Hospital among first to trial new electric bike
The quadracycle eCargo bike is being tested by the porter team at Castle Hill Hospital in Cottingham in partnership with East Riding of Yorkshire Council.
It will be in use for a trial period of 12 months, carrying linen, gas cylinders, and other medical equipment and essentials across the site.
If successful, the bike, which must be pedalled to gain assistance from the electric motor, will replace a van as part of a drive to reduce carbon emissions and operational costs.
The project was funded by Active Travel England's Capability Fund.
Marc Beaumont, head of sustainability at Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, said: "The eCargo bike is a fantastic addition to our fleet and will help to contribute to our net zero ambitions.
"With its own solar field, Castle Hill is already leading the way when it comes to hospital sustainability, and we hope to use the electricity we generate ourselves to recharge the new eCargo bike batteries."
Andrew Bradley, sustainable travel lead, net zero travel and transport for NHS England, said: "We hope this project will be the first of many, showcasing what is possible."
Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
New technology to help in brain tumour surgery
Hospital waste creates new homes for wildlife
Coastal town gets 'game-changing' ambulance e-bike
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Plans for new hospital in city to meet high demand
Plans have been submitted by a developer to build a new city hospital for day patients to tackle a "continued increase" in waiting times. Thorpe Wood Hospital in Peterborough would be part of the private hospital group, Ramsay Health Care UK, which already runs the Fitzwilliam Hospital in the city. In a report submitted to Peterborough City Council, developers ELG said the project would help to manage "excessive demand in the local health system". It said the Fitzwilliam had already "reached capacity", adding: "Essential expansion is urgently required for day case and community diagnostics." It said: "This investment is seen as being important and intrinsic to reducing the continued increase in patient waiting times and deferred treatment and diagnostic services in the community." There would be on-site magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facilities and computed tomography (CT) scanners for early diagnostic and surgical intervention. This would allow the Fitzwilliam to have more bed capacity for procedures such as complex surgeries. The new facility would be dedicated to several different areas including general surgery, ophthalmology, urology and gynaecology. The report said there was a "huge task" of clearing a backlog of NHS patients waiting for treatment, which has led to private hospitals taking on the care of some NHS patients. It is estimated 142 members of staff would work at the hospital, caring for patients coming via the private sector as well as the NHS. The single-storey hospital building is planned for a business park on the western edge of Peterborough. The plans have yet to be considered by Peterborough City Council. Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Plan to convert church hall into homes submitted Safety measures to be introduced at busy junction Former reptile pet shop to become pizza takeaway Peterborough City Council Planning Register
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The NHS ten-year health plan is missing a crucial ingredient: nature
The UK government has finally unveiled its much anticipated ten-year Plan for improving England's health. It contains a long overdue focus on prevention, after years of sidestepping by previous administrations. The plan rightly recognises that preventing illness before it begins is the most effective way to improve people's wellbeing. It should have the added benefit of reducing strain on the NHS and easing the nation's financial burden. Mental health, too, is given the attention it deserves. Recognised as integral to our overall health, its inclusion couldn't be more timely. A 2023 international study found that one in two people will experience a mental health condition in their lifetime — a much higher figure than previously estimated. But one striking omission threatens to undermine the plan's success: nature. Evidence tells us that it's one of the most powerful means of supporting physical and mental health. And yet is not mentioned once in the plan's 168 pages. If this plan is about prevention, then nature should be central to it. The science is unequivocal: contact with the natural world supports human health in wide ranging and profound ways. It lowers stress, improves mood, and alleviates symptoms of anxiety. For children, time in nature can even aid brain development. Nature helps reduce exposure to air pollution, moderates urban heat, and fosters physical activity and social connection. It can also reduce feelings of loneliness, improve the diversity of our gut microbiota – by exposing us to a wider range of environmental microbes that help train and balance the immune system – and support the immune system by reducing inflammation. All of these play a vital role in protecting against chronic disease. Read more: Then there are the intangible yet no less important benefits. Nature provides