Singhvi defends SC verdict on TN governor case; stresses Constitution's supremacy
CHENNAI: Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi refuted criticisms being made against the recent landmark judgment of the Supreme Court in Tamil Nadu's case against its governor and said it is the Constitution that is supreme and not the other three pillars of legislature, executive and the judiciary.
Addressing the function where Chief Minister MK Stalin felicitated four senior advocates, including Singhvi, who successfully represented the state in the case, the MP said the framers of the Constitution gave powers to the SC through Article 145 to be its custodian and final interpreter and therefore everyone should respect the verdict.
In what appeared as a veiled reference to the criticism of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar against the verdict, Singhvi said before anyone 'shoot their mouth off', they should understand the meticulous approach of the SC bench that delivered the verdict.
He said, at least on two occasions, the bench prepared a list of ancillary questions arising out of the case and made both parties to present detailed submissions on them.
Though the Constitution is largely unitary in conception and design, it is an 'amazing and beautiful paradox' that federalism has now become its basic structure over the last 75 years.
Stalin lauded the efforts of the four advocates and their team for the 'historic' verdict that is a victory for democracy, states' legislatures and their rights.
Rajya Sabha member and one of the four senior advocates P Wilson condemned Dhankar's criticism of the judgment, especially the remarks that Article 142 is a 'nuclear missile' available to the judiciary against democratic forces. Wilson said while one criticises a judgment, the institution should not be belittled.
Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi said those accusing the verdict for being a 'judicial overreach' should look at the 'overreach' of the governor. He said the SC only corrected the overreach of the latter. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi did not not attend the function due to personal reasons.
Veteran journalist N Ram said if Governor Ravi had any self-respect left, he should resign from his post in the aftermath of the SC verdict.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Promotion of state govt staff sets in motion after cabinet nod
Bhopal: As the Madhya Pradesh cabinet paved way for the promotion of govt employees after nine years, the departments will soon start the promotion process based on the cabinet decision. Meanwhile, SAPAKS is preparing to challenge the new promotion rules in court. The govt is also aware of the issue and has directed the departments to expedite the promotion of govt employees, as per the rules cleared in the cabinet meeting. The process will commence soon after the departments receive the notification from the general administration department in this regard. Chief minister Mohan Yadav chaired the cabinet meeting held on Tuesday in the secretariat. The cabinet approved the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Promotion Rules, 2025, ensuring the representation and protection of the interests of the reserved categories. Provisions include a 20% reservation for Scheduled Tribes (ST) and 16% for Scheduled Castes (SC). SC and ST public servants will also have the opportunity for promotion based on merit. SAPAKS, an organisation of general category, OBC, and minority govt employees, president KS Tomar said, "We have no option but to challenge the rules in court." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later! [Video] getfittoday Undo After the cabinet meeting, the govt stated that it has been provided that promotion committees may meet in the current year itself to prepare selection lists for the next year's vacancies, i.e., provisions for advance DPCs (Departmental Promotion Committees) have been included. Due weightage is given to seniority, and among senior officials, those obtaining the minimum qualifying marks will be eligible for promotion. For Class I officers, a merit-cum-seniority principle will apply. The rules aim to encourage efficiency, with clear criteria defining ineligibility for promotion. Circumstances under which an official becomes ineligible and the impact of penalties are clearly outlined. Provisions have been made for holding review DPCs for reconsideration of decisions. The new rules eliminate the system of rotation, which will help create more promotional posts. DPCs are empowered to determine the suitability of candidates, the govt stated. The problem for the general category employees is that SC and ST public servants will also have the opportunity for promotion based on merit, in addition to the 20% reservation for Scheduled Tribes (ST) and 16% for Scheduled Castes (SC). The govt is aware of the grounds on which the promotion rules will be challenged in court, and officials mentioned they have also done their homework. The promotion of the state govt employees has been on hold since 2016. Over a lakh of govt employees have retired while waiting to get promotions.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
BJP govt evicting tribals from their land, denying their rights: Cong
