
EXCLUSIVE Tories demand inquiry into Keir Starmer's National Security chief Jonathan Powell over secret taxpayer-funded talks with 'rogue states'
Jonathan Powell, the Prime Minister's National Security Adviser, founded the shadowy organisation after he left Tony Blair 's Downing Street, where he was chief of staff when the infamous 'dodgy dossier' helped to propel Britain into war with Iraq.
The outfit, Inter Mediate, receives funding from the Foreign Office for making contact with 'non-state armed groups', and is understood to have brokered the UK's deal with Syria which led to the re-establishment of diplomatic relations earlier this month.
Mr Powell, 68, who stood down as the charity's £200,000-a-year chief executive when he returned to No 10 in November, also brokered the hugely controversial deal to surrender UK sovereignty over the strategically important Chagos Islands to Mauritius earlier this year.
The move comes amid claims that the Blairites, led by Mr Powell and Liz Lloyd – his deputy in Tony Blair's administration and now Sir Keir's director of policy delivery – are trying to mount a 'power grab' within Starmer's administration.
Diplomatic sources say that Inter Mediate played a central role in re-establishing relations with the Syrian government, which is led by former Islamists with links to Al Qaeda.
After the deal was brokered earlier this month, Foreign Secretary David Lammy flew to meet President Ahmed al-Sharaa in Damascus, where Inter Mediate is said to operate an office inside the presidential palace.
The interim government has become embroiled in deadly clashes with Druze militias in the southern part of the country, prompting Israel to mount retaliatory raids on Damascus.
Last night, a senior Tory called for a Parliamentary investigation into why Mr Powell has been given 'special adviser' status, rather than being a direct ministerial appointment.
That means he does not have to answer to Parliament, despite his role in dealing directly with foreign governments and negotiating the handover of the Chagos.
Alex Burghart, Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said: 'Not being able to question the national security adviser on his role in the Chagos surrender is outrageous enough.
'But it now turns out that he is using his private outfit to run back channels to terrorist groups. Parliament must surely be able to question him about this. If the Government has nothing to hide, it wouldn't be trying so hard to keep Mr Powell away from the cold light of scrutiny.
'Labour must come clean and explain themselves at once.'
Inter Mediate displays Mr Powell prominently on its website, highlighting his role as 'a key architect of the 1999 Good Friday Agreement' in Northern Ireland.
It says that he founded the organisation in order 'to share lessons from the Northern Ireland peace talks and help other leaders navigating similar dilemmas'.
The website also says Mr Powell used his experience to 'play a central role in further successful peace accords', including the end of the Basque conflict in Spain, serving as a 'peace adviser' to President Juan Manuel Santos of Colombia and working alongside Mozambique's President Filipe Nyusi to end the country's civil war.
Less welcome headlines came over Mr Powell's role in the infamous 2002 dossier into Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction, when it was revealed that he asked a security chief to make changes to a draft version because it posed 'a bit of a problem' for Tony Blair's Downing Street.
The most recent accounts for Inter Mediate, which was founded by Mr Powell in 2011, highlight a 'greater commitment from the FCDO [Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office] through a new partnership agreement with the office of conflict, stabilisation and mediation'.
Government spending records show that Inter Mediate is bankrolled by the UK Government to provide back channels to 'non-state armed groups' due to its 'high-level access to political elites'.
The accounts, published in January, put its total income for the year to March 2024 at £2.96 million with the highest paid staff member – presumed to be Mr Powell – earning between £190,000 and £200,000.
A Whitehall source said: 'These are essentially outsourced spies and spooks undertaking 'back channel' discussions with political leaders and armed groups to reach negotiated settlements.'
In a letter to Simon Hoare, chairman of the public administration and constitutional affairs committee, Mr Burghart says Mr Powell should respond to the call to give evidence to Parliament's joint committee on the national security strategy (JCNSS), given that 'every previous national security adviser has appeared before the committee since the position was established in 2010'.
Mr Burghart writes: 'I believe that this raises important constitutional matters that would be worthy of wider scrutiny by Parliament.
'The first duty of Government is defence of the realm: yet the Government does not wish the Prime Minister's principal adviser on national security to be scrutinised.'
A Government spokesman said: 'The Government is committed to having a productive relationship with the JCNSS, and providing the best support and evidence to help it in its important work. In line with longstanding practice, senior civil servants and ministers with national security responsibility will provide evidence to the JCNSS.'
A Government source added that Mr Powell's deputies would appear before the committee.
They added: 'There is an established system in place for the declaration and management of financial interests. As has been the case under successive administrations, interests deemed relevant for publication for special advisers in No 10 and the Cabinet Office are published on an annual basis.
'Inter Mediate is a charity which works to resolve armed conflicts around the world.
'Jonathan severed all links with it when he rejoined Government last year.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jeremy Corbyn more popular among younger voters than Keir Starmer, new poll shows
Jeremy Corbyn is far more popular among young voters than Sir Keir Starmer, new polling has indicated, suggesting that Labour's decision to extend the vote to 16 and 17 year olds could backfire. While both leaders remain deeply unpopular among the public, there is a surge in support for Sir Keir 's predecessor among those aged 18-24, a new poll has shown. The survey comes just days after Mr Corbyn launched his own political party alongside former left-wing Labour MP Zarah Sultana. While Sir Keir's approval ratings are poor across all age groups, new polling conducted by YouGov on the day Mr Corbyn announced his new party showed that the left-wing politician has a rating of plus 18 among 18-24 year-olds. By contrast, Sir Keir has an approval rating of minus 30 among the same group. But among voters overall, the two leaders have a near identical approval rating, with Sir Keir on minus 40 and Mr Corbyn on minus 39. Earlier this month, the government announced it will give the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds, expanding the electorate by 1.6m people at the next election. While there have been accusations from the right that the move was an attempt to shore up its own support, the YouGov polling for The Times suggests the move could serve to split the electorate even further if the results are reflected among 16 and 17 year olds. It comes amid growing concern over the direction of Sir Keir's government from voters on both the left and the right, with the prime minister's approval rating hitting an all time low earlier this month. Sir Keir's support among the public reached new depths of minus 43 after the £5bn welfare U-turn, according to new polling. The survey, first reported by The Sunday Times, also found that just a year after coming to power, seven in 10 voters think Sir Keir's government is at least as chaotic as the Tories' previous term. That includes one in three voters, who believe it is more so. Seeking to capitalise on the discontent with the Labour government, Mr Corbyn promised a 'new kind of political party' when he launched the as yet unnamed project with Ms Sultana on Thursday, claiming that more than 200,000 people have signed up. But dismissing the movement, technology secretary Peter Kyle said that the Islington North MP 'doesn't think about governing, he thinks about posturing'. Asked about the move, Mr Kyle reflected on what he called the 'chaos and instability' of Mr Corbyn's leadership. Speaking on Times Radio, Mr Kyle said: 'He's not a serious politician. He doesn't think about governing, he thinks about posturing. And we see that writ large at the moment, because all the posturing, of course, just puts him at odds with his own supporters, which is why you've got George Galloway saying he won't join it.' When Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana announced their new party, a Labour source said: "The electorate has twice given its verdict on a Jeremy Corbyn led party." The polling, conducted by YouGov for The Times, spoke to 2,013 adults between July 24 and 25.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Iran's Supreme Leader 'high' and issuing threats to Israel
By Iran's Supreme Leader spends his days 'sleeping and high on substances' in his hidden bunker, according to insiders within Israel's national intelligence agency. A Mossad-linked X account last week shared the new information on Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a series of attacks on his leadership. 'How can a leader lead when they sleep half the day and spend the other half high on substances? Water, electricity, life!' the account wrote. 'Consuming drugs and conversing with spirits are not desirable traits for someone leading a country,' a second post read earlier this month. It comes after Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz warned Khamenei to stop threatening the existence of his people from his underground bunker. 'I want to convey a clear message to Khamenei the dictator,' Katz recently said. 'If you continue to threaten Israel, our long arm will again reach Tehran and with even greater force — and this time to you personally. Do not threaten, lest you be harmed.' A ceasefire has been in place between Israel and Iran since late June, following days of fiery attacks from both sides after Israel's surprise strikes wiped out top Iranian military figures and nuclear scientists. At the height of the 12-day conflict, there were widespread reports that Khamenei was hiding out in a bunker amid increased concerns for his safety. At this point, Israel had dismantled and destroyed Khamenei's senior network, wiping out key leaders and allies of the Supreme Leader. Mohammad Bagheri, the commander in chief of Iran's military and second highest commander after Khamenei, was among the first casualties identified after the strikes. Hossein Salami, commander in chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps was also killed, along with Gholamali Rashid, the deputy commander in chief of the armed forces. General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of the airspace unit of the Revolutionary Guards, Gen. Gholamreza Mehrabi, the deputy intelligence chief of the Armed Forces and Gen. Davood Sheikhian, the commander of air defense, were also wiped out. Simultaneously, bombs exploded at the homes of nine scientists, killing them instantly and at the same time. While the Mossad has not formally confirmed the X account's affiliation, two intelligence agents recently said the account appears authentic. 'Some of the information it has shared could only have come from Mossad,' said Beny Sabti, an Iran expert at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies. The accountholder urges supports who are 'contacting us through private messages, for your own security, please ensure you are using a VPN.' Khamenei has been accused of abusing drugs in the past, despite declaring illicit substances 'un-Islamic' in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution. Iranians face the death penalty for drug related offenses. In 2022, an Iranian academic publicly claimed the Supreme Leader had a drug habit. 'Many viewers do not know this, but Khamenei himself uses drugs,' Nour Mohamed Omara told a television station in Turkey at the time. 'He has a special village in Balochistan, where the drugs used by the leader are produced,' the academic added. 'This village is run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and no one is allowed in.' The same Mossad-linked account has been making efforts to reach and communicate with Iranians who are increasingly disenfranchised with their leadership. After the 12-day Iran-Israel war, the account posted: 'A ceasefire has been put into effect. Now, the extent of the damage is becoming clear. At this moment, the regime is focused on its senior officials, not on caring for its citizens.' 'We stand with you and have formed a team of specialized doctors, including experts in cardiology, diabetes. pulmonary diseases, infectious diseases, oncology, as well as support for pregnant women and psychological assistance.' The account warned Iranians interested in utilizing the services to contact them via a VPN for their own safety.


The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
I was kicked out of Wetherspoons for wearing Union Jack dress – staff's four cruel words mean I'll never go back
A WOMAN who was wearing a Union Jack dress and was refused entry to a Wetherspoon's pub has said she'll never go back. Wearing her patriotic dress, Tanya Ostolski, 54, was told "you're not coming in" despite being a regular for nearly 30 years. 3 3 Tanya was trying to visit The Picture House in Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, when she was barred entry. The events followed an anti-illegal immigration protest that took place 50 metres away from the pub in Nottingham town centre on Friday July 25 which Tanya attended. After marching in the protest, Tanya made her way to the local Wetherspoons but was denied entry due to her dress, despite putting away the flag she was carrying, she says. The decision caused anger amongst some protesters who clashed with bouncers on Friday evening as they were also denied entry, they said. A spokesperson for Wetherspoons has confirmed the pub asked customers with flags and placards not to enter so as not to "increase tension". Tanya said: "I'm disgusted, I won't be going back there. "I go in there all the time and I wasn't causing any trouble. "The whole day was a peaceful protest, I'm a grandma and I've never caused any bother. "I just can't believe this was all over a flag - it was really upsetting, I didn't do anything wrong." According to Tanya, she was first refused entry because she was carrying a St George's cross flag but after putting it away she was still refused entry. She claims witnesses defended her at the time, calling the bouncers actions "unfair" as she wasn't "causing any trouble". Tanya added that she had the flag tied around her waist and was asked to put the flag away and that she couldn't come in. "But I had flags all over my dress and then I was told I can't come in at all - I was really confused, it's just a flag," Tanya said. "I asked for a valid reason and they just kept saying you're not coming in. "I'm not aggressive and didn't want to cause trouble, so I just walked away. "I've heard I won't be welcome back or I might be barred." The protest was sparked after Reform MP Lee Anderson made an unfounded claim that a local man charged with rape was an asylum seeker. Anderson made the claims on X, despite being advised against it by Nottinghamshire Police as it could interfere with the justice proceedings. The claim regards a man who was arrested after reportedly raping a woman at Sutton Lawn. An estimated 300 people attended the earlier protest, with around a dozen counter protesters from Stand Up To Racism also present. Protests began at around 4.30pm and had ended by around 7pm. Anger was directed towards Sir Keir Starmer, with people chanting "stop the boats". At one point in the evening, police guarded the entrance to the Wetherspoon pub after protesters like Tanya complained about being turned away. JD Wetherspoons has a "no flag" policy which was prohibits the pubs from hanging the England flag. The move caused backlash from pubgoers during the 2018 football World Cup. But during the men's Euro 2024, the popular chain overturned it's policy and allowed the pubs to hang the England flag during the summer tournament. Wetherspoon spokesman Eddie Gershon commented in response to the incident in Sutton-in-Ashfield. He said: "Pub managers have a duty under the licensing laws, and as a matter of common sense, to judge every situation on its particular circumstances. "In this case, the pub manager felt that it was important not to increase tensions. "Therefore, on this occasion the manager asked customers not to enter with flags or any placards." 3