a sense of awe and wonder – feelings that help us gain perspective, boost emotional resilience and find deeper meaning in everyday life. Our own research, conducted in collaboration with Nick Bridge, UK special representative for climate change 2017-2023, and Michael Smythe, artist, activist and researcher and supported by a growing body of evidence, shows that even small, everyday moments in nature, watching birds from your window, for example, or pausing under a blooming tree on your way to the shop, can significantly boost mental wellbeing. Consider this: a Danish study found that growing up near green spaces during the first ten years of life reduces the risk of developing mental health problems in adulthood by a staggering 55%. A UK study similarly showed that people living in greener neighbourhoods were 16% less likely to experience depression and 14% less likely to develop anxiety. And as heatwaves become more frequent and intense – with soaring illness and mortality rates – the cooling effects of trees and parks will become more vital than ever for protecting our health. But it's not just access to green space that matters – it's also the quality of that space. Green areas rich in biodiversity, with a wide variety of plant life, birds, insects and fungi, provide much greater health benefits than sparse or manicured lawns. Biodiversity builds resilience not just in ecosystems, but in our bodies and minds. A recent study in The Lancet Planetary Health found that people living in areas with greater bird diversity were significantly less likely to experience depression and anxiety, even after accounting for socioeconomic and demographic factors. This research underlines a simple but urgent truth: we cannot talk about human health without talking about biodiversity. Read more: To deliver true prevention and resilience, we need a joined-up approach across government: one that aligns health policy with environmental protection, housing, urban design, education and transport. This means rethinking how we plan and build our communities: what kind of housing we develop, how we move around, what we grow and eat and how we live in relationship with the ecosystems that support us. There are many ways this vision can be put into action. The Neighbourhood Health Service outlined in the ten-year plan could be tied directly to local, community-led efforts such as Southwark's Right to Grow campaign, which gives residents the right to cultivate unused land. This kind of initiative improves access to fresh food, promotes physical activity, strengthens community bonds and increases green cover – all of which support long-term health. School curricula could be revised to give children the opportunity to learn not just about nature, but also in nature – developing ecological literacy, emotional resilience and healthier habits for life. Health professionals could be trained to understand and promote the value of time outdoors for managing chronic conditions and supporting recovery. Green social prescribing – already gaining ground across the UK – should be fully integrated into standard care, with robust resourcing and cross-sector support. Scotland's Green Health Partnerships show what's possible. These initiatives bring together sectors including health, environment, education, sport and transport to promote nature-based health solutions – from outdoor learning and physical activity in parks, to conservation volunteering and nature therapy. They don't just improve health; they strengthen communities, build climate resilience and create cost-effective, scaleable solutions for prevention. The ten-year plan is a once-in-a-generation opportunity. It could help remove departmental silos and unify national goals across health, climate, inequality and economic recovery, while saving billions in the process. But in its current form, it misses a crucial ingredient. By failing to recognise the centrality of nature in our health, the government overlooks one of the simplest and most effective ways to build resilience – both human and ecological. Surely it is not beyond a nation of nature lovers to put nature at the heart of our future health? This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Andrea Mechelli receives funding from Wellcome Trust. Giulia Vivaldi, Michael Smythe, and Nick Bridge do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The NHS ten-year health plan is missing a crucial ingredient: nature
The UK government has finally unveiled its much anticipated ten-year Plan for improving England's health. It contains a long overdue focus on prevention, after years of sidestepping by previous administrations. The plan rightly recognises that preventing illness before it begins is the most effective way to improve people's wellbeing. It should have the added benefit of reducing strain on the NHS and easing the nation's financial burden. Mental health, too, is given the attention it deserves. Recognised as integral to our overall health, its inclusion couldn't be more timely. A 2023 international study found that one in two people will experience a mental health condition in their lifetime — a much higher figure than previously estimated. But one striking omission threatens to undermine the plan's success: nature. Evidence tells us that it's one of the most powerful