Nancy Mace said 'due process is for citizens.' Here's who it's really for
In early June 2025, Republican U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina wrote an X post (archived) that read: "Due process is for citizens."
Her comment had been viewed more than 2.4 million times as of this writing and had amassed more than 6,500 likes.
The same claim has appeared in multiple X posts. In a similar tone, in May 2025, another X user wrote: "Due process is for citizens, not invaders."
(X user @NancyMace)
In short, due process is the legal principle that the government must follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty or property. It serves as a safeguard against arbitrary actions by the state, ensuring that people are treated justly under the law. For a more detailed explanation, see our full breakdown in this article on former President Bill Clinton's 1996 immigration law.
While Mace's post did not explicitly say that due process protections are, or should be, limited to only U.S. citizens, her replies below the post reinforced that interpretation. However, the U.S. Constitution protects all "persons," not just citizens, under the due-process clauses of the Fifth and 14th amendments. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that these protections apply to anyone physically present in the United States regardless of citizenship or immigration status.
An MSNBC article on the topic similarly concluded that Mace's "implication … that noncitizens don't get that protection" was "incorrect."
The South Carolina representative doubled down on her stance in the replies below her post, suggesting that noncitizens should not be entitled to due-process protections in the U.S.
For example, when one X user wrote, "The Constitution doesn't say 'only citizens.' Due process applies to persons — that includes non-citizens. That's settled law," Mace replied by saying: "Skip due process coming in, don't expect it going out. Citizens first!"
Other replies further suggested she believed only U.S. citizens should be entitled to such protections (archived, archived, archived).
(X users @FJBIDEN_22 and @NancyMace)
These exchanges were not the first time Mace commented on due process. In late May 2025, she weighed in on the principle in response to a federal judge's decision to block the deportation of eight noncitizens convicted of violent crimes.
The day before U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a 17-page order in which he emphasized that "the Court recognizes that the class members at issue here have criminal histories. But that does not change due process," Mace criticized the ruling, telling Fox News (archived): "They didn't want due process on their way in illegally, they shouldn't get due process on their way out."
However, the representative's comments about due process contradicted remarks she made about the principle in the past. In February 2023, Mace wrote on X (archived): "Everyone deserves the right to due process. Even those we vehemently oppose."
(X user @NancyMace)
Snopes has reached out to Mace for comment on whether she maintains that due-process protections should apply only to U.S. citizens and how she reconciles that view with her 2023 statement. We will update this article if we receive a response.
The U.S. Constitution's guarantee of due process appears in the Fifth and 14th amendments, both of which state that no person should be deprived "of life, liberty or property, without due process of law." As shown, the language uses "person," not "citizen," with regard to due-process protections.
Further, the Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted that due-process protections apply to everyone within U.S. borders regardless of citizenship or immigration status.
In Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel Mezei (1953) the Court emphasized (Page 212) that "aliens who have once passed through [U.S.] gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness-encompassed in due process of law." Similarly, in cases such as Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) and earlier decisions dating back more than a century, the Supreme Court made clear that the government cannot detain or deport people arbitrarily. In the 2001 case, the Court underscored that "the Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent."
In simple words, noncitizens must be given fair procedures, such as notice or a "credible fear interview," before being deprived of their liberty. The Supreme Court expressed the same view in the case of Reno v. Flores (1993), stating: "It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings."
This was not the first time Snopes addressed a claim regarding Mace. For instance, in late May 2025, we investigated a rumor that she ordered staffers to create burner accounts to promote her online. Meanwhile, earlier in June 2025, we also fact-checked a rumor about whether the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, signed by Clinton, allowed deportation without due process.
"327K Views · 15K Reactions | Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments That Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Heinous Crimes Deserve Due Process after a Judge Blocks a Deportation Flight to South Sudan | 'They Didn't Want Due Process on Their Way in Illegally, They Shouldn't Get Due Process on Their Way Out.' Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments... | by Fox News | Facebook." Facebook.com, 2022, www.facebook.com/FoxNews/videos/1432914678060895/. Accessed 6 June 2025.
