Lawmakers re-up push for short-term rental taxes to fund housing, education
Between April 2022 and 2023, Maine had almost 24,000 rental properties with at least one reservation, according to a statewide housing study. (Maine Morning Star)
Though several legislative attempts to institute taxes on short-term rentals have failed, Democratic lawmakers are trying again this session to institute these surcharges on vacation properties, specifically to support affordable housing for permanent residents and education.
Among these proposals being heard Wednesday in the Taxation Committee is the second iteration of a plan from Rep. Charles Skold (D-Portland). His bill, LD 632, would allow a municipality to impose a local option sales tax of 2% on short-term lodging that is subject to the state sales and use tax, if approved by voters in that municipality.
This is higher than the 1% sales tax on such properties Skold proposed last year in legislation that failed to gain support on the floor after narrowly being backed by the Taxation Committee by a one-vote margin.
Similar to his previous proposal, Skold's bill would require that the revenue the tax generates be used for affordable housing in that municipality.
The regulation of short-term rentals, such as Airbnbs, in Maine has largely fallen to municipalities, with cities such as Portland, Rockland and Bar Harbor taking it upon themselves to pass local rules.
Portland lawmaker proposes funding affordable housing with short-term rental tax
While noting the importance of short-term lodging on the state's economy, Skold and others supportive of his plan last year, including residents along the coast, argued that each housing unit converted into a short-term rental takes away units from individuals and families who would like to stay in Maine full time but who are currently being driven away by a lack of housing supply and high prices.
'This bill does not detract at all from the importance of short-term lodging in our economy, but it allows municipalities heavily impacted by this trend to recover some benefit and use that revenue to help meet their own housing needs,' Skold testified at the time.
But real estate, tourist groups and the state's Department of Administrative and Financial Services opposed Skold's proposed tax, arguing it could deter tourists because of higher costs or disadvantage businesses in the communities that choose to enact the tax.
There were also concerns over the constitutionality of the bill. DAFS testified that any local sales tax should be structured with the 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. in mind, which noted the importance of a simple tax system when imposing sales tax on remote sellers.
Other versions of a short-term rental sales tax are being considered this year, too.
Rep. Gary Friedmann (D-Bar Harbor) also proposed a bill to permit municipalities to impose a 2% sales tax on short-term lodging, if approved by referendum, to be used for affordable housing.
However, Friedmann's bill, LD 746, would require 10% of revenue generated to be transferred to the Maine State Housing Authority to be used to provide subsidies through the rural affordable rental housing program or another program that supports affordable housing development in rural communities, specifically.
While differing on the specifics, Skold and Friedmann's proposals to use this tax for affordable housing differ from how Rep. Michael Brennan (D-Portland) is seeking to use revenue generated from such a tax.
Brennan proposed LD 225, which would create a higher tax, an additional 3% sales tax on the value of rental living quarters in a hotel or other lodging, with its revenue reserved for the Maine Department of Education to fund school construction and K-12 education.
Earlier efforts to institute statewide regulations on short term rentals have attempted to impose fees, rather than a tax. That was the case for a bill from Rep. Tiffany Strout (R-Harrington) last session, as well as another bill in the session before last that specifically tried to place fees on second homes unoccupied by a permanent resident. Both bills died.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Impeachment wars
Rep. Jasmine Crockett's mere mention of a possible impeachment inquiry into President Trump has touched off negative reactions from some colleagues. "I think she's going to turn off a lot more people than gain," a House Democrat told us. Why it matters: House Democratic leaders are staying neutral. But many Democrats are allergic to the word after they impeached Trump twice only for him to return to power with full control of the government. Crockett (D-Texas), asked in a local news interview if she would pursue impeachment if Democrats retook the House in 2026 and she became Oversight Committee chair, said she would "absolutely at least do an inquiry." The other three candidates for the ranking member job on Oversight, Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), told us they wouldn't go that far. 👿 "Turning this ranker race into a proxy for impeachment is unhelpful and unfair to her colleagues," said a House Democrat who predicted Republicans will "try to motivate their base by saying that a Democratic majority will inevitably lead to impeachment." Crockett told us the term "impeachment inquiry" would stress to the public the "next level of gravity" of the subject matter — such as Trump's pardons for big money allies and the Qatari jet scandal. "A lot of times we as Democrats can overthink stuff," Crockett said. "A lot of people ... felt like [Oversight Committee chair] James Comer was an embarrassment. But at the end of the day, who won the House?" The bottom line: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries deferred to House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), whose panel, he said, "has jurisdiction over impeachment."
