
Wexford councillors oppose Triple Lock amendment as chair goes against his party to cast deciding vote
However, in May of this year, the government published a proposed amendment to the Defence Bill which would remove the requirement for UN approval when deploying members of the Defence Forces outside the State, thus ending the Triple Lock system.
At the July meeting of WCC, Councillor Jim Codd forwarded a motion requesting that the council express its opposition to the proposed changes. Arguing that any amendments to the current Defence Bill would 'signify a breach of trust with the Irish electorate and a serious diminution of Irish neutrality', Cllr Codd called upon his colleagues to support his motion.
Although the motion was swiftly seconded by Cllr Paddy Kavanagh there was some pushback from members of Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil.
'The facts of the matter on the Triple Lock are that the government makes a proposal and it goes to the Dáil, no other representative from any country should have any say on a decision made in Ireland on what to do with our troops,' said Cllr Darragh McDonald (Fine Gael). 'I trust the government, I trust all the people in the Dáil across all parties to make the right decisions, and I think they can act responsibly for the people of this country.'
While he was 'glad' that Cllr McDonald had such trust in the government, Sinn Fein's Tom Forde didn't share that sentiment. Offering his support for the motion, Cllr Forde said, 'This is an important safeguard for our neutrality. I'm glad Cllr McDonald has trust in our government in relation to this, I don't.'
His party colleague Aoife Rose O'Brien argued that this was an issue 'which should be discussed at every local authority meeting' and said she 'would be very disappointed' if any of Wexford's TDs members went against this motion.
Cllr John Dwyer was particularly strident in his support of the motion, arguing that removing the Triple Lock would see Ireland become an implement of the EU.
'It's through small incremental steps that our neutrality will be taken,' he said. 'If you look at the disgraceful behaviour of Ursula von der Leyen (President of the European Commission) in supporting the genocide happening every single day in Gaza, then you will see exactly the direction the EU is taking. Let there be no doubt the EU wants an army it can deploy.
"It is obsessed with Putin and undermining and attacking Russia. I fully support this motion. Seán Lemass was an ardent advocate of neutrality and I would ask the Fianna Fáil members here to reflect on his views when considering this motion.'
ADVERTISEMENT
One of those Fianna Fáil members had considered the motion and remained steadfast in her objections to it.
'If we maintain the Triple Lock, when peace comes to Gaza, we won't be able to send peacekeeping forces there,' said Cllr Barbara Anne Murphy. 'This is about peacekeeping, something we have honourably been doing for many, many years. There has been no UN peacekeeping mission mandated since 2014, none. And we are now living in a whole new world.'
Cllr John Fleming (also Fianna Fáil) described the motion as 'stupidity' while Pip Breen (FF) said the Triple Lock was 'not for purpose any more and has to go'.
With the chamber divided, Cllr Codd asked for a roll call on his motion but not before he took a sideswipe at his Fianna Fáil adversaries.
'This is a sad day, I'm mindful of Redmonditism rearing its head again,' he said. 'I'd understand that in Fine Gael but now it seems to be in Fianna Fáil as well.'
He reckoned without Cllr Sullivan, though, who, on this occasion, chose not to follow the party line.
'I'm absolutely conflicted,' he said. 'I hate war and anything which contributes to the death and destruction of human beings. We've had the Triple Lock in place for a number of years and it has served our country well. Ireland is one of the most respected international peacekeeping countries in the world, there is huge value in our neutrality, so this is a vote of conscience for me.,
"But I believe in the Triple Lock, and if I sit here and vote against something I believe in I am a fraud.'
The motion was subsequently put to a vote with Cllrs Vicky Barron (LAB), Jim Codd (Aontú), Craig Doyle (SF), John Dwyer (IND), Tom Forde (SF), Paddy Kavanagh (Wexford Independent Alliance), Leonard Kelly (IND), Marty Murphy (WIA), Aoife Rose O'Brien (SF), John O' Rourke (IND), Michael Sheehan (IND), Joe Sullivan (FF), and Biddy Walsh (LAB) voting in favour.
On the other side, Cllrs Pip Breen (FF), Trish Byrne (FG), Anthony Donohue (FG), John Fleming (FF), Pat Kehoe (FG), Donal Kenny (FF), Garry Laffan (FF), Darragh McDonald (FG), Barbara Anne Murphy (FF), Bridín Murphy (FG), Frank Staples (FG), Robbie Staples (FG), and Oliver Walsh (FG) voted against.
With the vote tied at 13 apiece it was left to Cllr Sullivan, as cathaoirleach, to have the deciding say.