Congress.gov. "U.S. Constitution - Fifth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress." Constitution.congress.gov, 15 Dec. 1791, constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-5/.
Constitution Annotated. "U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress." Congress.gov, 9 July 1868, constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/.
Deng, Grace. "Did Nancy Mace Order Staffers to Create Burner Accounts to Promote Her Online? Here's What We Know." Snopes, Snopes.com, 30 May 2025, www.snopes.com/news/2025/05/31/burner-accounts-nancy-mace-staffers/. Accessed 6 June 2025.
Dunbar, Marina. "Court Halts Trump Administration's Effort to Send Eight Men to South Sudan." The Guardian, The Guardian, 23 May 2025, www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/23/trump-south-sudan-deportations-halted-judge.
Gabbatt, Adam. "Group Stranded with Ice in Djibouti Shipping Container after Removal from US." The Guardian, The Guardian, 6 June 2025, www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/06/migrants-djibouti-ice. Accessed 6 June 2025.
"Gov.uscourts.mad.282404.119.0." Documentcloud.org, 2025, www.documentcloud.org/documents/25950940-govuscourtsmad2824041190/. Accessed 6 June 2025.
"Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)." Justia Law, supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/507/292/.
Rubin, Jordan. "Due Process Is Not Limited to Citizens, Contrary to Nancy Mace's Claim." MSNBC.com, MSNBC, 4 June 2025, www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/nancy-mace-due-process-citizens-rcna210851. Accessed 6 June 2025.
Wrona, Aleksandra. "Bill Clinton Did Not Sign Law in 1996 Allowing Deportation without Due Process." Snopes, Snopes.com, 5 June 2025, www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-clinton-immigration-reform-act/. Accessed 6 June 2025.
"Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)." Justia Law, supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/533/678/.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Padilla denies claims he lunged at Noem during LA press conference
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) denied the Trump administration's claims that he lunged at Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a Thursday presser in Los Angeles. 'I wasn't lunging at her or anybody, and yes, I identified myself,' Padilla told CNN's Erin Burnett Thursday night after being forcibly removed from the presser and placed in handcuffs. The lawmaker said he attended the press briefing to ask why the National Guard was deployed by the president to address local protests sparked by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids last week. 'I'm just trying to do my job as a senator when we ask questions in committee and don't get answers,' he added. Padilla said he used the press conference to try a different approach with the Trump administration to gain information on immigration operations after officials failed to respond to letters from lawmakers. 'I had a potential audience with the secretary, and I took it. Sadly, still not forthcoming with any sort of data or details,' the senator said, before describing his brief meeting with Noem following the incident. 'You would think, you would hope that that's how the meeting would have started, but no apology, no acknowledgment whatsoever. But it's the Trump administration, so I'm not holding my breath for decency, decorum or manners,' he told CNN. 'One of the big points I was trying to make with her is I get if the Trump administration was doing what Trump said on the campaign trail, let's focus on dangerous, violent criminals for detention and deportation. There's no disagreement there. There's no debate there. But that's not what's happening on the streets of Los Angeles and throughout the country,' he added. Padilla said instead lawful residents are being wrongfully removed and detained. 'Where is this going? It's going to keep getting worse. This is how authoritarianism happens, unless and until the people speak up and push back. So that's why you've seen so many protesters, vast majority peaceful protesters, not just in and around Los Angeles this last week, but increasingly in other cities,' he told CNN. 'So, we have to continue to exercise our First Amendment rights, keep it peaceful. Violence is not tolerated. Violence is not condoned. That will have its consequences. But people need to continue to speak up because this is not normal,' he added. Some Republican lawmakers have called for Padilla to be federally prosecuted over the outburst with Noem while Democrats defended his actions. The incident with Padilla follows the federal indictment of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) for allegedly impeding and interfering with law enforcement officers at an immigration detention center and the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D-N.J.) for trespassing at the same site.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cuomo and Mamdani tear into each other in final New York City mayoral debate
Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani bitterly clashed over age and experience Thursday in the final debate before New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, as Cuomo warned that the progressive state assemblyman is unprepared for the job and Mamdani hammered the former governor over scandals during his time in Albany. Cuomo, Mamdani and five other candidates squared off just before Saturday's start of early voting ahead of the June 24 Democratic primary. The fiery exchanges between the universally known Cuomo and fast-rising Mamdani reflected how many see the race as increasingly competitive — and how the two view each other as a threat. Cuomo said it would be 'reckless and dangerous' to elect a 33-year-old state assemblyman to a role that requires negotiating with city, state and federal lawmakers, standing up to President Donald Trump, responding to natural disasters and more. Mamdani retorted with a laundry list of the 67-year-old Cuomo's scandals in the governor's office, including the sexual harassment allegations that forced him out of office in 2021. 'I've never had to resign in disgrace,' Mamdani said, while also taking shots at Cuomo's handling of Medicaid and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. 'I have never hounded the thirteen women who credibly accused me of sexual harassment. I have never sued for their gynecological records. And I have never done these things because I am not you, Mr. Cuomo.' Cuomo shot back: 'Mr. Mamdani is right. He's never done anything, period.' 'He's accomplished nothing,' he said, criticizing Mamdani's four years as a state assemblyman. 'He has zero accomplishments, and now he thinks he's going to be ready to be mayor of the city of New York. It is laughable. It is laughable and it is dangerous.' Earlier Thursday, Cuomo's campaign had launched a television advertisement pointing to Trump sending troops to Los Angeles amid protests over deportations, and portraying Mamdani as 'dangerously inexperienced' and unprepared to take on the president. Mamdani, meanwhile, ripped Cuomo for repeatedly mispronouncing his name and spelled out his last name to make the point. Former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, a longtime Cuomo rival, said on X during the debate that Cuomo 'is REALLY scared' of Mamdani. 'He's not even faking it,' de Blasio said. 'And Andrew is REALLY disrespecting all the New Yorkers who support Zohran.' In deep-blue New York City, the primary is often the decisive contest. This year, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who was elected four years ago as a Democrat, will be on the ballot in November as an independent. Curtis Sliwa, who lost to Adams four years ago, is again the Republican nominee. Other candidates sought to offer Democratic voters a path besides Cuomo and Mamdani. New York's primary is a ranked-choice contest, which means candidates are also competing to be voters' second- or third-favorite contender, even if they don't win their first-place votes. New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who largely sought to remain above the fray, also questioned Mamdani's experience. She pointed to her experience crafting the city's budget and leading the council. 'Given what I've just laid out, do you think you're more qualified than me to lead the city?' she asked Mamdani. Scott Stringer, a former New York City comptroller, said Cuomo has experience and Mamdani has vision — but 'my experience and my vision, when you combine it, is the third lane to win this race.' New York City Comptroller Brad Lander might have landed the sharpest blows on Cuomo. He highlighted the specifics around Cuomo's resignation and the findings of the attorney general's office's investigation that concluded he sexually harassed multiple women and violated state law. Lander said he wouldn't want to have to tell college students, 'Don't go work at city hall because the mayor is a sexual harasser.' Cuomo responded that five district attorneys investigated the allegations against him and 'nothing has come of them whatsoever.' 'This is disqualifying. The man resigned. It should be obvious. The problem is that we do not get to address the issues that New Yorkers care about because we're talking about his past,' said state senator Zellnor Myrie. The candidates also clashed over police and public safety, as Cuomo described New Yorkers as 'afraid on the streets.' 'They feel unsafe,' he said. 'You can quote statistics all day long, they get afraid walking into the subway, they get afraid walking down the street when they see a mentally ill homeless person.' Cuomo sought to use his tough talk on public safety, much like Adams did in 2021, to differentiate himself from the Democratic field. He pointed to a 2021 plan to cut $1 billion in police funding from the city budget and accused his rivals of supporting efforts to 'defund the police.' 'That was the chant, and $1 billion was taken from the police department,' Cuomo said. He touted a proposal to add 5,000 police officers to the NYPD. Mamdani said he wants more social workers so that the NYPD can focus on serious crime but does not want to slash police funding. 