logo
VEU Vs. VXUS: Which Of These Vanguard ETFs Is Best For Those Looking To Diversify?

VEU Vs. VXUS: Which Of These Vanguard ETFs Is Best For Those Looking To Diversify?

Forbes17-04-2025

Both VEU and VXUS are excellent international ETFs with unique benefits depending on your investment ... More priorities and existing portfolio composition.
Investor concerns over the breakout of a global tariff war have eased after the White House announced a 90-day pause on new duties and negotiations with over 75 countries on trade deals. If successful, these negotiations could prevent trade reduction, supply-chain disruptions, and a rise in consumer prices. These negotiations underscore why international diversification is essential to reduce reliance on a single market.
For investors seeking to diversify their portfolios with an international ETF, VEU and VXUS, both offered by Vanguard, are top contenders. These funds both offer international exposure, void of U.S. holdings, but they differ in their strategy, national exposure and number of holdings. By understanding the key differences between these funds and in which situations either would be preferable, investors can choose the right fund for their portfolio.
In this guide, you'll learn how VEU and VXUS differ by market exposure, expense ratio, holdings and more, as well as how to make the final determination of which fund is right for you.
VEU and VXUS are both ETFs made up of international stock holdings from Vanguard, the firm known for revolutionizing low-cost investing with Vanguard index funds, intended to offer investors exposure to non-U.S. stocks. Both funds can be used to diversify your portfolio with international stocks, each with unique strategies to accomplish this goal.
VEU tracks the FTSE All-World ex-US Index which provides broad exposure to developed and emerging markets outside of the United States. VEU has over 3,000 holdings from Europe, Asia and Latin America providing significant exposure to international markets. VEU makes it easy to gain international exposure while avoiding overlap with U.S. stocks, including the best stocks for 2025.
This ETF is ideal for investors seeking broad diversification in international markets with a focus on large and mid-cap stocks. VEU is more focused on developed markets than emerging markets and its large positions include Taiwan Semiconductor, Tencent, SAP, Alibaba, and Novo Nordisk. VEU has a low expense ratio of just 0.04% and net assets of $59.54B.
VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex-US Index which includes small, mid and large-cap stocks from across the world with the exception of the United States. This ETF provides broader exposure to international stocks than VEU with more exposure to small-cap stocks and emerging markets than VEU. With holdings of over 7,000 stocks, VXUS is ideal for investors seeking more granular market exposure.
VXUS' primary holdings overlap with VEU including Taiwan Semiconductor, Tencent, SAP, Alibaba, and Novo Nordisk but with slightly lower percentage holdings in these than VEU as it has more total holdings. Like VEU, VXUS' primary sector holdings include Financial Service, Industrials, Technology, Consumer Cyclical and Healthcare. VXUS has higher net assets than VEU of $455.42B and a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.05%
VEU and VXUS both provide international exposure but they differ in their strategies and holdings. VEU's holdings are concentrated in mid and large-cap stocks in developed and emerging markets. This ETF excludes U.S. stocks and also has fewer holdings.
VXUS provides more broad exposure with small-cap holdings in addition to mid and large-cap stocks. This fund composition provides more diversification to investors and is ideal for investors seeking more complete international exposure. While its inclusion of small-cap stocks can increase volatility, it also can offer greater potential for growth.
Datawrapper link: https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/Jmn1O/1/
VEU has holdings of over 3,000 stocks from more than 45 countries with the exception of the U.S. This fund has more concentrated holdings in developed markets with heavy weightings in Europe and Asia. While it does provide emerging market exposure, it provides less than VXUS.
VXUS has holdings of over 7,000 stocks with broader exposure across emerging markets than VEU with more diversity in market capitalizations of its holdings. These attributes make VXUS more ideal for investors seeking full international exposure.
In light of recent tariff news, VEU's limited allocation to small cap stocks, many in emerging markets, may serve as a risk if trade deals aren't reached with specific trading partners like the EU for example. VXUS' broader inclusion of small caps and emerging market holdings may reduce the effect of any one region's tariffs.
