Britain's Labour chancellor Rachel Reeves to cut 10,000 civil service jobs
Rachel Reeves is preparing to cut 10,000 civil service jobs as part of a sweeping £2bn Whitehall savings drive, ahead of a spring statement she has warned will involve 'hard' choices.
The Labour chancellor has ordered mandarins to slash 15 per cent from departmental administrative budgets by 2029–30 – saving an estimated £2.2bn a year – and pledged the money will be redirected to 'frontline' services.
But the plans triggered an immediate backlash from unions, who said public services would suffer after years of underfunding.
'People want to know we're getting value for money,' Ms Reeves said.
Unions warned of 'chaos', with the general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union, Fran Heathcote, accusing ministers of setting 'an arbitrary figure for cuts plucked out of the air'. She predicted a backlash from the public 'who will be affected by cuts in the services they receive'.
She added: 'After 15 years of underfunding, any cuts will have an impact on frontline services. We've heard this before under Gordon Brown when cuts were made to backroom staff – and the consequence of that was chaos.'
Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect union, warned ministers against 'an arbitrary civil service headcount reduction' and said there must be 'a realistic assessment of what the civil service doesn't do in future as a result of these cuts'.
A Liberal Democrat spokesperson said: 'Of course we want to see a more efficient civil service ... but saying it won't make it happen. We now need to see concrete proposals on how they will achieve this. This also isn't going to help the government grow the economy – we need a proper plan for growth including scrapping the jobs tax and fixing our trading relationship with the EU.'
The job cuts come amid signs Reeves will need billions more in savings to meet her own fiscal rules, as sluggish economic growth and higher-than-expected borrowing limit her options.
She has ruled out tax rises this week, meaning spending cuts are the only route to balance the books.
In an interview with the BBC, Reeves rejected suggestions that Labour would 'tax and spend our way to higher living standards and better public services'. She said: 'That's not available in the world we live in today.'
She also hinted Labour could scrap the £1bn-a-year digital services tax – which targets large US tech firms – in a bid to head off the threat of punitive trade tariffs from Donald Trump.
But she was forced to deny Labour's policies were to blame for the UK's stagnating growth, and insisted that upcoming tax rises on employers, introduced last year, were necessary.
She said: 'Imagine if I'd have swept the problems under the carpet (last year) and said everything was fine, then today, when we face the aggression from Russia, we wouldn't have the additional money to spend on defence. We would be in a situation where NHS waiting lists would continue.'
Pressed on warnings from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation that living standards will fall before the next election, she rejected the idea the average family would be £1,400 worse off by 2030.
Reeves insisted her cuts would not amount to austerity and defended her decision to take £5bn from welfare payments, despite criticism from within Labour, saying the bill was going 'through the roof'. She added: 'I do not believe that one in eight young people are incapable of working.'
She told Sky News she was dissatisfied with the economic outlook: 'We do need to do more. Growth is the number one mission of this government. We're turning things around, but it takes hard work and there are no shortcuts to get there.'
Britain's first female chancellor has insisted the current path is the only responsible one – but faced accusations from her opponents of lacking ambition.
Former Tory cabinet minister Sir Robert Buckland accused Reeves of an 'absence of a plan' and called for 'bold action'.
The Independent
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Dubai Opens Public‑Sector Doors to Skilled Expats
Dubai has unveiled a landmark recruitment drive, inviting skilled expatriates to fill key roles across public-sector departments with monthly salaries reaching AED 40,000. The official Dubai Careers Portal currently lists ten positions spanning healthcare, education, IT, infrastructure, social welfare and urban planning, signalling a strategic move to diversify talent in government ranks. Audit Manager roles in energy and industry auditing, Air Traffic Controller posts at Dubai International Airport, and a Head of Infrastructure Operations are among the high-profile vacancies offering top-tier compensation. Functionally, these posts could include professional requirements such as seven to ten years of experience, relevant advanced degrees, and corresponding global certifications. Salaries vary by role—some exceed AED 40,000—while others, like Case Management or childcare supervision, offer between AED 10,000 and AED 20,000. Dubai's move signals a new era in its public-service landscape. Historically restricted to Emiratis, government roles are now accessible to non‑nationals—a shift aimed at enhancing operational efficiency in areas critical to the emirate's strategic vision. Openings span 45 government departments, encompassing health, education, technology, urban development and cultural heritage. ADVERTISEMENT Candidates must apply via Dubai Careers Portal, where the process—from CV submission to application tracking and interview scheduling—has been streamlined. The portal emphasises transparency and accessibility, underscoring the government's intent to broaden its talent acquisition pool. Labour analysts note that professional salaries across Dubai typically range from AED 10,000 at entry-level to AED 40,000 for senior roles, with department heads and specialised professionals often exceeding this threshold. Against