'By Seymour, for Māori?' - Tama Potaka defends Māori targeted funding cut
Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka says the government has serious fiscal issues and most agencies have had to cut back.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The Māori Development Minister has defended attacks by the opposition arguing he allowed targeted Māori funding to disappear under his watch.
Speaking in the Māori Affairs select committee for scrutiny week, Labour MP and former Māori development minister Willie Jackson said specific funding for Māori initiatives had fallen significantly since Tama Potaka took over.
He also questioned whether Potaka was being influenced by Deputy Prime Minister
David Seymour
, who disagrees with targeted funds based on race.
Jackson said while he did not doubt "for one second" that Potaka was committed to pushing kaupapa Māori, he was "failing" in terms of Māori-specific funding.
"You've had this decrease in terms of Māori funding, targeted funding, across the portfolio, and you have a deputy prime minister who believes funding us is racist... so how are you dealing with that?" Jackson asked.
Potaka said he did not share that view and encouraged others in the room to "amplify" that.
"What often happens is that certain views are given some really enhanced coverage, and others that I think are just as legitimate are not."
"We have a very important series of commitments emanating out of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Treaty of Waitangi... good kāwanatanga or rangatiratanga or ōritetanga, however many tangas we might want to refer to and that provides a very constitutional bedrock for our existence as a country. It amplifies and reflects some things that were already existing," Potaka said.
Potaka said funding allocated to the Māori Women's Welfare League was an example of the government's commitment to Māori funding.
Pushed again by Jackson on what "confidence" Potaka could give that Māori initiatives would be prioritised, Potaka said some of those initiatives "did not sync" with the government's current direction.
"This government, and I as the minister, are in a space where we've got serious fiscal issues, and I don't need to belabour that, but taking the debt up from $5 billion to $100 billion did not help, over five or six years, prior to us coming in.
"All agencies have basically cut back, except for Health, Education, Defence and Police, all agencies have had to take a haircut. That includes my agencies... the view that 'we don't have confidence because your agency has less money than last year', I think is misplaced given the fiscal context."
The government was focused on tilting the support towards economic development, rather than bits and bobs all over the place, Potaka said.
Budget 2025 saw the end of the
Whai Kāinga
, Whai Oranga housing fund which saw the government allocate over $700 million to help iwi build thousands of homes in 2021.
That money has been redirected to the government's broader Flexible Housing fund, a move which Jackson said "betrayed" the kaupapa.
"[Māori] can't get their heads around it, that you would betray a kaupapa and open up competition, now that Māori providers have to compete with mainstream providers, very unfair.
Former Māori development minister Willie Jackson said said specific funding for Māori initiatives had fallen significantly since Tama Potaka took over.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
"You're the minister responsible for the biggest transfer of money from Māori to mainstream in the history of ministers," Jackson said.
Potaka gave a mihi to the "architects" of the scheme and said their work was "absolutely outstanding".
"In terms of the Whai Kāinga, Whai Oranga budget that has effectively been centralised and reallocated," Potaka said.
"Some of that was the $200 million announced for 400 or more new homes, I announced in Waitangi week, that includes the 150 homes that are being built right now... in Gisborne, and a whole range of other homes. A whole range of other homes and sites across the motu, including up in Kaitaia and Rotorua and central North Island and other places."
Jackson said that figure showed how Potaka had "failed miserably" in the housing area.
"That's a far cry from what we talked about when we set Whai Kāinga, Whai Oranga up.
"So basically, it's 'By Seymour, for Māori' now, isn't it? Not 'By Māori, for Māori'," Jackson said.
"I reject that opinion presented as a question," Potaka said.
"What has happened is that the commitment over Whai Kāinga, Whai Oranga, a lot of that was consumed in the 1000 homes [built] through the Labour-led government and the 1000 homes that have been approved in 18 months - by the way, we didn't take five years - through this government.
