logo
The tragic true story of Titan: The OceanGate Disaster and the submersible implosion

The tragic true story of Titan: The OceanGate Disaster and the submersible implosion

Cosmopolitana day ago

On 18 June 2023, five passengers descended into the Atlantic Ocean in the hopes of seeing the famed wreckage of the doomed Titanic. They would have been prepared to see something incredible from the viewpoint of the Titan, the submersible they were travelling in. Instead, the ship's carbon fibre was struggling to uphold against the ocean's enormous pressure, and Titan imploded at supersonic speeds. All five passengers on board were instantly killed. A four-day search and rescue mission took place, with the remainder of what was left of the Titan found on the ocean floor, shredded.
Netflix's latest series, Titan: The OceanGate Disaster now looks to explore this tragedy in granular detail, focusing on billionaire Stockton Rush – the man behind the submersible, who also perished onboard his own creation. Here's everything you need to know.
The new Netflix documentary looks at the rise of OceanGate, an American company that wanted to launch deep sea tourism. Founded by Stockton Rush and Guillermo Söhnlein in 2009, the company built two submersible vessels – one of which being the infamous Titan. Söhnlein left the company in 2013. Rush, meanwhile, was the charismatic face of the brand.
'There's a huge demand for unique travel experiences,' he said in 2017. 'We will be profitable from the Titanic trips.'
Born into a wealthy family, Rush was an American businessman with a taste for adventure. He started scuba diving aged 12 and acquired a pilot's licence when he was 18. He initially thought about being an air force pilot, but was rejected for his eyesight not being good enough.
In 2006, after he went on his first submarine excursion, Rush began to toy with the idea of deep sea travel, and hoped to tap into the growing demand for adventure tourism. He wanted to build submersibles that went far deeper under the sea than other commercial submersibles.
Speaking to The Independent in 2017, Rush explained: 'Shallow dives equal shallow experience. The commercial subs out there are like a Disneyland ride versus paddling yourself through the Grand Canyon. Knowing you're there changes how you observe it.'
Understandably, there are strict regulations for submersible travel, which Rush previously criticised. He once decried the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 as 'needlessly prioritis[ing] passenger safety over commercial innovation'.
Rush also spoke passionately about the 'move fast and break things' culture typically attributed to start-ups. At the 2022 GeekWire summit, he told audiences: 'If you're not breaking things, you're not innovating. If you're operating within a known environment, as most submersible manufacturers do, they don't break things. To me, the more stuff you've broken, the more innovative you've been.'
Speaking of his former co-founder, Guillermo Söhnlein told Vanity Fair: 'I think [Rush] did see himself in the same vein as these disruptive innovators. Like Thomas Edison, or any of these guys who just found a way of pushing humanity forward for the good of humanity — not necessarily for himself. He didn't need the money. He certainly didn't need to work and spend hundreds of hours on OceanGate. You know, he was doing this to help humanity. At least that's what I think was personally driving him.'
The deep-sea vessel, built by OceanGate, was to focus on diving as far as 3,800 meters below sea level to visit the wreckage of the Titanic.
What made it different to other submersibles, usually comprised of titanium or steel in order to withstand the extreme levels of external pressure that are attributed to deep-sea diving, was that the Titan had a filament-wound carbon fibre hull. This material made the submersible lighter and more cost effective – but was not as reliable and could fail when too much pressure was applied.
Rush was told this by numerous employees and experts in the field, who warned of potential 'catastrophic' issues, but nothing was done to amend the submersible. Titan was also not 'classed', which meant that it did not undergo formal safety inspections or meet the standards of established classification societies.
In 2019, OceanGate explained why this was the case. In a press release, the company said: 'Bringing an outside entity up to speed on every innovation before it is put into real-world testing is anathema to rapid innovation.'
The submersible was also controlled by a modified video game controller, with the 'pilot' receiving instructions from the surface vessel above through a text-based messaging system.
No real training was required before getting on board, with any training needed to take part being provided online. However, those who paid for their seat on the submersible (a princely sum of up to $250,000, or £195,000), were expected to sign a detailed waiver that said that going on the Titan could 'result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma or death'.
Despite numerous warnings, Titan launched in 2021 with its first dive to the Titanic's wreckage. Between 2021 and 2022, the submersible made 23 dives, with 13 of these managing to reach the wreckage. On its final outing, the Titan was just 1600m away from the bow of the Titanic.
Onboard the Titan's final voyage on 18 June were:
Stockton Rush – 61 – OceanGate CEO
Paul-Henri Nargeolet – 77 – deep sea explorer and Titanic expert
Hamish Harding – 58 – businessman
Shahzada Dawood – 48 – businessman
Suleman Dawood – 19 – university student and Dawood's son
Originally Christine Dawood was meant to be going on the dive. However, she reportedly gave up her seat for her son, because he expressed an interest in going on the trip. He reportedly took a Rubik's cube on Titan, as he hoped he would be able to break a world record while seeing the wreckage.
Rear Admiral John Mauger explained in a press conference after the Titan was found that the wreckage was consistent with a 'catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber.'
Effectively, the carbon fibre material could not withstand the external pressure of a deep sea dive.
When the submersible did not reemerge at its scheduled time, the US coast guard was notified. Titan only had 96 hours of breathable air supply for its five passengers when it set out, which added a time pressure to finding those onboard.
Four days later, on 22 June, debris from the Titan submersible was found by the US coast guard, near the Titanic's wreckage.
All planned excursions by the company were immediately cancelled, with its main office closed the day the Titan wreckage was found. On 6 July, all business operations were suspended, with OceanGate now only serving as a legal entity.
The family of French explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet filed a $50 million wrongful death lawsuit against OceanGate in August 2024.
The US Coast Guard launched an investigation, which also led to a public hearing in September 2024. During this time, former employees testified saying they warned of the submersible's safety.
US court documents show OceanGate's former operations director David Lochridge had significant concerns with the Titan's design, including that it was made from carbon fibre which he warned would damage further with every dive.
Titan: The OceanGate Disaster is available to watch on Netflix now
Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JP Morgan maintains 2025 forecast for oil prices in low-to-mid $60s
JP Morgan maintains 2025 forecast for oil prices in low-to-mid $60s