VEU and VXUS both boast low expense ratios with VEU charging just a 0.04% expense ratio and VXUS charging 0.05%. While both funds are cost-effective, VEU's marginally lower cost may appeal to more investors seeking to minimize fees. For investors seeking broader diversification, VXUS' higher fee may be worthwhile.
VEU maintains lower trading volume than VXUS which may result in wider bid-ask spreads. Long-term investors won't be as affected by this difference but it is relevant for traders who need higher liquidity from their ETFs. VXUS offers greater liquidity and higher trading volume than VEU, making it also more ideal for institutional investors.
Both VEU and VXUS offer attractive dividend yields with VXUS edging out VEU with a 3.15% yield versus 3.03%. For investors seeking more income from funds in their portfolio, VXUS may be preferable. Dividend yields can change year to year due to payouts from holdings.
VEU and VXUS have had similar performance over the last 10 years due to similar holdings and primary exposure to the same markets. Despite this common trend, VEU has outperformed VXUS in both the short and longer term. VEU's 1-year return is 7.02% while VXUS' 1-year return is 6.62%.
Likewise, VEU's 3-year return is 5.00% while VXUS returned 4.58%. In comparison, VOO, Vanguard's S&P 500 ETF had a 1-year return of 6.93% and a 3-year return of 8.81%. Despite VOO's outperformance in the 3-year return, VEU and VXUS can offer valuable diversification for domestic-heavy portfolios.
For more information on two of the primary U.S. ETFs offered by Vanguard to consider, read this helpful guide: VTI vs VOO.
Investors should choose VEU or VXUS based on their investing objectives, portfolio composition and risk tolerance. If you want a fund with a history of higher performance and more concentration in developed markets, VEU would be a better fit. If you prefer broader international exposure and more diversification in cap size, VXUS is a better fit.
You want a fund with more focus in large and mid-cap stocks but without U.S. exposure. VEU is also a better fit if you wish to invest in larger, established international stocks with a lower expense ratio and a better history of performance. VEU could also be the right fund for you if you wish for lower volatility in the portfolio and less portfolio churn due to less exposure to small-cap stocks and stocks from developing nations.
You want broader international market exposure with more small-cap and emerging market stocks. For investors seeking more total-market exposure with a higher dividend yield, VXUS is an ideal fit. If you're also seeking more liquidity in your fund and slightly tighter bid-ask spreads, choose VXUS.
VXUS may also be a better fit for investors who want more diversification in their international fund, have a longer time horizon, and can tolerate more volatility for potentially higher long-term gains.
Bottom Line
Both VEU and VXUS are excellent international ETFs with unique benefits depending on your investment priorities and existing portfolio composition. VXUS is a superior fit for investors seeking broad market exposure and higher yield. VEU is a better fit for investors who are conscious of fees, want to invest primarily in international blue-chip stocks, and prefer a history of higher performance. Ultimately, both ETFs provide strong international exposure so your selection will be determined by how much you weigh the marginal differences in these ETF's features.
Yes, VXUS includes holdings from emerging markets including China, Brazil and India.
VXUS offers slightly better long-term growth potential due to small-cap and emerging market stocks being included in its index.
Both VEU and VXUS are tax efficient, as ETFs are more tax efficient than index funds. Both ETFs are subject to foreign tax withholding if you're a U.S. investor.
It would be unnecessary to hold both VEU and VXUS as these ETFs have significant overlap in their holdings and purpose so it would be more efficient to hold just one.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jeff Bezos' Mom Enrolled Him in Football Because He Struggled With Other Kids — 'Barely Made the Weight Limit' But 2 Weeks Later, He Was Captain
Jeff Bezos' Mom Enrolled Him in Football Because He Struggled With Other Kids — 'Barely Made the Weight Limit' But 2 Weeks Later, He Was Captain

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Jeff Bezos' Mom Enrolled Him in Football Because He Struggled With Other Kids — 'Barely Made the Weight Limit' But 2 Weeks Later, He Was Captain

