SC stays Madras High Court order, allows NHAI to collect toll on Madurai-Tuticorin highway
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed a Madras High Court order that prevented the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) from collecting toll on the Madurai-Tuticorin highway till it is relaid and maintained.
A bench of Justices P K Mishra and Manmohan issued notice on the appeal by the NHAI challenging the June 3 order of the Madurai bench of the high court. Turning down the request not to stay the order, the bench said, 'Let them recover now, then we can see.'
Opposing the stay on the NHAI, Senior Advocate P Wilson, appearing for the respondents, said, 'The ordeal of the road users every day is that we pay the toll, but we are not able to enjoy the road. This is daylight robbery.'
Additional Solicitor General N Venkataraman, who appeared for the NHAI, countered this and said thousands of commuters use it on a daily basis.
The Supreme Court asked Wilson to file a counter-affidavit and said it will hear the matter in detail later.
The writ petition before the high court had earlier sought a direction to the NHAI authorities 'to take necessary action against…officials for mismanagement in allocating funds for planting saplings in Madurai-Tuticorin National Highways-NH-38…and further to plant roadside trees on both sides and median on Madurai-Tuticorin National Highways-NH-38…'.
The high court had also made it clear 'that after the highway road is maintained in a good condition as per the standards prescribed under the said Act, the National Highways Authority of India is at liberty to collect toll fee from the road users.'
Though the NHAI had contended that arbitration proceedings are pending with regard to the alleged breach of conditions like planting saplings, etc, the high court did not accept the argument.
The high court had said, 'Pendency of arbitration proceedings is not a ground to reject the writ petition, since the National Highways Authority of India is under obligation to maintain the highways properly and thereafter, collect toll fee from the road users. Instead, they are maintaining the highway road in a bad condition.'
'Therefore, collection of toll fee in Madurai – Tuticorin National Highways is impermissible and the road users are entitled to a good conditioned National Highways and then alone they are liable to pay toll fee as prescribed by the authority concerned,' it had added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Seven more held in minor girl rape case
Puttaparthi: In a grave incident reported from Yedugurrallapalli village of Ramagiri Mandal, district police have arrested seven more individuals, including a juvenile, in connection with the sexual assault of a 15-year-old minor girl. District Superintendent of Police V Ratna, IPS, confirmed the arrests and revealed that the accused have been remanded to judicial custody. The details of the case were disclosed during a press conference held on Tuesday at the District Police Office conference hall. SP V Ratna addressed the media alongside Dharmavaram DSP B Hemanth Kumar, who led the investigation. The arrests were carried out by the Dharmavaram Sub-Divisional Police team under his supervision. Budida Rajesh (34), Tumu Hemanth (26), Chinna Basi Karthik (18), Basi Sonappa (46), Anke Muktanand @ Jukku (23), Budida Rajendra (29) and a Juvenile (Child in Conflict with Law) – Identity withheld as per legal provisions. All suspects were arrested on June 10 and have been produced in court. The crime reportedly occurred over an extended period, with the minor alleging repeated abuse by the accused. Based on her complaint, a case was registered under Cr. No. 21/2025 at Ramagiri Police Station. Charges include: BNS Sections: 115(2), 351(2), 96, 87, 77, 238, 308(5), 65 r/w 3(5) POCSO Act, 2012: Sections 5, 5(j)(ii), 5(l) r/w 6, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015: Sections 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(2)(v), IT Act, 2000: Sections 66E, 67, 67A. The investigation was described as scientific, thorough, and impartial, with the police confirming the use of technical evidence. Some accused had already been apprehended earlier, and the latest arrests were made as part of an ongoing operation. To apprehend the accused still at large, special teams were constituted under the leadership of Circle Inspector V Sridhar, under the direct supervision of DSP Hemanth Kumar. These teams conducted extensive search operations that led to the arrests. Further efforts are underway to track and arrest any remaining accused.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi HC rejects bail plea of Vedpal Singh Tanwar in PMLA case linked to illegal mining in Haryana
The Delhi high court on Monday rejected the interim and regular bail pleas of Vedpal Singh Tanwar in a money laundering case. He is an accused in a case linked to illegal sand and stone mining in the Dadam area of Bhiwani, Haryana. The high court dismissed the bail plea in view of the material placed on record by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Justice Girish Kathpalia dismissed the bail plea after hearing the submissions of the ED and material placed on record. Justice Kathpalia said, 'I am unable to satisfy myself that there is any reasonable ground for believing that the accused/applicant is not guilty of the offences alleged. That being so, the rigours of Section 45 of the PML Act dissuade this court from admitting the accused/applicant to bail on merits.' After perusing the medical status report of May 2, 2025, which compiled medical reports of hospitals including AIIMS, the bench rejected the interim bail plea to Tanwar. 