logo
Florida woman claims Atlanta police used excessive force for window tint violation

Florida woman claims Atlanta police used excessive force for window tint violation

Yahoo29-01-2025

The Brief
A Florida grandmother says an Atlanta police officer used excessive force when he arrested her over the weekend for having dark tint on her windows.
The 43-year-old says the officer cursed at her and yanked her out of the car. She says she recorded the encounter on her cellphone to prove it.
Ebony Thomas was arrested and charged with obstruction and having windows with an illegal dark tint on them.
ATLANTA - Florida resident Ebony Thomas says she was taking a friend to work on Sunday around 3:50 p.m. when an officer pulled her over at Lakewood Avenue and Jonesboro Road.
She says the cell phone video she captured tells the story.
What they're saying
Thomas: "The lock is on the door."
APD: "Unlock it."
Thomas: "You just hit it. What are you doing?"
APD: "Step out the car."
APD: "If I tell you again, I am going to pull your a-- out of the f---ing car."
Thomas says there was chaos from the very beginning when an Atlanta police officer pulled her over in her Mercedes CLA with dark tinted windows.
She says she started recording with her cellphone because she hadn't done anything wrong and the officer was so aggressive.
Thomas says she was afraid to move because she didn't want to be shot.
"The way he is so aggressive, I am like, 'What's going on? What just happened?" she told FOX 5 Atlanta reporter Aungelique Proctor. "He yanks my seatbelt off and pulled me out the car. I had on silver flip-flops. The shoes were in the driver's side on the floor, that is just how hard he pulled me."
Thomas says the officer cuffed both her and her passenger and searched the car. She says her passenger admitted to the officer that he smoked some marijuana right before Thomas picked him up, but the 43-year-old grandmother said she had done nothing wrong. She says a female recruit on the scene agreed with her.
"She's like, 'You are right. You didn't do nothing.' I said, 'You are admitting I did nothing, but I am still being arrested and detained?'" Thomas questioned.
The officer later released the male passenger and allowed him to go, but Thomas went straight to the Fulton County Jail.
"'I'm taking her to jail because her mouth is slick,'" Thomas said the officer said in front of her.
She was charged with obstruction and dark tinted windows. She was taken to the Fulton County Jail where she says she had to pay $3,700 to bond out.
What we know
Thomas has since reported the arrest to the Atlanta Police Department's Internal Affairs, alleging excessive force by the officer.
The department says it is looking into the matter.
The Source
This article is based on original reporting by FOX 5 Atlanta reporter Aungelique Proctor.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

APD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy' during anti-ICE protest
APD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy' during anti-ICE protest

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

APD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy' during anti-ICE protest

The Austin Police Department late Wednesday defended an officer's use of pepper spray during Monday's anti-deportation protest. A viral video posted to Reddit a day after the demonstration shows an Austin police officer pushing back a crowd of protesters while other officers forcibly arrested a protestor. The officer then deployed pepper spray into the scrum, dispersing the crowd. The video sparked a furor online with many commenters condemning the officer. Police Department spokeswoman Anna Sabana said the use of force incident was reported to the department's Force Review Unit, 'as is standard protocol.' But she said that 'early indication shows that it does fall within policy.' According to APD's use of force policy, pepper spray is used to 'disperse violent crowds or riots with (prior) supervisor approval.' The policy explicitly says pepper spray should not be deployed on non-violent crowds. 'As officers arrested the subjects that engaged in graffiti, the crowd closed in on them and pepper spray was used to disperse those that refused to move back after being ordered to back up,' Sabana said in a statement. 'During this time, several officers were hit by rocks that were thrown from the crowd of protestors.' Sabana did not say when the department would make a final determination. Local and state law enforcement deployed pepper spray and arrested over a dozen people during the downtown protest. The Austin chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation organized its 'ICE Out of Austin' protest in solidarity with Los Angeles' demonstrations against recent ICE raids. Austin Police Chief Davis had initially said on Tuesday morning that only the Texas Department of Public Safety deployed pepper spray, not APD. She later clarified that while APD did use pepper spray, the department did not use tear gas. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin police defends use of pepper spray during anti-ICE protest

Austin PD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy'
Austin PD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Austin PD: Officer's viral pepper spray use likely fell 'within policy'

