At least 46 victims duped of $3 million in scam involving fake MAS officers and WhatsApp screen sharing
In this type of scam, victims would receive calls on local numbers, with the callers claiming to be from firms such as NTUC Income, NTUC Union or Unionpay, the police said on June 26.
The scammers would claim there were issues with the insurance plans that the victims had purchased.
When victims denied purchasing such policies, the scammers would then redirect them to an accomplice, posing as an officer from MAS.
The second scammer would then claim that the victims' bank accounts were implicated in money laundering, before instructing them to transfer their money to a separate account used by the scammers for "safekeeping".
These fraudsters would guide the victims through the process of making internet banking transfers by using WhatsApp's screen sharing function, which would expose the victims' bank accounts and internet banking details.
The ruse would only be discovered when the scammers became uncontactable, or when they asked victims to transfer more money, the police added.
Stressing that individuals should never share their devices' screen with strangers or anyone whose identity has not been verified, the police said that doing so could result in unauthorised transactions and financial loss.
They added that government officials will never ask individuals to transfer money, disclose banking log-in details, install apps from unofficial sources, or transfer calls to the police through the phone.
As a precaution, the police reiterated advice to download the ScamShield app to block calls and filter SMSes, as well as to alert banks immediately if any suspicious activity has occurred, among other steps.
Scams remain a rampant problem in Singapore, with victims suffering losses that soared to $1.1 billion in 2024, which is about 70 per cent higher than the amount lost in 2023.
Since 2019, victims here have lost more than $3.4 billion to scams, with the highest number of scam reports made in 2024, numbering at 51,501.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
a day ago
- AsiaOne
Police warn of scammers impersonating staff from National Crime Prevention Council, Singapore News
Scammers are posing as staff members from the National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC) to phish for personal information in a new scam variant, the police have warned. These scammers would make unsolicited phone calls to members of the public, some of whom were told that their identities had been stolen and used to apply for credit cards, or to register phone numbers that were allegedly involved in criminal activities. The police said that in one case, the scammer had transferred the call to another "officer" from NCPC, who talked to the victim via WhatsApp. The scammer sent fake official documents to the victim to enhance his credibility. The victim was then instructed to transfer money into a "safety account" as part of police investigations. The victim only realised he had fallen for a scam after telling his family member about the alleged investigations, prompting the family to verify directly with the police. Senior Assistant Commissioner Devrajan Bala, director of the police's Scam Public Education Office and executive director of NPCP, said they had received information about this scam variant from the ScamShield Helpline. "I would like to assure the public that NCPC staff will never ask you to transfer money or disclose your bank login details," he said, adding that NCPC is a non-profit organisation and does not possess any investigative powers. Scammers also impersonating Citibank staff In a separate joint advisory with Citibank, the police said there has been a recent increase in phishing scams involving the impersonation of the bank's staff. At least nine cases have been reported since June 27, with losses of at least $153,000. Victims of this scam variant would receive calls from unknown caller IDs or private numbers from a "staff" from Citibank's Fraud Department, who would provide the victims' name, recent credit card transaction history and credit card information. Pretending to assist in urgently reversing fraudulent or suspicious transactions, the scammer would then ask victims to disclose the bank's authorisation OTPs which have been sent to them via SMS. These would be used to make unauthorised transaction in their Citibank accounts and in some cases, used to take over the victims' internet banking accounts. Victims would only realise that they had been conned when they discovered unauthorised transactions, typically in foreign currencies such as British Pound Sterling, being made on their cards. The police and Citibank urged members of the public to never provide bank account details or OTP to any unknown persons, and to carefully read OTP notifications and report unauthorised transactions to the bank. The public are also advised to take precautions to avoid falling for scams by using the ACT (Add, Check, Tell) framework, which involves adding the ScamShield app and setting security features. The public can also use the ScamShield app or website to check the legitimacy of suspicious messages, phone numbers and website links. [[nid:720323]]
New Paper
a day ago
- New Paper
Scammers are impersonating Singapore crime prevention officials
