
Amazon, Apple seek legal fees as sanction in US consumer lawsuit
Apple and
Amazon
have asked for a combined $223,000 in sanctions against a prominent class action law firm, accusing it of dragging out litigation over the price of iPhones and iPads after the initial plaintiff in the case sought to drop out.
#Operation Sindoor
Live Updates| From Sindoor to showdown, track Indo-Pak conflict as it unfolds
Pakistani Air Force jet shot down in Pathankot by Indian Air Defence: Sources
India on high alert: What's shut, who's on leave, and state-wise emergency measures
US district judge Kymberly Evanson in Seattle last month said the companies could ask to recover legal fees from Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro for failing to immediately disclose that its client wanted out of the case.
Hagens Berman "needlessly prolonged this litigation and required considerable judicial resources," Evanson said.
Play Video
Play
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Mute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute
Navy Quest
Undo
The companies said in their fee request on Friday that their legal teams worked more than 350 hours on motions relating to seeking information about the plaintiff.
Spokespeople for Hagens Berman, Apple and Amazon did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The lawsuit, which accuses the companies of conspiring to artificially inflate the price of iPhones and iPads sold on Amazon's platform, is continuing after other plaintiffs were added to the case.
Live Events
Apple and Amazon have denied the
antitrust claims
.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
Apple is represented by attorneys from Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, while Amazon has a team from Sidley Austin, Redgrave and Davis Wright Tremaine.
The tech companies said they would limit their fee request to match hourly rates typically charged in the Western District of Washington. Weil partner Mark Perry, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who co-leads the firm's appellate and strategic counseling practice, said his rate for the purpose of the fee request was $900 an hour. Perry and other defence lawyers in the case did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Hagens Berman client Steven Floyd told his lawyers in January 2024 that he wanted out of the litigation because he did not want to participate in the discovery process, Evanson said last month.
But the firm did not immediately disclose this to the court, the judge said, and instead created the impression that Floyd "had suddenly fallen out of contact in January 2024, for reasons his counsel did not know and possibly unrelated to the litigation."
Hagens Berman's "characterizations of Floyd's situation over the past fourteen months have not reflected his reality," Evanson said.
The judge on Tuesday formally dismissed Floyd's claims from the lawsuit.
William Burck and Alex Spiro aren't the only partners at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan who are charging $3,000 an hour.
Court filings in a $34 million fee fight between Quinn Emanuel and former client Desktop Metal showed that Michael Carlinsky, co-managing partner of the firm, is also charging the $3,000 hourly rate.
Carlinsky said in an email he is "honoured to be in the same club, so to speak, as Spiro and Burck. Two fine lawyers."
Reuters first reported Burck and Spiro's sky-high billing rates in February. Susman Godfrey also has a pair of veteran litigators - Neal Manne and Bill Carmody - who are charging that much.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
33 minutes ago
- India.com
China begging this Muslim nation to buy its J-10C fighter jet, the country is..., its India's...
China has offered the J-10C fighter jet to Indonesia. (File) China is touting the alleged success of its J-10C fighter jet in the recent India-Pakistan air battle during Operation Sindoor as Beijing is making efforts to sell the multirole fighter to Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country, which has close diplomatic ties with New Delhi. China offers J-10C fighter jet to Indonesia Addressing a public forum in Jakarta on Wednesday, Donny Ermawan Taufanto, Indonesia's deputy minister of defense, revealed that China had offered the J-10C fighter jet to Indonesia, and stated that the offer was currently under preliminary evaluation, and no technical team has yet been deployed to Beijing for further assessment. 'It is just an offer at the moment,' he said. Tafaunto said the proposal came up during a visit by Indonesian Air Force officials to China, and the Indonesian government is currently examining whether the aircraft meets the country's operational requirements and whether they can be integrated into existing military systems, Bloomberg News reported. China's offer to Indonesia comes at a times when smaller nations are spending more on military hardware due to global conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas war, and the recent tensions between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan. Indonesia 'pragmatic' defense procurement policy under Prabowo As per reports, Indonesia, under President Prabowo Subianto, is making efforts to diversify its defense export chain as part of the country's push towards military modernization. During Prabowo's tenure, Indonesia has explored options for military cooperation with traditional defense partners as well as new countries. Indonesia has partnered with South Korea in the development of the KF-21 supersonic fighter jet, and also recently expressed interest Turkey's 5th-generation 'KAAN' fighter jet project. Additionally, Prabowo has instructed defense officials to re-examine old plans to buy F- 15EX fighter jets from Boeing. Taufanto described Indonesia's defense procurement policy as pragmatic and non-aligned, which gives the country the freedom to ink defense defense agreements with different countries. 