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

JP Morgan maintains 2025 forecast for oil prices in low-to-mid $60s

(Reuters) - JP Morgan downplayed geopolitical concerns on Thursday and maintained its base case forecast for oil prices to stay in the low-to-mid $60s through 2025 and $60 in 2026, but said certain worst-case scenarios could send prices surging to double those levels. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States was moving personnel out of the Middle East because it "could be a dangerous place". He also said the U.S. would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Iran has said its nuclear activity is peaceful. Increased tension with Iran has raised the prospect of disruption to oil supplies, with both sides set to meet on Sunday. The geopolitical risk premium is already at least partially reflected in current oil prices, which are just under $70, trading about $4 higher than their estimated fair value of $66 for June, JP Morgan said in a Thursday note. However, the analysts drew attention to certain worst-case scenarios, where the impact on supply could potentially extend beyond a 2.1 million barrels per day reduction in Iranian oil exports. Attention is focused on the risk that a broader Middle East conflict could close the Strait of Hormuz, or provoke retaliatory responses from major oil producing countries in the region. "Under this severe outcome, we estimate oil prices could surge to the $120-130/bbl range," they said. Brent crude futures were trading near $68.76 per barrel on Thursday, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were at $67.14 per barrel. [O/R] If nuclear negotiations fail and conflict arises with the United States, Iran will strike American bases in the region, Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday, days ahead of a planned sixth round of Iran-U.S. nuclear talks. The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on Thursday and Tehran announced counter-measures, as tensions rose in the Middle East. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The number of Americans filing for jobless claims last week remains at the highest level in 8 months
The number of Americans filing for jobless claims last week remains at the highest level in 8 months

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

The number of Americans filing for jobless claims last week remains at the highest level in 8 months

