logo
Biden: Pope Francis stood for compassion as others embraced cruelty. May mercy be his legacy.

Biden: Pope Francis stood for compassion as others embraced cruelty. May mercy be his legacy.

USA Today28-04-2025

Biden: Pope Francis stood for compassion as others embraced cruelty. May mercy be his legacy. I fear with Pope Francis' passing, the world will be colder and less just. Which means that all of us who loved Francis need to step up.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Pope Francis requested a simple funeral in his will
Pope Francis requested a "simple" funeral in his will, reflecting a legacy devoted to humility.
As I sat among the more than 200,000 people who came to Rome to grieve the loss and celebrate the life of Pope Francis, one word kept running through my mind − mercy.
I thought of the pope's motto – ''Miserando atque eligendo." It translates as, "He looked at him with mercy and chose him.' It is a reference to Jesus selecting Matthew to be his disciple, not despite the fact that the tax collector was a sinner, but because of it.
I thought of the Jubilee Year of Mercy that Pope Francis proclaimed. I thought of 'The Name of God is Mercy' that he wrote.
Most of all, I thought of his mission, his ministry, his life's work.
Pope Francis gave me hope and optimism
I first met Francis at his inauguration as pope in 2013. I was vice president. Like millions of Catholics all over the world, I felt a surge of hope and optimism.
In Francis, I saw the revitalization of the faith I had grown up with. A faith that calls us to care for 'the last and the least' among us. A faith that gives us the obligation to feed the hungry, care for the sick, lift up the poor, welcome the stranger. A faith that sees the humanity in everyone and believes we are all God's children. A faith of forgiveness and compassion. Of dignity and respect. Of love and mercy.
Opinion: I'm a Catholic who craved spiritual connection. I found it in Pope Francis.
Francis was a pope for our time, when so many leaders embraced cruelty. He stood for compassion. When so many casually embraced lies. He stood for truth. When so many saw the climate as an imagined problem. He saw it as an existential crisis. When so many treated the climate as a political matter. He knew it was a moral imperative.
And when so many practiced the politics of dehumanization, he stood for our common humanity.
Francis spoke on behalf of migrants
Francis was a voice of great moral clarity even in the face of sickness and death.
In his final Easter message, which he gave just one day before he died, he cried out against war: 'What a great thirst for death, for killing, we witness each day in the many conflicts raging in different parts of our world!'
He called out the cruelty being inflicted on others: 'How much violence we see, often even within families, directed at women and children!'
He spoke against the demonization of the weakest among us: 'How much contempt is stirred up at times towards the vulnerable, the marginalized, and migrants!'
Opinion: With Francis, LGBTQ+ Catholics finally felt seen. Will new pope turn away from us?
Francis used to say that 'a little mercy makes the world less cold and more just.' Now I fear with his passing, the world will be colder and less just. Which means that all of us who loved Francis need to step up.
Francis wasn't the only one chosen by God's mercy. We all were. When we remember that, we will see that mercy isn't weakness. There is no greater strength.
One of the mementoes I most treasured as president was a photo with Pope Francis that I kept on my desk in the Oval Office. That photo is now on my desk at home in Delaware. It serves as a daily reminder to me to do more, to be better, to make a difference in the lives of others.
Pope Francis was a great leader and a deeply good man. Now we can honor his life by making his legacy a living legacy. A living faith. A faith of caring and compassion – and mercy.
Joe Biden was the 46th president of the United States.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nevada unions, elected officials rally in support of ICE protests
Nevada unions, elected officials rally in support of ICE protests

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nevada unions, elected officials rally in support of ICE protests

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Amid the triple-degree heat, Las Vegas union members, workers and elected officials rallied in protest of escalating action from federal immigration agents—wary Nevada could be next. The afternoon rally was called together by Nevada's SEIU Local 1107 in solidarity with their California chapter following the arrest of SEIU president David Huerta. Federal authorities arrested Huerta for interfering with law enforcement operations during an anti-ICE protest. 'He was out exercising his constitutional rights, and they arrested him,' Erika Watanabe, a SEUI local 1107 member, said. 'They injured him, then arrested him, and then detained him.' Huerta was released Monday afternoon according to CBS News and is set to appear in court for initial appearance on one felony charge. The Las Vegas rally of over a hundred people at the steps of the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse featured speakers from ACLU-Nevada, Nevada Immigration Coalition, NAACP, Culinary Union, the office of Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, and Clark County Commissioner Tick Segerblom. 'If Trump wants to bring the National Guard into Las Vegas, he's going to destroy our economy forever,' Segerblom said. 'Because we're not going to just let the National Guard do anything. We're going to fight the National Guard.' Segerblom continued to express concerns about the possibility of National Guard troops becoming active in Nevada. 'Without undocumented workers, this town would shut down and if [Trump] wants to dare to bring the National Guard in here, or, even better, the Marines, this town is going to blow up,' he said. The Trump administration's efforts in California received some praise but mostly significant pushback. Tedd Pappageorge, the Culinary Union Secretary Treasurer responded to claims the federal government is responding to people simply breaking the law. 'No, it's actually not as simple as that,' he said. 'What's really going on is we have folks that have been here for five years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years. They're parts of the community. They go to our churches, their kids go to our schools, and they power this economy.' The Culinary Union cited additional concerns with alleged escalating ICE raids in Nevada pointing to the Nevada Immigration Coalition's post of 12 raids over the Easter weekend. 'What we know is that at the end of the day, the idea that these ICE agents are going to go to schools and churches and workplaces and take folks out that are otherwise law abiding,' Pappageorge said. 'Nobody voted for that. Everybody agrees there needs to be a secure border, and everybody agrees that violent criminals should be deported. But this is the United States of America. There has been due process.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe
Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe

Advertisement Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple reflected on his own 'failure' Monday in scrutinizing press coverage of Joe Biden and his cognitive decline, particularly after the infamous 'Where's Jackie?' gaffe. As the legacy media continues to face a reckoning over how it handled covering the former president's mental acuity before his disastrous 2024 debate performance, Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out news organizations for not admitting any errors with the headline, 'Did legacy media fail in its Biden coverage? Not if you ask them!' In his lengthy critique, Wemple revisited an episode from a September 2022 event where Biden called for Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., who had died just weeks earlier in a car accident. Biden previously released a statement acknowledging her death after it happened and the event he attended similarly honored her memory. Advertisement 4 Erik Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out the media's lack of self-reflection. Fox News 'Jackie, are you here? Where's Jackie?' Biden said in the viral moment. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre defended the president at the time, insisting Walorski was simply 'top of mind.' 'It's time to turn this exercise on my own byline,' Wemple wrote Monday. 'The 'Where's Jackie' episode was my cue to start hammering mainstream outlets for not pushing on this story. Never happened — that was a failure.' Wemple noted, as Fox News Digital did at the time, that neither CNN nor MSNBC offered any coverage of the 'Where's Jackie' comment. Advertisement 4 Former President Joe Biden speaks during the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health, at the Ronald Reagan Building, Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2022, in Washington. AP 4 Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., is seen before a House Ways and Means Committee markup in Longworth Building on July 12, 2018. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Imag While acknowledging some in the press, like Axios' Alex Thompson and The Wall Street Journal's Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes for their pre-debate reporting that shed light on Biden's cognitive decline, Wemple knocked the media for broadly lacking the vigor to get to the bottom of it sooner. 'White House coverage must involve more than observing the president in action and writing up analysis pieces about his comings and goings,' Wemple wrote. Advertisement 'It needs to include a muckraking component detailing behind-the-scenes strategies, conflicts and debates over all manner of issues, particularly those relating to the president's mental acuity. An adjacent question relates to whether Biden himself was fully abreast of and in charge of day-to-day decisions.' 4 The Washington Post office in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, June 27, 2024. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'And it's on these fronts that major media organizations fell short: Though Biden's declining faculties were clear to all, they never ignited one of those glorious mainstream-media investigative frenzies that colonizes television and radio broadcasts,' he added. Thompson's 'Original Sin' co-author, CNN anchor Jake Tapper, said there should be 'soul-searching' in the legacy media for how Biden's clearly apparent issues were covered. 'Few souls are undergoing a pat-down,' Wemple wrote.

Opinion: Why Dems Have It So Wrong: Trump Is Spoiling for This L.A. Battle
Opinion: Why Dems Have It So Wrong: Trump Is Spoiling for This L.A. Battle

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: Why Dems Have It So Wrong: Trump Is Spoiling for This L.A. Battle

Consider what the average American is seeing on their phones/TV screens/computers out of Los Angeles over the past 48 hours: Cars being lit on fire (see below) Masked protesters waving Mexican flags standing in front of the burning cars Fireworks and rocks (and scooters!) being thrown at police vehicles Buildings being spray-painted with anti-law enforcement slogans To be clear: I am not saying that that is the whole story. As virtually every news story I have read is careful to note, these protests are very limited in scope—with much of Los Angeles not even noticing that they are happening. Trump's decision to call up the National Guard could well have been an accelerant to the violence as opposed to the solution for it. But, as I say over and over again: The average person is not seeking out every single nuance of a story like this. They are focused on their daily lives. They catch this sort of news only in passing. And, when you see a quick gloss of this story, it's one that clearly favors Donald Trump. Remember that Trump ran—expressly—in 2024 on getting MUCH tougher on illegal immigrants. The consensus—especially among loose partisans and swing voters—was that the Biden administration had been ineffectual at the Southern border, largely because of its unwillingness to put in place real and biting policies that would curtail the flow of illegals into the U.S. Even as Trump's numbers have faded on virtually every issue during his first five months in office, his polling on the border and immigration more broadly has stayed strong. Ask yourself this. If you are Trump would you rather have the big national story be: Your fight with Elon Musk? The ongoing struggles to pass the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' through Congress (and all the stuff that's actually IN the 'OBBB')? An immigration fight where the dominant images are protesters lighting cars on fire and clashing with the police? It's a TOTAL no-brainer. Don't believe me? Check out the full-court press Trump has put on to draw as much attention to the issue as possible over the last 24 hours, via his Truth Social feed. Here's just one(of many) examples: Trust me, this is 100% a fight he wants. And he will egg it on in all possible ways over the coming days—as a way to keep it in the news. (I'd argue the decision to call up the California National Guard without even consulting California Gov. Gavin Newsom is an example of how Trump is working to turn up the heat.) And it appears as though Democratic elected officials are willing to play along. Newsom's weird come-arrest-me threat on MSNBC on Sunday night felt tone-deaf. And speaking of tone-deaf, California Rep. Maxine Waters' comments—'I don't know why we have guns. What are those guns for? Are they to shoot protesters?'—feel decidedly out of step with the images we are seeing of the protests on TV. Politics, as I have said many times before, is about picking your battles. It's about fighting on ground that is favorable for you—and unfavorable for your opponent. Like him or hate him, Trump gets that. He knows a fight about deportations defined by burning cars and anti-police graffiti is a winner for him. Democrats need to think this way if they want to beat Trump and the broader Republican party. Fighting Trump on ground where the public is clearly on his side makes ZERO sense. Want more ball and strike calling—no matter what uniform the batter at the plate is wearing? Check out Chris Cillizza's Substack and YouTube channel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store