
Letters to The Editor — May 9, 2025
India's operation
In India's Operation Sindoor, countless personnel and professionals have played their part: from intelligence analysts who have tracked targets for weeks, to drone pilots who have operated their missions under extreme stress, to the naval forces who maintained strategic positions off the coast, ready for escalation if necessary, to, finally, the Army and the Air Force too.
To Pakistan, the message has been made clear: India's threshold for tolerance has shifted. Inaction is no longer the default. And to the world, this has been a reminder that India, when pushed, moves with calculated force, not chaos. It is not a celebration of war, but a celebration of deterrence — the kind born not from provocation, but preparation.
This is an operation that will go down in history as a mission carried out with iron resolve. To every armed forces personnel, this is your moment. And the nation thanks you.
K.J. Haroon Basha,
Vaniyambadi, Tamil Nadu
India has struck at terror bases inside Pakistan, but a real question that needs to be asked is whether India has really succeeded in hunting down those responsible for the Pahalgam attack. The operations so far have achieved their purpose — decimating certain terror camps that were detrimental to peace in Kashmir and India.
Prabhu Raj R.,
Bengaluru
The first step to minimise escalation is for both sides to avoid playing to the gallery or taking a position for political one-upmanship. Operation Sindoor has achieved its limited objectives from the Indian point of view. It is for Pakistan to accept that terror attacks emanate from its soil.
Wiser counsel should prevail upon India's neighbour. Pakistan needs to reflect upon what the Mahatma said: 'An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind.'
A.V. Narayanan,
Chennai
As expected, India's mobilisation of countermeasures following the massacre in Pahalgam has culminated in strong military action. This must serve as a lesson to Pakistan against nurturing terrorist elements on its soil, despite global pressure to take credible action against the UN-designated terrorists roaming free in that country. Pakistan's sympathisers would do well to educate that country about the new global situation and advise it to behave. Ratcheting up the rhetoric of war will not help anyone, and definitely not Pakistan which is facing economic distress and insurgency in some parts.
Gregory Fernandes,
Mumbai
Operation Sindoor not only signals a new chapter in India's counter-terrorism doctrine but also marks a strategic shift in India's military response to terrorism, combining surgical precision, multi-service coordination and symbolic messaging. This is diplomatic and tactful action taken by India to expose Pakistan's status as a rogue nation which actively promotes and patronises terrorism worldwide. India's assertive retribution to the Pahalgam attack is only a first salvo of a seemingly long-drawn-out battle.
R. Sivakumar,
Chennai
It is time for Pakistan to cease its support for terrorism and understand that further aggression will lead to punishment. A strong message must be conveyed: India's patience is not weakness. We will take all measures to ensure our national security.
Lawrence Vadukut,
Thrissur, Kerala

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
IPL Final: Royal Challengers Bengaluru win battle of the reds, clinch maiden title
Royal Challengers Bengaluru finally broke their longstanding drought and clinched their maiden Indian Premier League trophy by defeating Punjab Kings by 6 runs in the final at Ahmedabad on Tuesday. Punjab Kings got off to a steady start with Prabhsimran Singh and Priyansh Arya looking in good touch. But Phil Salt pulled out a blinder to send back Arya while Krunal Pandya bowled a tight spell snapping up Prabhsimran and Josh Inglis. Captain Iyer suffered a rare failure when he was out for 1 as Romario Shepherd accounted for him. Shashank Singh tried with all his might but PBKS ultimately fell short of the mark as their wait for their first title continued. Earlier, Punjab Kings bowlers did more than a decent job to restrict Royal Challengers Bengaluru to a below par 190 for 9 in the IPL final. For RCB, Virat Kohli top-scored with 43 off 35 balls while skipper Rajat Patidar couldn't build on a good start managing 26 off 16 balls. For Punjab Kings, Yuzvendra Chahal was brilliant with figures of 1/37 in 4 overs while Kyle Jamieson had the figures of 3 for 48. The prize wicket of Kohli was taken by Afghanistan all-rounder Azmatullah Omarzai (1/35). However, the best figures were of India's premier T20 bowler Arshdeep Singh (3/40), who got three wickets in the final over. In the closing ceremony before the match, 'Sabse aage honge Hindustani' and 'Dushman ke chhakke chhudaa de, hum India wale' were among the songs performed as national fervour was the central theme. 'Honouring the Indian armed forces', 'Salute to the armed forces' and 'Thank you armed forces' were the message displayed across the digital boards used for advertising and sharing match-related information near the boundary as well as on the first tier of the world's largest stadium here. Bollywood playback singer Shankar Mahadevan along with his sons Siddharth and Shivam enthralled the near capacity crowd. The songs from war-themed movie Lakshya titled 'Kandhon se milte hai kandhe' and 'Lakshya', 'Ae watan mere aabad rahe tu', 'Vande Mataram' (AR Rahman composed) were among the songs performed with 'sabse aage honge Hindustani' being the final one. The ceremony took place before the summit clash of the 18th edition of world's biggest T20 tournament between Royal Challengers Bengaluru and Punjab Kings. The players trained in the background with RCB being the first team to take the field for their warm-ups followed by their rivals PBKS soon after. The tournament was suspended for 10 days last month when the country's armed forces were executing Operation Sindoor — a military operation in response to Pakistan backed terrorists killing 26 Indian citizens in Kashmir' Pahalgam. (With agency inputs)


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Entrepreneur finds alternative to make areca plates safer after US ban
Mangaluru: Entrepreneur and researcher Nivedan Nempe has developed an innovative, eco-friendly alternative following the recent US ban on arecanut leaf sheath dinnerware. His intervention comes at a crucial time, as areca growers and industry experts from Karnataka's areca belt have appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to seek the lifting of the restriction. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an import alert banning dinnerware made from areca catechu sheaths, citing the presence of naturally occurring toxins that may migrate into food at unsafe levels. The FDA's concerns significantly impacted India's $400-500 million areca plate industry, with nearly 80–85% of exports directed to the US. Most manufacturers are concentrated in Dakshina Kannada and Shivamogga, and the ban threatens the livelihoods of many families. Nivedan, founder of Areca Tea and operating in Udupi and Shivamogga, acknowledged the FDA's concerns and told TOI: "As a preventive step, the FDA banned imports. But this severely affects Indian manufacturers. The Indian industry made efforts, including writing to the FDA, but the industry is at risk." In response, Nempe engineered a food-grade, anti-microbial paper lining that acts as a barrier between the food and the areca plate, preventing toxin migration and fungal growth. "The material is certified, heat-resistant up to 300°C, durable, printable, and gives a premium finish. It meets international safety standards without altering the existing production process," he said. While the innovation may increase production costs by 10–15%, Nivedan believes that it is the best way forward. "Our lab results were positive on all parameters. It even looks better than bagasse plates. My goal is to safeguard the industry and support the farmers by supplying this new food-grade paper."


The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
MPs delegation seeks to sensitise U.K. lawmakers to Pak-sponsored terror attacks on India
On the last day of their visit to the U.K., the all-party delegation of parliamentarians from India, led by Rajya Sabha MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, met Speaker of the House of Commons, Lindsay Hoyle, in an attempt to sensitize lawmakers to India's experience of cross-border terror from Pakistan, including the April 22 Pahalgam attack and its response via Operation Sindoor. Over the last three days, the delegation had met with civil society, think tank and diaspora members, in addition to junior ministers. Members of the multi-party delegation, comprised of male and female MPs from different religions, regions and parties, said that those they had met in Britain were receptive to India's concerns and sympathetic its situation. However, tangible policy shifts appeared to be elusive for now, with the delegation aiming to shift opinion and not expected to directly impact policy. Several members of the delegation suggested that those conversations would and do occur at the bureaucratic or ministerial level. At a media briefing at the Indian High Commission in London, on Tuedsay (June 3, 2025), Mr Prasad outlined the history of conflict between India and Pakistan and India's economic prospects, contrasting these with Pakistan's trajectory. He listed some of the terrorists Pakistan had harboured including Osama bin Laden (who was killed by U.S. forces in 2011). Speaking to journalists, Mr Prasad said the killer of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl had been killed in India's Operation Sindoor strikes. 'The world needs to speak with one voice' and Pakistan should be made to pay for sponsoring terrorism, Mr Prasad said, adding that getting to this outcome was the purpose of the visit. He suggested that funding from Pakistan (such as from the International Monetary Fund or IMF) was going towards weapons purchases rather than poverty alleviation. 'We are invoking the human spirit of all democratic countries and we trust in that spirit of human rights, civilized conduct…' , said Mr Prasad , in response to a question from The Hindu on whether U.K. lawmakers had committed to policy responses and whether India had used any leverage to elicit a change in response. 'Remember, we are parliamentarians…', Mr Prasad said, adding that there were other exchanges between the prime ministers and foreign ministers of India and the U.K. The delegation's interlocutors on the British side were familiarized with Pakistan's terror infrastructure 'where the distinction between the military leadership and the terror network is no more in existence', according to Mr Prasad. Asked about U.S. President Donald Trump's claim that he had helped to end the round of hostilities between India and Pakistan, and that trade deals were involved, Mr Prasad demurred. ' I don't wish to join issue with him, except to reiterate that Vice President [ J.D.] Vance also talked to our Prime Minister, the [ U.S.] Secretary of State talked to our foreign minister. It was conveyed [ that] it is a bilateral issue. Pakistan must stop,' he said. The majority of World Bank and IMF assistance to Pakistan goes to China for the purchase of weapons, Mr Prasad said, adding that India was engaged in a dialogue with China to explain that weapons sold to Pakistan were being used for terrorism, not conventional war. Mr Prasad expressed confidence that China would understand that its investments and projects in Pakistan were getting disturbed because of extremism and radicalisation. The legislators on both sides had a 'good freewheeling conversation', said Pankaj Saran, who was part of the delegation and formerly Deputy National Security Advisor and Ambassador to Russia. The conversation had a ' single point agenda of Pahalgam and the Indian response' Mr Saran said. During their conversations, they did not hear attempts to link the Kashmir issue to terrorism, as per Mr Saran. 'No one sat us down and said, 'Listen, you know, you have some problems. Please solve them if you want to address terrorism'', he said, adding, ' It's a big change.' However, some experts feel that the timing may be challenging for a global consensus on Pakistan's relationship to terrorism. 'The reality is that for the US, for the UK, for France and for Germany, this is not the global priority. They have other things to think about … Russia, Ukraine, Middle East, Gaza, Africa , China,' said Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, who heads the South and Central Asian Defence, Strategy and Diplomacy program at IISS, a think-tank. While terrorism and radicalisation are important areas for the U.K., Mr Choudhury says they are not the top few security concerns right now. There is also the risk of 're-hyphenating with Pakistan' , as per Mr Choudhury, and while other countries may lend India a sympathetic ear, they could also say, 'It's your [ India's] fight.' The group met the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG India) on Tuesday afternoon. 'The Co-Chairs Lord [ Karan ] Bilimoria and Jeevun Sandher expressed unequivocal condemnation of terrorist attack on behalf of APPG India and expressed solidarity with India,' said delegate and Shiv Sena Rajya Sabha MP Priyanka Chaturvedi. The group departed for Brussels on Monday afternoon for discussions with the European Union institutions.