'I will not defund the police. I will work with the police,' he said. Mamdani is running to be the city's first Muslim mayor. He was sharply attacked over his criticism of Israel's war in Gaza – which he has called a 'genocide' – as well as his support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement and his calls for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's arrest. Former hedge fund executive Whitney Tilson accused Mamdani of being a leader 'inciting these mobs' at Columbia University, where he said protests disrupted students' educations. 'When you use words referring to the only Jewish state in the world like 'genocide' and 'apartheid,' when you call for divestment and all, that is inciting these mobs,' he said. Mamdani said he is being 'smeared' and 'mischaracterized' for positions with which he says many Jewish voters agree. 'I say these things because far too often, we take what can be a place of disagreement and start to broach beyond that,' he said.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Northwest lawmakers won't attend military parade in D.C. on Army's 250th anniversary, Trump's birthday
Jun. 12—WASHINGTON — Thousands of Americans are expected to descend on the nation's capital on Saturday to see the city's biggest military parade in decades, but members of Congress from the Northwest won't be among the crowds. The parade marks the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, which estimates the total cost of the event will be between $25 million and $45 million. It also coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, and with Flag Day. Republicans from Washington, Idaho and Oregon said they don't plan to attend the spectacle but appreciated the opportunity to celebrate the Army. More than 6,000 soldiers will participate in the event, along with tanks, armed vehicles, rocket launchers, marching bands, horses, mules and one dog, according to the Army. "It's a great way to honor America's military history; happy birthday to the U.S. Army," said Rep. Michael Baumgartner. The Spokane Republican dismissed the idea that Trump is using the occasion to celebrate himself. Democrats from the Northwest said they celebrate the Army but questioned why the government would spend millions of taxpayer dollars on what they see at least partially as an elaborate birthday bash for the president, at a time when Trump and his GOP allies in Congress are proposing cuts to Medicaid and food assistance for low-income Americans. "It is a huge waste of taxpayer dollars," Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said in an interview. "I appreciate the 250th anniversary, but it should be about the soldiers. It should be about the men and women who serve, not about satisfying President Trump's ego." Rep. Adam Smith of Bellevue, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, called the parade "wildly inappropriate" and said that while he has no problem celebrating the U.S. military, including in parades, the price tag of Saturday's event is unprecedented. "It's clear Trump is doing this as a celebration of his power, not as a celebration of the military," Smith said in a brief interview at the Capitol. "It's obviously going to be very costly and very disruptive, and also, I think, sends the wrong message. As someone said a long time ago, we are not a tanks-in-the-street type of republic, and we should not become one." The U.S. Navy and Marine Corps were also founded in 1775, but in October and November of that year. Smith said neither of those military branches is likely to get the same celebration as the Army, "because their birthday doesn't fall on Donald Trump's birthday." Most members of Congress choose to head home on weekends and during recess periods, but several Republicans have said they plan to stay in D.C. to attend the parade. "While I will not be in attendance at the parade, I sincerely appreciate this meaningful tribute honoring our nation's heroes," Rep. Russ Fulcher, a Republican who represents North Idaho, said in a statement. "This celebration marks a historic milestone in the Army's proud legacy of courage and unity. It is with deep respect and gratitude that we recognize the U.S. Army's 250 years of dedication, service, and sacrifice on behalf of all Americans." Fellow GOP Reps. Dan Newhouse of Sunnyside, Mike Simpson of Idaho Falls and Cliff Bentz of Eastern Oregon will all miss the parade, their spokespeople said. Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch also said they will be out of town. "Happy 250th Birthday to the U.S. Army!" Crapo said in a statement. "For two and a half centuries, the brave men and women of the U.S. Army have stood as a bulwark of freedom, defending our nation and its values at home and abroad. We are eternally grateful for their unwavering courage, sacrifice, and dedication. Thank you for your service." Asked what he thought about the estimated cost of the event, Risch replied, "Don't know anything about it." Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., said she routinely goes to Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Tacoma for events celebrating the military, but she sees Saturday's event as something else. "We appreciate 250 years of the Army," she said in a brief interview. "I don't know that we had to do this to celebrate that. I'll definitely be thanking the men and women at our Army installations and commemorating them." Orion Donovan Smith's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.
