Tunnel vs transit: Bengaluru's infrastructure debate on social media heats up amid traffic woes
READ | 'Unworkable': Experts on tunnel highway network proposed in Bengaluru to ease traffic congestion
The tunnel road project — estimated to cost ₹19,000 crore — envisions an underground network between Hebbal and Silk Board, intended to ease surface traffic by creating a high-speed corridor exclusively for private vehicles, mostly cars. In contrast, the Namma Metro, along with the long-anticipated suburban rail project, is being pitched by many urban planners and citizens as a more inclusive, sustainable solution to the city's transportation crisis.
READ | 'Bound to fail': Tejasvi Surya slams ₹18,000 crore Congress-backed tunnel project in Bengaluru
Social media took the wheel in looking at the future of mobility in Bengaluru, arguing that the city's focus should be on enhancing public transport instead of creating infrastructure that encourages more private vehicle use.
A resident's post on the issue took the internet by storm, raising the question of both the metro and the tunnel road being built on the same corridor. 'Know this Bengaluru. City can neither afford nor does it makes sense to build both metro and Tunnel Rd on same corridor. Metro serves all. Tunnel Rd? Cars only. Great cities have great metros and aren't car dependent. Stop the Tunnel Road. Complete metro & suburban rail first,' the post read.
READ | ₹19,000 crore loan for tunnel? Bengaluru MP PC Mohan lists 13 better ways to spend the money
The post amassed 17,000 views and over 300 likes. Several users agreed, with one writing, 'Lived in Bengaluru for years. The traffic is already a nightmare. We need mass transit that serves everyone, not just those who can afford cars.'
'We need suburban Rail immediately,' another posted.
On the other hand, some disagreed, with a user replying, 'Have metro above tunnel. Think hybrid design concept.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Indira Gandhi attacked Golden Temple in collaboration with the British, claims BJP MP Nishikant Dubey
ANI BJP MP Nishikant Dubey (File) Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey on Monday accused former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of attacking the Golden Temple in Amritsar in collaboration with Britain and alleged that the Congress party has used the Sikh community for political gain. In a post on X, Dubey shared a letter written by the then Private Secretary to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Brian Fall, to the then Private Secretary to the Home Secretary, Hugh Taylor. He used this to support his claim that British army officers were present in Amritsar at the time of Operation Blue Star in 1984. "In 1984, Indira Gandhi launched an attack on the Golden Temple in collaboration with Britain, with British army officers present in Amritsar at that time. For Congress, the Sikh community is merely a toy," Dubey wrote. He further alleged that Kartarpur Sahib was handed over to Pakistan through an agreement signed in 1960 by Sardar Swaran Singh. "1. Pakistan was finally given Kartarpur Sahib in 1960 through an agreement made by Sardar Swaran Singh," the BJP MP wrote. Dubey also claimed that prominent Sikh leaders were elevated to high offices to mask the events of 1984 and shield Congress leaders accused of involvement in the anti-Sikh riots."2. During the 1984 attack on the Golden Temple and the killing of innocent devotees, GiZail Singh was made President. 3. To cover up the 1984 massacre of Sikhs and to protect senior leaders H.K.L. Bhagat, Jagdish Tytler, and Sajjan Kumar, Manmohan Singh was made a puppet Prime Minister in 2004. The story of selling out the country and surrendering before foreigners continues," the X post comments come a day after Dubey's earlier post on Sunday, in which he accused the Congress government of giving away 80 per cent of India's share of Indus River water and the Kartarpur Sahib gurdwara to Pakistan in 1960."Do you know that in exchange for Pakistan's blood, we gave 80 per cent of our water in the Indus Water Treaty in 1960, and in that same 1960, another agreement took place between Sardar Swaran Singh Ji and Pakistan's Home Minister K.M. Sheikh on January 11, 1960?" Dubey questioned the legitimacy of the agreement and accused the then-leadership of surrendering national interests."1. Look at the politics--Sardar Swaran Singh Ji was neither the Home Minister nor the Foreign Minister, yet he was making the agreement? 2. Because in that agreement, we gave away our religious centre, Kartarpur Sahib?" the X post read. He further accused former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru of giving away parts of land in Punjab and favouring Pakistan. "3. We gave away Sarja Majra, Rakh Hardit Singh, and Pathanke in the Lahore-Amritsar region. 4. We donated some parts of Punjab's Firozpur district. 5. We gave away the areas of Sulemank and Chak Ladke. They announced this in Parliament as if it were the personal property of Nehru Ji or the Gandhi family. Under the Constitution, this is illegal, but this history of Pakistan favouritism is a shameful and deplorable example of political mentality," the BJP MP claimed.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Presidential promises: Donald Trump swiftly implements his budget agenda
Mr Musk, and other critics of the Budget Bill, are concerned in particular about the risk of rising debt levels in the US Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article The United States (US) Congress stayed up late last Thursday passing President Donald Trump's signature new legislation, the 'Big Beautiful Bill', and on Friday Mr Trump signed it into law. The new Bill reworks taxes and expenditure and restructures the multi-trillion-dollar US federal Budget. While some of its implications are relatively minor implementations of Mr Trump's campaign promises — for example, it cancels taxes on tips — some are far more wide-ranging. Most importantly, however, it continues the tax cuts that Mr Trump had put in place in his first term as President. The $4.5 trillion tax-cut giveaway over 10
India Today
44 minutes ago
- India Today
Video: Children toy, shoot reels with 15-foot-long python in UP's Bulandshahr
2:38 The Tamil Nadu Congress chief, K Selvaperunthagai, who belongs to the Scheduled Caste, was reportedly prevented from participating in the Kumbh Abhishekam rituals. The incident occurred when Selvaperundagai attempted to take part in the holy water offering ceremony.