Bhopal: In a joint press conference, LOP Umang Singhar, former Union Minister Arun Yadav, and Congress Working Committee member Kamleshwar Patel stated that tribals in the state are being denied their rights to water, forests, and land by the BJP govt. The Congress functionaries said that, in gross injustice, tribals are being evicted from their land and suppressed with false allegations. The Congress cautioned that if the rights of tribals are not enforced within 15 days, the party will start a mass movement against the BJP govt. Calling the policies of the govt anti-tribal, the three senior leaders said that the BJP has deviated from the issues of development and is now engaging only in the politics of religion. LOP Umang Singhar alleged that the govt is depriving tribals of their traditional rights. "The land leases of thousands of tribal families were cancelled without any prior notice. It is clear from this action of the govt that it wants to snatch the rights of the tribals to water, forest, and land," LOP Singhar said. He also mentioned that in Madhya Pradesh, only five leases were given in Jhabua district so far, which shows that the govt's intention is not to give the tribals their rights but to drive them out of their homes and forests. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The LOP said that tribals talk about water, forest, and land, but the community is being divided into religions. "Tribals worship nature. Our identity is not with religion but with land and forest. The BJP RSS is going from village to village and dividing us because when BJP talks, it talks only about religion," Singhar alleged. "If the govt does not accept the tribals' demands for lease within 15 days, then a fierce movement will be launched. " Umang Singhar claimed that it was 17 years since the Forest Rights Act (2006) came into force, but the BJP govt has not yet given lakhs of tribal families their legal right to ownership of forest land. "More than eight lakh forest rights claims are still pending across the country. This shows that the govt failed miserably in the proper implementation of the Forest Rights Act 2006," Singhar said. He further argued that the Madhya Pradesh govt rejected more than 3 lakh claims out of 6.5 lakh forest rights claims made by tribals till 2024 without citing any clear reason. Quoting the Forest Rights Rules 2007, the LOP said that Rule 12A (6) states that it is mandatory for the govt to give reasons in writing for rejecting a claim. The Forest Rights Rules, 2007; Rule 12A says, "In the event of rejection or modification of a claim, the reasons for the same must be told in writing in the local language to the person concerned." The LOP alleged that due to the abundance of mineral wealth in the forests of Nepanagar, the govt wants to forcibly displace the tribals there, so that the way can be cleared for private companies. "The govt is falsely accusing the tribals of cutting the trees, while the truth is that they are protecting the forests and planting trees there. There are some other elements that are harming the forests, which the govt is ignoring," Singhar argued. Former Union Minister Arun Yadav said that the govt is removing tribals from the Nepanagar forests even though these tribals were engaged in forest protection. He accused that this is a trick of the govt because it wants to serve corporate interests by evicting the tribals from the forests. Giving the Mohan Yadav govt 15 days, the Congress leaders made it clear that if within this period the tribal society members do not get their rights back, then the Congress party will start a mass movement, and the fight for the rights of the tribals will be fought from the streets to the state assembly.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
MP high court issues notices over petition challenging section 12.4 of school teachers recruitment rules 2024
Bhopal/Jabalpur: The MP high court issued notices to the state govt and other respondents in response to a petition challenging the legality of Section 12.4 of the Primary and Middle School Teachers' Recruitment Rules-2024. Appearing for the petitioner, Dinesh Garg, Advocate Aryan Urmalia said that Section 12.4 is not only against the MP Teachers' Recruitment Rules-2018 but is also in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, which guarantee equality and equal opportunities to all citizens. The rule stipulates that a candidate from any of the reserved classes, on securing less than 90 marks in the eligibility test, will only be eligible to appear in the teachers' recruitment test from his reserved category and not as a general candidate. This is against the Supreme Court guidelines, which clearly state that any candidate from a reserved category would be eligible for selection from the general category if he scores marks at par with the marks of meritorious candidates from the general category. This rule doesn't allow candidates from EWS, OBC, SC, and ST sections to be selected as general candidates despite scoring higher marks than the cut-off marks of the general candidates. Following initial arguments, the court of Justice Vivek Jain issued notices to respondents, including the state govt, seeking a response.
