Cleverly: Starmer more interested in housing asylum seekers than hard workers
He said he was 'furious' when the Prime Minister 'blithely' said there are 'plenty of houses' around the UK for asylum seekers.
Sir Keir Starmer insisted there is 'lots of housing available' to accommodate both rising numbers of homeless people and asylum seekers when he was questioned by the Liaison Committee earlier this week.
Sir James told Times Radio: 'I was furious, I genuinely couldn't believe he said this, when the prime minister was at the Liaison Committee and blithely said, 'Oh there are plenty of houses around the UK for asylum seekers'.
'When there are people telling us and telling him that they're struggling to get on the housing ladder and he dismisses their concerns in one line and once again demonstrates he is more interested in finding accommodation for asylum seekers than for hard-working young people here in the UK and that is toxic.'
He said he understands the frustrations of local people when asked about demonstrations outside hotels believed to be housing asylum seekers.
There has been a series of protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, since an asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault.
'I understand the desire to protest,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
'There is never any excuse for rioting and we are seeing that agitators, both on the left and the right, are descending upon these communities to try and stir things up and there's never an excuse for that, but I do understand why local people are frustrated.'
His new role makes him the opposition counterpart to Angela Rayner in her housing, communities and local government brief, but not in her deputy prime minister post.
Ms Rayner said on Tuesday that immigration was among issues having a 'profound impact on society' as she updated Cabinet on her work on social cohesion.
Sir James said that she 'makes a very good point' but that it 'rings a bit hollow when she was one of the people that took the knee during the BLM (Black Lives Matter) protest'.
She and Labour have 'spent so much time seeming to be on the side of the people who don't play by the rules, who jump the queue, who abuse the system,' he said.
'And now that they're in government, she is saying, 'Oh, well, I think you know, society is fracturing', seemingly blind to the role the Labour Party have played in driving wedges between communities.'
He was also asked for his view on leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) after Conservative Party leader Mrs Badenoch launched a review to examine the issue and said she was 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw.
Sir James would not say whether he was also 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should leave the international human rights treaty.
It would 'not necessarily be a silver bullet' to leave the ECHR, he told the BBC, but said that if the review leads to it becoming party policy he would abide by that.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Trump's crypto push: Britain is right to say no to digital currency politics
Hype too often influences policymakers when it comes to regulating markets. So it was reassuring to hear Sir Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England, resist the momentum behind cryptocurrencies. In his July Mansion House speech, he reiterated his scepticism over the need for a 'Britcoin' central bank digital currency or a UK stablecoin, with tokens issued by finance houses and backed by their sterling reserves. As Donald Trump signs stablecoins into US law and rebrands private dollars with political colours, Sir Andrew's caution isn't just prudent, it's essential. The governor's view is that UK banks should not be allowed to issue their own stablecoins. Nor should the Bank effectively run Britcoin bank accounts without clear public benefit. These are not the views of a luddite, but of a regulator worried, correctly, about creating a new class of imprudent assets. The key question is not whether new technologies can be adopted in finance, but whether they should be – especially when the consequences of failure could affect the wider economy. George Osborne, the former Tory chancellor who advises a large cryptocurrency exchange, argued that Mr Trump's embrace of stablecoins, which are privately issued digital money, means Britain must sign up to remain relevant. The former Labour cabinet minister Ed Balls considered this naive, given recent history. He was right. Stablecoins are not, despite the branding, stable. These private digital tokens purport to be backed one for one by real money, often US dollars. But the peg is only as trustworthy as the institution making the promise. When a commercial bank issues a stablecoin, it is effectively minting its own currency – without, as the Bank for International Settlements noted, the backing, oversight or 'lender of last resort' guarantees of a central bank. This creates a parallel financial market, one prone to runs, crashes and contagion – just as happened in 19th-century America's free banking era, when half the new banks collapsed, many unable to honour the notes they had issued. Yet Mr Trump is pressing ahead by letting banks and even non-banks issue dollar-pegged crypto assets. He is also leveraging the power of his office for personal gain in plain sight. One of the Trump family's cryptocurrencies is conservatively estimated to have pulled in at least $320m since January, while another received a $2bn investment from a foreign government wealth fund. A third has sold at least $550m in tokens. Steven Levitsky of Harvard University spoke for many when he told the Guardian this summer that he had 'never seen such open corruption in any modern government anywhere'. Cyber-libertarians view cryptocurrencies as a tool to evade state control, regulation and taxation, aligning with radical rightwing ideas about government as a problem. This seems to be the view of Paul Marshall, the UK hedge fund tycoon and media baron, who sees a Manichean world of central bank fiat versus free-market cash. Such ideological takes don't help with stable capital markets or effective consumer protection. Britain's financial sector should be smaller for the country's long-term health, but it must still remain competitive – on regulatory terms that preserve stability, not simply to keep pace with Trump-era financial populism or petro-state opportunism. Crypto is a gamble not just on technology, but on the very meaning of money and who gets to control it.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Labour are engulfed in major online safety furore
