Sweida ceasefire is welcome but shouldn't be mistaken for a return to normality
What began on July 13 as a localised dispute between Druze and Bedouin groups quickly escalated into a full-scale military confrontation between Druze fighters and transitional government-aligned forces. In just four days, the clashes claimed at least 516 lives and displaced many more, shaking the foundations of Syria's already fragile transition.
With the fighting having subsided briefly, only for it to resume over the weekend before ending on Sunday, the cessation of hostilities is, at best, tenuous. It should certainly not be mistaken for a return to normality. Early signs indicate that the ceasefire largely restores the pre-conflict status quo, with local Druze factions resuming de facto control over Sweida.
Halting the violence is a welcome step, but it does not amount to a resolution. Unless the deeper drivers of the conflict – including political exclusion and contested authority – are meaningfully addressed, the truce risks becoming little more than a brief pause before the next eruption.
Sweida's violence began with the abduction of a Druze trader by individuals reportedly linked to Bedouin tribes in the region. In retaliation, a wave of reciprocal abductions broke out, eventually devolving into broader intercommunal violence. Such incidents are not unprecedented in southern Syria, where mistrust and unresolved grievances run deep. What set this episode apart was the decision of the country's transitional authorities to intervene militarily.
Damascus presented the deployment of security forces as a step to restore order. But people in Sweida, at least those who actively resisted, viewed it as a power grab. This reaction stems from long-standing disputes between local leaders and the transitional government – particularly over governance, security arrangements and the identity of the future Syrian state.
Sweida's notables have consistently advocated for decentralised governance and locally managed security structures tailored to the community's needs. In contrast, Damascus remains committed to a rigid, top-down model. On broader questions of identity and political inclusion, Sweida's calls for a secular and pluralistic system have largely been ignored.
These unresolved differences, compounded by repeated failures in negotiation, help explain why Damascus's intervention was viewed not as a stabilising measure, but as an attempt to reassert central authority by force.
In the wake of this intervention, hostilities broke out between government forces and fighters loyal to Sheikh Hikmat Al Hijri, the most prominent Druze religious authority. Both sides traded blame: Damascus accused Mr Al Hijri's men of attacking its personnel, while Mr Al Hijri accused the state of breaching prior commitments and committing serious abuses.
There is no sign that the ceasefire agreement addresses the structural causes of the conflict, nor the far-reaching ripple effects it has triggered
Reports soon surfaced about widespread abuses by government-aligned forces, including degrading treatment of detainees and extrajudicial killings. These images triggered widespread public outrage and galvanised local resistance. Mediation attempts broke down, largely due to Mr Al Hijri's refusal to concede or compromise.
The situation took a sharp turn when Israel launched air strikes on government forces and key facilities, including the Ministry of Defence, in response to the clashes in Sweida. Fearing broader regional escalation, the US stepped in to contain the crisis. A ceasefire was eventually announced by interim President Ahmad Al Shara, who described it as a necessary measure to prevent a deeper catastrophe.
While the details of the agreement remain sparse, early indications suggest it largely reinstates the pre-conflict arrangement: local forces retain de facto control over key areas of Sweida, and Damascus withdraws its military units from the city.
Though the ceasefire is a welcome step towards halting the violence, the fact that it was violated almost immediately means it merely freezes a crisis that continues to smoulder beneath the surface. There is no sign that the agreement addresses the structural causes of the conflict, nor the far-reaching ripple effects it has triggered. A return to the previous status quo is not just insufficient – it is dangerous. The events of the past week have profoundly altered Syria's political and social landscape, leaving deep wounds and a toxic environment.
Anti-Druze inflammatory rhetoric seized on Israel's strikes to depict the Druze community as collaborators or separatists, reinforcing sectarian narratives and fuelling calls for collective punishment. The result has been a disturbing surge in incitement against the Druze minority, including calls to boycott Druze-owned businesses and expel Druze students from university dormitories. Meanwhile, many Druze – particularly those aligned with Mr Al Hijri – have grown increasingly distrustful of the state and its institutions, further eroding the transitional government's legitimacy.
