Trump portrait artist says career is in peril after president accuses her of distorting his likeness
Sarah Boardman said in a statement Saturday that the portrait she was commissioned for in 2019 was approved throughout her artistic process by the Colorado State Capitol Advisory Committee. In the six years its hung in Denver, Boardman insisted she'd received "overwhelmingly" positive feedback on the painting.
That changed after Trump demanded the portrait be taken down in a March 23 Truth Social post, insisting his likeness "was purposefully distorted to a level that even I, perhaps, have never seen before."
The portrait was removed the next day and placed in storage after Republican leadership requested it be taken down, a spokesperson for Colorado House Democrats said.
Boardman denied the allegation, saying the work was completed without "political bias, or any attempt to caricature the subject, actual or implied."
"President Trump is entitled to comment freely, as we all are, but the additional allegations that I 'purposefully distorted' the portrait, and that I 'must have lost my talent as I got older' are now directly and negatively impacting my business of over 41 years which now is in danger of not recovering," she said.
According to her website, Boardman was born in England and traveled the world through her travel business until ultimately studying art in Germany.
She was previously chosen to paint the portrait of former President Barack Obama for the Colorado Capitol. Boardman painted him again in 2012 when she was privately commissioned for portraits of Obama and former President George W. Bush as part of a wider presidential series, her website said.
Boardman's family said that Bush had written her a letter thanking her for his portrait. Her family and friends described her as remaining 'gracious' despite the divisive attention directed toward her in recent days.
Her sister-in-law, Sandi Bartels, said Boardman was "absolutely amazing."
"We all know Trump. We all know how he talks," Bartels said. "Maybe he'll regret at some point having said that.'
She added that artists are aware that "there are going to be things that people might not like."
"I can't imagine her letting something like this get her down and say, 'I'll never paint again,'" Bartels said.
Boardman's niece, Elizabeth Paris, said the artist's loved ones rallied around her on social media, with some changing their cover photos to the portrait of Trump that Boardman had created.
'Great art elicits emotion. It's obviously done its job. Hats off to you, my dear auntie,' Paris said she wrote on Facebook following the fallout.
Paris said despite Trump's comments, many in their family have been supportive of the president when he took office for his second term. The unexpected attack on Boardman's abilities caught them off guard.
But 'she's a strong woman,' Paris said of her aunt.
'She'll probably soar with this," Paris said. "She doesn't have thin skin.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Signals that prove Trump forced a historic reckoning
No one knows if there will be a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. But this much is emphatically and impressively true: Donald Trump has already done something extraordinary — he has created a moment in which all parties can see two stark alternatives with sudden clarity. They can compromise and make a deal, or they can face the continuation of a grinding war with an uncertain duration and outcome. That sense of crossroads was on display at the White House on Monday in a tableau that was at once theatrical and substantive. Trump has managed, at least for now, to coax the United States, Europe, and Ukraine into a common position. That united front presents Vladimir Putin with what he has long tried to avoid: Western cohesion in the face of his aggression. The day unfolded with all the trappings of political theater. There was the banter about President Volodymyr Zelensky 's choice of wardrobe — a jacket that suggested a nod to formality rather than the olive drab sweatshirt that has become his wartime uniform. There was also a moment of personal warmth, when Zelensky handed Trump a letter from his wife to Melania Trump, written about the plight of children in the war zone. These gestures may appear minor, but in diplomacy such small signals help reinforce the larger message: unity, solidarity, and an insistence on treating each other as friends rather than supplicants or tetchy combatants. For Zelensky, a former actor who once made his living playing roles, Monday was a performance that mattered. He carried his lines with precision and his tone with care. The last time he visited Washington the chemistry soured and tensions spilled into public view. This time, the body language told a different story. Smiles, nods and a sense of easy rapport radiated from the Oval Office outward. Compared with Putin's frosty reception during his stop in Alaska on Friday — a visit the Kremlin had hoped would project strength — Monday's White House welcome stood as a vivid counterpoint. The most consequential takeaway from the day was the absence of daylight between Washington and its European allies. For years, Putin has relied on fissures within the transatlantic alliance, exploiting differences over energy, trade or the use of force. Yet on Monday, the alignment was clear: the US, Europe and Ukraine are working together to shape a peace plan. This is precisely the scenario Putin has sought to prevent, and brings the world to the essential questions now hovering over these fragile negotiations. Will Putin accept a combined European and American framework that offers Ukraine the