You can only tell the "Bezos started Amazon in his garage" story so many times before it starts to feel like a corporate bedtime story. But long before the garage and the buff billionaire energy, Jeff Bezos was just a scrawny Texas kid who, according to his mom, "barely made the weight limit" to play youth football. That detail — along with most of what follows — comes from "The Inner Jeff Bezos," a 1999 Wired profile that dug into the early years of the now-spacefaring mogul. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Jackie Bezos said her son wasn't always the most socially comfortable kid. To help him fit in, she and her husband signed him up for the high-stakes world of Texas football — and expected the worst. "I thought he was going to get creamed out there," she admitted. But just two weeks later, her undersized son was named defensive captain. Why? He was the only kid who could remember all the plays — not just his own, but the entire squad's. Of course, he was. That same brainpower showed up in more geek-approved ways, too. In elementary school, Bezos enrolled in the Vanguard program at Houston's River Oaks Elementary, a magnet school for academically advanced students. The Wired profile also mentioned how Julie Ray's 1977 book "Turning on Bright Minds" followed 12-year-old Jeff — pseudonym "Tim" — through a typical school day, describing him as "friendly but serious," and "possessed of general intellectual excellence." He was, notably, "not particularly gifted in leadership," though that might come as a surprise to his future employees and rocket engineers. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . But if he wasn't a born leader, he was a born sci-fi addict. Once his school got access to a mainframe computer, Bezos and friends would spend hours playing a primitive Star Trek game, hunting down cloaked Klingons on a three-by-three matrix. Forget flag football — this is what real future billionaires were doing in the '70s. By high school, Bezos had his eyes on the stars — literally. While other kids dreamed of becoming astronauts, he told people he planned to be a space entrepreneur. "He said the future of mankind is not on this planet, because we might be struck by something, and we better have a spaceship out there," recalled the father of his high school girlfriend, Rudolf Werner. That might've sounded like sci-fi-fueled delusion back then — the kind of thing a teenager says after too many NASA brochures and not enough sleep — but Bezos wasn't bluffing. He attended a high school space initiative at NASA's Huntsville facility in Alabama, where his plans for a future among the stars started taking shape. According to his science teacher Bill McCreary, "Oh, he had ideas about space promotion!"Those ideas weren't about being the next astronaut on a shuttle. Bezos wanted to build the shuttle. Run the launchpad. Own the orbital infrastructure. And if you've seen Blue Origin's New Shepard rocket or his statements about colonizing space, well — that wasn't just a passing teenage obsession. It was a business plan in beta. Even today, he hasn't let go of the big vision. When reminded in the Wired interview of his youthful warnings that Earth was vulnerable to extinction-level disasters, Bezos chuckled — but only for a second. "I wouldn't mind helping in some way," he said. "I do think we have all our eggs in one basket." Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Jeff Bezos' Mom Enrolled Him in Football Because He Struggled With Other Kids — 'Barely Made the Weight Limit' But 2 Weeks Later, He Was Captain originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Panama Canal Chief Warns $23B Port Deal Poses Risks to its Neutrality
Panama Canal Chief Warns $23B Port Deal Poses Risks to its Neutrality

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Panama Canal Chief Warns $23B Port Deal Poses Risks to its Neutrality