What was once latent sectarian tension has now become overt and volatile, fuelled by a surge in hate speech from all sides. This is precisely what makes the current ceasefire so fragile. A return to the previous arrangement is not a return to calm – it is a reversion to a simmering crisis that could explode at any moment.
The ceasefire may have paused the shooting, but only a genuinely inclusive and pluralistic political transition can stop the bleeding and set Syria on a path towards national healing. Unless the country's leadership moves quickly to address the root causes of the violence in Sweida, the current silence will be short-lived.
Preventing a return to widespread conflict remains possible, but the window for doing so in a sustainable and inclusive manner is closing fast.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
6 hours ago
- Zawya
Ceasefire in doubt as Rwanda-backed rebels kill hundreds in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
Hopes for peace in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have been shaken by a surge in brutal attacks on civilians by armed groups, including the Rwandan-backed M23 militia, in the country's troubled eastern region. The UN human rights office (OHCHR) said it had received first-hand accounts indicating that at least 319 civilians were killed by M23 fighters, aided by members of the Rwanda Defence Force, between 9 and 21 July in North Kivu province. Most of the victims, including at least 48 women and 19 children, were local farmers camping in their fields during the planting season. Stop attacks immediately Volker Türk, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, condemned the 'surge of deadly violence'. 'I am appalled by the attacks on civilians by the M23 and other armed groups in eastern DRC amid continued fighting, despite the ceasefire that was recently signed in Doha,' he said in a news release on Wednesday. 'All attacks against civilians must stop immediately and all those responsible must be held to account.' The latest massacre marks one of the highest civilian death tolls documented since the M23 – a group largely composed of Congolese Tutsi fighters established over 15 years ago – re-emerged as a major military threat in 2022. Peace agreement faltering The spike in violence comes just weeks after two high-level peace initiatives appeared to offer a path forward. On 27 June, Rwanda and the DRC signed a bilateral peace agreement in Washington, followed by the so-called Doha Declaration between the DRC Government and M23 rebel leaders on 19 July, which committed both sides to a ceasefire and further negotiations. However, humanitarian NGOs say little has changed on the ground. 'I urge the signatories and facilitators of both the Doha and Washington agreements to ensure that they rapidly translate into safety, security and real progress for civilians,' Mr. Türk said. Attacks from all sides Meanwhile, other armed groups continue to terrorise civilians across eastern Congo. In July alone, the UN documented deadly attacks by the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), Coopérative pour le développement du Congo (CODECO) and Raia Mutomboki/Wazalendo militias in Ituri, South Kivu and North Kivu. On 27 July, ADF fighters attacked a Christian congregation in Ituri's Komanda village, killing at least 40 worshippers – including 13 children – and torching homes, shops and vehicles. Earlier in the month the same group killed at least 70 civilians in a single attack on Pikamaibo village. Women and girls are also enduring systematic sexual violence as a weapon of war. On 27 July, eight women were raped by Raia Mutomboki/Wazalendo fighters in South Kivu's Busolo village. Worsening humanitarian crisis The growing insecurity is fuelling what humanitarians describe as one of the world's most acute humanitarian crises. According to UN figures, over 7.8 million people are now internally displaced (IDPs) in eastern DRC – the highest figure on record – while 28 million people are facing food insecurity, including nearly four million at emergency levels. Adding to the strain, more than 30,000 refugees from South Sudan have fled into Ituri province since April, escaping a wave of killings and active hostilities across Central Equatoria State. The World Food Programme (WFP) has warned that funding shortfalls may soon force it to suspend lifesaving assistance to hundreds of thousands. Health services are also collapsing under pressure. In the first half of 2025, 33 attacks were recorded on health workers and facilities – a 276 per cent increase from the previous six months, according to the UN reproductive health agency, UNFPA. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of UN News.
