logo
Opinion: Transportation minister needs to stay in his lane

Opinion: Transportation minister needs to stay in his lane

Article content
Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen recently wrote to the mayors of both Edmonton and Calgary with 'concerns' about bike lanes. His first letter to Edmonton called for the cancellation of the 132nd Avenue project, but the letter to Calgary was more vague, stating 'we need to seriously consider on how to maintain adequate capacity for motor vehicle traffic flow for current and future traffic needs, not reducing capacity.'
Article content
Article content
If Dreeshen is concerned about the movement of traffic through the city, he should support more transportation options, not fewer. Traffic doesn't just include cars, it includes people who walk, take transit and, yes, ride bikes.
Article content
Calgary city council has, in fact, been too hesitant in building cycling infrastructure. It has allowed the downtown cycle track to slowly crumble year after year, never making permanent what was built in the pilot project phase. This would be unacceptable if it were a road built for cars.
Article content
Much of the pathways end abruptly and large swaths of the city, including some of Calgary's lowest-income neighbourhoods, have little to no cycling infrastructure at all.
Article content
Buying and maintaining a car is a huge financial burden and one that should be optional. Thanks to inflation, people are forced to pay more of their income into their vehicles. If Dreeshen's concern is making life easier for Albertans, he'd make it so we wouldn't need to.
Article content
Article content
Adding more car traffic lanes in cities with limited space isn't going to solve traffic problems. If anything, it forces everything to spread out, which in turn forces us all into cars. It's a vicious cycle that we have been doing for decades, and stretches both municipal and personal budgets.
Article content
I know Dreeshen supports transportation options. He made it legal to drive golf carts on roads in his home riding last year. So why does he want to constrain options in Alberta's cities?
Article content
The research is abundant — giving people options to get around not only reduces traffic congestion, but improves quality of life.
Article content
Additionally, being able to experience the city around you in a way that is impossible to do in a car also feels pretty dang good. Since the initial build out of the downtown cycle track, other factors have induced a boom in people riding for transportation. Bike shops saw a boom during pandemic restrictions, and Calgary streets that were converted to active transportation were well used.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boaters, paddlers push back on Alberta's watercraft pass idea
Boaters, paddlers push back on Alberta's watercraft pass idea

CBC

time2 hours ago

  • CBC

Boaters, paddlers push back on Alberta's watercraft pass idea

Province tests waters on annual boating fee for kayakers, paddleboarders, sailors 13 hours ago Duration 2:04 Social Sharing The provincial government made a big splash with water recreation groups on Friday, when it launched a public survey looking for feedback on a potential new watercraft pass. The annual fee's purpose, the province said, would be to keep invasive mussels, like zebra or quagga mussels that can devastate aquatic ecosystems, out of Alberta. It would apply to watercrafts like kayaks, canoes, motorboats and jet skis, and is open until August 25. The province said it's interested in hearing from the public about how much the pass should cost and how it should be applied, including whether it should be used on a per-boat or per-operator basis. But boaters and paddlers around Alberta have raised concerns with the idea, said Alberta Whitewater Association executive director Mike Holroyd. WATCH | Province floats annual boating pass: Province tests waters on annual boating fee for kayakers, paddleboarders, sailors 13 hours ago Holroyd said his group has worked with the province on invasive species prevention in recent years, but the survey took them by surprise. "What they're really after is trying to stop the mussels from coming into the province, which is from the east and the south, and instead they're going with this shotgun approach that's kind of all over the province, which doesn't make a lot of sense," said Holroyd. More engagement with key stakeholders would be better before a public survey, Holroyd said. He added he believes motorboats or sailboats entering Alberta are likely the bigger problem the province faces with invasive mussels. "Our boats, recreational small boats, they're in the water for maybe a couple hours and then they're out of the water," said Holroyd. "It seems unlikely that that's going to spread things more than say fishing gear or people playing by the water." Zebra and quagga mussels currently aren't found in Alberta. But in the province's announcement of its new survey, it said there's an increasing risk of these mussels around North America. "Zebra mussels alone cause up to $500 million annually in damages to power plants, water systems and industrial water intakes in the Great Lakes region," said the Office of the Minister of Environment and Protected Areas in an emailed statement on Monday. "No decision has been made on next steps. We will look forward to hearing Albertans' thoughts before determining how to move forward." Revenue from a potential watercraft pass would fund prevention, monitoring and education efforts, including inspection stations and mussel-sniffing dog teams, the province said. If the new pass is implemented, Holroyd said he'd like to see some of the revenue it generates go toward improving access to Alberta's lakes and rivers. Earlier this year, Alberta implemented mandatory watercraft inspections for every boat entering the province from its eastern and southern borders. In 2024, 15 watercrafts were confirmed positive for invasive mussels in Alberta. Increased rental, lesson costs The cost of an annual pass could place greater strain on local businesses, which in turn would drive up the price of lessons and equipment rentals, said Rocky Mountain Paddling Centre owner Mark Taylor. He said the added cost could make the sport less accessible "It's like a blank check for the province. You know it seems like another money grab," said Taylor. "We already pay to access the provincial parks now, we already pay to go into the backcountry. Paddling was supposed to be a free sport once you bought all the equipment, and now it's turning into another expensive thing that makes it harder for people to access." While the province mandates boats entering Alberta to stop at an inspection station, Taylor said the stations aren't open 24 hours per day and aren't always located close enough to the provincial borders. Setting up inspection stations so boats entering the province must immediately be cleaned to ensure they're not bringing mussels in, would better serve Alberta, Taylor suggested, adding that a fee hitting boats travelling within the province instead, misses the mark. "Fish swim, water moves, but the mussels and things like that, the invasive species as it were, if they're not here, then there isn't a risk of transporting them from place to place," said Taylor.

