Why are people calling tonight's full moon a 'strawberry moon'?
If you've been seeing a lot of chatter about tonight's full moon being a "strawberry moon" on your social media feed, you'd be forgiven for expecting a lunar eclipse tonight.
But that's not the case.
Here's what you can expect from the full moon tonight.
Tonight's full moon is appealing to people for different reasons.
It's a big deal in the UK, for example, because of a phenomenon called a "major lunar standstill".
That means the moon will be the lowest in the UK skies it's been in more than 18 years.
But there's a lot of hype about the moon because people are calling it "the strawberry moon".
And with a name that sounds as visually appealing as "strawberry moon", it has been getting a lot of traction in some social media circles.
We're not expecting it to be.
The moon appears to glow red during a lunar eclipse, with many people calling the phenomenon a blood moon.
But the next total lunar eclipse visible in Australia isn't until September.
Local atmospheric conditions like bushfire smoke, dust and haze can also make the moon appear reddish.
So the moon might look reddish if there's haze in your area this evening, but it wouldn't be something all of Australia would be seeing.
It's also known as "lunistice" — think "solstice", but with the moon instead of the sun.
"It's when the Moon reaches the extremes of its northernmost and southernmost rising and setting points on the horizon," Matt Woods from the Perth Observatory said.
"These standstills happen because the Moon's orbit is tilted at a 5 degrees inclination relative to the Earth's equator and slowly shifts over time."
These shifts happen over a cycle that lasts 18.6 years.
"During a major lunar standstill, the Moon appears to travel much further across the sky over a month than usual, rising and setting at more extreme points and reaching higher or lower altitudes in the sky," Mr Woods says.
"It's not something that happens in just one night — it happens over weeks or months."
In the UK, the full moon's track throughout the night will be at its lowest point in the sky.
But it'll be the opposite for us here in Australia.
"This is the time it will be as high as it will ever get in the sky," University of Southern Queensland astrophysics professor Jonti Horner said.
So, if you were to go out and look up at the moon at midnight, it should be directly over you, rather than closer to the horizon.
"It will pass directly overhead," Professor Horner says.
In terms of the moonrise and moonset locations, it's not all that noticeable unless you're comparing it to previous years.
"You won't notice a big shift in just one night — and there's no sudden visual event like an eclipse — but astronomers are already tracking the gradual changes in the Moon's rising and setting positions," Mr Woods said.
Ancient cultures were very in tune with these events because they used the moon to track the passage of time.
And without big city buildings obstructing the horizon or smartphones sucking their attention, they would have been acutely aware of where on the horizon the moon rose and set each night.
But a smartphone can help you understand the significance of the phenomenon.
Professor Horner says you can download a stargazing app to show you where the moon is expected to rise in the future — which will help you understand what's happening tonight.
He recommends facing the horizon when the moon rises this evening and then using the app to show you where the full moon will rise in June next year, the year after, and so on until 2033.
And as for the night owls?
Stay awake until about midnight because that's when the moon will be at its highest.
"Look at the length of the shadows … you'll barely have a shadow," Professor Horner said.
He recommended taking a photo of the moon in the sky with visible landmarks in the horizon.
Take note of the exact spot you stood in and return mid-way through the cycle — about a decade from now — and retake that photo.
"If you go out at midnight in Brisbane, the moon will be directly overhead," Professor Horner said.
"If you go out in 9.3 years in June, instead of being overhead, it'll be 36 degrees lower in the sky."
Because it only happens every 18.6 years.
"The major lunar standstill would have been a generational event, spoken about in the stories that passed orally from one generation to the next," the English Heritage's Stone Henge website says.
"The phenomenon may have marked huge celebrations of religious, spiritual and social significance, and perhaps also mark the time for the rites of initiation of young members of the community into adulthood."
It's another name for the full moon in June.
It's not unlike the other names you might have for full moons at different times of the year, like the sturgeon moon or the hunter's moon.
Different cultural groups in different parts of the world may have their own names for full moons at certain times of the year, but many people go with the names used by a US publication called The Old Farmer's Almanac.
The annual magazine has been in print since 1792 and is something of a cultural institution in the US.
"The moon names we use in The Old Farmer's Almanac come from Native American, colonial American, or other traditional North American sources passed down through generations," the publication's website says.
However, Professor Horner is skeptical of the publication, saying it has "butchered" traditional beliefs and raised concerns about cultural appropriation.
It has nothing to do with the colour of the moon.
"The name comes from North American Indigenous peoples, marking the time of the strawberry harvest," Mr Woods said.
But the Southern Hemisphere is experiencing wintry conditions right now, so the term might not feel right for all of us here in Australia.
Strawberry season typically doesn't start for a few more months for growers in places like Victoria, South Australia and parts of southern Queensland, according to Berries Australia.
