logo
BREAKING NEWS Internet star's husband set to face child abuse charge after toddler son drowned in mansion's back yard pool

BREAKING NEWS Internet star's husband set to face child abuse charge after toddler son drowned in mansion's back yard pool

Daily Mail​16-07-2025
The husband of TikTok star Emilie Kiser is set to face charges after their toddler son drowned in their backyard pool in Arizona.
Kiser, a popular mommy blogger, lost her son Trigg on May 18 - six days after he was found unresponsive in a backyard pool in Chandler, Arizona.
Police say they have recommended Kiser's husband Brady Kiser face a felony charge of child abuse over the death, though the Maricopa County Attorney's Office will make the final decision.
'After a thorough review of the evidence, we have submitted the case to the Maricopa County Attorney's Office for further review and any potential prosecutorial decisions,' the Chandler, Arizona, Police Department said in a statement Thursday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fascinating reason Bryan Kohberger's inmates WON'T kill Idaho murderer revealed by expert
Fascinating reason Bryan Kohberger's inmates WON'T kill Idaho murderer revealed by expert

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fascinating reason Bryan Kohberger's inmates WON'T kill Idaho murderer revealed by expert

Quadruple murderer Bryan Kohberger is not likely to be killed by his fellow inmates because the risk of them ending up on death row is too high, an expert has claimed. Kohberger, 30, was sentenced Wednesday to four consecutive life terms for the brutal November 2022 slayings of four young University of Idaho students. A plea deal struck earlier this month saw him spared the death penalty, but he will never be able to apply for parole. He was handed a life sentence for each life he took - one for Madison Mogen, a second for Kaylee Goncalves, a third for Ethan Chapin and the final one for Xana Kernodle, all aged just 19 or 20 at the time of their deaths. Several of the victims' loved ones shared their desire for Kohberger to be attacked in prison during their addresses to the court. And even though his fellow inmates already think he is a 'f*****g weirdo', a former police investigator warns murder is not something Kohberger has to fear. Kohberger is 'vulnerable' being confined in the general population unit, retired NYPD inspector Paul Mauro admitted to Fox News, but can find some safety in the fact that 'Idaho is a death penalty state'. 'If you're in for life, and you kill somebody, well, that's going to get you to death penalty,' Mauro explained, suggesting that for most prisoners murder is too risky. Inmates sentenced to execution are housed in a designated part of the prison referred to as 'death row' and remain in isolation for 23 hours a day. As a result of his plea deal, Kohberger won't be kept near death row inmates - those most likely to be unbothered by the repercussions of committing murder. Kohberger was already in custody at the Idaho State Correctional Complex in Kuna by Wednesday afternoon, a source familiar with the case told Fox. The facility is located about 16 miles away from the Ada County courthouse in Boise, where he was sentenced earlier in the day. Once in custody, inmates go through an evaluation process to asses their 'needs' and 'determine appropriate housing placement', a state corrections department official said. The evaluation, which typically takes seven to 14 days to complete, includes a psyche check to determine whether a prisoner poses a threat to themselves, fellow inmates or prison staff. The prisoner's 'classification, housing placement, and privileges' will be determined after the evaluation process is complete. Mauro predicts Kohberger will be temporarily placed in solitary confinement, but eventually join the general prison population with other killers. And although the victims' families want Kohberger to 'living in fear' and thinking he is a 'target' in prison, the ex-inspector does not think threats on his life are likely. At least one fellow prisoner has already admitted he would have 'physically assaulted' Kohberger if he 'wasn't worried about further legal repercussions', jail records reveal. The inmate was talking about Kohberger during a jail transfer and branded him a 'f*****g weirdo'. Another prisoner alleged Kohberger became aggressive during a phone call with his mother MaryAnn after hearing an inmate shout 'you suck' at a sports match on TV. The killer allegedly thought the prisoner was talking about him and his mother and, according to records, 'immediately got up and put his face to the bars'. Mogen, Kernodle, Goncalves and Chapin were found stabbed to death on November 13, 2022 in their shared home on King Road in Moscow, Idaho. Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania, where his parents lived, in connection to the gruesome slayings roughly six weeks later. Police said they recovered DNA from a knife sheath found at the home, and used genetic genealogy to identify Kohberger as a possible suspect. They accessed cellphone data to pinpoint his movements and used surveillance camera footage to help locate a white sedan that was seen repeatedly driving past the home on the night of the killings. A Q-tip from the garbage at his parents' house was used to match Kohberger's DNA to genetic material from the sheath, investigators said. The 30-year-old killer - who spent years studying criminology - pleaded guilty to the quadruple murder earlier this month in a deal to avoid the death penalty. Kohberger's attorneys got his trial moved to Boise after expressing concerns that the court wouldn't be able to find enough unbiased jurors in Moscow. But Hippler rejected their efforts to get the death penalty taken off the table and to strike critical evidence - including the DNA - from being admitted in trial. The trial had been set to begin next month. In exchange for Kohberger admitting guilt and waiving his right to appeal, prosecutors agreed not to seek his execution. Instead, both sides agreed to recommend that he serve four consecutive life sentences without parole for the killings. The victim's families were split on how they felt about the plea deal. If investigators know why Kohberger committed the crime, they haven't said so publicly. Nor is it clear why he spared two roommates who were home at the time. Cellphone location data did show Kohberger had been in the neighborhood multiple times before the attack. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson has said that Kohberger used his knowledge about forensic investigations to attempt to cover his tracks by deep cleaning his vehicle after the crime. Police say Kohberger's Amazon purchase history shows he bought a military-style knife as well as the knife sheath found at the home. But the knife itself was never found. The case drew widespread interest and judges feared the publicity could harm Kohberger's right to a fair trial. A sweeping gag order was imposed and hundreds of court documents were sealed from public view. After Kohberger pleaded guilty, a coalition of news organizations asked that the gag order be lifted and the case documents be unsealed. Hippler agreed, but said unsealing the documents will take time. It's not clear how many answers they might contain.

