Farmers Still Rushing To Convert Land To Forestry
Whole farm-to-forest conversions continue, according to a new report released by Beef and Lamb New Zealand.
The research, carried out by Orme and Associates on behalf of Beef and Lamb, found close to 40,000 hectares of sheep and beef farms had been sold for forestry since September last year.
The report also confirmed 29,518ha had sold in 2023 and 30,483ha in 2024.
It brings the total amount of farm-to-forestry conversions since January 2017 to more than 300,000-ha. Beef and Lamb estimates this has resulted in the loss of more than 2 million stock units since 2017.
Chair Kate Acland said the data underpinned longstanding concerns about whole farm-to-forestry conversions.
"The numbers show whole-farm sales for conversion to forestry for carbon credits are continuing at pace," she said. "What we're really concerned about is whole farms, really good productive land getting planted into trees."
The research showed Hawke's Bay, Wellington and Wairarapa remained preferred locations, while Southland had also seen a notable increase.
There was a significant slowdown in the Gisborne region, likely due to the environmental impacts of adverse weather events such as Cyclone Gabrielle and tightened harvesting conditions being set by regional councils.
Acland said they were not against incorporating forestry within farms, adding if most farmers planted 10 percent of their least productive land in trees, they could still maintain production.
"We're very supportive of incorporating trees within farms. and I think there's a real opportunity here for farmers to be part of the solution."
This week the government introduced new legislation to restrict farm-to-forest conversions on Land Use Classification (LUC) 1-6 land.
Under the changes, which will retroactively take effect from December last year when the policy was originally announced, up to a quarter of farms can be planted in forestry for the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
There will also be a ban on full farm-to-forest conversions entering the ETS for actively farmed land and an annual cap of 15,000ha for forestry entering the ETS for lower quality farmland.
Acland said while the government putting restrictions around whole farm to forest conversions was positive, she wasn't sure it went far enough.
"Anecdotally we're still hearing of a significant number of farms being sold this year, despite the government announcing the limits last year.
"We're concerned that some sales are continuing on the basis of intent to purchase land before the limits were announced. We urgently need the government to tighten the criteria around proof of intent to purchase."
Additionally, she was particularly concerned about class 6 land, which she said was "some of the most productive sheep and beef breeding country".
Acland said carbon forestry had a comparatively "short-term return" when compared to sheep and beef.
"I think we need to recognise the importance of the red meat sector for the economy of this country."
Federated Farmers national president Wayne Langford echoed some of these concerns, saying the country was approaching critical mass for sheep production.
He said the new forestry conversion rules were moving "slowly".
"We're gonna see more processing plants close, we're gonna see a lot more communities close down unless we do something about this issue across the country."
The legislation is now before Parliament and is to come into force October 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
21 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Opinion: Road-user charges can pay for more than just road maintenance – NZ could lead the way
But for petrol vehicles, it is a shift away from fuel excise duty, or petrol tax, which is currently about 77c per litre of fuel. As it is linked to the price of petrol, more fuel-efficient petrol vehicles pay relatively less than gas guzzlers for every kilometre travelled. Much of the policy detail is yet to be worked out, but if all of the country's vehicles paid road-user charges, this would provide opportunities to do more than raise revenue for road building and maintenance. New Zealand would become the first country to charge all vehicles a distance-based fee and, used in creative ways, this could save money and deliver better societal outcomes, such as safer roads and lower pollution. How fuel revenue is collected Fuel excise duty is currently collected at source, when refined fuel either leaves the refinery or is imported. Some other costs are included, such as a fee for New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme, currently around 13c per litre. These are simple to collect, have low compliance costs and are essentially unavoidable. Road-user charges are a distance-based payment. Licences are pre-purchased in increments of 1000km and various rates apply depending on vehicle weight and axle configuration. Heavier electric vehicles (more than 3.5 tonnes) are exempt until June 2027. This system has higher compliance and administration costs than fuel excise duty. It also has a greater risk of evasion, because to some extent, it relies on vehicle owners' honesty. With all vehicles moving to road-user charges, everyone will pay for every kilometre they travel on the roads, with increased rates for heavier vehicles (anything above 3.5 tonnes). The plan is that this will be administered electronically through some device in or on the vehicle. This already happens with many freight vehicles. In most freight vehicles, the technology includes GPS and allows freight companies to monitor the performance of their vehicles and drivers. But rolling out electronic road-user charges across the whole vehicle fleet creates interesting opportunities beyond just raising revenue. Opportunities and challenges The move to a distance-based scheme could discourage some people from selecting more fuel-efficient vehicles because a road-use system does not encourage that. This could lead to increased greenhouse gas and other emissions. However, rather than using a uniform road-user charge based solely on vehicle weight and distance travelled, rates could vary based on a range of criteria, including emissions, and pay for other traffic-related costs to society and the environment. For instance, around 300 people die each year in road crashes, and thousands more are injured. This costs $9-$10 billion annually. To help pay, New Zealand could collect higher road-user charge rates for vehicles more likely to cause crashes, based on safety ratings. Traffic-related air pollution causes more than 2000 deaths per year, costing New Zealand around $10 billion. Road-user charges could be used to pay for this by charging a higher rate for vehicles that emit more pollution. The same could be done for noise pollution. And if the electronic road-user charge device is GPS-enabled, vehicles travelling near the most vulnerable citizens – such as near schools during pick-up and drop-off – could be charged more. This may deter some people from dropping children off right outside the school gate, which in turn could have the added benefit of making walking and cycling feel safer because of less traffic, attracting more people to use active transport and helping create neighbourhood greenways. But why stop there? New Zealand could use electronic road-user charges to encourage all sorts of other behaviours. For example, lower rates might encourage vehicles to use highways and main roads instead of cutting through quiet residential streets. Road-user charges could be used to set a congestion price, manage on- and off-street parking and monitor speed limits without the need for any additional technology, saving on setting up separate congestion and parking pricing schemes and speed cameras. Some will argue this is an invasion of privacy. But, as Minister of Transport Chris Bishop indicated, the privacy commissioner will oversee it. If New Zealand becomes the first country to charge all vehicles for the use of roads, this is an opportunity to lead in innovation.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Law Change Could Save Farmers And Taxpayers Millions
Federated Farmers is throwing its support behind a new Member's Bill that could bring much-needed clarity to New Zealand's climate change laws - and save millions in legal costs. National MP Joseph Mooney's Climate Change Response (Restriction on Civil Proceedings) Amendment Bill aims to confirm a common-sense principle: if a person or business is complying with national climate change laws, they can't be sued for causing climate-related damage. "It sounds very obvious, but that's not how the law appears to be working right now," Federated Farmers climate change spokesperson Wayne Langford says. "It's crazy that companies like Fonterra and Dairy Holdings, who are fully meeting their legal climate obligations right now, can still be dragged into court and sued for allegedly causing harm through emissions. "We fully support Joseph Mooney's Bill, which will restore some much-needed common sense and save farmers, food processors and taxpayers millions of dollars in court costs." Climate activist Mike Smith is taking seven major New Zealand companies, including Fonterra and Dairy Holdings, to court over their greenhouse gas emissions. He says the emissions are harming Māori land and culture, and is claiming public nuisance, negligence, and breach of a duty to stop contributing to climate change. The High Court threw out two of the claims but allowed the third to proceed. After appeals from both sides, the Supreme Court has now reinstated all three claims, allowing the case to go to trial, and the matter is now back in front of the High Court. Federated Farmers says the case sets a dangerous precedent. "Every New Zealander contributes to climate change in some way," Langford says. "When you turn on a light switch, cook dinner, drive your car - even an EV - you're using energy and consuming goods. All of that has emissions behind it." In most cases, those emissions come from companies operating within New Zealand's legal framework - following rules set out under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), reporting requirements, and other regulatory obligations. "So, it's silly stuff to then try and sue those law-abiding companies," Langford says. He points out that long-lived carbon dioxide emissions are already captured under the ETS, and the Government is actively investing in research and tools to help farmers reduce their short-lived methane emissions. "If these companies are following the rules, there has to be some certainty and protection in that, or the legal risk becomes unmanageable." Mooney's Bill would provide that certainty by spelling out in law that private legal action cannot be taken against individuals or companies for their greenhouse gas emissions, provided they're complying with climate laws already set by Parliament. "Rather than force the courts to debate and decide what the law in New Zealand is, this Bill would allow Parliament to exert its authority and define the law," Langford says. He says it's no different from how things work in other areas of law. "If a property developer gets resource consent to build a high-rise apartment, the neighbours can't turn around and sue them for the shade or noise. "That's because we recognise the developer has done everything required under the law to get permission. "Why should climate law be treated any differently?" Smith's lawsuit covers major electricity generators, petrol retailers, dairy farming and dairy processing. Langford warns that if Smith's case is successful, it would see a host of vital industries face major cost and risk. The case could open the floodgates to further lawsuits against other industries that also produce emissions, even if they're fully compliant with New Zealand's climate regulations. "In practice, the only way for those industries to avoid legal risk would be to stop emitting entirely - meaning they'd effectively have to shut down overnight." He says that would be economically disastrous and would leave the Government scrambling to urgently rewrite the law to protect the economy. "If the case is successful, Parliament will simply be forced to urgently change the law. Let's not wait for that crisis. Parliament should clarify the law now, before this goes any further." Federated Farmers is urging the Government to adopt Mooney's Bill as a Government Bill, which would significantly speed up its passage through Parliament. "Rather than wait for Fonterra and Dairy Holdings to go through a lengthy and expensive High Court process - something that will also cost taxpayers dearly - the Government should step in now and provide certainty. "We need to focus our time, energy and taxpayer dollars on solutions that actually reduce emissions, not on endless litigation against companies doing everything the law requires."
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Consumer debt dips to $14.5b but 470,000 Kiwis are behind on payments
'What we've noticed is that consumer arrears across all sectors, retail, energy, banking, credit card, buy now pay later, it's about 470,000 New Zealanders who are currently in arrears,' McLaughlin said. 'But over the last 12 months, that's stabilised at around about that level. We really saw a spike going back a couple of years ago where every year defaults and insolvencies climbed.' Consumer arrears vary across the country according to the latest Centrix Credit Indicator Report, with arrears higher in the North Island compared to the South Island. Tasman District had the lowest level of consumers in arrears at 8.2%, while Wairoa District had the highest at 18.12%. McLaughlin said although past weather events like Cyclone Gabrielle and flooding are factors, he thinks the uplift in the primary industries and the closure of manufacturing businesses are central to the change. A high milk price payout to dairy farmers has bolstered the rural economy. 'The first payments tend to go back to the lenders, back to the banks, because they're carrying a fair bit of debt over the period. 'The second lot went to the IRD and I think it's only now that the rural sector are going to have some disposable income, which hopefully will trickle down into the local economy.' McLaughlin said the South Island was benefiting from lower unemployment, high agricultural gains and lower housing costs, resulting in smaller mortgages. Financial hardship cases increased year-on-year for July, up 7.1%. Almost half (45%) relate to cases of mortgage payment difficulties, with the remainder coming from credit card debt (29%) and personal loan repayments (18%). The highest rate of financial hardship is among those aged between 35 and 49. McLaughlin said households are balancing their budgets a lot better than in the past, and are not spending money on discretionary items as much as they used to. He said buy-now-pay-later purchases and personal loan arrears were not increasing at levels like they were 18 months ago, with buy-now-pay-later arrears comprising about 8%-9% of borrowing. While the situation is good for households, McLaughlin said it places pressure on small to medium-sized businesses that rely on discretionary spending. '[Households are] saying 'if we can't afford it, we're not going to do it now, we're going to be conservative'. That's had a flow-on impact to those small businesses. 'Small businesses rely on their household mortgages to finance their business. They've had increasing wages and other costs going up, they've had interest rates going up and they've had their sales going down because people aren't spending the money.' McLaughlin thinks the current economic climate is affecting more people than during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008, and said although the GFC affected people who were invested in the sharemarket, the fallout from Covid was across the population. He said the older demographic had been less impacted by what has happened because they are on better salaries, have greater job security and generally have lower mortgages. McLaughlin said the biggest challenge for borrowers at the moment is non-discretionary debt, and the flexibility being able to borrow money provides can help in times of need. Nation of Debt series Monday: NZ nears trillion-dollar debt burden Tuesday: Government debt: Are higher taxes inevitable? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.