However, strawberry season does kick off in June for growers in Perth, Bundaberg and Sunshine Coast regions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Business Council of Australia calls for R&D funding to hit 3pc GDP, amid productivity push
Australia could miss out on its next great invention plus significant economic benefits, with one prominent business leader calling for an increase in research and development spending so we no longer lag behind other developed countries. Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black says the Albanese government should help boost public and private spending into research and development from 1.7 per cent of GDP to 3 per cent. As it stands, Australia is dragging behind the other OECD countries which on average invest 2.7 per cent of GDP into funding and developing innovating ideas. Australia was also significantly behind the United States and South Korea which invest 3.59 per cent and 5.21 per cent respectively. As a result, the country was missing out on the economic returns, with Mr Black pointing to analysis from the CSIRO which found that every dollar invested in R&D offered a $3 return to GDP. 'They're doing that because they see that the economic return, the dividend to their economy associated with these types of investment makes it worthwhile,' he said. More and better innovation also had the power to make 'life better' too, said Mr Black, pointing to world-leading Australian inventions such as the cochlear implant, Google Maps, pacemakers and even Wi-Fi. 'If we talk about these types of inventions – being able to hear, being able to see your child, being able to navigate your way through cities and towns with confidence – that is genuinely a reflection of how our society has changed as a consequence of good old Australian R&D,' he said. 'R&D when done right changes the way we live, every single day.' While sectors such as agriculture, health, renewables and the resources sector were areas where Australia had 'existing advantages,' he said there was also 'scope for opportunity' in more left field areas like quantum computing. Figures released by the Department of Industry, Science and Resources tip Australia's technology sector is set to contribute $244bn a year to the economy by 2031, a rapid increase from the current $167bn. Increasing Australia's quantum capabilities is set to amplify the growth of the sector. 'Who would have thought that Australia would be at the absolute forefront of global research with respect to this cutting edge technology, and yet we are,' he said. The push for a higher spend on R&D comes as Labor seeks to unite union and business leaders for a productivity roundtable which will be held at Parliament House in August. Mr Black said boosting Australian innovation was a key way to expose Australia to new market, create new jobs and develop emerging industries. In addition for a 5 per cent target on increased funding from the public and private sector, the BCA is also calling for a better tax incentives to encourage domestic and international to invest in Australian projects, plus a publicly accessible National Researcher Directory to help connect industry with research expertise. 'Ultimately what that means is that R&D is an excellent way of driving productivity (and) productivity is the main determinant for how we can deliver real wages growth across our economy,' he said. Labor is undertaking a strategic review into its R&D processes, with the government set to receive the recommendations by the end of the year. Former industry and science minister Ed Husic also acknowledged in October last year that R&D funding in Australia was at a 'sorry state,' and said the government was 'very focused on fixing up our languishing national R&D spend'.

ABC News
9 hours ago
- ABC News
What to know about sunscreen, SPF and protecting yourself from the sun all year round
For many Australians, the first port of call for sun safety is sunscreen. However, a new Choice report found 16 from a sample of 20 widely available sunscreen products failed to meet the SPF level on their label. But experts say there's no need to panic. Here's everything they say you need to know — from how sunscreen is tested, what to look out for when shopping and what else you can do to protect yourself from the sun. SPF stands for Sun Protection Factor — how well something protects you against ultraviolet radiation (UV). The higher the number, the less UV passes through to your skin. SPF measures how much time it takes for an individual to burn while wearing a particular sunscreen. If someone normally burns after 10 minutes in the sun, an SPF of 10 should allow them to spend 100 minutes in the sun before burning, says Melanoma Institute dermatologist Dr Linda Martin. In percentages, that means the difference between an SPF50 and SPF30 might not be as much as you think. If applied correctly, an SPF50 lets through just 2 per cent of UV rays, whereas an SPF30 allows 3.3 per cent through, Dr Martin says. But Michelle Wong*, a cosmetic chemist and science communicator, says the gap in effectiveness grows, the less you apply. "So instead of just 2 per cent or 3.3 per cent of UV getting in, you will be getting either 4 per cent or 6.7 per cent," she said. Most of us only apply around a quarter of what is used in testing conditions, Dr Martin says. An SPF rating is calculated through testing on humans in an accredited laboratory. It can't be done in the sun because the conditions would be variable and dangerous. Instead, an instrument called a solar simulator that imitates sunlight is used. Researchers measure the time it takes for the skin to redden in an area where sunscreen has been applied, versus an area that has no sunscreen on it. Australia follows the international standard for sunscreen testing, which mandates testing on 10 volunteers. Many sunscreen brands sold in Australia test in labs overseas. In most cases, yes — sunscreens are very effective and the Choice results shouldn't make you lose faith, Dr Wong says. Australia has some of the strictest sunscreen regulations in the world and all are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). But the TGA says SPF results can vary between different laboratories because of the reliance on human testing. For example, Dr Wong says the redness of skin can be interpreted differently by testing staff, and