Top DOJ official to meet today with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell inside a Florida federal prison
Top DOJ official to meet today with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell inside a Florida federal prison

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Top DOJ official to meet today with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell inside a Florida federal prison

A senior Justice Department official plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend and accomplice, on Thursday in Florida, where she is serving time for her role in a scheme to abuse girls, according to a report. As questions swirled around the handling of the so-called Epstein files, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Tuesday he planned to meet with Maxwell in the 'coming days.' That meeting is expected to happen Thursday, ABC News reported. Earlier this week, Maxwell's attorneys confirmed their client was 'in discussions' with the government. The 63-year-old was sentenced to 20 years in 2021 for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse multiple girls with Epstein and is serving time at the Florida Correctional Institution-Tallahassee. Her attorneys have taken an appeal of her conviction to the Supreme Court. The development comes amid an uproar around the Epstein files after the Wall Street Journal reported that President Donald Trump was told in May that his name appeared in the files 'multiple times.' The president filed a $10 billion defamation suit against the paper and its owners after it published a report claiming that Trump gave Epstein a bawdy birthday card in 2003; he has vehemently denied the claims. 'This is another fake news story, just like the previous story by The Wall Street Journal,' White House communications director Steven Cheung told the paper about the claims Trump was named. However, Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed Trump was told that he is in the files. Being mentioned is not an indication of wrongdoing and officials say hundreds of names appear. Shortly after Blanche's announcement Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee approved a subpoena for Maxwell. Speaking to reporters at the White House later that day, Trump said that the subpoena for Maxwell "sounds appropriate." Last week, Trump requested Attorney General Pam Bondi release 'any and all pertinent' grand jury transcripts related to the Epstein case. Bondi then asked the judges overseeing the cases of Epstein and Maxwell; two judges have so far denied these requests. Trump's request came as the White House attempted to quell the noise following the DOJ's July 6 memo, which stated that no further disclosures were necessary in the Epstein matter.

Why Trump's political playbook is failing in the Epstein case
Why Trump's political playbook is failing in the Epstein case

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Why Trump's political playbook is failing in the Epstein case

The problem with a successful playbook is that you eventually keep doing the same thing mechanically. Fresh from intimidating ABC and CBS with meritless lawsuits, Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal reporters who broke the story of a lewd birthday message for Jeffrey Epstein. But, unlike with the frivolous allegations against the big broadcasters, there's clearly a fact of the matter here: an authentic letter either exists or it does not; and there is plenty to be revealed in the process of finding out. Trump's time-proven move – whatever happens, just counter-attack – is likely to keep the very story he wants to kill alive. Meanwhile, the other elements of his playbook – deny, deflect, distract – only work if journalists and Democrats play along. They, not the seemingly all-important Trump base, are the actors to watch. We still debate whether Trumpism is a substantial ideology or not; what we are missing is that Trumpism, for sure, is a set of tactics for exploiting weaknesses in the US political, legal and media systems. Some of these tactics were inherited from his mentor Roy Cohn and many are now being adopted by Trump's followers – one must never admit guilt; one must always swing back; and one must reject, or ideally entirely bury, defeats (such as Trump's case against Bob Woodward and Woodward's publisher being dismissed recently). But there is also a less obvious element and it has to do with managing political time (a challenge for all politicians, come to think of it). The point is not just seizing opportunities or exploiting opponents' weaknesses in a timely manner; rather, it is about the art of speeding things up or slowing them down to one's advantage. Think of how we appear to have become inured to Trump doing and saying things that would have ended previous presidencies (OK, previous presidents did not have AI-generated images of themselves as kings or popes available, but still). One reason is this: an administration that faces one or two big scandals in a four-year period may well be damaged beyond repair; one that produces three very big scandals a day seems to have nothing to worry about since no one can keep up. It is difficult to stick with one story, as the newest outrage already appears so much bigger (the Qatar plane scandal can feel like it happened years ago). To be sure, not all scandals are consciously produced, but there is little doubt that Trump's posting an AI-generated clip of Barack Obama being arrested in the White House and identifying Obama as a 'ringleader' of election fraud are meant to distract – which is not to deny that they would justify impeachment. While the frequency of scandals is maximized to game the news cycle, the legal system is used to slow things down. Releasing the grand jury testimonies in the Epstein case will take time, if the request is not rejected altogether by courts (as has already happened in Florida). Even if they are released, they are unlikely to contain anything relevant about Trump. The calculation is that, a few weeks from now, the files will be forgotten. None of this is to suggest Trump is a master Machiavellian who can manipulate Americans (or even just his base) at will. His approach partly works because institutional and cultural contexts have changed: news cycles are shorter, as are attention spans. His behavior has become progressively normalized – and generalized: shamelessness once unique to him is now in the manual of required GOP conduct (just think of blatant lies about Medicaid). Most important, a free press sticking relentlessly with scandals and ignoring intimidation can no longer be taken for granted; broadcasters in particular have become vulnerable to parent companies putting profits before everything else. Democrats, understandably not wanting to look like they mainly focus on the sordid details of the Epstein story, are tempted to move on and deal with the vaunted 'kitchen-table issues'. But it should give them pause that the story is apparently so scary for the other side that Republicans would rather shut down the House than deal with it in any shape or form. Are they right to panic? For sure, Trump made a mistake with his social media post urging followers to move on, which was the equivalent of 'don't think of an elephant' (while also providing further evidence for the Streisand effect: censorship generates the very attention meant to be avoided). Trump lobbying Murdoch to kill the story will give pause to all still naive enough to think of Republicans as free speech defenders. By now, the fact that releasing only the grand jury testimony is relatively meaningless has sunk in and – never mind the base – what political scientists call 'low-information voters' will be left with a lasting impression of a Trump-Epstein connection or at least a chaotic administration. In the lawsuit, Trump has to prove 'actual malice' on the part of the newspaper – a difficult hurdle to jump. Unlike with the Russia investigation, Trump himself is the instigator of a lengthy process overshadowing his presidency; unlike with the many investigations between his presidential terms, when his lawyers outran the clock, time is not really on his side. In fact, he might be lucky if the case is dismissed on a technicality – he apparently failed to comply with a Florida law that requires giving defendants five days' notice. Jan-Werner Müller is a Guardian US columnist and a professor of politics at Princeton University

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store