A scam variant has recently emerged, where scammers impersonate staff from the National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC). In these scams, they phish for personal information from victims, said the police on July 23. In some cases, the scammer informed victims that their identities had been stolen and used to apply for credit cards or register phone numbers that were allegedly involved in illegal activities. At times, the call was transferred to another "officer" from NCPC, who communicated with the victim via WhatsApp. The scammer would then send fake official documents to the victim via the messaging app to enhance his credibility, and instruct the victim to transfer money to a "safety account" for safekeeping as part of police investigations. In one case, the victim realised it was a scam only after he told his family member about the alleged investigations and the family verified directly with the police. NCPC staff will never ask you to transfer money or disclose your bank login details, said Senior Assistant Commissioner of Police Devrajan Bala, director of the Singapore Police Force's Scam Public Education Office and executive director of the NCPC. "As a non-profit organisation, NCPC also does not possess any investigative powers," he added. To find out more about scams, members of the public can call the ScamShield hotline on 1799, or visit
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Heavier anti-money laundering penalties could help Singapore maintain high standards as wealth hub
[SINGAPORE] Authorities in Singapore appear to be kicking it up a notch, as they round up more individuals and entities for their involvement in a S$3 billion money laundering scandal unveiled in August 2023. To be clear, action against the 10 foreigners at the heart of the scandal that sent shockwaves across the Republic has long been concluded. By around this time last year, all 10 had finished serving their time in jail; they have since been deported and barred from re-entering Singapore. But the anti-money laundering (AML) war is far from over. On Jul 1, the Council for Estate Agents fined two property agents for their failure to conduct customer due diligence measures on clients who were connected to the case. Then, on Jul 14, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) and the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority proposed amendments to help strengthen Singapore's corporate framework, including the barring of those who have been convicted of money laundering offences from serving as a company director. Just a day later, the Ministry of Law said that it was investigating 24 law firms for their involvement in the conveyancing of real estate properties seized in the 2023 bust. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Also in July, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued penalties totalling S$27.5 million to nine financial institutions (FIs) for AML-related breaches. The penalties took into account various factors, including the extent of the FIs' exposure to the persons of interest, the number of breaches of AML requirements, and the degree of weakness in the FIs' AML controls. By Singapore's standards, this is no small sum. This is likely the largest penalty that MAS has meted out since the 1MDB scandal in 2017. Then, MAS shut down two banks, and imposed total financial penalties of S$29.1 million on eight banks for various breaches of AML requirements. But some observers noted that the financial penalties may appear small when compared to the total quantum of the case. With S$3 billion worth of assets involved, the money laundering case is the largest that Singapore has ever seen. It came as a shock to many, given the country's image of having a reliable, transparent and stable financial system. Breaking down the penalties, Credit Suisse received the highest penalty at S$5.8 million, followed by UOB – the only local bank on the list – at S$5.6 million. LGT Bank received the lowest penalties among the nine, at S$1 million. For most banks, whose profits are in the billions, the penalties are unlikely to hurt their bottom lines – and could even be seen as little more than a slap on the wrist. For instance, UOB clocked a net profit of S$6 billion in 2024, while UBS – which took over Credit Suisse in 2023 – saw a net profit of S$5.1 billion in the same year. Granted, MAS does not oversee the offence of money laundering itself; that is a job for the criminal courts. What it does look after is the degree of AML control that FIs have, and how compliant they are with MAS' AML requirements. In response to queries on whether the penalties are adequate, an MAS spokesperson said that the penalties are 'appropriate to the extent and severity of the breaches'. The spokesperson added: 'In determining whether enforcement action is warranted, MAS takes into account whether the deficiencies amount to significant breaches, and the degree of weakness in the FI's AML controls.' MAS pointed out that most of the FIs had established AML policies and controls, with the breaches arising out of 'poor or inconsistent implementation'. Yet regulators elsewhere have issued larger penalties on FIs for AML breaches as well. For example, in 2024, TD Bank was fined over US$3 billion in the US for failing to comply with AML requirements. In 2022, Danske Bank was fined US$2 billion by the US Department of Justice, or suspected money laundering at its former branch in Estonia, in what was one of the largest money laundering scandals in Europe. Meanwhile, Standard Chartered Bank in 2019 was fined US$1.1 billion by US and UK authorities for poor AML controls. Some observers also pointed out that the penalties imposed by MAS were mostly imposed on international FIs, despite the involvement of other local banks – including DBS and OCBC – in earlier investigations. For example, during DBS' 2023 third-quarter results briefing, then-CEO Piyush Gupta said that the lender had around S$100 million in exposure to the money laundering case. In response to that, MAS deputy chairman Chee Hong Tat said that MAS will assess 'fairly and objectively' the severity of the different offences when it comes to regulatory cases. He added: 'It's not whether it is a local or international financial institution, but it is about the nature, extent and severity of the lapses and offences that have been committed.' Clearly, Singapore is sending a message that it does not take AML breaches lightly. But, perhaps, as the Republic tightens AML controls across the financial ecosystem, it will need to strike that balance between remaining business-friendly yet tough on transgressions.
