No need for leniency while granting bail in drug cases, says Kerala high court
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
A bench of Justice Jobin Sebastian made this observation while dismissing the bail plea of P N Abhinav of Kozhikode, who was arrested along with another accused for possessing 221.89 grams of MDMA stored inside an almirah in a hotel room at Kunnamangalam. Abhinav was detained on Jan 21 and has remained in custody since then.
Opposing the bail plea, the public prosecutor submitted that chemical examination revealed the contraband seized was not MDMA but
Methamphetamine
, and the quantity involved in this case is commercial.
The source of the contraband is yet to be traced, and a meticulous investigation is essential to identify its origin.
HC noted that the allegation against the petitioner, along with the co-accused, involves possession of a large quantity of Methamphetamine intended for sale, in violation of the
NDPS Act
— a charge that cannot be taken lightly. Agreeing with the prosecutor, the court emphasised the need for an in-depth investigation to uncover all details of the case and accordingly dismissed the bail application.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Delhi HC pulls up police for separating interfaith couple: ‘If couple wants marriage, will protect them' rules judge
The Delhi High Court on Friday came to the rescue of an interfaith couple, ordering for their continued protection and stay at a government safe house, while pulling up the police for allegedly separating the couple instead of providing them protection. The court also sought that the police identify the personnel responsible for the same. A 26-year old Muslim man, in a relationship with a 25-year old Hindu woman since 2018, had moved HC last month seeking its urgent directions to the Delhi Police to provide the couple necessary protection and a safe house. The request was made after the couple expressed their intent to marry, which was met with familial opposition and threats. According to advocate Utkarsh Singh, representing the man, instead of being provided with the safety, the couple was 'forcibly separated', with the woman 'medically examined, and later detained at a woman's shelter July 24, despite her repeated pleas to be with her partner. The police, in a status report filed before HC on August 6, asserted 'there was no element of coercion, unlawful separation, or procedural irregularity at any stage', with all actions 'taken purely from a welfare and constitutional standpoint,' with due regard to the woman's 'safety and autonomy'. The police's submission, however, did not convince the court. The woman, who virtually interacted with Justice Sanjeev Narula on Friday, said that she was taken away forcibly by the police and separated from her partner. She asserted that when the couple had initially sought protection, the police had said 'there is no such thing as a safe cell', and coerced her into undergoing a medical examination. 'I went for a medical examination and without telling me or without my consent, I was taken to a shelter home,' she told Justice Narula, adding that all her personal belongings were taken away, including her phone. Orally remarking that 'police has to sensitise its officers' and that they are 'forcibly separating' consenting adult partners, Justice Narula expressed disapproval with the police's status report. 'Has he (the police personnel who filed the status report) even interacted with the (woman) to understand what has happened? I'm not going to allow this at all.' The HC also refused to allow the woman's father – who is opposed to the relationship – to interfere, noting that he has 'no role' given that his daughter is an adult and has consented to the relationship. The father's counsel impressed before the court that 'social reality has to be taken into consideration', with 'in Indian society, parents have to be consulted' for marriage. To this, the court orally responded, 'What law requires an adult to ask father for marrying someone of different faith?… You are insisting on something that I cannot appreciate… Constitutional right guarantees she can marry of her choice and I am going to honour that… If the couple wants to get married, I am going to protect them.' After sustained interaction with the woman, Justice Narula went on to assure her orally, 'If you are firm about your decision, we will support you. I am supporting your choice, I will support your decision.' 'As far as the police are concerned, they will support you,' the HC said, while recording in its order that the woman's 'intention to marry is informed and consistent based on her relationship with him (her partner) over the past seven years'.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
ED opposes arms consultant's plea on 'fugitive' tag
NEW DELHI: ED on Friday opposed in Delhi HC a plea by UK-based arms consultant Sanjay Bhandari against a trial court order declaring him a "fugitive economic offender". The agency said when the order was passed in July, the trial court was aware of an assessment order showing property worth Rs 655 crore being surreptitiously acquired. Bhandari's counsel, senior advocate Kapil Sibal , contended before Justice Neena Bansal Krishna that the prosecution was initiated without completion of assessment proceedings. "They had no evidence to show that there was a Rs 100 crore tax liability," he submitted. HC said it would hear the matter on Aug 20.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Bawankule faces flak for sharing stage with accused in Tuljapur drugs case
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: State revenue minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule was embroiled in a controversy after he was felicitated by a man currently out on bail in the Tuljapur drugs case. Critics raised eyebrows, pointing out that Bawankule not only accepted the felicitations at the event on Thursday, but also praised the accused and even put his hand on his shoulder, suggesting a close relationship between the two. Vinod alias Pintu Gangane, the husband of Tuljapur municipal council's former president, got bail in the case a month ago from the Bombay HC bench in Aurangabad. Ambadas Danve, leader of opposition in the legislative council, said the Tuljapur drugs case has been making headlines and probe is still on. "A man who indulged in illicit businesses welcomed and felicitated Bawankule, who is not only the state's revenue minister but also a BJP leader. Bawankule then respectfully brought such a person close. It looks like the minister almost hugged him," he said. BJP workers said the event was organised to mark the approval of the Tuljapur development plan. A BJP office bearer from Sambhajinagar said, "Vinod Gangane has just been named an accused and that too for consumption. He has not been convicted. There is no point in making so much noise about it." State food and civil supplies minister Chhagan Bhujbal also defended Bawankule. "Senior political functionaries are not aware of all those who are on stage when they go for a public programme. It often happens that citizens want to meet politicians and get photographed. At such times, if the politician stops anyone from sharing the dais, and if that person happens to be a good functionary, it creates problems for the party in electoral politics," Bhujbal said. "The onus is on local party units, who should ensure that people with controversial backgrounds are not allowed on stage," he added. Gangane's name featured as an organiser on the programme's invitation card. Political sources said he shares close ties with local MLA Rana Patil. The Tuljapur drug trafficking case came to light on Feb 14 after the arrest of three people from Tamalwadi village with 45 grams of MD. Police seized synthetic drugs worth Rs 2.5 lakh on Feb 15, uncovering a network spanning Solapur, Naldurg, Pune and Mumbai. A priest from Tuljabhavani temple was among the main peddlers. After the HC rejected his interim bail, Gangane was arrested on June 7 based on the Tamalwadi police's FIR for possession and consumption of MD drugs under relevant sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The HC granted him conditional bail on July 10. At the time of seeking bail, his lawyer had argued that Gangane was a consumer and not a drug peddler, and even in the charge sheet, only section 27 of the NDPS Act, which attracts a year's punishment, was invoked against him. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