The Panama Canal Authority's lead official is the latest stakeholder to express his doubts about the sale of two ports on both sides of the waterway. Ricaurte Vásquez Morales, administrator at the Panama Canal Authority (ACP), told the Financial Times the $23 billion deal that would shift the ports into the hands of Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and BlackRock could potentially put the canal's own neutrality at risk. More from Sourcing Journal Panama Canal Sees Post-Drought Spike in Container Shipping Transits Staud Said to Bring On a New Investor Panama Ports Buyers Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place 'There is a potential risk of capacity concentration if the deal comes the way it is structured as we understand right now,' Vásquez said. 'If there is a significant level of concentration on terminal operators belonging to an integrated or one single shipping company, it will be at the expense of Panama's competitiveness in the market and inconsistent with neutrality.' The Panama Canal operates as a neutral passage for ships representing all countries. Treaties signed during the Carter administration in 1977 established its neutrality, and ensured that the then-U.S.-controlled waterway would gradually be returned to Panama by Dec. 31, 1999. President Donald Trump has made overtures challenging the canal's neutrality, with claims that he wants the U.S. to 'take back' the trade artery on the grounds that it is allegedly under Chinese control. While China does not control the canal, Washington had wider concerns about the country's influence on the waterway. The sale of the Balboa and Cristobal ports by owner Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings was considered a win for the Trump administration, since the port operator's ownership of the ports was classified as a national security risk. But that deal has been scrutinized left and right, and has yet to get approval from the Panamanian government. The Chinese government, as well as state-owned media in the country, had spoken out against the deal, with reports saying President Xi Jinping was furious that CK Hutchison went forward with the sale. Following those reports, China's antitrust regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), opened a probe into the deal. That investigation has resulted in the parties deciding to amend several parts of the initial deal to try and appease both Trump and Xi, an FT report said. Hutchison, which would be selling off more than 40 non-Panama ports to MSC and BlackRock in the deal, floated the idea of potentially selling off some or all of its 10 remaining ports in China in a separate sale. The regulator had already warned Hutchison against splitting the Panama ports from the original deal altogether as a means to circumvent antitrust review. Along with government regulators, supply chain stakeholders have shown their displeasure with the potential acquisition in that it would give MSC, already the world's largest ocean carrier, a leading market share in port terminal operations. Vásquez noted that the deal has essentially pitted container shipping operators further against each other for space. 'This has become a significant battleground on transshipment capacity,' Vásquez said, noting that some at the ACP were worried the $23 billion transaction would cost it some container traffic if Hutchison's customers moved elsewhere. Vásquez added that the canal should use the ports deal as an opportunity to become a terminal operator itself by reactivating a project to build a terminal in the Port of Corozal at the Pacific end of the canal, according to FT. As Vásquez and the ACP keep an eye on the situation, the authority will itself be on the radar of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) in the U.S. as it plans its infrastructure projects. 'They're doing a very efficient job. What we're watching there is what's going to happen when they have a drought and they have reduced slots to go through there and then how those slots are allocated,' said FMC chairman Louis Sola, in a Monday briefing with the Port of Long Beach, calling it the agency's 'number one priority' at the canal. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which helped build and maintain the canal, is currently assisting the ACP on water management practices, according to Sola. The record drought throughout the second half of 2023 prompted the ACP's decision to build a new reservoir in the Indio River watershed to mitigate impacts from future climate conditions. To diversify its business lines, Vásquez also said the authority was considering building a pipeline along the length of the canal to carry up to 1 million barrels per day of liquefied petroleum gas.

Alphabet stock pares gains on buyout offers to search and ads employees
Alphabet stock pares gains on buyout offers to search and ads employees

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Alphabet stock pares gains on buyout offers to search and ads employees

-- Shares of Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) pared earlier gains on Tuesday after reports emerged that the tech giant is offering voluntary buyouts to employees in its search and ads division. According to The Information, Google is extending buyout offers to staff in its knowledge and information organization, which encompasses the company's core search business and much of its advertising operations. Nick Fox, who leads the knowledge group, reportedly informed employees via email that the buyouts would target U.S.-based workers. "Earlier this year, some of our teams introduced a voluntary exit program with severance for U.S.-based Googlers, and several more are now offering the program to support our important work ahead," a Google spokesperson confirmed. The buyout program comes as Google faces mounting competitive pressure from AI systems like ChatGPT and follows a significant setback in a U.S. antitrust case that could potentially restrict the company's ability to distribute its search product. Industry observers note that voluntary buyouts sometimes precede more extensive workforce reductions, raising questions about Google's future staffing plans. Alphabet shares briefly turned negative following the news but recovered to trade up 0.9%, significantly below earlier gains of 2%. Related articles Alphabet stock pares gains on buyout offers to search and ads employees Groupon Bull Pushes Back on Short-Seller Report, Calls Claims 'Sensational' US Commerce Secretary Lutnick says China trade talks going well Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store