance and more concentration in developed markets, VEU would be a better fit. If you prefer broader international exposure and more diversification in cap size, VXUS is a better fit.
You want a fund with more focus in large and mid-cap stocks but without U.S. exposure. VEU is also a better fit if you wish to invest in larger, established international stocks with a lower expense ratio and a better history of performance. VEU could also be the right fund for you if you wish for lower volatility in the portfolio and less portfolio churn due to less exposure to small-cap stocks and stocks from developing nations.
You want broader international market exposure with more small-cap and emerging market stocks. For investors seeking more total-market exposure with a higher dividend yield, VXUS is an ideal fit. If you're also seeking more liquidity in your fund and slightly tighter bid-ask spreads, choose VXUS.
VXUS may also be a better fit for investors who want more diversification in their international fund, have a longer time horizon, and can tolerate more volatility for potentially higher long-term gains.
Bottom Line
Both VEU and VXUS are excellent international ETFs with unique benefits depending on your investment priorities and existing portfolio composition. VXUS is a superior fit for investors seeking broad market exposure and higher yield. VEU is a better fit for investors who are conscious of fees, want to invest primarily in international blue-chip stocks, and prefer a history of higher performance. Ultimately, both ETFs provide strong international exposure so your selection will be determined by how much you weigh the marginal differences in these ETF's features.
Yes, VXUS includes holdings from emerging markets including China, Brazil and India.
VXUS offers slightly better long-term growth potential due to small-cap and emerging market stocks being included in its index.
Both VEU and VXUS are tax efficient, as ETFs are more tax efficient than index funds. Both ETFs are subject to foreign tax withholding if you're a U.S. investor.
It would be unnecessary to hold both VEU and VXUS as these ETFs have significant overlap in their holdings and purpose so it would be more efficient to hold just one.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Currency Exchange International Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results
TORONTO, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Currency Exchange International, Corp. (the 'Group' or 'CXI') (TSX: CXI; OTCQX: CURN), today reported net income of $1.98 million for the second quarter of 2025, 291% higher than the prior year (all figures are in U.S. dollars except where otherwise indicated). This 2025 reported net income reflected $2.7 million net income from continuing operations and a net loss of $0.7 million from Exchange Bank of Canada, the Company's Canadian subsidiary which was classified as discontinued operations effective the second quarter of 2025. These results include restructuring charges of $0.2 million, pre-tax, related to discontinued operations in Canada and certain one-time charges of $0.1 million, pre-tax. Excluding these items, the Group's adjusted net income1 increased by 18% compared to the prior year and adjusted diluted earnings per share1 ('EPS') was 24% higher than the prior year. The completed condensed interim consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis ('MD&A') can be found on the Group's SEDAR profile at Q2, 2025 Reported Results EBITDA $4.9 million Up 10% YoY Net Income $1.98 million Up 291% YoY Diluted EPS $0.31Up 288% YoY Annualized ROE 5% Down 50% YoY Q2, 2025 Adjusted Results1 EBITDA1 $5.1 million Up 15% YoY Net Income1 $2.3 millionUp 18% YoY Diluted EPS1 $0.36 Up 24% YoY Annualized ROE1 12%Flat YoY Below is a reconciliation of reported results to adjusted results based on non-recurring items: Three-month period endedApril 30, 2025 Three-month period endedApril 30, 2024 Six-month period endedApril 30, 2025 Six-monthperiod endedApril 30, 2024 Reported results $ $ $ $ EBITDA 4,901,810 4,470,061 8,755,560 7,755,158 Group net income 1,983,025 506,522 2,795,555 1,356,397 Pre-tax adjusting items Specified item: Restructuring charges 229,404 - 229,404 - Specified item: Advisory costs* 145,452 - 425,513 - Specified item: Deferred tax assets reversal* - 1,427,600 - 1,429,850 1,427,600 654,917Impact of income tax (72,073) - (80,647) - Adjusted results** EBITDA 5,131,214 4,470,061 8,984,964 7,755,158 Group net income 2,285,808 1,934,122 3,369,825 2,786,247Group Diluted earnings per share Reported 0.31 0.08 0.44 0.21 Adjusted** 0.36 0.29 0.53 0.42 *These adjustments are reported within the results from discontinued operations. **These are non-GAAP financial measures and ratios. For further details, refer to the key performance and non-GAAP financial measures section below. Total revenue was 3% lower than the prior year due to a decline in consumer demand for foreign currency as travel activity tapered during the current quarter. Although revenue declined, the Company's net income for the second quarter rose compared to the same quarter last year, primarily due to the favorable impact of a weaker U.S. Dollar on the revaluation of foreign currency banknote holdings. The Group's capital position remained robust, and liquidity was strong with $81.2 million in total equity and $60.4 million in net working capital as of April 30, 2025 ($79.4 million and $55.9 million as of October 31, 2024, respectively). All reported amounts are based on the Group's condensed interim consolidated financial statements presented in compliance with International Accounting Standard 34 Interim Financial reporting, unless otherwise noted. On February 18, 2025, the Group announced its decision to cease the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Exchange Bank of Canada. This strategic decision and operational plan for restructuring were communicated to all staff of EBC on February 19, 2025. Following the cessation of operations, the Bank intends to apply to the Minister of Finance in Canada to discontinue from the Bank Act. The application to discontinue is expected to be made in the fourth quarter of 2025, with the actual discontinuance of the Bank being subject to receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals. Following the Group's decision, management has commenced implementation of the restructuring and planned discontinuance of the Bank. Management anticipates that certain operating expenses and personnel costs, that are currently shared with EBC, will be 100% borne by the continuing operations of CXI, subsequent to the exit of EBC from Canada, and the current annualized estimate of these costs is approximately $3 million after tax. In the second quarter of 2025, Exchange Bank of Canada was classified as a discontinued operation in the Group's condensed interim consolidated financial statements. On May 20, 2025, CXI upgraded its U.S. securities listing with the Company's shares commencing trading on the OTCQX Best Market under the symbol CURN. Randolph Pinna, CEO of the Group, stated, 'The second quarter showed continued growth in the payments business, while with the current political and economic uncertainties, international travel activity to and from the United States decreased banknote revenues. CXI's diversified business model in the United States allows for continued new client growth in the payments business complemented by successful multi-channel banknotes offerings for both our U.S. Financial Institutions in branch or online as well as the Direct-to-Consumer customer offerings through online, agent and physical branch locations. CXI's management team and I remain committed to executing CXI's strategic plan which is focused on revenue and earnings growth as well as the return on capital and creating value for our shareholders resulting from providing leading FX technology and transaction processing solutions'. Financial Highlights for the three-month periods ended April 30, 2025 and 2024: Revenue decreased by 3% or $0.5 million to $15.9 million compared to $16.4 million. Banknotes revenue decreased by 5% or $0.6 million over the prior period while Payments revenue increased by 5% or $0.1 million; Reported EBITDA increased by 10% or $0.4 million to $4.9 million from $4.5 million. Adjusted EBITDA2 was $5.1 million, 15% higher than the prior period; Reported Group net income was $1.98 million, a 291% increase compared to the prior period. Adjusted Group net income2 increased 18% or $0.4 million to $2.3 million from $1.9 million in the prior period; Reported earnings per share were $0.32 and $0.31 on a basic and fully diluted basis, respectively, compared to the prior year's reported earnings per share of $0.08 on both a basic and fully diluted basis. Adjusted earnings per share2 were $0.37 and $0.36 on a basic and fully diluted basis, respectively, compared to the prior year's adjusted earnings per share of $0.30 and $0.29; and The Group maintained a strong financial position, with net working capital of $60.4 million and total equity of $81.2 million as of April 30, 2025. Financial Highlights for the six-month periods ended April 30, 2025 and 2024: Revenue increased by 3% or $0.8 million to $31.3 million compared to $30.5 million. Payments revenue increased by 11% or $0.5 million and Banknotes revenue increased by 1% or $0.3 million over the prior period; Reported EBITDA increased by 13% or $1.0 million to $8.8 million from $7.8 million. Adjusted EBITDA3 was $9.0 million, 16% higher than the prior period; Reported Group net income was $2.8 million, a 106% increase compared to the prior period. Adjusted Group net income3 increased 21% or $0.6 million to $3.4 million from $2.8 million in the prior period; and Reported earnings per share were $0.45 and $0.44 on a basic and fully diluted basis, respectively, compared to the prior year's reported earnings per share of $0.21 on both a basic and fully diluted basis. Adjusted earnings per share3 $0.54 and $0.53 on a basic and fully diluted basis, respectively, compared to the prior year's adjusted earnings per share of $0.44 and $0.42. Corporate Highlights for the three-month period ended April 30, 2025: The Group continued its growth in the direct-to-consumer market through its network of company-owned branch locations, agent relationships, and in the majority of states where it operates its OnlineFX platform. During the second quarter of 2025, the Group added the State of Mississippi to its OnlineFX platform network, now operating in 45 states and the District of Columbia; The Group increased its banknotes market penetration into the financial institutions sector in the United States with the addition of 124 new clients in the second quarter of 2025; and The Group continued to grow its Payments product line benefiting from the recent investments in core banking platform integrations which enabled the Group to expand its reach and increase its volumes in the United States. The Group processed 45,788 payment transactions in the second quarter compared to 37,781 payment transactions in the prior period. Selected Financial Data The following table summarizes the performance of the Group over the last eight fiscal quarters: Results of Continuing Operations - Reported Group Net Results - Reported Group Net Results- Adjusted3 Quarterly Results Revenue Net income Earnings per share (diluted) Net income (loss) Earnings/(loss) per share (diluted) Net income Earnings per share (diluted) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Q2 2025 15,865,150 2,674,849 0.42 1,983,025 0.31 2,285,808 0.36 Q1 2025 15,450,861 1,694,672 0.26 812,530 0.12 1,092,648 0.17 Q4 2024 18,460,390 3,313,852 0.50 (2,817,897) (0.45) 2,780,445 0.42 Q3 2024 19,961,122 5,122,815 0.77 3,935,350 0.59 4,644,984 0.69 Q2 2024 16,358,796 2,731,629 0.41 506,522 0.08 1,934,122 0.29 Q1 2024 14,141,018 2,020,274 0.30 849,874 0.13 849,874 0.13 Q4 2023 18,742,856 3,467,825 0.52 2,303,822 0.34 2,303,822 0.34 Q3 2023 19,416,155 4,650,604 0.69 4,056,478 0.60 4,056,478 0.60 Earnings Conference Call Details CXI plans to host a conference call on Thursday, June 12, 2025, at 8:30 AM (EST). To participate in or listen to the call, please dial the appropriate number: Toll Free - North America: (+1) 800 717 1738 Conference ID Number: 21262 About Currency Exchange International, Corp. Currency Exchange International is in the business of providing comprehensive foreign exchange technology and processing services for banks, credit unions, businesses, and consumers in the United States and select clients globally. Primary products and services include the exchange of foreign currencies, wire transfer payments, Global EFTs, and foreign cheque clearing. Wholesale customers are served through its proprietary FX software applications delivered on its web-based interface, ('CXIFX'), its related APIs with core banking platforms, and through personal relationship managers. Consumers are served through Group-owned retail branches, agent retail branches, and its e-commerce platform, ('OnlineFX'). Contact Information For further information please contact: Bill MitoulasInvestor Relations(416) 479-9547Email: KEY PERFORMANCE AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES The Group measures and evaluates its performance, as presented in this document, using a number of financial metrics and measures, such as adjusted net income, which do not have standardized meanings under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and may not be comparable to other companies. The Group's management believes that these measures are more reflective of its operating results and provide the readers of this document with a better understanding of management's perspective on the performance. These measures enhance the comparability of our financial performance for the current year with the corresponding period in the prior year. For further information, including a reconciliation, refer to key performance and non-GAAP financial measures in the MD&A. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION This press release includes forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon, estimates, forecasts, and statements as to management's expectations with respect to, among other things, demand and market outlook for wholesale and retail foreign currency exchange products and services, future growth, the timing and scale of future business plans, results of operations, performance, and business prospects and opportunities. Forward-looking statements are identified by the use of terms and phrases such as 'anticipate', 'believe', 'could', 'estimate', 'expect', 'intend', 'may', 'plan', 'predict', 'preliminary', 'project', 'will', 'would', and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date such information is provided, and on information available to management at such time. Forward-looking information involves significant risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause the Group's actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from the results discussed or implied in such forward-looking information. Actual results may differ materially from results indicated in forward-looking information due to a number of factors including, without limitation, the competitive nature of the foreign exchange industry; evolving worldwide geopolitical developments and pandemics including COVID-19 all of which may continue to have a material adverse effect on global economic activity, and may continue to result in volatility and disruption to global supply chains, operations, mobility of people and the financial markets which impact personal and business travel, tourism and factors relevant to the Group's business; global economic deterioration negatively impacting tourism in general; currency exchange risks, the need for the Group to manage its planned growth, the effects of product development and the need for continued technological change, protection of the Group's proprietary rights, the effect of government regulation and compliance on the Group and the industry in which it operates, network security risks, the ability of the Group to maintain properly working systems, theft and risk of physical harm to personnel, reliance on key management personnel; volatile securities markets impacting security pricing in a manner unrelated to operating performance and impeding access to capital or increasing the cost of capital as well as the factors identified throughout this press release and in the section entitled 'Risks and Uncertainties' of the Group's Management's Discussion and Analysis for the three and six-month periods ended April 30, 2025 and 2024. Forward-looking information contained in this press release represents management's expectations as of the date hereof (or as of the date such information is otherwise stated to be presented) and is subject to change after such date. The Group disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under applicable securities laws. The Toronto Stock Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this press release. 1 These are non-GAAP financial measures and ratios and are not standardized financial measures under IFRS, they are based on management-determined non-recurring items. For further information, refer to the key performance and non-GAAP financial measures section on page 4 of this document. 2 These are non-GAAP financial measures and ratios and are not standardized financial measures under IFRS, they are based on management-determined non-recurring items. For further information, refer to the key performance and non-GAAP financial measures section on page 4 of this document.3 These adjusted results are non-GAAP financial measures and ratios and are not standardized financial measures under IFRS, they are based on management-determined non-recurring items. For further information, refer to the key performance and non-GAAP financial measures section on page 4 of this in to access your portfolio
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
OCEU President Harry Goslin to Join WSIB Strike Picket Line in London
LONDON, Ontario--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Harry Goslin, President of the Ontario Compensation Employees Union (OCEU/CUPE 1750), will join striking Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) workers on the picket line in London on Thursday, June 12, in a show of solidarity as the historic province-wide strike enters its fourth week. Goslin will visit workers on the line at the WSIB Office, 148 Fullarton St., where he will thank members for their strength and determination and deliver remarks in support of their ongoing fight for fair wages, safer workplaces, and an end to the outsourcing of Ontario jobs. Where: WSIB Office, 148 Fullarton St. London, Ontario Time: 10:00 a.m.- 2 p.m. 'This strike has shown the power of frontline workers standing together to defend public services, demand fair wages, and push back against reckless outsourcing,' said Harry Goslin, President of OCEU/CUPE 1750. 'I look forward to joining our members in London as they continue to send a clear message to WSIB and the Ford government: it's time for a fair deal.' WSIB staff represented by OCEU/CUPE 1750 have been on strike since May 21, citing unmanageable workloads, chronic understaffing, stagnant wages, and the contracting out of public services to U.S.-based firms. mb/cope491
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' could wreck Utah's groundbreaking AI laws
