Donald Trump to sign order requiring universities to submit admissions data on race
Leavitt shared the news on the microblogging platform X.
The presidential memorandum, which Trump is expected to approve on Thursday, directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to expand the scope of requiring reports from institutions' admissions data to "provide adequate transparency" and "to increase accuracy checks" on that data, CNN reported.
The US Supreme Court had in June 2023 ruled that colleges and universities could not longer consider race as a basis for admission, terming it to be 'unconstitutional'. In a landmark decision, SCOTUS overturned the long-standing precedent that benefited students of colour in higher education.
Citing that there is not enough admissions data from the universities, the White House raised "concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice".
ALSO READ | Columbia University to pay $200 million as settlement to Trump administration: Here's why
McMahon will also be expected to revamp the higher education database known as the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, which carries out surveys to review trends in tuition and fees, admissions considerations, enrollment and financial aid, the report mentioned.
The latest development against the backdrop of Trump's continued emphasis on policy changes at universities and colleges, including Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives.
Just recently, two Ivy League universities, Columbia and Brown, agreed to disclose admissions and race data in a settlement with the Trump administration.
The administration will reportedly gain access to the standardised test scores and grade point averages of all applicants, including information about their race, a move that could potentially alter college admissions, The New York Times reported.
The Trump administration is pushing to bring elite college admissions offices toward "merit-based" processes, which give higher weightage to grades and test scores.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon had said while announcing the Brown deal, "Because of the Trump administration's resolution agreement with Brown University, aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Letters to The Editor — August 8, 2025
More tariffs For the U.S. President, friendship with India seems to be substantially different from his presidential decisions (Front page, August 7). For all the bonhomie with New Delhi, the U.S. continues to treat India as a secondary power. India may have to accept that Mr. Trump will arm-twist countries to force them to fall in line with his policies. If New Delhi can get the tariff hike postponed it would give it elbow room to manoeuvre. A.V. Narayanan, Chennai Is the U.S. trying to derail India's economic standing? Mere expressions of verbal protest are not enough. The Government of India must respond firmly and decisively. Continued silence could have severe consequences, particularly for Indian businesses. Gulam Rabbani, Bajpatti, Sitamarhi, Bihar While India and the U.S. share a strategic partnership built on mutual respect and shared values, this sort of punitive trade action risks prioritising business interests over the spirit of friendship. The U.S. should choose dialogue that honours both economic realities and the deepening bond between the two nations. Anush D'Cunha S.J., Thiruvananthapuram Nature's warning The 'cloudburst' that wreaked havoc in Uttarkashi's Dharali and Sukhi Top areas is a reminder of the Himalayan region's vulnerability to extreme weather events. The message is clear. The region desperately needs transformation, from reactive responses to proactive resilience building. Only through such an approach can we protect the Himalayan communities while also preserving this ecosystem for future generations. R. Sivakumar, Chennai Deletions, gender disparity How can the Election Commission of India (ECI) ensure free and fair elections in Bihar when there are major issues with deletions and omissions in the electoral rolls?The ECI finds itself in a catch-22 situation. Its actions, once unquestionable, are being questioned by the Opposition and the judiciary. It will be a disaster if the ECI's responses to the Supreme Court's candid observations are not met with concrete replies, evidence and action (Data point, August 7). Balasubramaniam Pavani, Secunderabad On the tomato I write this letter as former Director, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology and Government Ophthalmic Hospital, Chennai. The article, 'The virtues of tomato, a healthy vegetable' ('Science' page, July 27), was descriptive in terms of the health benefits of consuming tomatoes. But as a health-care provider, it is my duty to issue caution against some negative factors in this angel vegetable. Consumption in excess can lead to side-effects in certain individuals. These include acid reflux, allergies, digestive issues and potential kidney problems due to high potassium content. Being rich in calcium and oxalates, the tomato can induce kidney stone formation. The tomato is a nutritious gift from mother nature, but moderation is the key for good health. Dr. M.V.S. Prakash, Chennai
India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
DNA Decodes: How Trump-Munir Bond Is Threatening China's Influence In Pakistan
US President Donald Trump is infamous for turning foes into friends and friends into foes in pursuit of a good deal. But every friendship has its limits and layers. When two individuals with differing status and worldviews appear unusually close, it often signals shared interests driving a strategic alliance. Such a bond has now emerged between Trump and Pakistan's military chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir. In today's DNA, we analysed this unique and strategic equation between Trump and Munir, highlighting its broader geopolitical implications for South Asia. #DNAWithRahulSinha #DNA #USA #DonaldTrump #USTarrif #China #AsimMunir @RahulSinhaTV — Zee News (@ZeeNews) August 7, 2025 China's Investment in Pakistan China's footprint in Pakistan is vast: bilateral trade stands at INR 19,000 crore; CPEC alone has drawn INR 54,000 crore (now stalled); the power sector has absorbed INR 28,000 crore across hydropower, coal, and LNG; infrastructure projects, including roads, railways, and ports, total INR 11,000 crore. Moreover, Pakistan imports 80% of its military hardware from China at subsidized rates. On top of this, China has extended INR 24,000 crore in loans, with interest repayments proving burdensome. This heavy reliance has sparked fears that Pakistan could become a Chinese colony. In response, the US is working to bring Pakistan back into its strategic orbit. As Washington's influence grows through Munir, Beijing's grip weakens — a trend that has unsettled China. Frequent visits to Pakistan by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reflect these concerns. For China, the Trump-Munir proximity is a major red flag. Further complicating matters, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's recent visit to Pakistan is seen as a backchannel effort — reminiscent of General Yahya Khan's role in the 1970s — to broker US-Iran ties, with Munir again as the quiet mediator. Munir Protecting US Interests Beyond geopolitics, Munir is also seen as protecting Trump's interests. During his White House visit, Munir handed Trump symbolic 'balloons,' supported his Nobel Prize bid, and now oversees a major crypto deal involving the Trump-linked World Liberty Council worth INR 17,000 crore. In return, Trump appears to be offering Pakistan strategic assurances. US military aid, reduced under Biden, has resumed, with INR 330 crore allocated for F-16 support. During Operation Sindhu, Pakistan received IMF relief worth INR 20,000 crore. Trump has also signed oil deals to support Pakistan's exploration ambitions, even suggesting Pakistan could one day export oil to India. The growing Trump-Munir axis marks a significant realignment in regional geopolitics. Trump's quiet endorsement of Munir as Pakistan's de facto leader signals a move that could reshape power balances in South Asia, particularly by sidelining China's influence over Islamabad.