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. filings for jobless benefits were unchanged last week, remaining at the higher end of recent ranges as uncertainty over the impact of trade wars lingers. New applications for jobless benefits numbered 248,000 for the week ending June 7, the Labor Department said Thursday. Analysts had forecast 244,000 new applications. A week ago, there were 248,000 jobless claim applications, which was the most since early October and a sign that layoffs could be trending higher. Weekly applications for jobless benefits are considered representative of U.S. layoffs and have mostly bounced around a historically healthy range between 200,000 and 250,000 since COVID-19 throttled the economy five years ago, wiping out millions of jobs. In reporting their latest earnings, many companies have either trimmed their sales and profit expectations for 2025 or not issued guidance at all, often citing President Donald Trump's dizzying rollout of tariff announcements. Though Trump has paused or dialed down many of his tariff threats, concerns remain that a tariff-induced global economic slowdown could sabotage what's been a robust U.S. labor market. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has said the potential for both higher unemployment and inflation are elevated, an unusual combination that complicates the central bank's dual mandate of controlling prices and keeping unemployment low. Powell said that tariffs have dampened consumer and business sentiment. In early May, the Federal Reserve held its benchmark lending rate at 4.3% for the third straight meeting after cutting it three times at the end of last year. Last week, the Labor Department reported that U.S. employers slowed their hiring in May, but still added a solid 139,000 jobs despite uncertainty over Trump's trade wars. In a separate report last week, Labor reported that U.S. job openings rose unexpectedly in April, but other data suggested that Americans are less optimistic about the labor market. The report showed that the number of Americans quitting their jobs — a sign of confidence in their prospects — fell, while layoffs ticked higher. In another sign the job market has cooled from the hiring boom of 2021-2023, the government reported one job for every unemployed person. As recently as December 2022, there were two vacancies for every jobless American. The government has estimated that the U.S. economy shrank at a 0.2% annual pace in the first quarter of 2025, a slight upgrade from its first estimate. Growth was slowed by a surge in imports as companies in the U.S. tried to bring in foreign goods before Trump's massive tariffs went into effect. Trump is attempting to reshape the global economy by dramatically increasing import taxes to rejuvenate the U.S. manufacturing sector. The president has also tried to drastically downsize the federal government workforce, but many of those cuts are being challenged in the courts and Congress. On Wednesday, Google confirmed that it had offered buyouts to another swath of its workforce in a fresh round of cost-cutting ahead of a court decision that could order a breakup of its internet empire. Other companies that have announced job cuts this year include Procter & Gamble, Workday, Dow, CNN, Starbucks, Southwest Airlines, Microsoft and Facebook parent company Meta. The government's report on Thursday also showed that the four-week average of jobless claims, which evens out some of the weekly ups and downs during more volatile stretches, rose by 5,000 to 240,250. The total number of Americans receiving unemployment benefits for the week of May 31 jumped by 54,000 to 1.96 million, the most since November of 2021.

Voyager soars 82% on first day of trading as defense tech booms
Voyager soars 82% on first day of trading as defense tech booms

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Voyager soars 82% on first day of trading as defense tech booms

Voyager Technologies' stock surged 82% on its first trading day. The company plans to use initial public offering funds for research, acquisitions, and debt repayment. Voyager's IPO highlights renewed interest in defense and space tech from investors. Defense tech company Voyager Technologies closed its first day of trading 82% higher than its initial public offering price. Voyager, which provides software for space and defense tech companies, priced its New York Stock Exchange debut at $31 per share on Tuesday. It offered 12.4 million shares and closed at $56.48 per share on Wednesday. Shares continued climbing after hours. Voyager plans to use the cash injection from the offering to fund investment in research and development programs and buy assets needed for growth, the company said in a statement on Tuesday. A portion of the proceeds may also be used to pursue mergers and acquisitions in Voyager's core business areas. The rest will be used for repaying debt and the business's day-to-day needs, the company said. Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan jointly led the offering. Early investors in Voyager include national security-focused venture firms Industrious Ventures, Marlinspike, and Scout Ventures. Voyager's IPO is an outlier because most venture-backed companies have preferred to stay private, especially after the pandemic. Like many tech companies that go public, Voyager is unprofitable. Founded in 2019, it's younger than peers like Palantir, which was founded in 2003 and went public in 2020, and Anduril, which was founded in 2017 and remains a private company. Voyager also relies largely on one client: the US government. The company posted $144 million in revenue last year, out of which 80% came from US government work. NASA alone made up 25% of its sales last year. Voyager reported a loss of $66 million in 2024, over double the prior year's loss, according to a regulatory filing. The IPO pop shows a renewed interest in defense and space tech companies from Silicon Valley and Washington alike. In an inaugural speech in January, President Donald Trump said that "We will pursue our manifest destiny into the stars, launching American astronauts to plant the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars." Late last month at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has been bullish on battlefield tech, said that America's military will be equipped with the most advanced capabilities as part of the 2026 fiscal year budget. US military leaders have increasingly prioritized the development of AI capabilities in recent years, and want to build up America's arsenal in the technological arms race with China. They have argued that whichever country dominates this tech space will win future conflicts. Top VCs, including Founder's Fund and Andreessen Horowitz, have been pouring into defense tech darlings like Anduril and Shield AI. In March, Shield AI raised $240 million in a funding round, boosting its valuation to $5.3 billion. Last week, Anduril closed a new funding round of $2.5 billion, a deal that more than doubled the defense startup's valuation to $30.5 billion. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store