"Those homes are on the go. Some have been delivered, and some are yet to be delivered, and actually, the capacity of Māori housing developers to deliver massively is evolving," Potaka said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Police Minister blames Labour government for police recruit exemptions
Police Minister Mark Mitchell and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers fronted a scrutiny hearing this week. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The Police Minister's office says the use of discretion over police college recruits who had not passed a literacy test was introduced in 2018 under the Labour government. It comes after the minister Mark Mitchell and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers were challenged over revelations an Assistant Commissioner personally signed off at least two exemptions from recruitment standards. Chambers and Mitchell had told MPs at a select committee at Parliament on Monday that there were never any specific orders to drop standards, and that the current administration has been clear what the expectations were. Chambers knew of the approvals when he told the hearing no one in the executive had said applying discretion was allowed. Police in a written statement confirmed Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers gave at least two approvals in the past year, and records were being checked to see if there were more. "As is already accepted, there had been a practice of discretion applied to some applicants to Police College in relation to the Physical Appraisal Test (PAT)," the statement said. "Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers can recall two occasions in the last year where she gave approval to be applied to two applicants. There was no directive, instruction, or request issued in relation to this. We are searching available documentation to confirm this number. "As with other recruits, those two candidates went on to pass all the tests required to graduate as constables. "The Commissioner has made it very clear no more discretion is to be applied, and that is in place now. "He has discussed the standards with his Police Executive, and emphasised his very clear expectation that standards will not be dropped for entry to Police College." Police also confirmed Chambers was told in April about Rogers' approvals - the same month concerns about recruits being admitted for training despite failing physical testing was made public . Chambers told reporters this week the decisions had been made by "decision makers" involved in the recruitment process and some others at the Police College, but from now on any decisions of "that importance" would sit with him. Asked whether it was members of the Police Executive who drilled into those decision-makers that using discretion was okay, he said "not that I'm aware of, no". Chambers on Wednesday rejected the suggestion Rogers' approval could be seen as an order that use of discretion was okay. "No. Decisions on when to use discretion to allow an applicant to become a recruit without meeting all components of the testing requirements have been made on a case-by-case basis, with regard to a specific individual's circumstances. They do not amount in any way to a general instruction or "order" around the use of discretion," he said. "There was nothing out of order about Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers making those decisions at the time, given her role as Assistant Commissioner: Leadership, Talent and Development. "The cases in question pre-dated my request for the audit on recruitment standards and my instruction for any use of discretion to be halted." He said the instruction he gave was the result of the audit showing the use of discretion had become "too widespread for my liking", and it had developed "over a period of years that pre-dated my time as Commissioner. The government committed in its coalition agreements to recruiting 500 more police officers by November - but seems unlikely to meet that target . Labour's Police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the revelations Rogers was involved raised serious questions about whether political pressure had been applied to the Police College to deliver on that promise. "It's pretty clear that people at the Police College themselves don't make these types of decisions, there's a hierarchy in police. "There's been a clear pattern here of recruits not meeting standards and when the government has promised 500 more police it's pretty clear that pressure has been applied to the college and that's not right. "They've delivered around 30 of 500, and they have until November. It's pretty clear they've failed." She said the minister had not been upfront about the matter with New Zealanders when he fronted at the select committee. "He was asked if there was any direction or intervention from the police executive to the college, and he said that there was not to his knowledge. He may wish to revise those words in light of the information that's come to hand. "This really causes concern whether it might undermine integrity of police." In a statement, Mitchell's office said a draft report showed "that for the delivery of the 1800 new police target, a discretionary pass was introduced where the literacy assessment standards were not met, which has since become common practice". "This does raise questions about political pressure." Labour in 2017 committed to recruit an extra 1800 police officers, marking that milestone in June 2023. RNZ has requested a copy of the draft report the minister's statement refers to. "We have made very clear on discovering this practice that it does not meet our expectations and Police have responded quickly with the Commissioner directing that the practice be ended," his office said. "Labour should be upfront with New Zealanders about the mess they created in order to deliver their well overdue and incomplete 1800 new police target, instead of trying to blame this government that had to come in and clean it up." RNZ sought further comment from Andersen responding to Mitchell's statements. She said the review made it clear "recruits failed physical tests and got through anyway". "This happened in the past year, under their watch. Mark Mitchell needs to take accountability for his failure to deliver 500 more police." The audit covers 1022 recruits between January 2024 and April 2025. Preliminary findings showed a significant number of applicants were allowed into the college , despite failing preliminary tests. Police Association president Chris Cahill has previously said he thought the matter was not a government issue, but an internal police issue. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Taxpayer to foot the bill for cancer drugs for private patients
