Serial thief loses appeal to reduce six-year jail term
Fuad Ibrahim had pleaded guilty to three separate offences—housebreaking, theft in a building and house trespass—committed between January and October 2021. He was sentenced to an aggregate of six years' imprisonment with two strokes of the cane by the Intermediate Court in September 2023.
Fuad's application for leave to appeal argued that his sentences should run concurrently, citing his family responsibilities, medical condition (hemorrhoids) and cooperation with authorities.
However, the Court of Appeal, presided by Chief Justice Dato Seri Paduka Steven Chong, with Justices Michael Lunn and Edward Timothy Starbuck Woolley, rejected the application.
The court heard that Fuad's crimes involved separate incidents over a 10-month period. These included breaking into a home in Kampong Jangsak, stealing electronics and jewellery and later stealing BND10,500 from a cafe owner's bag.
Another burglary involved breaking into a house in Limau Manis and stealing valuables while the owner was working offshore.
Despite Fuad's eventual guilty plea, the court noted that it was only entered after the trial had already been set to proceed, and not at the earliest opportunity. His long criminal history, spanning 21 prior convictions for theft-related offences since 2007, weighed heavily against him.
In delivering the judgment, the court emphasised that Fuad's offending showed a pattern of repeat criminality with no evidence of rehabilitation, justifying consecutive sentences.
The judges also found that the original sentencing judge had already been generous in granting a one-third discount on each sentence due to the guilty plea.
With no arguable merit to the appeal, the Court of Appeal concluded that granting an extension of time would serve no useful purpose, and dismissed the application.
Fuad will continue to serve his six-year sentence with two strokes of the cane.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ahmad Firdaus Mohammad represented the respondent. – Borneo Bulletin/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
8 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
3 years later, court ordered to release judgment in DAP man's case
Sarawak DAP chief Chong Chieng Jen (third from right) with his team of lawyers at the Court of Appeal. (DAP pic) PETALING JAYA : The Court of Appeal has ordered the Kuching High Court to release its grounds of judgment for the Sarawak government's defamation suit against DAP's Chong Chieng Jen, three years after ruling in the state administration's favour. Chong, the state opposition leader, said his legal team had written five times to the High Court to request for the grounds of judgment but to no avail. He said the appellate court was scheduled to hear his appeal against the High Court's decision today but could not proceed as there were no grounds of judgment. 'Finally, the Court of Appeal has ordered the High Court to provide the grounds of judgment within one month from today. It has postponed hearing of the appeal,' Chong said in a statement. The Sarawak DAP chief also said his lawyers would be writing to the chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak on the matter. The state government and Sarawak Financial Authority (SFA) had sued Chong in 2013 for claiming that RM11 billion in state funds had disappeared into a 'black hole'. The case only came up for trial in January 2021, with 26 days of proceedings before it concluded in July the same year. In August 2022, High Court judge Alexander Siew, then a judicial commissioner, ruled that Chong had defamed the plaintiffs and awarded RM150,000 in damages.
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Judge in Sarawak DAP chief's defamation case ordered to produce judgment
KUCHING: The Court of Appeal has ordered the trial judge in the defamation trial of Stampin MP and Sarawak DAP chairman Chong Chieng Jen to provide the written grounds of judgment within one month from today. This is to enable the hearing of Chong's appeal to be heard. The hearing of the appeal today had to be postponed as the written judgment was not available. "As directed by the Court of Appeal, my lawyers will also be writing to the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak on this matter," Chong said. He hoped to receive the grounds of judgment soon for the appeal to proceed. Chong said the trial had concluded four years ago and "yet there is still no grounds of judgment from the trial judge". In 2012, Chong criticised the state's budget, pointing to what he described as a recurring line item titled "government's contribution towards government-approved agencies trust fund". He argued that this allocation acted as a "black hole" since it lacked transparency as substantial sums in billions of ringgit were transferred without disclosure of the actual recipients or their uses. In 2013, the then Sarawak government and State Financial Authority (SFA) filed a defamation lawsuit against him following his published claims, including in leaflets and news outlets, that RM11 billion in public funds had gone into this "black hole". The suit was filed in the Kuching High Court, and the trial started on Jan 7, 2021. On August 30, 2022, the judge ruled in favour of the state government, determining that Chong's "black hole" remark was defamatory, and that his defences — justification, fair comment, and qualified privilege — did not hold. The judge ordered Chong to pay RM150,000 in damages and RM50,000 in legal costs, and issued an injunction preventing him from repeating the statement. Chong said the trial judge then did not provide the grounds of judgment. "After almost three years from the decision of the High Court judge, or four years after the conclusion of the trial, the judge has not provided the grounds of his judgment. "Over the years, we have written five times to the High Court to request the grounds of judgment, but all to no avail," Chong said. He said because there were no grounds of judgment, his appeal, which was to have been heard today, had to be postponed. Chong filed the appeal on Sept 12, 2022, arguing that allowing the government to sue individuals for defamation was a dangerous erosion of freedom of speech and that the judgment posed a threat to democratic rights across the Commonwealth. The judge who presided over the trial was a judicial commissioner at the time.
Borneo Post
10 hours ago
- Borneo Post
‘Black hole' defamation ruling: Appeals court gives judicial commission one month to deliver written grounds of judgment
Chong (centre) flanked by Kong (right) and Siew Chiang at the Kuching Court Complex. — Photo by Kentigern Minggu KUCHING (Aug 12): The Court of Appeal here today adjourned Sarawak DAP chairman Chong Chieng Jen's appeal against the Kuching High Court's 2022 defamation ruling over his 2013 'black hole' allegations, as the judicial commissioner had yet to deliver the written grounds of judgment. A three-member bench comprising Datuk Azimah Omar, Datuk Wong Kian Kheong, and Datuk Ismail Brahim, unanimously made the decision and ordered the judicial commissioner to deliver the written grounds within one month from today. The court further directed Chong's legal team to write to the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Datuk Azizah Nawawi to inform her of the unavailability of the written grounds. Chong's lawyer Michael Kong pointed out the appeal was adjourned because the grounds of judgment had not been provided to the parties despite the trial concluding 49 months ago. During the appeal, Chong was also represented by counsels Chong Siew Chiang, Sharon Lo, and Brenda Chong. The respondents were represented by legal officers Ronald Felix Hardin, Mohd Adzrul Azlan, Mohamad Muhaimin Zakaria, and Felicity Thomas. In 2013, Chong, who is Stampin MP, alleged that RM11 billion from the state coffers had disappeared into a 'black hole' — implying financial mismanagement by the Sarawak government and the Sarawak Financial Authority (SFA). In a statement today, Chong said the state government subsequently sued him for defamation and the trial ran from Jan 7, 2021 to July 5, 2021. On Aug 30, 2022, Judicial Commissioner Alexander Siew How Wai ruled in favour of the plaintiffs, awarding RM150,000 in damages and RM50,000 in legal costs. 'However, he did not provide the grounds of judgment — the reasoning for his decision in favour of the state government,' Chong said. The court also granted an injunction restraining Chong, whether by himself, his servants, agents, or otherwise, from publishing or causing to be published the same or similar words or statements. According to him, over the years his party had written five times to the High Court requesting the grounds of judgment, but to no avail. black hole Chong Chieng Jen Court of Appeal lead