New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Adams Team Works Behind Scenes to Try to Sway Rabbis Against Cuomo
Mayor Eric Adams may be running an unusually low-key race for re-election in New York City, opting out of the Democratic primary and mounting an independent general election run without even a campaign manager to steer it. But behind the scenes, he is making an aggressive play to try to shape the field to his liking and hold onto a key voting bloc. A top aide to Mr. Adams has been calling Orthodox Jewish leaders in recent weeks to urge them not to back Andrew M. Cuomo in the June 24 Democratic primary, or to temper their support for him if they do, according to six people familiar with the effort. Mr. Adams's allies have indicated they believe he would have a better chance of winning the general election if Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist assemblyman now polling in second place, defeats Mr. Cuomo and becomes the Democratic nominee. At the same time, Mr. Adams has used his mayoral powers to make policy pronouncements that seem designed to resonate with some Orthodox Jews. He signed an executive order recognizing the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism and created the Mayor's Office to Combat Antisemitism to address the spike in antisemitic hate crimes in the city. 'He is going around to people to ask for support for the general election,' said Rabbi Moishe Indig, a leader of one faction of the Satmar Hasidic group in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. 'He would love that everyone just ignore the primary and wait until the fall.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
NY lawmaker lambastes failed commemoration of Oct 7 attack, as Dem leadership accused of 'antisemitism'
The New York assemblyman behind an effort to formally commemorate the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack in Israel lambasted leadership for tanking what was supposed to be a "poignant" bill remembering the tragedy. Assemblyman Lester Chang, R-Brooklyn – one of the few GOP members from New York City in the 103-47 Democratic-majority chamber – said he had been working on a resolution for New York state to officially remember the terror attack since hostage negotiations began a year ago. "I'm a Navy veteran of 24 years and I did a tour in Afghanistan. So I understand what war is all about," said Chang. "I've seen atrocities out there." Once American figures like then-candidate Donald Trump began helping hostage negotiations, Chang said he directed his staff to craft a message – which he said took more than a month of back-and-forth to make sure it was "balanced" and did not have a partisan streak. "We submitted it in January, as a resolution, and it was rejected… because [leadership] said it was 'controversial,'" Chang said. "We were astounded but not surprised. So we converted it to a bill," he said, adding that, in the end, a bill would be better because a resolution only commemorates an event for that year, while a bill would codify the remembrance for eternity. With a handful of Democratic co-sponsors, Chang and colleagues believed they had the right balance to attempt to put it up for a vote, but as the New York Post reported, it was reportedly ultimately blocked by House Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, and other top Democrats. Chang said the bill, destined for the smaller governmental operations committee, was redirected to the larger Ways and Means committee, and that four members were "switched out." The top Republican on that panel, Assemblyman Ed Ra, told the New York Post that remembering Oct. 7 and/or combating antisemitism should never be "political." Republican Assemblyman Ari Brown, who, like Ra, represents Long Island, accused Albany Democrats of "veiled antisemitism," telling the Post the legislature is "rotten" with it. The assembly also tanked a resolution from Brown that complimented Chang's bill. Compounding that was, as Chang described, no GOP bills have been successfully put through the process at all this session. "Having me as a Republican [sponsor] – that would [procedurally] choke them – not because of me, the person, but as a member of that party." Chang said he would just as soon "give this bill to a Democrat" to sponsor if it meant commemorating the Oct. 7 attack. He added that, as a person of Chinese ancestry who represents largely Asian and Italian Bensonhurst, he has no religious horse in the race. "That should make it more poignant as a non-Jewish person pushing this bill in a mostly Christian and Buddhist district," he said. At least seven Democrats did come out in support of the Oct. 7 remembrance legislation, all of whom hail from New York City. Senate Minority Leader Rob Ortt, R-Niagara Falls, echoed Chang's concerns in comments to Fox News Digital. "Many New Yorkers had loved ones injured or worse in the terror attacks in Israel on Oct. 7," Ortt said. "The least we can do is commemorate this tragic day." "Instead of taking commonsense action, Albany Democrats would rather play politics, and have time and again refused to defend our Jewish brothers and sisters." Fox News Digital reached out to Heastie for comment and response to the allegations but did not hear back.