Taxpayers will soon begin footing the bill for newly-funded cancer medicines administered in private facilities for 12 months, under the so-called "transitional access" arrangement. Photo: 123RF The government's decision to let private patients have publicly-funded cancer drugs is a waste of taxpayers' money, and could even make wait times worse, the Labour Party is warning. From 1 July, taxpayers will begin covering the cost of newly-funded cancer medicines administered in private facilities for 12 months, under the so-called "transitional access" arrangement. In a testy exchange with the Associate Health Minister David Seymour at Wednesday's health select committee, Labour Party spokesperson Dr Ayesha Verrall pointed out the vast majority of New Zealanders did not have private health insurance. "Wouldn't this money have been better spent on hiring oncologists in the public system so that people can get free care there?" Under the current framework, insurers already picked up the tab for any new medicines that Pharmac funded, so the change did not actually benefit patients in most cases, she said. "So this money that you are spending on this is achieving almost nothing in terms of access, it's just a subsidy for insurers." However, Seymour disagreed, saying one should not underestimate the "inconvenience" of having to shift facilities mid-treatment, and people "should not be disadvantaged by the fact that they have taken precaution of having private insurance". "When you're getting treated for cancer, you just don't want any more problems in your life or inconveniences in your life, you just want to get through it." He dismissed Labour's characterisation of the change as "subsidising private insurers". "Insurers don't have any money other than what's paid to them by the patients," he said. "So ultimately this is also a subsidy for the patients, who are also taxpayers who are entitled to public funding in this country.... "You can always say we could do more if we were prepared to exclude some New Zealanders from care in the public system." "Everyone is entitled to care in the public system," Verrall responded. Private patients who were not covered by insurance would still have to pay "infusion" costs to have the medicines administered. Pharmac chair Paula Bennett said the drug-funding agency had been contacted by patients who were in private care and had insurance before Pharmac started funding more cancer medicines. "One man was eligible for four treatments but actually needed 12 and he was going to have to move into the public system to receive the other eight. "The thought of having to change oncologist just to get access to the extra eight treatments that he desperately needed was incredibly stressful." According to correspondence between officials and the minister's office, which was released to the Labour Party under the Official Information Act, the plan was initially going to be announced in April. Seymour was unable to say why the announcement had not gone ahead as planned. Talking points provided to the minister ahead of the Cabinet discussion on 2 April noted no additional funding was being sought for the proposal, but instead Pharmac would "make some trade-offs within the medicines budget" to fund it. "Numbers of patients that will benefit from transitional access may well be small (likely less than 10 per medicine) but over time this policy will reach patients at a critical time." In a statement to RNZ, Pharmac director strategy, policy, and performance Michael Johnson said the rule change applied "only to newly funded cancer medicines (medicines funded after 1 July 2025). "The number of patients expected to benefit from this change will depend on what cancer treatments are funded in the future. " Labour's Ayesha Verrall said doctors working in the public system feared shifting more resources into the private system would further increase inequities and wait times for patients who could not afford private care. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Police Minister's office blames Labour government for police recruit exemptions
Police Minister Mark Mitchell and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers fronted a scrutiny hearing this week. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The Police Minister's office says the use of discretion over police college recruits who had not passed a literacy test was introduced in 2018 under the Labour government. It comes after the minister Mark Mitchell and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers were challenged over revelations an Assistant Commissioner personally signed off at least two exemptions from recruitment standards. It follows statements from Chambers and Mitchell at a select committee at Parliament this week that there were never any specific orders to drop standards, and that the current administration has been clear what the expectations are. Chambers reportedly knew of the approvals when he told the hearing no one in the executive had said applying discretion was allowed. In a statement, Mitchell's office said a draft report showed "that for the delivery of the 1800 new police target, a discretionary pass was introduced where the literacy assessment standards were not met, which has since become common practice". "This does raise questions about political pressure. "We have made very clear on discovering this practice that it does not meet our expectations and Police have responded quickly with the Commissioner directing that the practice be ended. "Labour should be upfront with New Zealanders about the mess they created in order to deliver their well overdue and incomplete 1800 new police target, instead of trying to blame this Government that had to come in and clean it up." Police in a written statement confirmed Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers gave at least two approvals in the past year, and records were being checked to see if there were more. "As is already accepted, there had been a practice of discretion applied to some applicants to Police College in relation to the Physical Appraisal Test (PAT)," the statement said. "Assistant Commissioner Jill Rogers can recall two occasions in the last year where she gave approval to be applied to two applicants. There was no directive, instruction, or request issued in relation to this. We are searching available documentation to confirm this number. "As with other recruits, those two candidates went on to pass all the tests required to graduate as constables. "The Commissioner has made it very clear no more discretion is to be applied, and that is in place now. "He has discussed the standards with his Police Executive, and emphasised his very clear expectation that standards will not be dropped for entry to Police College." Police also confirmed Chambers was told in April about Rogers' approvals - the same month concerns about recruits being admitted for training despite failing physical testing was made public . Chambers told reporters this week the decisions had been made by "decision makers" involved in the recruitment process and some others at the Police College, but from now on any decisions of "that importance" would sit with him. Asked whether it was members of the Police Executive who drilled into those decision-makers that using discretion was okay, he said "not that I'm aware of, no". The government committed in its coalition agreements to recruiting 500 more police officers by November - but seems unlikely to meet that target . Labour's Police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the revelations Rogers was involved raised serious questions about whether political pressure had been applied to the Police College to deliver on that promise. "It's pretty clear that people at the Police College themselves don't make these types of decisions, there's a hierarchy in police. "There's been a clear pattern here of recruits not meeting standards and when the government has promised 500 more police it's pretty clear that pressure has been applied to the college and that's not right. "They've delivered around 30 of 500, and they have until November. It's pretty clear they've failed." She said the minister had not been upfront about the matter with New Zealanders when he fronted at the select committee. "He was asked if there was any direction or intervention from the police executive to the college, and he said that there was not to his knowledge. He may wish to revise those words in light of the information that's come to hand. "This really causes concern whether it might undermine integrity of police." RNZ has sought further comment from Andersen.