It worked for rapper Kendrick Lamar; why not Technology Secretary Peter Kyle? Kyle delivered a quite extraordinary, spittle-flecked response to critics of the Online Safety Act on Tuesday morning. Nigel Farage is on the same side as paedophiles, Kyle spat. Not just any paedos either, the minister said that Farage would be on the same side as Jimmy Savile, were he still alive. Going even further later on, he said that anyone wanting to overturn the controversial legislation is 'on the side of predators'. That includes more than 400,000 people who have signed a petition calling for the Act to be repealed and could expand to organisations like Liberty, Big Brother Watch, Index on Censorship and the parent companies of Facebook and Wikipedia. Even Ian Russell, the chair of the Molly Russell Foundation, a child protection charity, said that the Act was not up to snuff and had to be replaced by something even tougher. Who knew paedophiles had so many allies? Quite why Labour are defending a Tory piece of legislation – the Act was passed by the Conservatives but is only coming into force now – is a question with a couple of answers. The first is a political one. 'Protect our children' has become a potent rallying cry for the right, identifying bogeymen in everyone from asylum seekers to drag queens. This is Labour's counterblast: You're putting children at risk. If you're against us, you're on the same side as child abusers. READ MORE: Labour respond as 400k demand repeal of Online Safety Act As a strategy it could work. Many parents will doubtless be glad to see the Government come down hard on the worst bits of the internet. It will certainly be welcomed by many that unregulated social media companies will be held responsible for removing content like child pornography and blocking children's access to sexual content or instructions for committing acts of self-harm or suicide. There is unlikely to be great amounts of sympathy for arguments about the sanctity of end-to-end encryption or free online speech. The flipside: are Reform UK railing against the Act – which this week enforced age restrictions on adult content – as a means to target the porn-addicted, misanthropic young men likely to make up its youth base at the next election? Quite possibly. (Image: James Manning/PA) The other reason that Kyle and his Labour comrades so aggressively back the Act is that they genuinely believe in it. They do not care about warnings that by introducing strict age checks, people might be pushed into downloading software to evade restrictions and access the darker corners of the internet. Demand for virtual private networks, which allow people to browse the web away from the prying eyes of regulators, is soaring. Kyle, as a rational being, must consider it plausible that the Act could have unintended consequences, though he shows no signs that he does. He seems to believe that the intention of legislation is its effect. He appears to care only about why laws were introduced, not how they work. Keir Starmer's response to criticism of the Act earlier this week took a similar approach: 'I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.' It surely cannot be beyond him that the two are not mutually exclusive. So it was with the SNP's doomed Named Person Scheme. Ministers were warned in 2016 that while the aim of the policy was 'unquestionably legitimate', it would violate people's human rights. It took another three years before it was officially ditched by the Scottish Government. With Donald Trump's sidekick JD Vance threatening consequences for governments insufficiently amenable to his definition of free speech, perhaps Starmer and co might catch up with the laws of unintended consequences sooner rather than later.
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Tributes paid to former Edinburgh Conservative group leader Christine Richard
Tributes have been paid to former Edinburgh Tory group leader Christine Richard, who has died, aged 82. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Mrs Richard was a colourful and outspoken figure at the City Chambers, a councillor for 12 years and group leader for four of these. Former Tory councillor Lindsay Walls said: "She was a very efficient woman, a good debater in the council chamber, very bubbly and had good connections - she knew a lot of people." Former councillor Christine Richard has died, aged 82 | supplied Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mrs Richard was first elected councillor for Murrayfield in 1984 and served as leader of the Tory group from 1989 until 1993. In 1992 she received an OBE for public service. And she stood unsuccessfully in the first elections for the Scottish Parliament as Tory candidate in East Lothian in 1999. But she later quit the party and joined Labour. She died peacefully on July 10. Her daughter Fiona Fahey was her carer for the last five years. Mrs Richard was born in Yorkshire to a Swiss father and an English mother. She went to Ilkley Grammar School, but instead of going on to university had to get a job and help look after the family after her father died. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She married her first husband, Len, a company chief executive, when she was 21. He was 17 years older and had three sons from his previous marriage. Fiona said: "She took on my dad's three children and then had me, so by 22, she was running a house, working, and had four children." The family moved around quite a bit and came to Edinburgh around 1970, when Len was appointed to printers Morrison & Gibb. Christine Richard with fellow Conservative Malcolm Rifkind on Calton Hill Edinburgh in May 1992. | TSPL Fiona said her mother was always quick to get involved in new situations. 'She very much plunged herself into whatever community she ended up in.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But a few years later the marriage broke up and she married stockbroker John Richard, who had four children, one of them now the Duchess of Northumberland. Mrs Richard was already active in the Conservative Party, as well as working. She held several posts as personal assistant, including to merchant banker Angus Grossart. And later she taught business skills and mentored women who were setting up their own businesses. Her election to Edinburgh District Council came just as Labour won control of the authority from the Conservatives, so she was in opposition all of her time on the council. But she played an energetic part in city politics, including enthusiastic support for the reopening of the former Empire Theatre as the Festival Theatre. Christine Richard was Tory group leader in Edinburgh from 1989 until 1993. Picture: Justin Spittle. | TSPL In 1992, she admitted making nuisance phone calls to her husband's ex-wife and was admonished by the court. An attempt to oust her as group leader failed, but she stood down from the post the following year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She left the Tories and joined Labour in 2002, when Tony Blair was prime minister. Fiona recalled: "She said she stayed in the same place but the parties moved.' She did not seek re-election under her new colours, but she did act as agent for the late Labour councillor Liz Maginnis at the 2007 council elections. And Fiona said another friend was the late Margo MacDonald. 'They had great fun together. They would always pretend to be the worst enemies, but they were the best of friends.' Mrs Richard owned a racehorse, Tre Bonkers, which Fionas said 'won a few trophies'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And after she left the council, she wrote a novel 'Whitewalls' - described as 'a Scottish family saga' - which was published in 2009. Fiona said her mother remained active, out and about, attending events and going to the ballet up until Covid, but after that 'never got back out on the road properly' though she remained 'very witty and chirpy and funny'. 'She did a lot of good, she was quite fearless, she lived her life to the full and she was a very kind, very generous woman. She was passionate about what she did and a real grafter. She was a real character, brimming with stories and very much loved.' The funeral will be at Warriston crematorium on Tuesday, August 5, at 2pm. And an event is planned for the Festival Theatre later in the year to celebrate her life.