this backdrop, the AED 40,000 cap in government roles aligns with private-sector compensation at senior levels, particularly for strategic and executive-level posts. For expatriates, public-sector employment brings enhanced job security, comprehensive benefits and stability—advantages difficult to match in the private sector. These perks, combined with salary parity, are attracting seasoned professionals who may have routinely secured higher pay in private firms but now seek state‑backed employment. Officials within the recruitment drive highlight the dual goals of optimising government performance and fostering multicultural synergy. Dubai's leadership sees merit in blending global expertise with local insights to advance infrastructure management, healthcare delivery, education systems and citizen services. Recruiting at this scale may signal a soft pivot in policy—granting expats limited access to government roles previously reserved for citizens, while safeguarding national workforce priorities through targeted quotas and strict selection criteria. Critics argue the move presents a challenge: balancing citizen employment quotas with expat appointments. According to established Emirati employment frameworks, certain public-sector roles remain reserved, while others are being selectively opened to qualified professionals from abroad. Analysts caution that this expansion must comply with Emiratisation objectives to prevent disruptions in youth employment schemes. Mid-career professionals in fields such as engineering, finance and healthcare stand to gain. A mid-level civil engineer, for instance, may earn AED 20,000–AED 40,000—a figure that mirrors both private-sector packages and the upper salary tiers in public service roles. The AED 40,000 ceiling is positioned to attract the same calibre of talent now shaping Dubai's AI, sustainability and infrastructure-enhancement ambitions. This recruitment wave coincides with the emirate's long-term urban and economic strategies, such as Dubai 2040 Urban Master Plan and UAE Centennial 2071, which demand leadership in transport, social infrastructure and digital governance. Government departments are thus seeking professionals capable of steering data‑driven policymaking, overseeing public service delivery and managing major capital projects. Dubai's public sector is making a strategic pivot to draw global talent and elevate capabilities across critical service areas. With lucrative compensation, transparent recruitment and an open application portal, the initiative offers a compelling proposition for qualified expats. The move also reflects a broader ambition—crafting a progressive, efficient and internationally aligned government apparatus, while maintaining commitment to national employment priorities.
Middle East Eye
8 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Labour peer says Britain could impose sanctions on Israel
Lord Michael Levy, a Labour peer who was former prime minister Tony Blair's Middle East adviser and envoy, has thrown his support behind the UK government's move to suspend trade talks with the Israeli government. On Tuesday, Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced that the UK is summoning the Israeli ambassador in London and suspending its free trade agreement with Israel. He also condemned "this Israeli government's egregious actions and rhetoric". Now Lord Levy, a prominent figure in Britain's political scene, has endorsed Britain's move in a significant intervention. "I absolutely do support the stand - perhaps it's even a little late," he told BBC Radio 4, describing himself as "a very proud Jew, deeply involved in our community and someone who passionately cares for Israel". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Levy said of Israeli far-right ministers Bezalal Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir that "really, they were terrorists". The peer is the cousin of Emily Damari, who was taken captive in the Hamas-led 7 October attack on southern Israel and held for more than 15 months before her release in January. 'Strong possibility' of sanctions Levy told the BBC: "There has to be a stand, not just from us in this country, but internationally, against what is going on in Gaza. "It is so difficult to watch the news and see what's going on in Gaza, to the civilian population, to innocent children and the total destruction - and then to listen to the words of some of the far-right ministers – Smotrich, Ben Gvir – and what they are saying. That, to me, is not the way I was brought up as a Jew." The peer added that there is a "strong possibility" that Britain could place sanctions on Israel. UK charity supporting disabled Israeli soldiers hit by £1m fraud Read More » He said trade talks had broken down but added that "it could go deeper than that, in terms of stopping any form of arms sales, and sanctions against Israel. "I don't want that to happen, but it may have to happen, with other countries involved, because what is going on is absolutely intolerable." However, Levy refused to accuse Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza. Pressed by BBC presenter Sarah Montague on the issue, he said: "That's for the courts to decide." Levy, who had a home in Tel Aviv, raised millions of pounds for the Labour Party before Blair became prime minister, and was then appointed Blair's personal envoy to the Middle East in 2000. He has often drawn controversy, famously walking out of a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2003, which many believed led to the envoy being sidelined. Levy also brokered talks between Palestinian Liberation Organisation chairman Yasser Arafat and the Israeli government and was credited with having convinced Arafat, whom he descibed as "very personable" but "difficult to read", to appoint a Palestinian prime minister. In October 2024, Levy declared that "I don't think there's any hope for peace with Netanyahu in power".