'I stand by what I said, ' he announced to much cheering from the chamber.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
The money candidates for President can claim back in expenses is going up by €50,000
THE VALUE OF election campaign expenses that candidates running to be President of Ireland can claim back is increasing by €50,000. The maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election is rising from the previous amount of €200,000 up to €250,000. Election expenses are reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election if the candidate is either elected or receives enough votes to reach more than one-quarter of the quota. Advertisement Minister for Local Government James Browne signed an order today bringing the change into effect. A statement released by his department this evening said that the change was made under ministerial powers to adjust the maximum value of expenses alongside inflation. 'Applying the Consumer Price Index increase since the amount was last revised resulted in a potential increase to €252,700, which has been rounded down to €250,000,' the statement said. Under the Electoral Act 1997, a candidate in a presidential election is not allowed to spend more than €750,000 in total on their campaign. As President Michael D. Higgins is reaching the end of his term, an election for his successor must be held by 11 November. Related Reads Labour Party throws support behind Catherine Connolly as Left unity candidate for president Fianna Fáil staying schtum on presidential candidate, but here's the names in the mix (so far) A date has not been formally set yet but there's plenty of talk in political circles about who the candidates will be. So far, two candidates with enough support to be on the ballot have formally declared themselves: Former EU Commissioner Mairéad McGuinness for Fine Gael and Independent TD Catherine Connolly, who is jointly backed by the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and Labour as a left-wing candidate. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Here's where Ireland is opening five new embassies and consulates around the world
THE DEPARTMENT OF Foreign Affairs is opening five new embassies and consulates across the world as part of diplomatic missions seeking to expand Ireland's footprint. Embassies will be opening in Belgrade, Serbia as well as Chisinau in Moldova and Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In a statement, Tánaiste Simon Harris said the new embassies show Ireland's 'commitment to EU enlargement', as it takes up the presidency of the European Union in the second half of 2026. 'Our expanded presence in the Western Balkans and Eastern Neighbourhood will reinforce links with countries who look to Ireland as an example of how a country can benefit from, and contribute to, the European Union' The missions will begin operations in the autumn. In addition to the embassies, two new consulates will open – one in Málaga, Spain and one in Melbourne, Australia. Advertisement Consulates are offices that support the embassy in that country. The Tánaiste said these will deliver services to the growing Irish diaspora and holiday makers in both regions. Both are due to become operational in 2026. 'Taken together, and with the mission already opened as part of the Global Ireland strategy, these five new missions will further strengthen Ireland's global presence and influence,' Harris said. Under Global Ireland 2025 – a whole government strategy with the aim of doubling Ireland's influence and footprint – there have been 22 missions opened to date. These include embassies in Kyiv, Rabat, Wellington, Bogotá, Amman, Monrovia, Santiago de Chile, Tehran, Manila, Dakar, and Islamabad. Consulates general have been opened in Vancouver, Mumbai, Frankfurt, Los Angeles, Cardiff, Manchester, Lyon, Miami, Toronto, Milan, and Munich. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump claims victory on trade - but EU had little choice
In many respects US President Donald Trump achieved his aims by introducing a swath of tariffs with America's main trading partners around the world. The European Union has a population of 448 million compared to the US which has 340 million. However, the US economy is larger. Many have been surprised at the way Donald Trump has appeared to be able to dictate terms to Europe. His announcement yesterday that he would commence the new tariff arrangements from 7 August appeared to be his decision with little input from the EU. President of the European Commission Ursula Von Der Leyen has defended the deal, which will see tariffs of 15% imposed on EU goods. There are two reasons why the EU did not want a full blown trade war with Mr Trump. Firstly, European businesses were opposed to a prolonged period of tit-for-tat tariffs with enormously damaging consequences. Secondly, if relations with Mr Trump soured, he could threaten to row back on defence commitments. The EU is highly reliant on the US for arm supplies, funding for NATO and military support for Ukraine. But looking at scale of tariffs imposed on other countries the EU's 15% does not seem too damaging compared to India's 25%, Canada's 35% and Switzerland's 39%. Most of the US' main trading partners have rates of 15% or 20%. The exception is the UK's 10% tariff. However, this is not an all-inclusive rate. In other words, other rates can be added to it. Nor does Britain have a written agreement capping pharmaceutical tariffs unlike the EU. It is worth bearing in mind that while tariffs on European goods go up, Mr Trump stated the EU would be "opening up their countries at zero tariffs" for US exports. Unanswered questions From the Irish point of view there are still many unanswered questions. There is no agreement on alcohol exports to the US. That sector was expected to be covered by a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement but that has not yet been confirmed. This is critical for Ireland's whiskey industry and the EU's wine exports. It seems clear that pharmaceuticals and computer chips will face tariffs of up to 15%, but the timing is still uncertain. Both are subject of so-called Section 232 investigations because Mr Trump believes the US' use of imports is a national security issue. Tánaiste Simon Harris said the tariffs for sectors under investigation will not become clear until those processes are concluded. For pharmaceuticals that is expected to happen in two weeks. But the fact that the EU-US agreement won't exceed 15% does provide some clarity for the industry. Bank of Ireland pointed out that drugs are relatively inelastic, which means if prices go up people still buy them because they are prescribed by doctors. The new swath of tariffs come at a time when the dollar has been weakening and making EU exports to the US more expensive at the worst possible time. Then there is the question of what this all means for the Irish economy. In March, the Department of Finance and the Economic Social Research Institute published research on the impact of tariffs on the Irish economy. It looks at a range of scenarios from tariffs of 10% to 25%. Based on that analysis, officials at the Department of Finance told business leaders yesterday that the economy would continue to expand, but at a slower pace than previously expected. Employment will grow but at a slower rate. The Government will now have to decide how all this will impact the Budget in October. But while Mr Trump may believe he has achieved his aims on tariffs, in the long run his actions carry the risk of higher inflation in the US and undermining the American economy.