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
‘To call India's fast-growing economy ‘dead' is so Trumpian —the US President is undermining faith in American statistics'
Alan Blinder Synopsis Alan Blinder, former Federal Reserve Vice Chair, critiques Trump's economic policies, highlighting the contractionary effects of tariffs and the undermining of statistical agencies. He expresses concern over the future of global trade due to the US's shift away from globalization. Alan Blinder, former Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve, is Gordon S. Rentschler Memorial Professor of Economics and Public Affairs at Princeton University. He spoke with Srijana Mitra Das about tariffs — in a Trumpian world: ADVERTISEMENT Q. Donald Trump has called the Indian economy 'dead' — what is your view?A. India's economy doesn't look 'dead' to most people. If you went back a few decades, perhaps you could have used that euphemism — but certainly not now. India has been growing fast — to call it a 'dead economy' is very Trumpian. Q. You've written about how Donald Trump is now playing with the risk of causing negative GDP growth in the US — could you elaborate? A. Yes. Tariffs — although the President doesn't like to use this word — are taxes. In particular, they are sales taxes — and discriminatory sales taxes against foreign goods that don't apply to American goods are contractionary. Raising tariffs thus is a stagflationary shock. It pushes up prices and takes away purchasing power from Americans. That makes it contractionary on real output and consumer spending — we are just starting to see this. I will also mention the crackdown on undocumented or immigrant labour in the United States — this is reducing the labour force. If you have a given amount of demand growth and the labour force isn't keeping pace, GDP growth slows and might even turn negative. I think 'slows' is more likely here. Q. President Trump also recently fired the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) chief, saying their data presented was inaccurate, even 'rigged' to dent his image — how likely is all that?A. All data is inaccurate. Yes, there were big revisions here and there will probably be revisions next month as well. But to suggest this was part of political manipulation to make Donald Trump look bad is ridiculous — it's more than ridiculous. It's actually quite evil and it is undermining the faith the whole world has in American statistics which are considered the gold standard. The BLS is possibly the most outstanding statistical agency in the world. To think they fiddled numbers to make Trump look bad is simply ludicrous. ADVERTISEMENT Q. What does this indicate about the future of statistical organisations? A. It's troubling. The next thing that may come up with a 'bad' number in Donald Trump's mind is the Bureau of Economic Analysis in the Commerce Department, where GDP figures and much else — such as the measure of inflation the Fed focuses on — come from. This is setting a horrible example of what might be done with other statistical agencies. It's not even limited to economic statistics — President Trump and his administration are shutting off information channels about health, climate change and a variety of things. Q. President Trump says tariffs will increase US productivity — do they work like that? ADVERTISEMENT A. It's very unlikely. The only reason I don't say a flat 'No' is if you protect a particular industry. A common example in the United States, one that's been getting protection for 60 years, is steel. The American steel industry can grow behind the protective tariff, keeping out foreign won't enhance productivity but it will create some jobs in the steel industry — at the cost of many more jobs in industries that use steel. If you rack up how many jobs there are in US steel — it's not that many anymore — against how many jobs there are in US industries that use steel as an input, it's not even close. So, tariffs won't be a source of economic progress, although they might bring back some manufacturing jobs that are now abroad. Q. What is the future of global trade, given Donald Trump's precedents? ADVERTISEMENT A. I'm quite pessimistic about that. For the last 70 years, as globalisation expanded, the United States was always in the lead, pushing it. We had some backsliding now and then but we've basically supported globalisation and we're pushing the other way around. I don't know how long this is going to last. President Trump is in office for four years. Hopefully, this won't continue beyond that and we can dismantle some of the damage he's done. But some damage will be permanent. The world will need a new leader or leaders pushing towards open trade and globalisation now. Of course, this will be hard without the United States of America, the biggest economy on Earth — earlier, trade was backed by Americans and most other big economies. But the effort to bring trade back in the Trump era will now have to come from outside the United States. Q. Given everything going on, are there thoughts you'd like to share with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell? A. Yes — hang in there. He's said two significant things. First, he's not going to resign before his term or be pushed out by President Trump. Second, the Fed will continue to call its shots on monetary policy the way it always has, looking at the economy's needs — and not listening to political overlords. ADVERTISEMENT Alongside, I should now add the last jobs report we had does cast a negative light on job growth and probably economic growth in the US. That strengthens the case to cut rates. If you had asked me before this last report if the Fed should cut rates at its next meeting in September, I'd have said, 'Probably not'. If you ask me today, given this data, I would likely say, 'Yes'. They'd both be close calls. I'm not sure what's in Jay Powell's head — but, to me, that last jobs report pushes towards a cut. Views expressed are personal (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY
