
Lebanon's reconstruction delays: Key appointments and IMF talks loom
Report by Joe Farchakh, English adaptation by Mariella Succar
As the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approach in April, Lebanon's reconstruction process is again in the spotlight.
The appointment of a new board for the Council for Development and Reconstruction (CDR) is one of the international community's key reform demands, along with other reforms such as amendments to the banking secrecy law, the restructuring of banks, and more.
The new CDR board is central to funding the reconstruction process due to its pivotal role in receiving aid and implementing projects.
The criteria of competence and integrity remain essential in selecting candidates for these positions. However, according to LBCI sources, agreement on the new appointments has not been reached yet.
The international community focuses on the post-2006 reconstruction experience, which various domestic and international stakeholders influenced. This context shaped the firm stance taken by U.S. Deputy Envoy Morgan Ortagus on the matter.
Reconstruction in Lebanon has always been a contentious issue involving both official and unofficial entities, each with its own funding channels and operational mechanisms.
In 2006, Hezbollah's Jihad al-Binaa organization, which receives direct support from external sources, took the lead in rebuilding homes and infrastructure in Hezbollah-controlled areas.
In addition to Jihad al-Binaa, reconstruction projects were distributed between the Council for Development and Reconstruction, which serves as the official channel for foreign aid and development loans, the Higher Relief Committee, which manages emergency crises and compensation, and the Council for South Lebanon, which is directly funded by the Lebanese government and focuses on southern areas affected by the conflict.
This division of donors and implementing entities, combined with a lack of transparency in funding and expenditure mechanisms, has made the reconstruction process a part of Lebanon's complex political landscape and a key concern for the international community.
There are fears that reconstruction funds may be diverted toward rebuilding the military infrastructure of Hezbollah, such as tunnels.
As a result, the reconstruction file remains frozen until a new CDR board is appointed that meets standards of integrity and competence. This step is seen as an indication of Lebanon's good faith toward the international community ahead of the upcoming IMF meetings.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


LBCI
4 hours ago
- LBCI
'Rising Lion': A Mossad-led strike to dismantle Iran's missile network
Report by Amal Shehadeh, English adaptation by Mariella Succar The Israeli strike that targeted Iran was not conceived overnight but was the result of a plan years in the making. During that time, Mossad and Israeli intelligence reportedly infiltrated deep into Iran, bringing with them equipment and drones. They surveilled, planned, and executed parts of the operation, which began with the assassination of key military and security leaders, as well as nuclear scientists—part of a broader effort aimed at toppling the regime. This complex operation included the establishment of a base for explosive-laden drones. The components were smuggled into Iran and later used to strike surface-to-surface missile platforms at a base near Tehran. While that unfolded, Mossad commando units reportedly spent months preparing operational systems and combat tools that were deployed against open areas near Iranian surface-to-air missile sites during the strike. Friday's operation—marked by its intensity, speed, and multiple targets—closely resembled the so-called "Pager" operations previously carried out against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Several Israeli security officials have pointed to similarities, explaining how Mossad managed, in a short time, to paralyze Iran's air defense systems. Commandos reportedly deployed offensive systems and advanced technologies, smuggling them into Iran via vehicles, thereby eliminating threats to Israeli fighter jets. One security source revealed that Israel deceived Iran's air force by spreading disinformation, the details of which were not disclosed. This prompted a high-level commanders' meeting, allowing Israel to target them at the same place and time. The source added that this step was preceded by a highly accurate intelligence effort that gathered details on the leadership. Information emerging from within Israel indicates that the intelligence planning began in parallel with the launch of Operation "Rising Lion" and that Mossad operatives were not exposed to any danger during the execution. Israel's strategic plan included a wartime emergency protocol expected to last between 10 days and two weeks. With Mossad reportedly thwarting attempts to launch ballistic missiles from deep inside Iran toward Israel, decision-makers are now reassessing the scope and duration of the domestic state of emergency, depending on the scale and objectives of Iran's response.


MTV Lebanon
6 hours ago
- MTV Lebanon
Lebanese Airspace Closed Till 6:00 am
Reports indicate that Civil Aviation has decided to close Lebanese airspace until tomorrow morning at 6:00 am, following Iran's response to the Israeli operation.


Nahar Net
7 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Israeli interception missile hits Lebanon amid efforts to shoot down Iranian drones
by Naharnet Newsdesk 6 hours Lebanon's National News Agency said Friday that an Israeli interception missile exploded over the southern Lebanese town of Ibl al-Saqi, as Israel's Channel 14 said two interception missiles were fired at Iranian drones over Syria and Lebanon. An Israeli interception missile later landed on the al-Hasbani River in south Lebanon, NNA reported. Alert sirens later wailed in Israeli settlements near Lebanon's border as two Iranian drones were shot down by the Iron Dome over northern Israel.