Trump demands homeless people 'immediately' move out of Washington DC
"We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital," he posted on Sunday. The Republican president also trailed a news conference for Monday about his plan to make the city "safer and more beautiful than it ever was before".
Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, said: "We are not experiencing a crime spike."
Trump signed an order last month making it easier to arrest homeless people, and he last week ordered federal law enforcement into the streets of Washington DC.
"The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY," Trump wrote on his social media site Truth Social on Sunday.
"We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong."
Alongside photos of tents and rubbish, he added: "There will be no 'MR. NICE GUY.' We want our Capital BACK. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
The specifics of the president's plan are not yet clear, but in a 2022 speech he proposed moving homeless people to "high quality" tents on inexpensive land outside cities, while providing access to bathrooms and medical professionals.
On Friday, Trump ordered federal agents - including from US Park Police, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the FBI and the US Marshals Service - into Washington DC to curb what he called "totally out of control" levels of crime.
A White House official told National Public Radio that up to 450 federal officers were deployed on Saturday night.
The move comes after a 19-year-old former employee of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) was assaulted in an alleged attempted carjacking in Washington DC.
Trump vented about that incident on social media, posting a photo of the bloodied victim.
Mayor Bowser told MSNBC on Sunday: "It is true that we had a terrible spike in crime in 2023, but this is not 2023.
"We have spent over the last two years driving down violent crime in this city, driving it down to a 30-year low."
She criticised White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller for dubbing the US capital "more violent than Baghdad".
"Any comparison to a war-torn country is hyperbolic and false," Bowser said.
Washington DC's homicide rate remains relatively high per capita compared to other US cities, with a total of 98 such killings recorded so far this year. Homicides have been trending higher in the US capital from a decade ago.
But federal data from January suggests that Washington DC last year recorded its lowest overall violent crime figures - once carjacking, assault and robberies are incorporated - in 30 years.
Trump has said there will be a news conference at the White House on Monday to outline their plans to stop violent crime in the US capital.
In another post on Sunday he said the event at 10:00 EDT (14:00 GMT) would address ending "crime, murder and death" in the city, as well as its "physical renovation".
He described Bowser as "a good person who has tried", adding that despite her efforts crime continues to get "worse" and the city becomes "dirtier and less attractive".
Community Partnership, an organisation that works to reduce homelessness in Washington DC, told Reuters news agency that the city of 700,000 residents had about 3,782 people homeless on any given night.
Most were in public housing or emergency shelters, but about 800 were considered "on the street".
As a district, rather than a state, Washington DC is overseen by the federal government, which has the power to override some local laws.
The president controls federal land and buildings in the city, although he would need Congress to assume federal control of the district.
In recent days, he has threatened to take over the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department, which Bowser argued was not possible.
"There are very specific things in our law that would allow the president to have more control over our police department," Bowser said. "None of those conditions exist in our city right now."
Teenager arrested after three shot in New York City's Times Square
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amendments to protect 'equal rights,' reverse Ohio Constitution's ban on gay marriage given OK
Aug. 11—There will be two new citizen-initiated amendments circulating around Ohio following a state board's decision to split a proposed initiative guaranteeing equal rights under the law and formally remove the Ohio Constitution's gay marriage ban into separate amendments. The initial proposal was cleared by Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost last month, pending further clearance from the Ohio Ballot Board, which has the responsibility to determine whether proposed constitutional amendment initiatives contain one or more proposals. On July 9, the board determined the organizer's petition contained "two distinct proposed amendments: (1) a proposed constitutional amendment that would create more than a dozen protected classes, and (2) a proposed constitutional amendment related specifically to marriage." Now that the proposal has been split in two, organizers officially have the state's permission to begin collecting signatures, Yost announced Friday. The first proposed amendment, titled the "Ohio Equal Rights Amendment," would amend the state's constitution to expressly forbid the state from abridging someone's rights under the law "on account of race, color, creed or religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression regardless of sex assigned at birth, pregnancy status, genetic information, disease status, age, disability, recovery status, familial status, ancestry, national origin, or military and veteran status." The second proposal would strike out the portion of Ohio's constitution which says: "Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions." It would replace that text with a mandate that the state "shall recognize and treat equally all marriages regardless of race, sex, or gender identity." The amendment would, however, give individual clergy the option to refuse to "solemnize" marriages of their choosing. Ohio has recognized same-sex marriages since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, an Ohio-based case that directly struck down the state's constitutional and legal bans on gay marriage and guaranteed it as a federal right. Yost's office explained that, in order to get these proposals on a statewide ballot, petitioners will now need to collect "signatures from registered voters equal to at least 10% of the vote cast in the most recent gubernatorial election." "Those signatures must come from voters in at least 44 of Ohio's 88 counties, and for each of those counties the number must equal at least 5% of the vote cast in the most recent gubernatorial election," a Friday press release from Yost's office reads. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Putin cannot decide on land swaps, say Ukraine and EU