security guarantees it needs to risk peace? And will Ukraine, whose soldiers have retaken and held swathes of territory at immense cost, truly be willing to cede land now under its control in exchange for ending the bloodshed? Neither question yields an obvious answer. For Putin, compromise has always been a synonym for weakness. For Ukraine, yielding territory risks validating aggression and betraying those who have died defending it. Yet the very posing of these questions, out loud and on equal terms, marks a shift in the conversation. The possibility of peace, however brutal, is now at least conceivable. If the answer to either or both questions is 'no,' then the burden will shift back to Trump. What will he do? Will he enforce punishing new sanctions designed to cripple the Russian economy? Will he authorize Ukraine to use American-supplied weapons to strike deeper into Russian territory? Will he risk escalation to demonstrate resolve? The options ahead are perilous, but they are his to shape. What is striking is how Trump — long painted as skeptical of NATO, dismissive of Europe and oddly solicitous of Putin — now finds himself in the role of transatlantic unifier. By engineering a moment when the allies stand shoulder to shoulder, he has created the conditions for a test: either Putin comes to the table, or he faces the combined weight of American and European pressure. This is not a neat choice between war and peace. It is instead what might be called a 'brutal peace.' Any deal will be painful, incomplete, and fraught with moral compromise. But it will still be peace. If Trump cannot deliver Putin to the table, then he must bring him to heel by other means. Either way, the calculus has changed. Diplomacy often depends on timing. Wars grind on until one side collapses or until leaders perceive that further bloodshed is more dangerous than negotiation. What Trump has done, at least for now, is force that moment of reckoning. He has made all sides look squarely at the costs of continuing the war versus the costs of ending it. It is too soon to know whether history will mark this week as a turning point. But it is fair to say that Trump, a man once derided as an opponent of Europe and a skeptic of alliances, has demonstrated a capacity to bring allies together in common cause against a murderous dictator. That alone is remarkable. It may yet be remembered as the moment when urgency became opportunity.
Times
37 minutes ago
- Times
Swiss Army knife production may move to US amid Trump tariffs
America could wrest control of the manufacture of Swiss Army knives away from their Alpine homeland in a coup for President Trump's trade policy. Victorinox, which has made the knives in Ibach, Switzerland, since 1884, is considering moving part of its production to the US to soften the blow from import tariffs on its business. Carl Elsener, chief executive of Victorinox, told the German business magazine WirtschaftsWoche: 'We are looking into carrying out directly on site individual processing steps at the end of the value chain, such as the final cleaning and packaging of commercial knives.' 'That would reduce the value of the goods on which we have to pay customs duty by 10 per cent,' he added. Since 1884, Victorinox's founding family, the Elseners, have worked to keep manufacturing the Swiss Army knife in Switzerland. The country has been severely hit by Washington's trade policy under Trump, who earlier this month increased US tariffs on Swiss imports to 39 per cent. The US is a leading export market for Swiss brands including Swatch, Rolex and Patek Philippe watches as well as high-end cheeses and chocolates. Victorinox, which makes commercial knives as well as its well-known pocket knives, generates some 13 per cent of its revenue in the US. Elsener told WirtschaftsWoche that the customs duties were coming at an already difficult time. 'The strong Swiss franc has put our competitiveness and our margins under considerable pressure,' he said. Still, high inventories in the US meant the tariffs would not affect Victorinox until early next year, he added. For now, the firm would wait and see how things develop, he said. Industry associations and economists have said the tariffs will inflict major damage on the Swiss economy, put jobs at risk and curtail growth. They could also push the Swiss National Bank to cut interest rates next month. Economic uncertainty caused by Trump's trade policies has fuelled demand for the safe haven Swiss franc, boosting the currency and making Swiss-made goods more expensive abroad.
South Wales Guardian
42 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trump offers assurances that US troops will not be sent to help defend Ukraine
Mr Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining Nato and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. The Republican president, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. While answering questions from journalists, Mr Trump did not rule out sending US troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Mr Zelensky. Mr Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked on Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Mr Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Mr Trump would have no control over the US military after his terms ends in January 2029. Speaking later, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that 'US boots will not be on the ground' as part of any potential peacekeeping mission. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the Nato military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Mr Trump said. Mr Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.