The Austin Police Department late Wednesday defended an officer's use of pepper spray during Monday's anti-deportation protest. A viral video posted to Reddit a day after the demonstration shows an Austin police officer pushing back a crowd of protesters while other officers forcibly arrested a protestor. The officer then deployed pepper spray into the scrum, dispersing the crowd. The video sparked a furor online with many commenters condemning the officer. Police Department spokeswoman Anna Sabana said the use of force incident was reported to the department's Force Review Unit, 'as is standard protocol.' But she said that 'early indication shows that it does fall within policy.' According to APD's use of force policy, pepper spray is used to 'disperse violent crowds or riots with (prior) supervisor approval.' The policy explicitly says pepper spray should not be deployed on non-violent crowds. 'As officers arrested the subjects that engaged in graffiti, the crowd closed in on them and pepper spray was used to disperse those that refused to move back after being ordered to back up,' Sabana said in a statement. 'During this time, several officers were hit by rocks that were thrown from the crowd of protestors.' Sabana did not say when the department would make a final determination. Local and state law enforcement deployed pepper spray and arrested over a dozen people during the downtown protest. The Austin chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation organized its 'ICE Out of Austin' protest in solidarity with Los Angeles' demonstrations against recent ICE raids. Austin Police Chief Davis had initially said on Tuesday morning that only the Texas Department of Public Safety deployed pepper spray, not APD. She later clarified that while APD did use pepper spray, the department did not use tear gas. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin PD defends officer's pepper spray use during anti-ICE protest

Aspen Police Department Warns Kids Having Fun Is a Crime
Aspen Police Department Warns Kids Having Fun Is a Crime

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Aspen Police Department Warns Kids Having Fun Is a Crime

"When you see this, do you think it's just fun? Or do you think that it's illegal? It is definitely the latter. Whether it's fun or not." This is the beginning of a Facebook post by Colorado's Aspen Police Department (APD). What is this possibly fun but definitely illegal activity? The post includes a photo that shows two children on a bike—one child sitting on the seat and the other on the first rider's lap—riding on a sidewalk. "Colorado law says that two-up riding on a single seat bike is against the law, and of course, bikes are not allowed on sidewalks," the post continues. "These 'Sidewalk Sallys' could potentially hurt themselves or others." (If you had to Google "Sidewalk Sally" you are not alone, as it's not a real term. A daytime talk show seems to have coined and used it once, unrelated to riding a bike on a sidewalk.) The APD post goes on to inform Aspen's citizens that this behavior could result in a "ticket or a trip to the emergency room," both of which seem like rather dramatic consequences for an activity that has been popular since the invention of bikes. The tone-deaf post is signed "The Aspen Police Department—protecting the Wild West on two wheels since the 1880s," which seems to inadvertently imply that APD officers get around exclusively on bikes. The post has garnered over 300 comments—far more than the department's other posts—most of which are not thankful for the Department's caution and concern: "Tell me you don't have real crimes in Aspen without telling me you don't have real crimes." "'Kids never go outside anymore!' Proceeds to police every single thing kids do." "Lol yes. Our children should really be playing IN the traffic. Not away from it. Got it." (That one really resonated. My mom made me ride on the sidewalks, so it's not obvious to all of us that biking on the sidewalk is a crime.) Many of the comments were very libertarian-toned, naturally: "So basically every kid since the bicycle was invented has broken the law!" "Find a crime to deal with or reduce your force." "The more laws you make, the more police you have to hire to enforce new laws, the more police you hire to enforce those new laws, the more criminals you make. This pattern doesn't stop one day. It keeps growing." Several commenters asked if the page was satire, while one dealt a devastating blow: "Colorado used to be cool." Despite this, in 2022, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed the Reasonable Independence for Children law, clarifying that "a child is not neglected when allowed to participate in certain independent activities that a reasonable and prudent parent, guardian, or legal custodian would consider safe given the child's maturity, condition, and abilities." Utah passed the first such law in 2018 and has since been joined by Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Virginia, Illinois, Connecticut, and Montana. This year alone, Georgia and Missouri also passed similar legislation, with Florida expected to follow soon. Let Grow, the nonprofit I run, supported all of these laws and continues to work with broad coalitions to see legislative protections for childhood independence enacted. No child should be treated like a criminal for riding a bike with a friend. And no police department should be proud of doing so. Facebook commenters know this. Hopefully, the APD will catch up soon. The post Aspen Police Department Warns Kids Having Fun Is a Crime appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store