
OpenAI and Microsoft Execs Reportedly Considering the ‘Nuclear Option'
OpenAI and Microsoft like to present themselves as the power couple of Silicon Valley, but behind closed doors, it's looking increasingly like a distraught and loveless marriage. The two companies, which are bound together by cash flows and an entwined product base, have been undergoing a turbulent negotiation surrounding OpenAI's desire for a shorter leash and the opportunity to turn itself into a for-profit company. Microsoft appears to be resistant to some of those goals. Now, a new report claims that the staff at OpenAI have prepped a 'nuclear option,' in case the negotiations do not go the way they want them to.
The Wall Street Journal reports that OpenAI may run to the federal government and accuse Microsoft—its own sugar daddy—of anti-competitive practices. Were this to happen, OpenAI execs claim they would seek a federal regulatory review of the terms of the contract between them and Microsoft, with an eye towards identifying potential antitrust violations. For Microsoft, calling in the antitrust cops could be the most extreme form of betrayal that exists. It's been down that road, picked up the pieces, and become a very different company in the meantime. OpenAI might also launch a media campaign to air the duo's dirty laundry in public.
The two companies have a quite unique relationship that could make such a conflict particularly disastrous. Microsoft doesn't own OpenAI outright, and the startup isn't technically beholden to the software giant. But Microsoft provides the cloud computing infrastructure necessary to fuel OpenAI's tools, and Microsoft earns a large percentage of OpenAI's profits until the startup repays Microsoft's initial investments. After the initial investment is paid, Microsoft will retain a large stake in the company and earn a certain percentage of OpenAI's profits until it hits a cap. But again, because it's not technically owned by Microsoft, OpenAI is still (technically) its own organization.
OpenAI's effort to become a for-profit company is presumably pivotal to its long-term growth strategy—a strategy that could be strangled if Microsoft holds onto it too tightly. The Journal notes that much of the strife between the two companies seems to revolve around Microsoft's continued ownership over large parts of OpenAI's business:
The companies continue to be at odds over how much of OpenAI Microsoft would own if it converts into a public-benefit corporation. Microsoft is currently asking for a larger stake in the new company than OpenAI is willing to give, people familiar with the matter said. OpenAI has to complete the conversion by the end of the year, or it risks losing $20 billion in funding.
Were OpenAI to actually turn on Microsoft, the resultant corporate battle could be one for the ages—a truly ugly mud fight between two of the most influential companies in Silicon Valley. It's not clear whether we're at that stage yet, however. 'We have a long-term, productive partnership that has delivered amazing AI tools for everyone,' representatives for the two companies told the Wall Street Journal in a joint statement. 'Talks are ongoing, and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come.' Gizmodo reached out to OpenAI and Microsoft for more information.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TechCrunch
15 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Anysphere launches a $200-a-month Cursor AI coding subscription
Anysphere launched a new $200-a-month subscription plan for its popular AI coding tool, Cursor, the company announced in a blog post on Monday. The new plan, Ultra, offers users 20x more usage on AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and xAI compared to the company's $20-a-month subscription plan, Pro. Anysphere also says Cursor users on the Ultra plan will get priority access to new features. Anysphere CEO Michael Truell said in a blog that the Ultra plan was made possible through multi-year partnerships with AI model providers. In the last several months, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind have similarly rolled out pricier subscription plans — ranging from $100-a-month to $250-a-month — as part of an effort to capitalize on their power users, and offer them increased usage. The new, pricy Cursor subscription plan seems poised to add revenue to Anysphere's already booming business. Earlier this month, Anysphere announced that Cursor had reached $500 million in annualized recurring revenue and is being used by major companies such as Nvidia, Uber, and Adobe. Anysphere was one of the fastest companies ever to reach $100 million in ARR, and it doesn't seem to be slowing down. Based on TechCrunch's previous reporting, Cursor's ARR has grown by $200 million since April. However, the race to develop 'vibecoding' tools is heating up, and many of the AI model providers Cursor relies on are developing their own AI coding products. OpenAI has reportedly acquired Cursor's competitor, Windsurf, to beef up its offerings of AI coding products. Meanwhile, Anthropic continues to develop Claude Code, its in-house AI coding tool that utilizes its popular AI models. It's unclear whether Anysphere can sustain this level of growth without bumping into AI model providers. We've seen more competitive tactics emerge in the AI coding space as these businesses have grown. For example, Anthropic recently slashed Windsurf's direct access to Claude AI models as a means to undercut its largest competitor, OpenAI. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW At the same time, Anysphere has started putting more resources towards developing its own AI models that work alongside models from OpenAI and Anthropic. In May, Anysphere rolled out a new 'Tab' AI model, which can suggest code changes across various files. In a recent interview with TechCrunch, Anthropic co-founder Jared Kaplan said he believed Anthropic would be working with Cursor for a long time. Anysphere's multi-year partnerships with Anthropic and other AI model providers certainly suggest these relationships aren't going anywhere just yet. Nonetheless, the competition for users is getting more intense.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI's $3 Billion Windsurf buy sparks Microsoft IP clash
OpenAI's $3 billion acquisition of coding startup Windsurf has reportedly strained its deep partnership with Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) over access to AI intellectual property. According to a Wall Street Journal report, the deal terms give OpenAI pause about extending Microsoft's existing access to Windsurf's technology, even though Microsoft currently holds rights to all of OpenAI's IP under their multibillion-dollar investment agreement. The report says OpenAI doesn't want to grant Microsoft the same level of access to Windsurf's code. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with MSFT. Both companies downplayed tensions, telling the WSJ they have a long-term, productive partnership and remain in talks optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come. The frictions come amid Microsoft's growing stake in OpenAIit initially invested $1 billion in 2019 and has since poured in roughly $13 billionand as OpenAI transitions to a public benefit corporation, where Microsoft is pushing for a larger equity share than OpenAI is willing to cede. Any wobble in the OpenAI-Microsoft alliance could ripple through the cloud and AI markets. Microsoft's exclusive rights to sell OpenAI's models via Azure and its preferred technology access have been a linchpin of both companies' cloud strategies. Scaling such partnerships without diluting competitive advantagesor investor returnswill test how Big Tech and AI startups navigate IP-sharing, governance and commercial incentives as they race to build next-gen AI services. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


TechCrunch
34 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Streaming viewership exceeded cable and broadcast combined for the first time last month, report says
In Brief Streaming services surpassed both cable and network television in total viewership among people in the U.S. for the first time in May, according to a new report from Nielsen. Last month, streaming services accounted for 44.8% of all television viewership, their largest share to date. Nielsen found that total viewership for cable and network television accounted for 44.2% of all television viewership. When compared to May 2021, streaming usage has increased 71%, while broadcast is down 21% and cable is down 39%. The report also shows that YouTube took the crown for highest viewership with 12.5%. Netflix followed with 7.5% of total viewership for the month. Nielsen notes that free streaming services has been a major driver of streaming's overall success: PlutoTV, Roku Channel, and Tubi accounted for a combined 5.7% of total TV viewing in May.