Breakenridge: Government needs to end the charade of Alberta Next
Breakenridge: Government needs to end the charade of Alberta Next

Calgary Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Breakenridge: Government needs to end the charade of Alberta Next

Article content For example, with regard to the claim in the video that Ottawa sets local RCMP policing priorities, Duheme points out that under the existing agreements, it is the municipality that sets those priorities for the police force contracted to that municipality. Article content The letter also disputes the claim that unilingual Alberta RCMP members are denied promotional opportunities. Duheme notes that all commissioned positions in Alberta are deemed 'English essential' and not subjected to bilingualism requirements. Article content And as to the video's claim that the RCMP can move members out of a community 'at a moment's notice,' the letter argues that 'the process to relocate a member includes careful planning to support them and their families should they choose to pursue another opportunity.' Article content Article content Now, for most Albertans, these points aren't as relevant since municipal police forces already handle most community policing. But the idea that some communities could suddenly lose members to abrupt transfers or have policing priorities dictated or overruled by a distant and detached federal government would be of concern to all Albertans. Article content Surely the province is not oblivious to the reality of how such claims will be received, hence their prominence in this video. However, if the claims are not true, then obviously the Alberta government shouldn't be including them in the first place. If the goal is to influence public opinion on this issue, then the motivation becomes clearer. Article content If the government is hellbent on making these changes, it should just say so. But spare us the charade of pretending otherwise. If they genuinely want to know what Albertans think, then a course correction is badly needed.

Rob Breakenridge: Government needs to end the charade of Alberta Next
Rob Breakenridge: Government needs to end the charade of Alberta Next

Edmonton Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Rob Breakenridge: Government needs to end the charade of Alberta Next

After they were clearly stung by the overwhelmingly negative response in their Alberta Pension Plan Survey, it's not surprising to see the Alberta government leaving less to chance with the Alberta Next process. Article content There's something to be said for a government that's genuinely interested in citizen feedback on important issues, but that assumes there's not a preferred or predetermined outcome. In that case, then, they needn't bother. Article content Article content Article content For example, the government is already altering some of the survey questions that deal with an Alberta Pension Plan, a Provincial Police Force, and an Alberta Revenue Agency. In all three cases, there was no option for respondents to disagree with the proposals (although folks who had already completed the survey aren't allowed to complete it a second time). Article content These are consequential and expensive changes, and Albertans deserve to be consulted before we go down these paths. However, it seems like those decisions have already been made, and this whole exercise is about providing cover. Article content The first two Alberta Next town halls were held in July, with three to follow in August and five more in September. There's still time for the government to ease up on the message control and allow this to be a genuine consultation. Article content Article content Even though some of the survey questions will finally offer a 'none of the above' option, there's still the issue of the government-produced videos that must be viewed before taking part in the surveys. These are clearly not objective and neutral presentations of the facts. Article content Article content The video that accompanies the questions about an Alberta Provincial Police Force was skewed enough to prompt a response last week from RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme. Again, there could be benefits to Alberta transitioning community policing to a provincial force. There could also be benefits to ending contract policing altogether and refocusing the RCMP on federal policing responsibilities. Article content But it's also a question that deserves a thorough and honest discourse. As the commissioner's three-page letter details, Alberta Next is falling short in that regard.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store