
Why GM is Investing Almost $1 Billion in Combustion Engines While Others Go Electric
It feels like just a few years ago, V8 engines were destined for an early extinction. But in the face of disappearing EV incentives and changing demands, more and more automakers, like GM, are sticking with combustion.
V8s may be disappearing, but GM's apparently aren't going anywhere
GM's been resolute, for the most part, on electrification. With the Silverado EV released and a mix of electric SUVs across the Chevy and Cadillac brands (Escalade iQ and Lyriq, Chevy Equinox and Blazer EV), the brand has committed harder than any other American automaker. That's not to say the automaker's commitment to internal combustion is gone, though. Tonawanda Propulsion, a GM-owned plant covering 190 acres and comprising three separate facilities, has received nearly $900 million in funding, securing over 850 jobs and production of GM's sixth-generation V8 engine.
The 2021 Chevrolet Tahoe rolls off the line at GM's Arlington Assembly plant.
A worker at GM's Bedford Casting Operations in Indiana Friday, Nov. 18, 2022. (Photo by AJ Mast for General Motors)
The investment is a 'new chapter' for the plant, but it's also a change of direction for GM
The investment is important to a lot of people. 'This investment marks an exciting new chapter for our plant,' said Tara Wasik, the plant's director. 'This is a testament to the hard work of the membership of Local 774,' said Raymond Jensen Jr. in an interview with local news. 'It's extremely important to the community, to the surrounding areas, and to New York State itself.' The impressive sum of $888 million will go towards new machinery, equipment, tools, and renovations as part of the more than $1.5 billion GM has invested in New York State in the last 15 years. It's also hardly the first time in recent memory that GM has extended the V8's lifespan. In 2023, GM invested $579 million in its Flint, Michigan production site. There, too, V8 production will continue to chug along.
CEO Mary Barra addresses the gathering during the grand opening celebration at the GM Factory ZERO EV assembly plant. (Photo by Rob Widdis for General Motors)
GM Oshawa Assembly Plant in Ontario, Canada
However, it doesn't account for the $300 million commitment made two years ago in union negotiations to produce electric vehicles, specifically at Tonawanda. And it's not the first area where GM has had to pump the brakes on EV endorsements. The company has sold off its stake in a battery production facility to its partner, LG Energy. In other areas, GM has pushed back against California's 2035 plan to eliminate sales of gas-only vehicles, which is now, by the way, completely dead. On the other hand, GM pushed into the number two spot for April EV sales, capturing nearly 15% of EV sales. Getting mixed signals? Us too, but we blame the current political and economic climate, not necessarily GM.
CEO Mary Barra emphasizes the importance of heritage and US jobs
Outfitting the plant for V8 production is important for CEO Mary Barra, too. 'Our significant investments in GM's Tonawanda Propulsion plant show our commitment to strengthening American manufacturing and supporting jobs in the U.S.,' she said in a press release. She further emphasized the plant's importance to the brand, citing its 87 years of operation. The plant will finish production of GM's fifth-gen V8 before commencing work on the sixth-gen product.
Final thoughts
This $888 million investment marks the largest single investment GM has ever made in an engine-producing facility. The fact that it happens to make V8s is almost irrelevant; it implies the combustion engine at large still has several decades of work ahead of it. GM isn't faring poorly in the EV arena, either, so unlike other automakers that have rekindled V8 production, this isn't a crutch. GM's going where the money is, and that's just good business.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
40 minutes ago
- Times
Gleeson warns ‘incentives' to sell homes have hit profits
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk clashes with CBS reporter over Trump policies
Elon Musk got prickly when asked by CBS about one of President Donald Trump's most controversial policies. Musk, who attended an official going away ceremony in the Oval Office on Friday, had been interviewed Tuesday at SpaceX 's headquarters outside of Brownsville, Texas - with the full sit-down released on Sunday. CBS' David Pogue first queried Musk on whether his businesses had been impacted by President Donald Trump's tariffs and then asked the South African-born Musk if he supported Trump's attempts to ban foreign students. 'Yeah. I mean, I think we wanna stick to, you know, the subject of the day, which is, like, spaceships, as opposed to, you know, presidential policy,' Musk responded. Pogue, who was conducting the interview for CBS Sunday Morning, pushed backing telling the billionaire that he had been told 'anything is good' as far as an interview subject. 'No, well - no,' Musk replied. But throughout the sit-down, Musk complained that DOGE became blamed for anything unpopular the Trump Administration was doing. 'Yeah, I think … what was starting to happen was that, like, it's a bit unfair because, like, DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk said. 'So, if there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE. I've had people think that, like, somehow DOGE is gonna stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue,' he continued. Pogue asked if Silicon Valley's mantra of 'move fast and break things 'really works 'before you really understand what the agency does?' Musk answered that 'it depends on where you're coming from.' The billionaire, who funneled $288 million to help get Trump elected in 2024, said he was ideologically a proponent of small government. 'So, now if somebody's a proponent of, you know, more government programs and bigger government, and they see, "Hey, DOGE is cutting all these government programs," then they'll be fundamentally opposed to that because they just think the government should do more things,' he said. 'That's just a fundamental, I guess, ideological opinion. But my frank opinion of the government is that, like, the government is just, like, the DMV that got big, OK? So, when you say it like, "Let's have the government do something," you should think, "Do you want the DMV to do it?"' Musk mused. Pogue pointed out when the interview aired that Musk started speaking out about his differences with the Trump Administration unprompted. 'And you know, it's not like I agree with everything the administration does,' Musk revealed. 'So it's like, I mean, I agree with much of what the administration does. But we have differences of opinion. You know, there are things that I don't entirely agree with. But it's difficult for me to bring that up in an interview because then it creates a bone of contention,' he continued. 'So then, I'm a little stuck in a bind, where I'm like, well, I don't wanna, you know, speak up against the administration, but I also don't wanna take responsibility for everything this administration's doing,' the billionaire added. In a clip that aired Tuesday ahead of Sunday's full interview, Musk was heard complaining about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and how it basically erases the cost-savings he says DOGE is responsible for. Musk said 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don't know if it could be both.' That criticism irritated some in Trumpworld and by Wednesday, Musk was announcing that his time in Washington, D.C. was coming to an end.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Carmakers warn Chinese tariffs could bring US manufacturing to a stop
Every automotive part that enters the US is slapped with a 25 percent tariff. The tariffs, imposed by President Donald Trump, are expected to reinvigorate an automotive manufacturing sector in the US that has experienced a decades-long malaise. But China responded to the auto tariff — and its separate, even higher product levies — by stopping nearly all trade on rare earth magnets. The magnets are indispensable for modern car production. They're used in dozens of vehicle parts, including brakes, seats, screens, and ignitions. But more than two decades after domestic magnet-making factories migrated to China, the US now produces almost none. Without access to Chinese supplies, factories across the Midwest and the South could soon face shutdowns, automakers and analysts are warning. And US carmakers are running out. 'This could be similar to the chip shortage where automakers simply can't produce the vehicle if the rare earths ban remains in place,' Seth Goldstein, a strategist and Tesla expert for MorningStar, told 'Tesla is planning to remove rare earths magnets from their EV motors, so the company should have a limited impact on its EV sales.' Beijing officials stopped sending US automakers the magnets in early April. The materials, which were last built in the US at scale in the late 1990s, are scattered throughout vehicles. A modern, power-adjusting seat can use as many as 12 individual magnets. In May, the trade groups representing some of the biggest automakers in the US — including General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Hyundai — sent a letter to President Trump warning about the potential US manufacturing issues because of the dwindling magnet supply. 'Without reliable access to these elements and magnets, automotive suppliers will be unable to produce critical automotive components,' the letter from the Alliance for Automotive Innovation said. 'In severe cases, this could include the need for reduced production volumes or even a shutdown of vehicle assembly lines.' Meanwhile, the problem could get worse, even if Beijing officials re-open the magnet floodgates. Some Chinese producers have suspended operations altogether, waiting for export approvals. The resulting delays have jammed up supply chains, leaving automakers scrambling to secure critical inputs. The trade blockages are also colliding with dwindling supplies on new vehicle lots. Some car companies are facing shortages of product on their new vehicle lots: Toyota, for example, has fewer than 30 days' worth of vehicles at many of their American dealerships. These compounding issues could send the price for remaining vehicles further through the roof as demand outstrips supply, and American manufacturing can't produce enough. It currently costs the average American more than $49,000 to drive a new vehicle off a dealership lot. Goldstein pointed out that there are signs for hope: Saudi Arabia, a country that is increasing trade relations with the US, is investing in rare earth production. 'Any shortage could prove temporary,' Goldstein added. But for now, the manufacturing impact extends well beyond cars, too. Factory automation, semiconductors, and critical military components all rely on high-performance magnets made from rare earth elements. President Trump recently lashed out against Chinese officials for exploiting these gaps in American production. 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. Last week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (pictured) said he hoped that Trump and top Chinese officials would convene to discuss a new truce in the ongoing trade war. 'I believe we'll see something very soon,' he reassured CBS News. On Monday, car stocks took a major hit as news about the tariffs and magnet controls permeated Wall Street. Ford and GM both lost over 4 percent of their share price by mid-day trading.