'If we feel that this aircraft performs well, meets our requirements and the price is also reasonable, then why not? We are not bound by any alliance, we can buy weapons from any country – even China,' he stated. China touts J-10C 'success' in Indo-Pak air battle Meanwhile, China is touting the purported 'success' of its J-10C fighter jets during the recent India-Pakistan military confrontation. Taking advantage of the speculations surrounding the alleged 'success' of J-10C fighter, a two-part documentary was aired on China's state-run CCTV, which delved in to the origins of the aircraft and its 'battle-tested' capabilities. The documentary claimed that the J-10CE (export variant) achieved its 'first victory' in the recent war. The move was not only to promote China's military technology but also an attempt to strengthen its position in the global arms market. Pakistan claims J-10C downed Indian Rafales Pakistan has claimed that its air force shot down several Indian Air Force (IAF) fighter jets, including the French Rafale jets, using Chinese-made J-10C fighter jets during the aerial battle that took place on the night of May 7 when Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor against terror infrastructures inside the enemy country. Speaking in the country's Parliament, Pakistan Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, claimed, without proof, that the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) shot down several Indian jets, including three Rafales, using J-10C fighter jets and Chinese PL-15E missiles. However, Pakistan's claims have been vehemently refuted by India as 'rumors' and 'misinformation'. Indian Defence Ministry and Air Force officials clarified that reports of losses were exaggerated, though CDS General Anil Chauhan has confirmed some air losses in a recent interview.


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Inside the net worth of Steve Jobs' daughter and her Olympian fiancé
The upcoming countryside wedding of 26-year-old Eve Jobs — daughter of the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs and Laurene Powell Jobs — and 25-year-old British equestrian Harry Charles is shaping up to be one of the most glamorous society events of the year. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Scheduled for August in England's celebrity-favored Cotswolds, the celebration is expected to draw a star-studded guest list, with names like Princess Beatrice and U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly on the invite list. The couple, both accomplished equestrians, first appeared publicly at the 2024 Paris Olympics, where Harry clinched a gold medal in team jumping. Their shared passion for horse riding likely drew them together, but it's their striking backgrounds—and family legacies—that have drawn the public's fascination. So, how wealthy is this golden couple? Let's take a look at each of their net worths and how they've made their mark beyond their famous names. Eve Jobs' net worth: As the youngest daughter of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs and philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, Eve Jobs was born into immense wealth. However, Laurene has been public about not planning to pass down the family's entire $21.7 billion fortune to her children. She has emphasized that her children must build their own careers — and Eve seems to be doing just that. Credit: X Despite her "nepo baby" status, Eve is steadily forging her own path: She graduated from Stanford University in 2021 with a degree in Science, Technology, and Society. Eve began modeling in 2020 with a Glossier campaign alongside Sydney Sweeney and Naomi Smalls. By 2022, she was signed to DNA Model Management, the same agency that represents Kaia Gerber and Emily Ratajkowski. She has since walked in Paris Fashion Week and starred in campaigns for brands like Louis Vuitton and Enfants Riches Déprimés. In equestrian sports, she has been ranked as one of the top under-25 riders globally and won major competitions like the $130,000 CSI 3 Grand Prix in 2018. Her mother purchased a $15 million equestrian estate in Wellington, Florida, where Eve trains under Missy Clark. While official figures are scarce, Eve's personal net worth is estimated to be in the $500,000 to $1 million range as of 2024. That figure could rise significantly with future modeling and equestrian deals, especially given her social capital and growing presence in both industries. Harry Charles net worth : Harry Charles, Eve's fiancé, is a British equestrian prodigy and Olympic champion. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Born into a family of elite riders—his father, Peter Charles, also won Olympic gold—Harry is now one of the most celebrated names in show jumping. Highlights of his career include: Making his Olympic debut at the Tokyo Games in 2021 at just 22. Winning team gold at the 2024 Paris Olympics alongside his equestrian hero, Scott Brash. Signing with Rolex as a Testimonee in 2019, making him the youngest rider to represent the luxury brand. Competing in prestigious events across Europe and North America, including the Longines Global Champions Tour and Hickstead Derby. Like many top-level riders, Harry's earnings come from a mix of: Prize money from international show jumping events. Brand endorsements and sponsorships (notably Rolex). Support from equestrian patrons and family-owned stables. While precise data on his earnings is not publicly available, estimates place Harry's net worth in the range of £500,000 to £2 million ($600,000 to $2.5 million USD). His career is on an upward trajectory, and with the recent Olympic win and global visibility, that number is expected to grow.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India aims to be global arbitration hub with strong legal framework: CJI
