MP high court issues notices over petition challenging section 12.4 of school teachers recruitment rules 2024
Bhopal/Jabalpur: The MP high court issued notices to the state govt and other respondents in response to a petition challenging the legality of Section 12.4 of the Primary and Middle School Teachers' Recruitment Rules-2024.
Appearing for the petitioner, Dinesh Garg, Advocate Aryan Urmalia said that Section 12.4 is not only against the MP Teachers' Recruitment Rules-2018 but is also in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, which guarantee equality and equal opportunities to all citizens. The rule stipulates that a candidate from any of the reserved classes, on securing less than 90 marks in the eligibility test, will only be eligible to appear in the teachers' recruitment test from his reserved category and not as a general candidate.
This is against the Supreme Court guidelines, which clearly state that any candidate from a reserved category would be eligible for selection from the general category if he scores marks at par with the marks of meritorious candidates from the general category.
This rule doesn't allow candidates from EWS, OBC, SC, and ST sections to be selected as general candidates despite scoring higher marks than the cut-off marks of the general candidates. Following initial arguments, the court of Justice Vivek Jain issued notices to respondents, including the state govt, seeking a response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Days after interim stay, contempt plea in HC over ‘OBC list' in college portal
The Calcutta High Court on Thursday allowed a contempt petition to be filed against the West Bengal government for allegedly violating the stay on the interim Other Backward Classes (OBC) list in undergraduate college admissions in the state. Petitioner Purabi Das approached the Division Bench of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Ritobrata Kumar Mitra, alleging that despite the High Court's interim stay on the new OBC list, the state-run college admission portal continues to display reservation under the OBC-A and OBC-B categories. 'We stated that in the recent college admissions portal, the Tuesday's order of the High Court is not being followed. Thus, it is a contempt of court. We have made the chief secretary and secretary, Education Department, a party in the matter,' counsel Bikram Banerjee said. On Wednesday, the college admission process for undergraduates began through the government's centralised portal for over nine lakh seats across 7,229 undergraduate courses in 460 state and state-aided colleges. A day earlier, at the launch of the portal, State Education Minister Bratya Basu had said the interim stay on the new OBC list would not affect the admission process. 'Should agricultural work stop because of predictions of drought or heavy rain? We will continue our work. If there is any instruction, we will take emergency measures,' the minister had said. On Tuesday, the Division bench of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Rajasekhar Mantha, while putting a stay on reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories till July 31, had said that OBC certificates issued before 2010 under the 1993 law would remain valid for employment and education.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC put stop to 'bulldozer justice': Executive can't be judge, jury, says CJI
CJI BR Gavi NEW DELHI: Highlighting Supreme Court's contribution in the last 75 years to accelerate political, economic and social justice to the poor and marginalised, CJI B R Gavai on Thursday told an assembly of top judges of Italy how the top court recently banned "bulldozer justice" and prevented the executive from becoming the judge, jury and executioner. Gavai was referring to SC's judgment last year barring the executive from arbitrary demolition of houses of those accused of crime, bypassing the legal process, which violated citizens' fundamental right to shelter under Article 21. CJI B R Gavai was speaking at the Milan Court of Appeal on 'Role of Constitution in Delivering Socio-Economic Justice in a Country: Reflections from 75 Years of Indian Constitution". "The executive cannot become judge, jury and executioner all at once," the CJI said and quoted the judgment, which stated, "Construction of a house has an aspect of socio-economic rights." "For an average citizen, construction of a house is often the culmination of years of hard work, dreams and aspirations. A house is not just a property but embodies the collective hopes of a family or individuals for stability, security and a future," the CJI further added. "As we look back on these 75 years, there is no doubt that the Indian Constitution has strived for change in the life of the common people. To summarise, several aspects of Directive Principles were made enforceable by reading or legislating them as a facet of fundamental rights," CJI Gavai said. "While Parliament took the lead by way of legislation and constitutional amendments, Supreme Court has consistently worked to transform socio-economic rights, ranging from education to livelihood, into enforceable fundamental rights, which were then given effect by Parliament," he added. The CJI added