means of supporting physical and mental health. And yet is not mentioned once in the plan's 168 pages. If this plan is about prevention, then nature should be central to it. The science is unequivocal: contact with the natural world supports human health in wide ranging and profound ways. It lowers stress, improves mood, and alleviates symptoms of anxiety. For children, time in nature can even aid brain development. Nature helps reduce exposure to air pollution, moderates urban heat, and fosters physical activity and social connection. It can also reduce feelings of loneliness, improve the diversity of our gut microbiota – by exposing us to a wider range of environmental microbes that help train and balance the immune system – and support the immune system by reducing inflammation. All of these play a vital role in protecting against chronic disease. Read more: Then there are the intangible yet no less important benefits. Nature provides a sense of awe and wonder – feelings that help us gain perspective, boost emotional resilience and find deeper meaning in everyday life. Our own research, conducted in collaboration with Nick Bridge, UK special representative for climate change 2017-2023, and Michael Smythe, artist, activist and researcher and supported by a growing body of evidence, shows that even small, everyday moments in nature, watching birds from your window, for example, or pausing under a blooming tree on your way to the shop, can significantly boost mental wellbeing. Consider this: a Danish study found that growing up near green spaces during the first ten years of life reduces the risk of developing mental health problems in adulthood by a staggering 55%. A UK study similarly showed that people living in greener neighbourhoods were 16% less likely to experience depression and 14% less likely to develop anxiety. And as heatwaves become more frequent and intense – with soaring illness and mortality rates – the cooling effects of trees and parks will become more vital than ever for protecting our health. But it's not just access to green space that matters – it's also the quality of that space. Green areas rich in biodiversity, with a wide variety of plant life, birds, insects and fungi, provide much greater health benefits than sparse or manicured lawns. Biodiversity builds resilience not just in ecosystems, but in our bodies and minds. A recent study in The Lancet Planetary Health found that people living in areas with greater bird diversity were significantly less likely to experience depression and anxiety, even after accounting for socioeconomic and demographic factors. This research underlines a simple but urgent truth: we cannot talk about human health without talking about biodiversity. Read more: To deliver true prevention and resilience, we need a joined-up approach across government: one that aligns health policy with environmental protection, housing, urban design, education and transport. This means rethinking how we plan and build our communities: what kind of housing we develop, how we move around, what we grow and eat and how we live in relationship with the ecosystems that support us. There are many ways this vision can be put into action. The Neighbourhood Health Service outlined in the ten-year plan could be tied directly to local, community-led efforts such as Southwark's Right to Grow campaign, which gives residents the right to cultivate unused land. This kind of initiative improves access to fresh food, promotes physical activity, strengthens community bonds and increases green cover – all of which support long-term health. School curricula could be revised to give children the opportunity to learn not just about nature, but also in nature – developing ecological literacy, emotional resilience and healthier habits for life. Health professionals could be trained to understand and promote the value of time outdoors for managing chronic conditions and supporting recovery. Green social prescribing – already gaining ground across the UK – should be fully integrated into standard care, with robust resourcing and cross-sector support. Scotland's Green Health Partnerships show what's possible. These initiatives bring together sectors including health, environment, education, sport and transport to promote nature-based health solutions – from outdoor learning and physical activity in parks, to conservation volunteering and nature therapy. They don't just improve health; they strengthen communities, build climate resilience and create cost-effective, scaleable solutions for prevention. The ten-year plan is a once-in-a-generation opportunity. It could help remove departmental silos and unify national goals across health, climate, inequality and economic recovery, while saving billions in the process. But in its current form, it misses a crucial ingredient. By failing to recognise the centrality of nature in our health, the government overlooks one of the simplest and most effective ways to build resilience – both human and ecological. Surely it is not beyond a nation of nature lovers to put nature at the heart of our future health? This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Andrea Mechelli receives funding from Wellcome Trust. Giulia Vivaldi, Michael Smythe, and Nick Bridge do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