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
Syria to expand main airport and build subway in $14 billion deal with foreign partners
The new Syrian government has announced the country's largest foreign investment deal in years, with a massive $14 billion to modernise infrastructure. The funding will go towards modernising Damascus airport and the revival of a long abandoned plan to construct a metro system in the capital, among other projects. "We are announcing a group of 12 major strategic projects for a total of $14 billion," Talal Al Hilali, the head of the Syrian Investment Authority, said at the ceremony at the presidential palace on Wednesday. The plans include a $4 billion investment project for Damascus airport with Qatar's UCC Holding, a deal worth more than $2 billion for a mall and two towers developments, signed with the Italy-based construction firm Ubako, and a $2 billion investment for a Damascus metro system. The metro deal follows talks between a delegation from the UAE's National Investment Corporation, Syrian Minister of Transport Yarub Badr and Damascus Governor Maher Marwan earlier this week. The projects "will extend across Syria and represent a qualitative shift in infrastructure and economic life", Mr Al Hilali said. President Ahmad Al Shara and US special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack were present at the signing ceremony. Mr Barrack congratulated Syrian authorities on "another great accomplishment", saying they will witness the rise of a "new hub" in "trade and prosperity". Foreign investment in Syria was enabled by US President Donald Trump's decision to lift sanctions imposed during Mr Al Assad's rule. The EU followed suit soon afterwards. "The future of a prosperous and peaceful Syria is in the hands of Syria and its regional partners, like Qatar's UCC and Turkey's Cengiz and Kalyon groups who were awarded the Build-Operate-Transfer for the new Damascus International Airport," Mr Barrack said in a post on social media. "The path to recovery must begin with the fits and starts of building a foundation of security and stability, then followed by government systems and ultimately enterprise and prosperity." The UN has estimated that Syria's postwar reconstruction will cost more than $400 billion. Several agreements have already been announced. Last month, Saudi Arabia signed major investment and partnership deals with Syria, valued at $6.4 billion. Also in July, Syria signed an $800 million deal with UAE-based company DP World to develop the port of Tartus, state media reported. In May, Syria signed a $7 billion energy deal with a consortium of Qatari, Turkish and US companies as it seeks to revive its crippled power sector. Mr Al Hilali said the signing ceremony on Wednesday was "a clear declaration that Syria is open to investment, determined to build a prosperous future, and ready to work side by side with our trusted partners to write a new chapter of progress and development', Syrian state news agency Sana reported. promote trade ties.
Zawya
7 hours ago
- Zawya
Fleeing conflict, facing crisis: South Sudanese refugees gather in Ituri, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
With violence intensifying in South Sudan, more than 33,000 refugees have fled to northern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In May, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) teams launched emergency activities to provide lifesaving medical care to a community facing crisis. 'We saw people shooting guns. Then we saw planes shooting people from the sky,' says Blessing Halima, a refugee from Morobo County, South Sudan, who recently fled to Adi, northern DRC, with her six children. 'They began killing people and stealing everything. They took my husband. That's why we ran.' Blessing Halima is not alone. In April, Atay Rose travelled for several days through the bush to reach Adi from Panyume, South Sudan. 'If we used the main road, we would have been killed. They rape young girls and even married women,' says Atay. 'I don't know if I can go back. There's still looting. There's still raping. There's still the killing of women and children. That's what we fear the most.' South Sudan is experiencing its most severe surge in violence since the signing of the peace agreement and end of its civil war in 2018. The crisis escalated in February, when clashes broke out between government forces and armed youths, known as the White Army, in the northeastern state of Upper Nile. The violence quickly spread to other parts of the country, incorporating armed groups in Central Equatoria state, which borders DRC to the south. There have been widespread civilian casualties throughout the country – with more than 730 civilians killed between January and March alone. [1] Between January and June, an estimated 300,000 people were displaced by the violence according to the UN,[2] of whom 125,000 fled to