logo
Join scientists as they drive into hailstorms to study the costly weather extreme

Join scientists as they drive into hailstorms to study the costly weather extreme

SHAMROCK, Texas (AP) — As severe storms once again soak, twist and pelt the nation's midsection, a team of dozens of scientists is driving into them to study one of the nation's costliest but least-appreciated weather dangers: Hail.
Hail rarely kills, but it hammers roofs, cars and crops to the tune of $10 billion a year in damage in the U.S. So in one of the few federally funded science studies remaining after Trump administration cuts, teams from several universities are observing storms from the inside and seeing how the hail forms. Project ICECHIP has already collected and dissected hail the size of small cantaloupes, along with ice balls of all sizes and shapes.
Scientists in two hail-dimpled vehicles with special mesh protecting the windshields are driving straight into the heart of the storms, an area known as the 'shaft' where the hail pelting is the most intense. It's a first-of-its-kind icy twist on tornado chasing.
'It's an interesting experience. It sounds like somebody on the outside of your vehicle is hitting you with a hammer,' said Northern Illinois University meteorology professor Victor Gensini, one of the lead researchers.
A team of journalists from The Associated Press joined them this week in a several-day trek across the Great Plains, starting Tuesday morning in northern Texas with a weather briefing before joining a caravan of scientists and students looking for ice.
Driving toward the most extreme forecasts
The caravan features more than a dozen radar trucks and weather balloon launching vehicles. At each site, the scientists load and unload drones, lasers and cameras and other specialized equipment. There are foam pads to measure hail impact and experimental roofing material. There are even special person-sized funnels to collect pristine hail before it hits the ground and becomes tainted with dirt.
Already in treks across Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, the team has found hail measuring more than 5 inches (13 centimeters) in diameter — bigger than a softball, but not quite a soccer ball. The team's equipment and vehicles already sport dings, dimples and dents that scientists show off like battle scars.
'We got a few good whacks,' said forensic engineer Tim Marshall, who was carrying roofing samples to see if there were ways shingles could better handle hail. 'I look at broken, busted stuff all the time.'
At Tuesday's weather briefing, retired National Weather Service forecaster David Imy pointed to potential hot spots this week in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. Computer models show the potential for a 'monster storm down here near the Red River' later in the week, he said. Acting on the latest forecasts, Gensini and other leaders told the team to head to Altus, Oklahoma, but be ready to cross the Red River back into Texas at a moment's notice.
A few hours after his briefing, Imy had the opportunity to chase one of the bigger storms, packing what radar showed was large hail at 8,000 feet (2,438 meters) in the air. Because of the warm air closer to the surface, the hail was only pea sized by the time it hit the ground. But the outing still provided good data and beautiful views for Imy, who was with a group that stationed themselves about a half-mile from the center of the storm.
'Beautiful colors: turquoise, bluish green, teal,' Imy said, pointing to the mushroom shaped cloud dominating the sky. 'This is beauty to me and also seeing the power of nature.'
A costly but overlooked severe weather problem
This is not just a bunch of scientists looking for an adrenaline rush or another sequel to the movie 'Twister.' It's serious science research into weather that damages a lot of crops in the Midwest, Gensini said. Hail damage is so costly that the insurance industry is helping to pay for the mission, which is primarily funded by the National Science Foundation.
'These are the stones that do the most damage to lives and property,' Gensini said. 'We want the biggest hail possible.'
A 2024 study by Gensini found that as the world warms from human-caused climate change, small hailstones will become less likely while the larger ones become more common. The bigger, more damaging ones that the ICECHIP team is studying are projected to increase 15% to 75% this century depending on how much the world warms. That's because the stronger updrafts in storms would keep stones aloft longer to get bigger, but the heat would melt the tinier ones.
The experiment is unique because of the combination of driving into the hail and deploying numerous radars and weather balloons to get an overall picture of how the storms work, Gensini said, adding that hail is often overlooked because researchers have considered it a lower priority than other extreme weather events.
Outside scientists said the research mission looks promising because there are a lot of unanswered questions about hail. Hail is the No. 1 reason for soaring costs in billion-dollar weather disasters in the United States, said meteorologist Jeff Masters, who cofounded Weather Underground and is now at Yale Climate Connections.
'Now a large part of that reason is because we simply have more people with more stuff in harm's way,' said Masters, who wasn't part of the research. 'Insurance has become unaffordable in a lot of places and hail has become a big reason.'
