Thousands join pro-Palestinian march over Sydney Harbour Bridge
Nearly two years into a war that Palestinian authorities say has killed more than 60,000 people in Gaza, governments and humanitarian organisations say a shortage of food is leading to widespread starvation.
Some of those attending the march, called by its organizers the 'March for Humanity', carried pots and pans as symbols of the hunger. Among the marchers was Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
New South Wales police and the state's premier last week tried to block the march from taking place on the bridge, a city landmark and transport thoroughfare, saying the route could cause safety hazards and transport disruption.
US to refuse visas to Palestinian Authority officials
The state's Supreme Court ruled on Saturday that it could go ahead.
New South Wales police said they were deploying hundreds of personnel and urged marchers to remain peaceful.
Police were also present in Melbourne, where a similar protest march was taking place.
Diplomatic pressure ramped up on Israel in recent weeks.
France and Canada have said they will recognise a Palestinian state, and Britain says it will follow suit unless Israel addresses the humanitarian crisis and reaches a ceasefire.
Israel has condemned these decisions as rewarding Hamas, the group that governs Gaza and whose attack on Israel in October 2023 began an Israeli offensive that has flattened much of the enclave.
Australia's centre-left Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said he supports a two-state solution and Israel's denial of aid and killing of civilians 'cannot be defended or ignored', but has not recognised Palestine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Rifts in Israel over full Gaza occupation
The Israeli military will have to execute any government decisions on Gaza, the defence minister said Wednesday after reported disagreements over the prospect of a full occupation of the Palestinian territory. Signs of a rift over strategy emerged as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to announce a new phase in the war, after he said Israel must "complete" the defeat of Hamas in order to secure the release of hostages still held in Gaza. The Israeli press, citing officials speaking on condition of anonymity, has predicted an escalation of operations, including in densely populated areas where hostages are believed to be held, such as Gaza City and refugee camps. The reports also said Netanyahu and his cabinet would order a full military occupation of Gaza, sparking dissension from the army's Chief of Staff, Eyal Zamir. On Tuesday, Netanyahu held a restricted three-hour meeting with security chiefs to discuss options for the continuation of the war, his office said in a statement. At the meeting, Zamir reportedly warned that a full occupation would be like "walking into a trap," according to public broadcaster KAN. The army chief suggested alternatives to a full occupation, such as an encirclement of specific areas where Hamas is believed to be hunkering down, according to the Channel 12 broadcaster. But Defence Minister Israel Katz hit back with a clear message. "It is the right and duty of the Chief of Staff to express his position in the appropriate forums," he wrote on X. "But once decisions are made by the political echelon, the IDF will execute them with determination and professionalism... until the objectives of the war are achieved," he added, using an acronym for the Israeli military. Netanyahu is expected to convene the security cabinet on Thursday to finalise a decision on the expansion of the offensive, local media reported. US President Donald Trump told reporters on Tuesday he was not aware of reported plans to occupy the entire Gaza Strip, but said that such a decision would be "up to Israel". At war with Hamas since the unprecedented attack by the Palestinian Islamist movement on Israel on October 7, 2023, the Israeli government is under growing pressure to bring the conflict to an end. Israelis are increasingly alarmed about the fate of the dozens of hostages in Gaza. Of the 49 still held there, the Israeli military says 27 are dead. The UN Security Council held a special session on Tuesday to discuss Israeli hostages in Gaza, as the country seeks to keep the issue on top of the global agenda. On Tuesday, Trump described a recent video released by Hamas of emaciated Israeli hostage Evyatar David purportedly digging his own grave as "horrible."