neighbouring countries, including Sudan, Ethiopia, Uganda, and DRC. In DRC, more than 33,000 people have arrived since April, according to the country's National Council of Refugees. Instability has led to the total collapse of already-fragile public services, and MSF has been forced to close two hospitals and scale down operations in the country amid attacks on health facilities. Most people arriving in DRC have fled Morobo county in Central Equatoria state, which has become highly volatile due to intensified fighting this year. A few days ago, we were forced to suspend all activities in Morobo—including services in camps for internally displaced people—as well as in neighbouring Yei River county. This decision followed the abduction of health workers, including one of our own staff members. Arriving with nothing Ituri province, in northeastern DRC, where most of the South Sudanese crossing into the country arrive, has itself been beset by conflict for decades, characterised by violence, ethnic division and a wide prevalence of armed groups. Even prior to the arrival of South Sudanese refugees, health systems were under strain and almost non-existent in the border area. Many refugees arrive with few or no possessions whatsoever, having hastily fled South Sudan for their lives. 'We are suffering,' says Jacob Justin, who travelled alone with nothing but the clothes on his back. 'We have no schools, no hospitals and no access to clean water.' Viola Kani fled across the border in May with her brother and four children. 'We ran away with nothing. They took our food and clothes,' she says. 'Now we are dying of hunger and don't have anything to sleep on.' Six percent of children aged 6 to 59 months seen by MSF teams near the border are suffering from severe malnutrition, which represents a major public health problem, according to Dr Léonard Wabingwa, MSF's medical activity manager in Adi. MSF response To address the growing needs of the refugees, MSF launched an emergency response in May. We sent two mobile clinics and set up six community healthcare centres. In less than two months since activities were launched, more than 3,000 medical consultations were carried out—with the weekly average of more 370 consultations continuing to rise. Malaria accounts for more than half of all cases, followed by respiratory tract infections and acute gastroenteritis. We screen children under five years old for malnutrition, treating patients with therapeutic food. 'We have also provided care to several survivors of sexual violence, including some as young as 12,' says Dr Wabingwa. Risk of disease outbreaks Measles cases have already been reported among the refugee community, and an MSF-supported mass vaccination campaign, targeting 62,000 children, is set to begin in August to reduce the risks of an outbreak. A parallel vaccination campaign will seek to provide routine vaccinations to a further 520 infants and 310 pregnant women. 'Instability in South Sudan means routine vaccinations have been interrupted,' says Félicien Lwiteo, MSF project coordinator in Adi. 'If you are running for your life, it is difficult to respect a medical appointment. There's a real risk of disease outbreaks and it's vital that we act quickly.' MSF is also working on critical infrastructure projects. Our teams are installing six water distribution points and 200 latrines and showers, expected to be completed by mid-August. Additionally, nearly 6,000 non-food item kits containing essential items—such as mosquito nets, buckets, soap, and portable toilets—will be distributed to families. Mounting needs, limited support With more refugees arriving daily in DRC, MSF's capacity to meet the growing needs is under pressure. 'There are very few international organisations on the ground and none that are providing the same range of medical services as MSF,' says Asiyat Magomedova, MSF Head of Programmes covering the area. 'Without support from other partners, there is a risk that further lives will be lost.' In South Sudan, the situation remains 'critical' according to Dr Ferdinand Atte, MSF Head of Mission in the country. 'It is crucial to ensure safe and unobstructed access to populations in need, and to protect civilians and civilian infrastructure, including medical facilities, before we can consider resuming our activities,' says Dr Atte. 'While we are deeply committed to providing care to those in need, we cannot keep our staff working in an unsafe environment.' For the South Sudanese refugees now living in DRC, there is little hope of returning home anytime soon. 'If we go back, that means we are going to die,' says Viola. 'How can we go back there?' [1] UNMISS: Violence against civilians surges amidst escalating conflict in South Sudan (January - March 2025) | UNMISS [2] OCHA - South Sudan: Humanitarian Snapshot (June 2025) | OCHA Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Médecins sans frontières (MSF).