In Colorado, hail is 'actually our most costly natural disaster,' said Lori Peek, director of the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado, adding that 'hail does such incredible damage to property.'
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

All the ways Trump and Musk could tear each other apart
All the ways Trump and Musk could tear each other apart

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

All the ways Trump and Musk could tear each other apart

The fallout from Elon Musk's bitter public spat with Donald Trump struck an immediate blow, sending shares in the billionaire's company Tesla tumbling. But the damage risks spreading much further as two of the world's most powerful men squabble over policy, politics and personal behaviour. As US president, Mr Trump has the powers of the federal government at his fingertips – giving him a variety of ways to make Mr Musk's life difficult through investigations, regulatory actions and even scrutiny of his immigration status. Yet at the same time, the world's richest man has leverage too: his billions may hold the key to maintaining Republican control of Congress, with crucial midterm elections coming up next year. Both men have fiercely loyal followings, ready to trash their rival's reputation. And both have a burn-it-down mentality that pushes them to keep going until they have won… or lost it all. Here's how the pair could go to war against each other: Mr Musk is already fighting off multiple probes into his business empire. America's stock market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission, is investigating whether he violated trading rules when he first began investing in Twitter, now called X. When investors hold 5 per cent or more of a company's stock, they are supposed to declare it publicly. But the SEC accuses Mr Musk of waiting at least 10 days too long, only making a disclosure when he already owned 9.2 per cent of Twitter. He went on to buy the entire business in a $44 billion deal. At the same time, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investigating accidents involving Tesla cars when their full-self driving mode is activated. Shareholders assumed these probes would be dropped by a Musk-friendly administration. Now they might only be the beginning. Another bombshell investigation by the New York Times claimed Mr Musk, who has publicly admitted taking small doses of ketamine, was given advance notice of drug tests at SpaceX. As a government-contractor, the rocket company is required to maintain a zero-tolerance environment. It wouldn't take much to dig deeper. And did Mr Musk overstep a national security line when he famously tried to get a briefing on US plans for war with China? Both Mr Trump and Mr Musk have their own social media platforms, Truth Social and X (formerly known as Twitter) respectively. But as bully pulpits go, X is by far the bigger beast. While Truth Social reportedly has around six million monthly active users, Twitter boasts more than 600 million. Throughout last year's presidential election campaign, Mr Musk used his platform to boost Mr Trump's chances, amplifying his messages and even hosting a live video interview on X. He may now use these same tactics to attack the president. Critics have also previously accused the businessman of changing X's algorithms to suit his whims, as well as repeating unverified claims that later turn out to be false. This week Mr Musk demonstrated how he can also quickly turn X against his former ally with posts attacking Mr Trump, which appeared prominently on the feeds of many users. In one particular jibe, he reached for what he described as 'the really big bomb'. He wrote: This was a reference to the unproven conspiracy theory that the Trump administration is dragging its feet in releasing all the details of the investigation into the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who died in 2019, because of alleged revelations about his links to the president. 'The truth will come out,' Mr Musk added in a follow-up post. His claim has already been viewed by more than 185 million people, according to X. Even if Mr Musk has no evidence to back up his claims, the allegations underscore the power of his platform. The US president has already threatened to use his constitutional power to kneecap Mr Musk's SpaceX programme by cancelling his government contract worth billions of dollars. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it,' the president wrote on Truth Social. SpaceX has secured $16 billion worth of contracts from Nasa alone since 2006, including $5 billion for research and development, according to analysis by research firm Eurospace. Still, Mr Musk holds some cards too. At present, Nasa is completely reliant on SpaceX to send both cargo and astronauts into space – and at one stage on Thursday Mr Musk suggested he could 'decommission' the Dragon craft used by the agency. Although potential alternatives to Dragon exist, SpaceX's Falcon 9 reusable rocket is currently the only booster cleared for sending humans into space in the US. 'The alternative, of course, would be to do what they did before Falcon and Dragon were available – which is to use the systems provided by the Russians,' says Pierre Lionnet, managing director of Eurospace. Because of this, Steve Bannon, a former adviser and long-time ally of Mr Trump, has suggested the president should use the Defense Production Act to nationalise SpaceX, citing national security. Mr Bannon is a longstanding opponent of Mr Musk, and took huge delight in the very public breakdown of his relationship with the president. He also called for the immediate nationalisation of SpaceX and Starlink because of their importance to national security. Tesla, Mr Musk's electric car company, has made substantial amounts of money from government green energy programmes. This includes more than $11 billion it has made selling clean air 'credits' to rival car makers under a carbon emissions scheme, which have accounted for about one third of the company's profits since 2012, according to analysis by Axios. Under Joe Biden, federal grants worth up to $7,500 were also introduced for drivers who buy electric vehicle purchases. Both of these money-spinning schemes are threatened by Mr Trump's tax and spending bill and the president has suggested this is why Mr Musk has turned on him. Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Analysts at JPMorgan have suggested Tesla could lose $3.2 billion in profits as a result of Mr Trump's tax and spending bill, which axes the subsidies and targets carbon trading schemes. White House aides at first insisted that the dispute between the two men came down to differences over Mr Trump's flagship piece of legislation, the 'big, beautiful bill', rather than a deeper divide. Mr Musk has claimed the bill will cause the US national debt to balloon, condemning Americans to 'debt slavery'. His public comments have emboldened some Republicans in the House and Senate to also change their minds and voice opposition. The billionaire previously made life difficult for Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, in December when he rallied opposition against a bipartisan spending bill to avert a government shutdown. Now, his attacks on Mr Trump's signature policy could create serious headaches. The president and his Republican allies are grappling with wafer-thin majorities in Congress, meaning a careful balance of promises and threats will be needed to keep enough law makers on board. Insiders have also spelt out the bill's importance. If the first 100 days of his presidency was about shock and awe, pushing through hundreds of executive orders, the second 100 days is supposed to be about working the phones and mobilising support in Congress to pass this legislation. Mr Musk's intervention has put the entire project, and a chunk of Mr Trump's tax-cutting legacy, on the brink of collapse. Mr Musk's origin story has a wrinkle. The South African arrived in the US to pursue graduate studies at Stanford University during the 1990s. But he ditched classes and instead used his time to launch the first of his companies, Zip2, which he later sold for $300 million. That put him in breach of his visa and meant that he worked illegally, according to documents and legal experts cited by the Washington Post. His enemies have long used those details to call him an illegal alien. As the row accelerates, Steve Bannon, the former Trump adviser, has reportedly advised Mr Trump to launch a formal investigation into Mr Musk's immigration status – and have him 'deported'. 'I am of the strong belief that Musk is an illegal alien and should be deported from the country immediately,' Mr Bannon told the New York Times. It seems unlikely that Mr Musk will end up on a plane to El Salvador with other illegal immigrants – but the threats are a sign of just how much hostility he now faces within Trumpland. Mr Musk and Mr Trump made for odd ideological bedfellows. Mr Musk, from the tech right, is a libertarian, intent on reducing the federal government to dust … all the better to allow his business empire to thrive. Mr Trump wants to use all the agencies at his disposal to promote the interests of the blue-collar voters who back him and to crush his opponents. Their alliance meant Mr Musk could pump more than $200 million into the 2024 election, helping Mr Trump win battleground states and Republicans to win the Senate and House. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Mr Musk declared on Thursday. 'Such ingratitude,' he added in a follow-up post. Mr Musk had already signalled he might not have more time or money for politics. And, without his largesse, the rupture with the president could spell doom for Republicans in tight districts. Mr Trump is no stranger to the impeachment process: in fact he is the only president to be impeached twice, both of the trials occurring in his first term. On both occasions he was saved by a Republican firewall in the Senate, with members of his own party circling the waggons to protect him, paving the way for his political comeback and election win last year. On Thursday, their relationship breaking down while the world watched on in real time, Mr Musk suggested the president should be impeached, convicted and replaced with JD Vance, the vice-president. So far, that looks unlikely: Republicans control both chambers of Congress, and it's unlikely the Tesla billionaire has enough support among senators to reach the two-thirds threshold to boot him out of office. But it's a damaging intervention, nonetheless, because Mr Musk has declared his former ally unfit for office. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Warren, Wyden warn Trump policies could ‘decimate retirees' savings'
Warren, Wyden warn Trump policies could ‘decimate retirees' savings'

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Warren, Wyden warn Trump policies could ‘decimate retirees' savings'

Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) and Ron Wyden (Ore.) are pressing the Trump administration over the impact the president's sweeping trade policies will have on the finances of retirees and people close to retirement. 'The economic chaos triggered by President Trump's disastrous tariff policy has the potential to decimate retirees' savings,' they wrote in a letter to the White House on Friday that was obtained by The Hill. 'Simultaneously, the Trump Administration has taken a wrecking ball to the Social Security Administration (SSA), limiting seniors' access to their hard-earned benefits.' 'In doing this, the Trump Administration is making it harder for seniors across the country to make ends meet,' they added. Warren, 75, is the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, and Wyden, 76, is the top Democrat on the Finance Committee. The duo addressed the letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano. The White House didn't immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. Fidelity Investments, the largest provider of 401(k) plans in the U.S., reported this week that average 401(k) balances fell 3 percent to $127,100 during the first three months of the year. It said average individual retirement account (IRA) balances fell 4 percent to $121,983. The financial services giant said the slumps were primarily 'a result of market swings,' which have been widely attributed to Trump's unpredictable shifts on tariffs this year. 'President Trump's trade policy is creating economic chaos,' Warren and Wyden wrote in their letter to Cabinet officials, citing recent remarks from the Federal Reserve's Federal Open Markets Committee and Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell about the nation's economic outlook amid Trump's tariff swings. 'Of the 57 million retirees in this country, 77 percent rely on a combination of their savings — often in the form of a 401(k) — and Social Security benefits,' they continued in the letter. Their letter highlighted cuts to the SSA from the White House's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Dozens of Social Security offices across the country are expected to close this year as part of DOGE's federal government makeover. The senators have asked Trump officials to provide them with details by Monday on whether the administration has conducted analyses of how the tariff policies are impacting retirees and inflation, as well as how DOGE cuts will impact the ability to access retirement benefits and whether the administration plans to offer additional support on seniors living on fixed incomes. The White House said earlier this week that the administration sent letters to countries to remind them that the president wants to broker more favorable trade deals while his tariffs are temporarily paused. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Musk-Trump, from fast friends to breaking up: A timeline
Musk-Trump, from fast friends to breaking up: A timeline

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk-Trump, from fast friends to breaking up: A timeline

President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's alliance formed with swift and intense speed less than a year ago. It devolved just as quickly this week. Their relationship abruptly imploded in a matter of days, as a simmering feud boiled over and spilled out in public between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader. Just last week, Trump presented a ceremonial key to Musk at the White House. But on Thursday, the two were trading personal insults and threatening to hurt each other's business and political prospects. Here's a look at the relationship's history, from the friendship phase to the nasty breakup. Up until last year, Musk had largely stayed out of the political spotlight. And there were times when he seemed skeptical of Trump. In a 2015 interview with Vanity Fair, he said he got involved as 'little as possible' but thought Trump getting the 2016 presidential nomination 'wouldn't be good.' Musk, like many Silicon Valley leaders at the time, took issue with some of Trump's policies, but his criticism was less public. Trump did not hold back in his criticism of Musk in 2022, calling the tech billionaire a 'bulls‑‑‑ artist' for supporting the former president's opponents in 2016 and 2020. Musk had flirted with Trump during the presidential race, but he went full MAGA after the attempt on Trump's life at a rally in Butler, Pa. Musk's politics had gradually shifted to the right for years during the former Biden administration, which notably snubbed Tesla during the 2021 electric vehicle summit. The tech mogul took issue with the Biden White House over its diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and its handling of immigration and the southern shift in politics culminated with his endorsement of Trump in July last year after Trump survived the assassination attempt in Butler and was formally nominated by the GOP the following week. Once in the Trump fold, Musk quickly brought the Silicon Valley 'move fast and break things' approach to the campaign trail. As the 2024 election inched closer, Musk and Trump's alliance was deepening. Musk increased his rally appearances with Trump, while ramping up his political discourse on his social media platform X. Musk used his online platform as a vehicle to attack former Vice President Kamala Harris and other Democratic leaders and prop up Trump's presidential bid. Musk, whose net worth is north of $385 billion, said in March last year that he would not donate to either Biden or Trump during the 2024 presidential election. But months later, the billionaire entrepreneur became the biggest donor in the 2024 White House race, spending more than $290 million to propel Trump back to the Oval Office and boost Republicans in congressional races, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings. The majority of Musk's contributions went to America PAC, a super PAC that backed Trump's presidential bid. The outside group, which was filed with the FEC in May last year, spent money on direct mail, digital advertising, canvassing and get-out-the-vote efforts. He also contributed to other outside groups during the election, including