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Importance of the Pezeshkian's visit to Pakistan
A couple of days ago, Islamabad hosted Dr Masoud Pezeshkian, the honourable President of Iran, and his accompanying delegation. This was Dr Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan. In April 2024, the then President Ebrahim Raisi made a three-day trip to Pakistan, receiving a warm welcome from the people and officials of the country. Shortly after Raisi's visit to Pakistan, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif travelled to Tehran to pay his respects and attend the memorial ceremony for the late President Raisi. A year later, in May of this year, Sharif visited Tehran once again to express his appreciation on Iran's stance regarding the India-Pakistan conflict. Pezeshkian's recent visit was also at the invitation of Shehbaz Sharif and, in effect, a reciprocal response to Sharif's trip to Tehran. Thus, within less than two years, top officials from Iran and Pakistan have travelled to each other's countries four times in addition to their frequent meetings on the sidelines of major regional and international summits. These repeated meetings reflect the close ties between the two countries and underscore the importance of their relationship, particularly in the current context where the need to expand cooperation is being felt more than ever. Iran-Pakistan relations have enjoyed relative stability in recent decades, and visits and meetings between their officials have become a common occurrence. However, what added extra significance to the President's recent trip were the unique political circumstances and regional and global developments that have unfolded in recent months. The outbreak of war between India and Pakistan in May 2025, both nuclear-armed nations, placed the region in an extremely sensitive situation. Although the war was short-lived and lasted no more than four days, its consequences still linger for both countries and the broader region and world. Ongoing war in the occupied territories and the genocide in Gaza have also deeply impacted international politics. In this regard, the stances of Islamic countries, especially Iran and Pakistan, carry considerable weight. Both Tehran and Islamabad have taken firm, united positions, emphasizing full support for the Palestinian cause. Another issue is the tariff war initiated by Trump against many countries, which has drawn in most nations to some extent. Pakistan has not been spared, facing threats from Trump's policies. Most significantly, the recent 12-day imposed war launched by the Zionist regime against Iran has left wide-ranging effects on the region and fundamentally altered the geopolitics of the region and the Islamic world. Pakistan's stance as one of the most important and populous Muslim nations and a nuclear power holds particular importance. The President's visit to Pakistan came at a time when the country's stance regarding the 12-day imposed war was under intense scrutiny in Iran. Given that the Iran-Israel conflict erupted shortly after the India-Pakistan war, Pakistan's governmental and public reaction could have heavily influenced the Islamic Republic's position toward the India-Pakistan conflict. Available evidence suggests that Pakistan was satisfied with Iran's position. Shehbaz Sharif's visit to Tehran immediately after the India-Pakistan conflict — aimed at thanking Iran and other supporters — clearly attests to this. Islamabad's officials expressed appreciation for Iran's foreign minister's trip to both Pakistan and India and Iran's efforts to mediate between the two sides. Additionally, the Pakistani public's sensitivity toward the Palestinian issue and their strong aversion to the Zionist regime's criminal acts in Gaza significantly contributed to their support for Iran. There is also a growing concern in Pakistan about illegal joint actions by the Zionist regime and the US against Iran's nuclear facilities, and a possibility that similar actions could one day be taken against other countries as well. All these factors led to Islamabad's broad and firm support for Tehran and the unequivocal condemnation of Israeli and US aggression. This condemnation was strongly voiced in the UN Security Council by Pakistan's permanent representative. Pakistan, as a non-permanent member and rotating president of the Security Council at the time, explicitly labelled the bombing of nuclear facilities as illegal. Furthermore, Islamabad supported dialogue and negotiation and endorsed Iran's right to nuclear knowledge. Simultaneously, inside Pakistan, there was comprehensive support from the army and political figures to the extent that Pakistan's Parliament passed a resolution in support of Iran against Israeli aggression. All of this indicates that Pakistan, as a neighbour and fellow Muslim country, strongly supported the Islamic Republic of Iran. Thus, the Iranian President's visit could be seen as a reciprocal response to Shehbaz Sharif's appreciative visit to Tehran. For decades, Iran-Pakistan relations have been influenced by security issues, particularly regarding the condition of their shared borders. In past visits by Pakistani prime ministers and military chiefs to Tehran and vice versa, a recurring theme has been upgrading border security to border economics. Over the years, both sides have developed mechanisms to enhance coordination in combating terrorism. As outlined in the President's itinerary, boosting economic and trade relations between the two nations was a major goal of the current trip. Considering the economic structures and capacities of Iran and Pakistan, there was broad consensus that their economic cooperation potential far exceeds current levels. On a larger scale, one crucial issue Tehran and Islamabad should consider is tapping into regional economic capacities. One such opportunity is connecting Pakistan to Turkey and Europe via Iran. Both Tehran and Islamabad can capitalize on the improved recent relations between Pakistan and Turkey. Additionally, interest from traders in operating through Chabahar port and its proximity to Gwadar port presents an opportunity to transform these two potentially rival ports into complementary nodes along Pakistan's trade route to Europe. All of this depends on the economic outlooks of Iran and Pakistan: whether they aim to use each other's economic potential and act as partners and complements. There is an ocean of untapped capacities in both countries, and activating them requires serious political will from both sides. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Israel bars Jerusalem's top Muslim cleric from Al-Aqsa
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM: Israeli authorities have banned Jerusalem's top Muslim cleric from entering the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound for six months over a recent sermon, his attorney told AFP on Wednesday. Muhammad Ahmad Hussein, the grand mufti of Jerusalem, will be prevented from entering the holy site in the Israeli-annexed Old City until January 2026, according to lawyer Khaldoun Najem. Najem said Israeli police 'did not interrogate' or held a hearing for the mufti prior to their decision. Contacted by AFP, police did not immediately comment. Hussein's lawyer said that the ban was due to a Friday sermon the mufti gave at Al-Aqsa — Islam's third-holiest site and a Palestinian national symbol — in late July, 'which contained nothing inappropriate'.