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget package could derail the state's groundbreaking artificial intelligence laws unless it is changed. The 1,000-page bill that passed the House last month includes a 10-year prohibition on AI regulations. An updated Senate version removed the all-out ban but conditioned $500 million in AI infrastructure grants on states pausing enforcement of AI laws. Behind these provisions is a desire by some lawmakers to prevent a nationwide patchwork of AI regulations that hampers innovation amid competition with China. But Cox, and Utah's top tech policymakers, said the approach taken by Trump's bill interferes with the state's right to react to rapidly evolving technologies. 'Our hope is that the last version of this bill that passes, whatever that looks like, will allow for the smart type of regulation that we're doing in Utah, and prevent the bad kind of regulation that would stop AI from reaching its fullest potential,' Cox said Tuesday during a monthly PBS broadcast. Utah has been recognized around the world for having the 'first and smartest of the AI regulations that have been proposed,' according to Cox. These policies include bills that create a state-run AI policy lab, clarify consumer protection liability for AI and require AI disclosures in industries like finance and mental health. The governor said that multiple members of the U.S. House have told his team that they were not aware of the AI moratorium when they voted on the bill. Members of the White House and Senate have also said that they don't want the 'BBB bill' to eliminate Utah's law, Cox said. 'AI companies actually support what we're doing because they recognize that this is the right way to do AI regulation as opposed to just piecemeal,' Cox said. Cox agreed that 'a hodgepodge' of AI laws around the country would cause the U.S. to 'fall behind and we would lose this global race that is happening right now.' But he said a moratorium on AI policy shouldn't come at the expense of Utah's novel approach which doesn't actually tell AI companies how they can develop their models. Utah Rep. Doug Fiefia, R-Herriman, said the problem goes beyond counterproductive policy. It targets the foundation of states rights that has allowed Utah to lead out on so many issues, according to Fiefia, a freshman lawmaker who previously worked at Google. 'States are laboratories for innovation when it comes to policy, and I believe that the federal government should not overreach on this process and allow it to work,' Fiefia said. 'We will not give over our control because the federal government believes that it's the right thing to do to win this race.' On Tuesday, Utah House legislative leadership, and 62 state senators and representatives, sent a letter authored by Fiefia to Utah's congressional delegation arguing that the moratorium hindered 'Utah's nationally recognized efforts to strike the right balance between innovation and consumer protection.' Not only would the moratorium harm state efforts to legislate guardrails, it would also hurt businesses that are using AI responsibly by allowing their competitors to engage in unethical behavior, according to Fiefia. States have shown they are more nimble than the federal government when they need to adapt to change, Fiefia said. And this is the approach Fiefia believes Utah has demonstrated in opening up legal pathways for innovation while updating the law for the threats posed by AI. 'Just because we want to move fast in this global arms race of AI doesn't mean we can't do so with a seat belt,' Fiefia said. 'I believe that we can both win this AI race, but also doing it in a thoughtful and meaningful way.' The AI moratorium faces procedural hurdles in addition to ideological pushback. Utah Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, pointed out that reconciliation bills are meant only to amend the annual budget and not make substantive policy shifts. Some senators have alleged that the AI moratorium does not comply with the 'Byrd Rule,' a procedural requirement that prohibits 'nonbudgetary' additions during the budget 'reconciliation' process. Cullimore, who was the sponsor behind most of Utah's AI legislation, was in Washington, D.C., last week, speaking with members of the House Commerce Committee, which oversaw the inclusion of the AI moratorium provisions. The intentions behind the moratorium, Cullimore said, were to prevent states from implementing what are called 'foundational regulations' that restrict the kind of technology AI companies can develop. Utah's laws do not do this, according to Cullimore, who also signed Fiefia's letter, but they would still be sidelined by the 'big beautiful bill' even if the moratorium is replaced by the conditioned federal funding. 'I think the drafting of the moratorium was so broad that it potentially encompassed all of that stuff,' he said. 'So I hope that that we can refine the text a little bit, and then if they want to put those conditions in on foundational regulation, I think that'd be appropriate.'