'According to the said medical status report, the accused applicant is stable and regularly reviewed by the doctor on duty, and all medicines prescribed by AIIMS are being provided to him from the jail dispensary itself. So, on that count also, the accused/applicant has failed to establish a ground for grant of bail,' Justice Kathpalia said in the order passed on June 9. While rejecting the bail pleas, the high court said that there was a huge loss of ₹78 crore to the government exchequer. The court noted that the documentary record reflected the unlawful gain to the accused persons, including Tanwar, and the unlawful loss to the exchequer to the time of ₹78,14,75,324. Tanwar has moved a plea through advocate Sumer Singh Boparai and Aman Sharma. ED had arrested Vedpal Singh Tanwar under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, on May 30, 2024, in connection with illegal mining in the Dadam area of Haryana. As per ED, it initiated an investigation on the basis of the prosecution complaint filed by the regional officer, Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Bhiwani, before the Special Environment Court, Kurukshetra, against the Firm M/s. Govardhan Mines and Minerals for violating the conditions of Environment Clearance under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and subsequently, an FIR was registered by Haryana Police under various sections of IPC, 1860. ED said that the investigation revealed that the firm had been involved in large-scale illegal and unscientific mining in the Dadam area of Haryana. It had led to large-scale damage to the environment and a huge loss to the exchequer. It is worth mentioning here that rampant illegal mining in the area led to the killing of five persons due to landslides, ED said in a press note.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
No compromise on women's dignity: SC tells lawyer who abused judge
The judiciary cannot compromise when it comes to the safety and dignity of women judges, the Supreme Court said on Tuesday, refusing to interfere with the conviction and 18-month jail sentence of a Delhi-based lawyer who verbally abused and threatened a woman judicial officer in court. 'There can be no leniency in ensuring a safe workplace for women judges…Most of the judicial officers in Delhi today are women. They must feel safe at their place of work,' a bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan emphasised. Rejecting an appeal by advocate Sanjay Rathore, the bench added: 'They (women judges) won't be able to function if someone like him gets High Court is right.' The top court's decision comes weeks after the Delhi High Court delivered a scathing verdict, describing Rathore's conduct as 'an assault on justice itself' . The trial court had originally sentenced Rathore to a total of two years' imprisonment for using gendered abuse against a woman magistrate in 2015, but the high court reduced the term to 18 months. Rathore had already undergone six months in jail by the time his appeal was heard in the Supreme Court. His lawyer argued that the incident was a 'spur-of-the-moment' outburst and that further incarceration would be harsh. But the top court remained unmoved. 'Your sentence has already been reduced to 18 months. We can't bring it down. Your matter was duly dealt with by the high court and a strong judgment was issued. We have to ensure the safety of women judicial officers,' the bench said during the hearing. The court also took note of the testimony given under oath by the woman magistrate, who corroborated the charges. 'Look at the kind of language you have used. How will judges work if we entertain your petition?' the bench asked. In its brief order, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and granted Rathore two weeks to surrender. The case dates back to October 2015, when Rathore, aggrieved by an adjournment in his case that was passed in his absence, verbally abused a woman magistrate in Karkardooma court, including using gender-specific slurs. The incident prompted the judicial officer to lodge an FIR at Farsh Bazar police station. In 2023, a trial court found Rathore guilty under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code -- 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman), 189 (threat of injury to a public servant), and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty) -- and sentenced him to two years in jail. The high court, while upholding the conviction in May 2025, modified the sentence to 18 months. In her May 26 judgment, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the high court minced no words in rejecting Rathore's plea for leniency. She observed that 'the act of outraging the modesty of a judicial officer while she was presiding over court proceedings… attacks the very foundation of judicial decorum and institutional integrity.' Justice Sharma emphasised that Rathore, being an officer of the court, was expected to uphold its dignity, not undermine it. 'This is not merely a case of individual misbehaviour, but a case where injustice was done to justice itself where a judge… became the target of personal attack while discharging her official duties.' The judgment went on to highlight the larger systemic issue: 'Any act that seeks to threaten or intimidate a judge, especially through gender-specific abuse, is an assault on justice itself and must be met with firm accountability. To trivialise such conduct under the garb of emotional outburst or momentary lapse is to reflect a patriarchal mindset — one that struggles to respect women in authority and seeks to normalise the unacceptable. This cannot be permitted. Not in law. Not in court.' Calling the woman magistrate's experience a reflection of 'a mindset where even women in empowered roles are not seen as immune from humiliation or indignity,' the high court warned that no judicial officer, especially women at the district level who form the 'backbone of our justice delivery system,' should ever feel unsupported or unsafe. 'If a woman holding judicial office is made to feel that her authority is conditional on the civility or restraint of others, the very foundation of judicial independence would get shaken,' Justice Sharma wrote.