Ukraine and its backers in Europe insist that the United States and Russia cannot decide on land swaps behind their backs at a summit this week, but the Europeans concede that Moscow is unlikely to give up control of Ukrainian land it holds. Ahead of the summit in Alaska on Friday, US President Donald Trump suggested that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories', but the Europeans see no sign that Russia will offer anything to swap. Europeans and Ukrainians, so far, are not invited to the summit. European Union foreign ministers are meeting on Monday following talks on Ukraine among US and European security advisers over the weekend. They are wary that President Vladimir Putin will try to claim a political victory by portraying Ukraine as inflexible. Concerns have mounted in Europe and Ukraine that Kyiv may be pressed to give up land or accept other curbs on its sovereignty. Ukraine and its European allies reject the notion that Mr Putin should lay claim to any territory even before agreeing to a ceasefire. 'As we work towards a sustainable and just peace, international law is clear: all temporarily occupied territories belong to Ukraine', EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said ahead of the ministerial meeting. 'A sustainable peace also means that aggression cannot be rewarded,' Ms Kallas said. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said 'it must be obvious to Poland and our European partners – and I hope to all of Nato – that state borders cannot be changed by force'. Any land swaps or peace terms 'must be agreed upon with Ukraine's participation,' he said, according to Polish news agency PAP. On Sunday, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany would not accept that territorial issues be discussed or decided by Russia and the United States 'over the heads' of Europeans or Ukrainians. In 2022, Russia illegally annexed the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in Ukraine's east, and Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in the south, even though it does not fully control them. It also occupies the Crimean Peninsula, which it seized in 2014. On the 620-mile front line, Russia's bigger army has made slow but costly progress with its summer offensive. The relentless pounding of urban areas has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to UN estimates. 'In the end, the issue of the fact that the Russians are controlling at this moment, factually, a part of Ukraine has to be on the table' in any peace talks after the Alaska summit, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said on CBS on Sunday. Giving up any territory, especially without a ceasefire agreement first, would be almost impossible for Mr Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to sell at home after thousands of troops have died defending their land. Ultimately, Putin is seen as being not so much interested in land itself, but rather in a more 'Russia-friendly' Ukraine with a malleable government that would be unlikely to try to join Nato, just as pro-Russian regions in Georgia stymied that country's hopes of becoming a member. Mr Zelensky insists that a halt to fighting on the front line should be the starting point for negotiations, and the Europeans back him. They say that any future land swaps should be for Ukraine to decide and not be a precondition for a ceasefire.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge denies request to unseal transcripts from grand jury that indicted Ghislaine Maxwell
NEW YORK (AP) — Transcripts of the secret grand jury testimony that led to the sex trafficking indictment of Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell won't be released, a judge decided Monday. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer said in a written ruling that the government had suggested that the materials could be released publicly 'casually or promiscuously,' which would risk 'unraveling the foundations of secrecy upon which the grand jury is premised' and eroding confidence by persons called to testify before future grand juries, 'And it is no answer to argue that releasing the grand jury materials, because they are redundant of the evidence at Maxwell's trial, would be innocuous. The same could be said for almost any grand jury testimony, by summary witnesses or others, given in support of charges that later proceeded to trial,' he added. Federal prosecutors had asked to unseal the documents, in an effort to calm a whirlpool of suspicions about what the government knows about Epstein, a well-connected financier who died behind bars while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell, his socialite ex-girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. It's unclear how much the transcripts would have revealed since the Justice Department has acknowledged that they contained no testimony from witnesses who were not members of law enforcement. Maxwell recently was interviewed by the Justice Department and was moved from a prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas. Her attorney says she testified truthfully. Prosecutors have said much of what was discussed behind the grand jury's closed doors ultimately became public at Maxwell's 2021 trial in 2021, in victims' civil lawsuits or in public statements from victims and witnesses. The only grand jury witnesses were law enforcement officers. The decision about the grand jury transcripts doesn't affect thousands of other pages that the government possesses but has declined to release. The Justice Department has said much of the material was court-sealed to protect victims and little of it would have come out if Epstein had gone to trial. Another federal judge still is weighing whether to release the transcripts from the grand jury testimony that led to Epstein's indictment. A federal judge in Florida declined to release grand jury documents from an investigation there in 2005 and 2007. Some Epstein victims supported releasing the grand jury transcripts with some redactions. Other accusers said the debate over the material was causing them anguish. Maxwell, who's appealing her conviction, opposed unsealing the documents. Her lawyers said she hasn't seen them but believed they were full of questionable statements that her defense had no opportunity to challenge. Solve the daily Crossword
