'Unintended impacts': Councils ‘blindsided' by decision to halt planning work
Resource Management Act (RMA) Reform Minister Chris Bishop has put a stop to councils working on District and Regional Plans until the new RMA legislation takes effect.
"Rather than let these pricey, pointless planning and policy processes play out, we will be giving councils clarity on where to focus their efforts while they await the new planning system," Bishop said at the Local Government NZ conference in Christchurch today.
Christchurch city councillor Sara Templeton said her council is working a plan change on noise in the central city, which could be placed under threat.
The plan change was about "finding a balance between people living in town and the need for a vibrant nightlife", she said.
"I'd be frustrated if we couldn't do that work with our communities. The top-down approach from central government at the moment has had multiple unintended impacts."
Cr Templeton called on the government to work more closely with councils.
The Kaikōura District Council has been working through a review of its District Plan, which was adopted in 2008.
Council chief executive Will Doughty said the announcement will stifle its attempts to make changes to benefit the community.
"We have just awarded a contract to our consultants to work on the first two or three chapters.
"We always knew reform was under way, but we took an approach to respond to the needs of our community, while being flexible enough to review and respond to any changes."
Mr Doughty said the council faced criticism that the "rules are prohibitive", so it was keen to update the plan.
Waitaki Mayor Gary Kircher said his council has been reviewing parts of its District Plan, but its efforts were impacted by constant changes from central government.
"The government has been signalling changing requirements for a long time, and we wish they would just get on and do it so we can get on and do what we need to do."
Mr Kircher said councils had called on the government to stop signalling changes ahead of legislation, as it set "unrealistic expectations for the community".
"Once the government makes these announcements, people expect us to implement the changes, but it takes time to go through the planning process."
Mr Bishop said money is wasted on planning review processes, which is required under the existing RMA.
'The government will suspend councils' mandatory RMA requirements to undertake plan and regional policy statement reviews every ten years, and the requirement to implement national planning standards."
Mr Bishop said there will be some exemptions, including private plan changes and natural hazards planning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
39 minutes ago
- Scoop
Family Home In Labour's Tax Crosshairs
Press Release – New Zealand National Party Labour crashed the economy, has opposed every measure to get it growing, and has no economic plan except imposing higher taxes on homes, businesses, and savings. Kiwis deserve to know why and how Labour would do this. Labour's refusal to rule out taxing the family home is a frightening prospect for ordinary Kiwis, says National MP Chris Bishop. 'As Kiwis continue to deal with the cost-of-living consequences of Labour's high tax, high spend record, it defies belief that its leader can't rule out piling more costs on Kiwis with a tax on their family home. 'Earlier this month, a former Labour Party advisor publicly confirmed the party had agreed to progress a Capital Gains Tax so it's unclear why Chris Hipkins can't bring himself to explain even the most basic detail. 'Similar to last week when Hipkins had to be corrected by Megan Woods on the party's position on oil and gas, and last month when Kieran McAnulty corrected Hipkins' position on public-private partnerships, it could be that he just doesn't know. Or he might just have to wait for permission from Labour's Policy Council and the Greens. 'Labour crashed the economy, has opposed every measure to get it growing, and has no economic plan except imposing higher taxes on homes, businesses, and savings. Kiwis deserve to know why and how Labour would do this.'
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Some water permits to get extension
The Otago region's water users will now have at least five years before changes to consents occur. Since legislation was passed in October 2024 preventing the notification of the draft Land and Water Regional Plan (LWRP), the Otago Regional Council has been working with the government to find a way to provide some certainty for farmers and growers, and water permit holders until a new plan is in place. The legislation prevented all regional councils from notifying freshwater planning measures before a new National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPSFM) was published, or December 31, 2025, whichever came sooner, but several previously identified issues with the current plan could not be resolved through the new LWRP. The regional council requested the government consider a legislative fix for these known issues, that would extend the expiry date of existing short-term water permits and override certain discharge provisions of the plan — providing short-term clarity for the region's produce growers, primary producers and water permit holders. The amendment will extend the duration of most existing short-term water permits for another five years, on the assumption that their expiry date will be after a new plan is put in place. ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson said she was pleased the council had gained support from the government to address these known issues through a change in legislation. "While this only provides some further short-term certainty for the Otago community it ensures we avoid unnecessary costs and regulation until new freshwater rules are in place." Federated Farmers said the changes would spare thousands of farmers from needing an unnecessary resource consent just to keep farming. RMA reform spokesman Mark Hooper said the changes were "just common sense". "Without these urgent changes to the discharge rules under section 70 of the RMA, we would have been facing a ridiculous, expensive and totally unworkable situation. "Thousands of farmers would have needed to go through the process of applying for a new resource consent, and ticking boxes, for absolutely no environmental gain." Mr Hooper said councils would still be able to require consent for genuinely high-risk activities but would not be forced to do so when something such as a farm plan is a better option. "Taking a risk-based approach is much more sensible — particularly when many farmers already have farm plans in place that will drive real environmental improvements." — Allied Media
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Farmers won't need consent to pollute waterways as government undoes RMA rules
The government's changes mean thousands of farmers won't need resource consents to discharge pollutants into waterways. Photo: 123RF The government has taken what it is calling urgent action to save thousands of farmers from having to lodge resource consents to discharge pollutants into waterways. It said changes to the Resource Management Amendment (RMA) Bill meant farmers could carry on the routine work they had been doing for years without needing consent. Federated Farmers has welcomed the move, but critics called the environmental law changes a last-minute smash and grab that was being rammed through Parliament RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop said last month Waikato Regional Council told the government that unless urgent changes were made to water discharge rules in the RMA, approximately 2800 Waikato farms would require resource consents for on-farm activities. "The Waikato region generates 20 percent of the nation's primary exports, with dairy farming supporting the employment of over 9000 Kiwis in the Waikato alone. If we don't act, the economic heart of New Zealand's primary sector could grind to a halt under what would effectively be a 'stop work' order," he said. Horizons Regional Council, Bay of Plenty Regional Council, Tasman District Council and Environment Southland all requested further changes to water discharge rules as well. The amendment would broaden what water discharges could be allowed as a permitted activity. But Tom Kay, from the freshwater campaign group Choose Clean Water, said local councils would be stripped of the power to have any meaningful say over the future for their communities and environment. The changes would, among other things, prevent councils writing or changing plans and policy statements until 2027, give the minister the power to modify or remove provisions of a Regional Policy Statement or regional or district plan, and weaken restrictions on commercial fishing and farming industries, he said. "Despite claiming to be for the benefit of council efficiency, these changes effectively grind vital planning to a halt while allowing increasing pollution. Councils won't be able to move ahead with protecting things that are important for their communities-like drinking water sources or coastal fisheries-until the government says so." He said the government was doing what agricultural lobby groups Federated Farmers, Beef & Lamb and Dairy NZ had asked for in their submissions on the Bill. Federated Farmers applauded the changes, saying they would spare thousands of farmers from needing an unnecessary resource consent just to keep farming. "I'd love to say this is a practical and pragmatic change from the government - but it's actually just commonsense," its RMA reform spokesperson, Mark Hooper, said. Councils would still be able to require consent for genuinely high-risk activities but would not be forced to do so when something such as a farm plan was a better option, he said. The Bill was expected to pass into law by the end of next week. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