that the Constitution's journey in the past 75 years in delivering socio-economic justice "is a story of great ambition and important successes... the earliest initiatives undertaken by the Indian Parliament immediately after the adoption of the Constitution included land and agrarian reform laws and affirmative action policies for backward classes. The impact of these initiatives is clearly visible today". CJI Gavai, the second Dalit to become the head of India's judiciary, said, "Affirmative action policies in education, which sought to correct historical injustices and ensure representation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and socially and educationally backward classes, have been a concrete expression of the Constitution's commitment to substantive equality and socio-economic justice." Because of these measures, he could become CJI, Gavai said, adding that he was a product of the very constitutional ideals that sought to democratise opportunity and dismantle the barriers of caste and exclusion.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India's Constitution Has Delivered On Socio-Economic Justice In 75 Years, Says CJI Gavai in Italy Address
1 2 3 4 Nagpur: Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan Gavai on Wednesday underscored the Constitution's transformative role in delivering socio-economic justice in India over the past 75 years, stating it continues to serve as a living document that empowers the marginalised and upholds equality. Addressing legal professionals in Italy on the invitation of Chamber of International Lawyers, he delivered a keynote on "Role of the Constitution in Delivering Socio-Economic Justice". The framers of the Constitution were deeply conscious of the imperative of socio-economic justice, Justice Gavai said, noting how the document emerged from the struggle for independence with a vision to correct centuries of entrenched inequality. He emphasised that socio-economic justice was not just aspirational, but was pursued through constitutional mechanisms like the Directive Principles of State Policy, affirmative action, and judicial interpretation of rights. Justice Gavai, who hails from Vidarbha, pointed to the First Constitutional Amendment of 1951 as a foundational moment when Parliament protected land reform laws and enabled reservations for Scheduled Castes and Tribes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top Internet Deals for Your Home – 2025 Edition Search7 Learn More Undo "This amendment was a direct legislative response to ensure social justice and equitable distribution of opportunities," he said. The CJI credited Supreme Court for expanding the reach of socio-economic rights through progressive interpretations of Article 21, which guarantees the right to life. "The Constitution has shown that law can be a tool for social change, a force for empowerment, and a protector of the vulnerable," he stated, citing landmark rulings such as Kesavananda Bharati, which enshrined the 'basic structure' doctrine to shield fundamental constitutional values. Reflecting on India's early legislative interventions, he mentioned land and agrarian reform laws and affirmative action policies as tangible expressions of the Constitution's commitment to dismantling caste hierarchies and redistributing opportunity. "For countless landless and marginalised individuals, especially from oppressed castes and communities, these reforms represented the first real opportunity to secure economic independence and dignity," he added. Justice Gavai offered a personal reflection on the Constitution's democratising force, stating, "I have often said, and I reiterate here today, that it is because of this constitutional vision of inclusion and transformation that I am standing before you as the CJI. Coming from a historically marginalised background, I am a product of the very constitutional ideals that sought to dismantle barriers of caste and exclusion. " In the education sector, reservation policies for SCs, STs, and socially and educationally backward classes were highlighted as powerful tools for achieving substantive equality. He said such measures enabled generations from disadvantaged backgrounds to access professional and academic opportunities that were previously out of reach. Concluding his speech, he invoked Martin Luther King Junior, saying the Constitution provided both "the vision and moral guidance" to continue bending the arc of the moral universe toward justice. "It enabled us to create an inclusive democracy where law is not merely a command but a means to achieve dignity, equality, and justice for all," he affirmed. # Key takeaways from CJI Gavai's speech in Italy Indian Constitution is a transformative tool for socio-economic justice Directive Principles and early amendments protected land reforms & reservations Landmark rulings expanded socio-economic rights under Article 21 Land & agrarian reforms dismantled caste hierarchies, enabled economic dignity Affirmative action in education created access for marginalised communities Judiciary & Parliament work in tandem to enforce justice Constitution is a moral and legal force for empowerment Reiterated Constitution's success over 75 years of Indian democracy