Chief Justice of India B R Gavai on Thursday said India has continuously aspired to become a hub of international arbitration by building a progressive legislative framework, a pro-enforcement judiciary and robust institutional support. In his keynote address on "Arbitrating Indo-UK Commercial Disputes" as part of the London International Disputes Week, the CJI said India and the United Kingdom shared a rich history, bound by a common legal heritage rooted in the principles of common law. He referred to the July 2018 memorandum of understanding signed between India and the United Kingdom for cooperation in the area of law and justice and said it has enhanced the engagement between the two countries and paved the way for greater collaboration and exchange of expertise across areas including the rule of law, dispute resolution, training and legal services resolution. "Speaking as the Chief Justice of India, I state that India has continuously aspired to become a hub of international arbitration by building a progressive legislative framework, a pro-enforcement judiciary and robust institutional support," he said. CJI Gavai highlighted that this bond between India and the UK was further strengthened by the signing of a Free Trade deal between the two nations this year -- a step that would significantly enhance bilateral trade and economic cooperation. "The United Kingdom, with its established reputation as a hub for commercial arbitration, and India, with its expanding economy and legal reforms, stand poised to deepen cooperation in this critical domain. By promoting dialogue, encouraging joint institutional initiatives, and building confidence among businesses and practitioners, we can create a seamless dispute resolution environment that benefits both jurisdictions," he said. He added as any form of commercial activity, disputes were an inevitable part of the process but what truly mattered was not the existence of these disputes, but the capacity and commitment to efficiently resolve them. "The manner in which we address and settle conflicts is what defines the strength and resilience of our commercial relationships," he said. He said such a framework ensured that disagreements did not undermine trust or hinder progress and instead turned into an opportunity for constructive engagement, promoting long-term cooperation and stability in business interactions. "One such mechanism is international commercial arbitration. In light of the expanding trade and investment flows between India and the UK, the need for an effective, reliable, cost efficient, and timely dispute resolution process has never been more pressing," the CJI said. Referring to the statutes, CJI Gavai said the current legislations regarding arbitration in both India and the United Kingdom were enacted around the same time period with similar provisions focusing on party autonomy, choice of jurisdiction, independence of arbitrators, and finality of the arbitral awards. "Both countries have a single legislation for arbitration that governs both international and domestic arbitration procedures. These legislations have been used by the parties and interpreted by the courts for more than two decades now," he said. He, as a result, underscored the importance to learn from each other's experience and adopt the best possible practices to promote a business-friendly environment for both countries. He said it wouldn't be an "overstatement" to say that for India to become a leading hub for international commercial arbitration, the international arbitration community must have access to high-quality, independent and impartial arbitrators, both as a matter of fact and of perception. "As with India's potential to be an international arbitration hub, there is huge potential for Indian lawyers to become arbitrators that are in demand across the globe. However, this potential is, as yet, unrealised," the CJI pointed out. Courts in India, he continued, have been making a conscious effort to ensure that for arbitral proceedings, the best candidates were chosen, keeping in mind the subject matter of the dispute, amount in dispute, arbitrator's expertise and availability and the requirements of the parties. "Concluding this discourse on arbitrating Indo-UK commercial disputes, it can be said that the synergy between our two nations, rooted in a shared legal heritage and mutual economic interest, presents a unique opportunity to build a robust, efficient, and globally respected arbitration ecosystem," he said. India's evolving arbitration framework, the CJI said, reflected a strong commitment to aligning with international best practices, promoting institutional arbitration and ensuring judicial support that was "facilitative" than being "interventionist". The CJI referred to the decision of the Bar Council of India to notify rules for the registration and regulation of foreign lawyers and law firms in India, underlining its positive affect on the resolution of international commercial disputes.