The National
a day ago
- The National
Spending review is no immediate panacea for Britain's growth woes
A key theme of the UK spending review is raising government budgets in some areas and using those increases to boost economic growth. Defence will receive a major injection with British contractors set to cash in, driving skills and jobs and revitalising some of the worst-hit post-industrial regions. It all sounds exciting and eminently doable on paper but, moving away from the drumbeating, the picture is not as clear-cut as the one Chancellor Rachel Reeves paints. Indeed, it is nowhere near the rosy, easily achievable image she creates. Britain is to increase its military expenditure to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027 and then to 3 per cent in the lifetime of the next parliament. Those numbers are tiny and fall a long way short of the 5 per cent sought by the US and Nato. Given it is not remotely clear how even the 2.5 per cent will be met, which represents a lift of only 0.2 percentage points from the current level, it is hard see how Prime Minister Keir Starmer's 'ambition' of 3 per cent, let alone 5 per cent, will be met. As the Institute for Fiscal Studies makes clear, there are few avenues: spending less on public services or raising borrowing and tax revenues. Some funding is to be derived from cutting international aid but after that, attention will focus on savings elsewhere or borrowing and taxing more. Details of what Reeves has in mind are scant – they will be revealed in her autumn budget – but tax rises look the most likely option. They will be justified on the grounds of need and the argument is already being rehearsed. Gone is the old rhetoric of maintaining a deterrent. Instead, the language is of 'readying for war'. It is presented as a national crisis, a conflict when the usual caveats and restraints are abandoned in favour of all hands to the pump or rather, the wallet. Except they are not. The day before Reeves' set piece, the Labour activists' news website LabourList published a poll finding that one in four party members backed defence savings not increases. 'The poll, conducted by Survation, found that 26 per cent of readers who identified as members would want to see money earmarked for defence to be spent elsewhere, despite the government pledging to boost investment in the military in the coming years,' LabourList said. One Nottingham councillor, Steve Battlemuch, seemed to voice the reasoning of many when he said: 'I will watch the Chancellor's spending review with my fingers crossed that councils start to get a better deal, but I suspect the multinational defence industry will be the ones popping the Champagne corks when she sits down. 'They have more lobbyists than children and councils have, and they have the fear factor. In a world where fear beats hope we have an uphill battle to get money allocated to making things better locally.' He may well be right. Despite the talk of 2.5 per cent, it is small compared to how Britain once was. In 1955, the military accounted for 7.63 per cent of national income. The subsequent long-lasting 'peace dividend' saw that proportion of GDP scaled back and the money directed to other services. With that decline, though, came a commensurate decrease in weapons manufacturing – armaments suppliers disappeared and the sector heavily retrenched. Rebuilding will not occur overnight. It will be a slow process necessitating the planning and construction of factories and their attendant infrastructures and the sourcing of parts and materials, not to mention the development of skills. Into that breach is bound to step established major producers from the US and similarly friendly countries. Those overseas behemoths will be rubbing their hands, or as Battlemuch put it, 'popping the Champagne corks', at the prospects ahead, despite Starmer and Reeves promising to 'buy British'. It was that downsizing that saw Britain slash domestic defence shipbuilding capability, so the sector fell, effectively to just one shipyard at Barrow-in-Furness in Cumbria. It happens to be my hometown. Even there, the size of the workforce drastically diminished, as Ministry of Defence orders continued to slump. At one stage, with completion of the generation of Vanguard submarines, it was down to below 5,000, badly hitting the town's fortunes. More recently, the site, now part of BAE Systems, has been climbing and is back up to 12,000 workers with another 5,000 to be added in the years ahead. Under the Strategic Defence Review 2025 and proclaimed by Starmer, the plant will build 12 new attack nuclear submarines. Local Labour MP Michelle Scrogham said: 'This will safeguard jobs, provide huge opportunities for local people and be the driver for our local economy across south Cumbria.' BAE, however, has struggled to obtain the necessary approvals for expanding its production facility. On the employment front the situation is little better. A nuclear industries task force has been set up to help train the tens of thousands of workers needed across the upscaling of nuclear in defence as well as in civil energy programmes. On the defence side, the submarines will be built by BAE with their nuclear reactors hailing from Rolls-Royce. It too is doubling the size of its Raynesway site in Derby. Once launched, the vessels will be maintained by Babcock. John Howie, Babcock's chief corporate affairs officer, has said: 'The industry needs to recruit a lot just to stand still. We don't want to steal from each other.' Starmer and Reeves then, may be gung-ho and what they are promising will certainly be of economic advantage, not to mention security. But the great defence push will cost and it cannot be completed immediately. A healthy dose of realism is required before everyone gets too carried away.