the RBG PAC, which worked on moderating Trump's stance on abortion. By election night, it became clear Musk was moving closer to Trump's inner circle. He joined the president at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida as they awaited election results and even joined the Trump family for a picture with his son 'Little X.' Shortly after winning the 2024 presidential election, Trump selected Musk and ex-GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory board focused on reducing the size of the federal government, slashing spending and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. Ramaswamy departed DOGE in January and is now running to become Ohio's next governor. Musk, who served as an adviser to the cost-cutting board, initially set the goal for DOGE to slash $2 trillion from the federal government. Later, the goal post was lowered to $1 trillion. The latest estimate claimed that DOGE saved $180 billion. At this point, the Trump and Musk relationship appeared strong, even though some were already wondering how long it would last and when the two would have a serious falling out. Musk found himself at the center of a debate last December among Trump backers and MAGA-allied conservatives over the H-1B visa, a temporary, nonimmigrant work permit. Musk fiercely defended the H-1B process, arguing that the program allows U.S. companies to hire talented employees when corporations cannot find an ample number of workers within the U.S. The tech billionaire locked horns over the issue with far-right activist and ardent Trump supporter Laura Loomer and Trump's ex-chief strategist Steve Bannon, making a rival of Bannon in the process. Bannon and Loomer argued that the program takes away job opportunities from Americans. Trump eventually weighed in, siding with Musk and Ramaswamy in the heated debate. The move signaled how much Trump valued Musk's insight. 'I've always liked the visas, I have always been in favor of the visas. That's why we have them,' Trump said in an interview with the New York Post in late December. Bannon, however, continued to take public shots at Musk over the next several months. Musk seemed as close as ever to the president as Trump launched his second term and DOGE's cost-cutting initiatives hit numerous federal agencies. The lightning speed of DOGE's infiltration underscored Musk's sudden power over the federal government as an unelected special government employee. The DOGE cuts stirred chaos and confusion in Washington and led to layoffs of federal employees and spending cuts across agencies. While the official tally is unknown, a New York Times analysis estimated that there have been more than 58,000 job cuts and another 76,000 federal workers have taken buyouts as of May 12. Several of DOGE's actions, including the team's access to sensitive data, have been challenged in court while protests unfolded across the country. Musk's tightness with Trump was on public view when he sat in on his first Cabinet meeting in February. While Musk's role as DOGE chief was not a confirmed Cabinet position, the tech billionaire made a statement by participating in multiple White House Cabinet meetings during his tenure. By March, reports circulated that Trump's Cabinet members were increasingly taking issue with Musk's apparent authority through his DOGE leadership. Up until this point, Trump was publicly supportive of Musk's work and shied away from commenting on the reported conflicts. In one meeting, Trump asked if anyone was 'unhappy with Elon' and suggested he would throw them out, signaling a level of loyalty to his adviser. But during a March Cabinet meeting, Trump showed early signs of shifting his tone on Musk's power. The president told his Cabinet secretaries that they lead on staffing choices and that DOGE cuts should be made with a 'scalpel' not a 'hatchet.' 'As the Secretaries learn about, and understand, the people working for the various Departments, they can be very precise as to who will remain, and who will go. We say the 'scalpel' rather than the 'hatchet,' Trump wrote in March on Truth Social. This marked a shift from where Musk stood in February, when his power seemed above other Cabinet members. Behind the scenes, Musk reportedly ruffled the feathers of a host of Cabinet members as his DOGE workers dug into various government agencies. Musk clashed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio during an early March Cabinet huddle, slamming the nation's top diplomat for not terminating much of the State Department workforce and saying that he was only 'good on TV' but not much else, according to The New York Times. Rubio fired back, saying that Musk was not telling the truth. Trump eventually stepped in to defend Rubio and commended the former senator for his work. During the same meeting, Musk butted heads with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy over the condition of the gear the Federal Aviation Administration uses to track aircraft and what must be done to make it better. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was on Musk's side during the exchange. Duffy said to Musk that DOGE staffers tried to fire air traffic controllers, a claim the tech mogul said was not true. Duffy, the former House GOP lawmaker, also criticized Musk for claiming that airport control tower staff were brought on through diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The heated exchange ended with, again, Trump stepping in and telling Duffy that he needs to hire 'geniuses' from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to be air traffic controllers. Publicly, Duffy praised DOGE's work and the administration's decision to slash the federal workforce, saying the Transportation Department would work 'closely' with Musk and the advisory board to 'revolutionize the way government is run.' The public meetings remained largely cordial, despite reported tensions. All the while, Trump urged Musk on. Musk waded into the Wisconsin Supreme Court race earlier this year, fueling speculation of his continued involvement in campaigns. He backed Brad Schimel in the race over liberal candidate Susan Crawford, spending millions through the America PAC and traveling to Wisconsin, where he handed out $1 million in checks to voters who penned a petition against 'activist judges.' Democrats used Musk's involvement as part of their messaging in the last few days of the hotly contested election. Crawford prevailed in the match-up in early April. In May, Musk said he would pull back his spending in elections, although he left the door open for future expenditures. Musk, who was deemed a special government employee by the White House, told investors in April he planned to reduce his time spent on DOGE once his status expired, though it was not clear what that would look like. His comments were welcomed by Tesla investors amid concerns the leader was not giving enough attention to his tech ventures as a result of his work in Washington. The move did not appear to be a result of any conflict with the president, who previously said he expected Musk to eventually return to running his businesses. Musk and Trump confirmed in late May the tech billionaire would be stepping down from DOGE on May 31, the day his special government employee status ended. The two held a press conference celebrating his time in the White House, during which the administration said Musk would remain a 'friend and an adviser' after leaving DOGE. Musk, standing with his arms crossed next to Trump, who was seated at the Resolute Desk, and sporting a black DOGE cap, showed up with a black eye on right side of his face. When asked what caused it, Musk said it resulted from his young son punching him while the two were 'horsing around.' 'I was just horsing around with little X and I said, 'Go ahead, punch me in the face.' And he did. Turns out even a 5-year-old punching you in the face actually is —,' Musk told reporters. Trump gifted Musk a gold key to the White House for his 'incredible service,' and the tech mogul maintained it was 'not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning.' While Musk appeared somewhat subdued, the two seemed to be on good terms, and Musk reiterated he would remain an adviser to Trump. The tone from the Oval Office did not last long. Just days later, Musk launched a public push against Trump's tax and spending bill as the Senate prepared to take it up after it passed the House last month. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on June 3. The legislation, officially titled the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and boosts funding for border and defense priorities, while cutting spending on programs such as food assistance and Medicaid. A day later, Musk called on lawmakers to kill the legislation and urged constituents to call their congressional offices to oppose the bill. The White House, at the time, brushed off Musk's bashing of the bill, stating the criticism 'doesn't change the president's opinion.' Up until Thursday morning, tensions seemed limited to their disagreement over the bill rather than their friendship. Tensions rapidly boiled after Trump told reporters he was 'very surprised and very disappointed' in Musk. The comment set off an hours-long back-and-forth between the two. Musk took credit for Trump's electoral victory last November, while the president argued Musk was upset about the legislation's repeal of the electric vehicle tax credit and that he was aware of the legislation from the beginning. Musk rejected this. Musk later alleged Trump is included in the Jeffrey Epstein files, and he backed calls for the president to be impeached and succeeded by Vice President Vance. Musk also floated the idea of forming a third party. Trump fired back, threatening to eliminate the federal contracts Musk's businesses have and suggested that the tech billionaire's disenchantment should have come sooner. At one point, he called Musk 'crazy,' claiming the tech billionaire was 'wearing thin.' 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given,' Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social. Musk also said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon, the spacecraft used to shuttle astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station. Hours later, he appeared to backpedal when engaging with a user on X. Less than a day since the blowout began, Musk signaled that he is open to brokering peace with Trump. Amid the haymakers the two were exchanging on Thursday, allies of both men offered to be peacemakers. 'I support @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk and they should make peace for the benefit of our great country. We are much stronger together than apart,' Bill Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square, said Thursday on X. In response, Musk wrote, 'You're not wrong.' By Friday morning, The White House looked to turn the page on the feud and shut down talk of a potential call for the two men to reconcile. 'No. I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well,' Trump told CNN in an interview. While the two may need time for the dust to settle, the door for makeup may not be entirely closed. Trump frequently clashes with advisers or allies, but some cases have resulted in a reconciliation. The president, for example, sparred memorably in the 2016 election with Rubio, who is now a key figure in Trump's second term. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store