results can differ depending on ethnicity and where testing is done. "Someone in Australia that's just come out of our summer is also going to have much more sun-tolerant skin than someone in, let's say, Europe," she says. Dr Wong said the best one is the one you will apply generously and regularly, and fits in with your budget. She says most of the time, an SPF30 is going to provide enough protection if you apply the right amount. The higher the SPF, the better — but remember if you only apply a quarter of the right amount of SPF50, you're essentially wearing an SPF 12.5, Dr Wong says. The TGA says SPFs in the range of 30 to 59 provide "high protection", while a SPF of 60 or higher provides "very high" protection. While SPF filters what's called UVB rays, you also need to protect from UVA radiation. UVB rays typically causes sunburn, while UVA penetrates deeper into the skin and can get through glass. So, make sure your sunscreen says something like 'UVB and UVA protection' or 'broad spectrum'. Also, if you're going to be spending a lot of time in the water (or just sweating heaps) then go for a water-resistant sunscreen. Dr Wong said there's a lot of debate about chemical versus mineral sunscreens, but at the end of the day they offer similar protection. You'll know you have a chemical sunscreen if the ingredients include things like octocrylene or aobenzone. You'll see zinc oxide or titanium oxide if it's a mineral sunscreen. She says in general, chemical sunscreens are lighter but have a higher chance of stinging your eyes, while mineral ones will have a more matte texture but may leave more white residue. Sunscreen can be applied underneath moisturisers and make-up, but Dr Wong says research shows they can be more effective when put over the top of skincare. The general recommendation is that when the UV index is forecast to reach 3 or above you should apply sunscreen as part of your daily routine. While UV radiation is generally higher in summer than winter, it's still there all year round. You might even need to wear sunscreen indoors, depending on your circumstances. For example, if you spend a lot of time driving, remember that untinted windows don't completely block UVA radiation. However, the latest advice, which you can read here and is backed by the Australasian College of Dermatologists, reflects the fact that people with darker skin tones need different sun safety advice. There's a lot we could cover here, but the most common mistakes are: You remember slip, slop, slap, right? Since that campaign was rolled out in 1981, two more have been added: seek shade and slide on sunglasses. In full, the Melanoma Institute's five rules for greater sun protection are: "Remember sunscreen is a filter. It's not a coat of armour and it's not the only step," Dr Martin says. "Skin cancer is the most common, the most expensive and the most preventable cancer in Australia." *Michelle Wong says in 2022 she did one-off sponsored posts with some of the brands tested by CHOICE.

The Australian
11 hours ago
- The Australian
Study backs Rhythm's colorectal risk model
Rhythm publishes peer-reviewed study validating its next-generation colorectal cancer risk assessment model Proprietary geneType assessment enhanced and cross-validated using data from nearly 400,000 individuals in UK Biobank Next generation geneType design continues focus on usability and simplicity, while providing superior performance Special Report: Rhythm Biosciences has published a peer-reviewed study in PLoS One validating its next-generation colorectal cancer risk assessment model, marking a major step forward in predictive cancer diagnostics. Rhythm Biosciences (ASX:RHY) said the study detailed updates and improvements to its proprietary geneType colorectal cancer risk assessment, which was enhanced and cross-validated using data from nearly 400,000 individuals in the UK Biobank. Rhythm said the article titled 'Colorectal cancer risk prediction using a simple multivariable model' described creation and validation of a new risk model that incorporated sex-specific factors and outperformed current models. The company said as colorectal cancer was a disease associated with many environmental and lifestyle risk factors, the study focused on expanding its geneType model beyond the two primary risk factors – family history and polygenic risk. Watch: Inside ColoSTAT's road to market Key findings of study Rhythm said the study delivered several key findings, most notably development of the enhanced risk model that incorporated three additional risk factors. These factors were selected for their strong associations with colorectal cancer and ease of use in a clinical setting, improving the model's predictive performance over standard family history assessments. The company said the most impactful risk factors were identified and integrated into an updated geneType risk model, which was then tested using data from the UK Biobank. Rhythm said other key findings included: Commitment to improvement – The study highlighted the importance of including clinical and lifestyle factors in multifactorial diseases like colorectal cancer. Commercial application – The new model was designed with commercial clinical applications in mind, minimising the number of risk factors while maximising predictive accuracy. Sex-specific factors – Incorporating sex-specific risk factors enhances model performance across diverse populations. Superior performance – A multivariable risk assessment is shown to be superior to standard of care of family history assessment in its ability to predict risk of developing colorectal cancer. 'Significantly improve stratified screening' Rhythm director of scientific affairs Dr Erika Spaeth said publishing the findings in PLoS One underscored its commitment to advancing cancer risk prediction. 'Our new multifactorial model outperforms previous methods based solely on polygenic risk and family history,' she said. 'By integrating clinical and lifestyle factors, we enhance our prediction accuracy for colorectal cancer. 'We're excited about these results and confident that this model will significantly improve stratified screening in the population." This article was developed in collaboration with Rhythm Biosciences, a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing. This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions.