logo
‘You're Dr. Phil.' TV personality says he joined immigration raids in Chicago for ‘transparency'

‘You're Dr. Phil.' TV personality says he joined immigration raids in Chicago for ‘transparency'

Yahoo28-01-2025
CHICAGO — Partway through answering questions Sunday during an immigration enforcement blitz in Chicago, a man who appeared to be in federal custody briefly stopped talking when he recognized the man with the Texas accent asking the questions.
'You're Dr. Phil,' the man said to television personality Phil McGraw, who, while standing alongside federal agents, peppered the man with questions about his citizenship and alleged crimes.
The scene played out not only in Chicago but across the internet Sunday as McGraw and cameras from his Merit TV media platform were embedded with President Donald Trump's 'border czar' Tom Homan and others from various federal agencies as they began their long-promised immigration action in and around the city this past weekend.
Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials did not respond to questions Monday about McGraw's presence during the enforcement actions or the specifics of interactions with suspects that were disseminated on his platform and social media accounts. But in an interview with Tribune, McGraw, who spoke at a Trump rally just before last year's election, said he was in Chicago to provide 'transparency' for 'a very targeted, surgical operation' aimed at people with criminal records who are in the country without legal authorization.
'Transparency is going to be important for people to understand what's going on and what's not going on,' McGraw said. 'I've read a lot of things about sweeping neighborhoods and raiding businesses and even schools and things like that. That is just absolutely untrue. That's not going on.'
For many others, however, granting largely unrestricted access to a well-known television personality during high-stakes law enforcement encounters raises questions about the propriety of the operation. It also underscores the extent to which Trump — who parlayed his turn as a reality TV star into a political career powered by harsh rhetoric on illegal immigration — relies on spectacle and showmanship to convey his message.
Further blurring of the lines between politics and popular media is likely to be a hallmark of the second Trump administration, as evidenced by his cabinet appointments of former Fox News personalities such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Sean Duffy, a former Wisconsin congressman and star of MTV's 'The Real World' tapped to lead the Department of Transportation.
Longtime Chicago immigration attorney Kevin Raica said he was surprised to see McGraw tagging along with federal officials during Sunday's enforcement actions.
'These are usually law enforcement-only operations,' said Raica, who's practiced immigration law for 20 years. 'Generally, they want to restrict that access because they say it's law enforcement sensitive and that it could reveal their methods of operation or how they conduct themselves. That it would be unsafe for the people they're trying to detain.'
Indeed, a former federal law enforcement official who was based in Chicago said he wouldn't have permitted a TV personality to have cameras rolling during an operation.
'We generally tried to stay out of the media's attention … for a host of reasons,' said the former official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized by his current employer to speak to the press.
Those reasons include both safety concerns and 'the humiliation issue.'
'We always took great pains to make sure nobody, regardless whether they were a public official, a law enforcement officer, a drug dealer or anybody else, (was) humiliated in a process of an arrest because that creates a whole host of other grievances that could emerge at the scene or down the line,' the former official said.
McGraw, who's previously interviewed Homan at length, said officials took great care Sunday to ensure safety.
'Their No. 1 priority was safety of everybody involved, including the targets that they were arresting, and they were going to great lengths to make sure that they went about this operation in a way that provided the greatest degree and likelihood of safety for the people that were being arrested as well as the agents that were doing the detaining,' he said.
Still, videos from the incidents, especially those that involved McGraw, were surreal — and questionable.
During the exchange with the man who recognized McGraw as 'Dr. Phil,' the TV personality continued asking questions of the man even after he mentions wanting to speak to a lawyer. The clip posted to McGraw's account on X, the social media platform formerly called Twitter, showed the man being questioned stood with his hands behind his back next to a law enforcement official.
Standing at McGraw's side, Homan said: 'This is an example of sanctuary cities, right?' mentioning the policy Chicago and many other large cities have in which city agencies and local law enforcement do not cooperate with federal deportation authorities.
'We've got an illegal alien convicted of sex crimes involving children, and he's walking the streets of Chicago,' Homan continued.
'You've been charged with sex crimes with children?' McGraw said.
'Not really,' the man said, shortly before Homan is seen on the video telling agents to 'take him in, process him and lock him up.'
The questioning should have stopped as soon as the man mentioned wanting to speak to an attorney, the former federal official said.
'You have to cease and desist and let them get their lawyer,' the former official said.
While he's 'not a lawyer,' McGraw told the Tribune, 'I wouldn't think that would extend to me, but I suppose somebody could certainly ask the lawyers involved if that's true.'
A representative of the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois also raised questions about the exchange.
'It is disturbing that high-level government officials stood idly by as a hand-picked media outlet sensationalized an arrest and attempted to gain admissions from a suspect even after he asked to speak to his lawyer,' ACLU of Illinois spokesman Ed Yohnka wrote in an email. 'If the administration thinks this sort of stunt will lend credibility to its operations, it is mistaken.'
Immigration enforcement, particularly the deportation of people who've committed major crimes, is serious business and should be treated as such, said David Axelrod, an adviser to former President Barack Obama.
Obama deported more people during his first term than Trump did during his, Axelrod noted, but 'didn't bring camera and film crews with him to mark the occasion.'
'Donald Trump is the greatest marketer, brander and self-promoter in history. … I wouldn't take that away from him,' Axelrod said. 'But the spectacle of Dr. Phil on ICE raids is really … kind of a cheap reality show thing and detracts from the gravity and the seriousness of what this should be.'
'Spectacle' was also the word that came to mind for University of Illinois communications professor Stewart Coles.
'It's no secret that Trump is personally obsessed with ratings, with popularity, with mass media,' said Coles, whose research includes the political effects of entertainment media.
With McGraw and cameras on hand, the administration's highly publicized enforcement effort 'turns into entertainment for, presumably, his supporters, that they see that he's doing something about immigration.'
And while McGraw told the Tribune his goal was to document the 'factual' and 'actual,' there's an array of unanswered questions in today's fragmented media landscape about 'what types of journalistic ethics are being followed here,' Coles said.
McGraw's involvement, while 'disturbing' and 'abnormal,' 'it's also pointing to normalization,' said Heather Hendershot, a Northwestern University communications professor.
'It's very strange to have a talk show host out with immigration officials, gathering people for potential deportation,' Hendershot said. 'That is completely inappropriate. It doesn't make any sense, but it points to the ways that I fear that the Trump administration and its extremism and authoritarian inclinations are being kind of normalized this time around.'
Nubia Willman, former deputy chief of staff and current chief programs officer at Latinos Progresando, said she imagines 'this second round, the federal administration will continue to look for ways to antagonize and scare Chicagoans in an attempt to deepen divides. Adding a TV personality to the mix is likely the first of many questionable decisions we will see as they attempt to vilify immigrants.'
Ald. Raymond Lopez, 15th, an outspoken critic of the city's sanctuary status, appeared in an interview segment Sunday on McGraw's Merit TV platform.
He hasn't met McGraw but said 'it's very important to show who these targets are and to show why they are being pursued by the federal government.'
Lopez added he thinks local media also should have been invited to witness the deportation efforts.
'It's crucial for all of us to share as much information, otherwise you have the rumor mill running rampant, spreading fear and hysteria,' said Lopez, who doesn't support the deportation of immigrants without legal status who haven't committed other crimes.
For some, though, the spotlight on Sunday's actions instilled more fear.
A Venezuelan woman who said her name was Iseamary said she forced herself to go to work on Monday even though the messaging from Homan and McGraw scared her. She's a single mom who lives on the South Side.
'But what if something happens to me?' she asked. 'Then my son will have no one.'
Iseamary asked not to have her last name included because of the threat of deportation. She said she normally takes the bus downtown, where she works cleaning hotels, she said.
'I've applied for asylum. And even though I have no legal papers yet, I keep my court documents on me at all times in case they stop me,' she said.
She said she watches the news and has heard that she needs to get a good lawyer. But because she doesn't always have steady work, she said she doesn't have the money to hire an attorney.
'I really don't know what to do,' she said. 'I don't like hearing about what they're doing to people.'
____
(Chicago Tribune's Laura Rodríguez Presa contributed.)
____
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

University of Alaska dorms to host up to 750 Russian delegates in town for Trump-Putin summit
University of Alaska dorms to host up to 750 Russian delegates in town for Trump-Putin summit

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

University of Alaska dorms to host up to 750 Russian delegates in town for Trump-Putin summit

The University of Alaska Anchorage is expecting hundreds of Russian delegates who are in the city for the summit between President Trump and President Vladimir Putin to stay in student dorms. 'There may be up to 750 people staying on campus between the U.S. and Russian delegations,' vice chancellor Ryan Buchholdt said in an email to the Alaskan newspaper, Anchorage Daily News. The school can house around 12,000 people. This week marks the start of the school calendar for those returning from the summer break. The summit is going to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, about a 10-minute drive from Anchorage, reports Alaska's News Source. The meeting will mark the first time Trump and Putin have met in person since 2018. 'In addition to the dorms, we do have the Alaska Airlines Center [a sports arena that has a 5,000-seat capacity] that has been set up with beds, meeting most of the need, mostly from the Russian delegation side,' Buchholdt also told Alaska's News Source. University police are working closely with state and federal law agencies to monitor security, Buchholdt added. 'Our main concern is making sure anyone who is staying on campus, whether they are from the United States or Russia or any other locality, is safe,' Buchholdt said, 'and is able to do the mission that they're here to do and go back home safely.' On Thursday, some of the delegates had already arrived as of Thursday afternoon, according to university spokesperson Katie Bender. Flight tracking data showed that at least one flight from Moscow had touched down in Anchorage that afternoon. 'The delegations are in separate locations. For security purposes, we are not able to share where the delegations are located,' Bender added. Alyeska resort, located about 40 miles south of Anchorage, informed local press that they were fully booked for the weekend, and the website of the local hotel, Captain Cook, was also fully booked. The hotel site showed one remaining room in a hostel, at a staggeringly raised price of $150 a night on Friday. Town mayor Suzanne LaFrance explained that finding accommodation at the height of the tourist season is hard enough as it is, let alone with a significant political event taking center stage. 'I know that people are looking at creative solutions. I don't have any specific details about that [housing delegations in UOA], but I know that the university is engaged in those conversations, and I'm optimistic that we'll come up with some options for folks,' she said to Alaska's News Source. At the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, news and camera crews were seen rolling in on Thursday morning. Locals watched on as officials gathered in the vicinity. 'It's kind of a big deal, I mean, do we all want World War III?' one man told Alaska's News Source. The two leaders will hold peace talks regarding the future of Russia and Ukraine, amid a deadly war that has killed hundreds of thousands of soldiers on both sides. Earlier on Thursday, Putin praised Trump's 'energetic and sincere efforts to stop' the war in Ukraine. More than a million Russian troops have been killed or injured since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began on 24 February 2022, reports the British Ministry of Defense. Meanwhile, Ukrainian personnel fatalities and casualties have amounted to around 400,000, says the US-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Ahead of the summit, Trump vowed that Putin was 'not going to mess around with me,' as he hopes to secure a ceasefire deal. The Independent contacted the university, along with the Anchorage tourism board, for comment.

Live Updates: Trump Flies to Alaska for High-Stakes Summit With Putin
Live Updates: Trump Flies to Alaska for High-Stakes Summit With Putin

New York Times

time3 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Live Updates: Trump Flies to Alaska for High-Stakes Summit With Putin

President Trump boarded Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Md., on Friday. The leaders of the United States and Russia are set to hold talks at an American military base in Alaska to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine, which Russia invaded in 2022. President Trump plans to meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia on Friday in Alaska. The focus of their high-stakes summit will be to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine, which Russia invaded in 2022. Mr. Trump has sought to broker peace in a conflict he once boasted he could resolve in a day. He has expressed frustration with Mr. Putin recently over what he described as the Russian leader's 'meaningless' gestures toward peace. But Ukraine, whose president wasn't invited to the talks, and its European allies are worried about any deal that might be struck without Kyiv's involvement. Here's what to know about the summit. When are Trump and Putin meeting? The White House said the leaders would begin meeting at 11 a.m. local time (3 p.m. Eastern) on Friday. The Kremlin said Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin would first hold a 'tête-à-tête' discussion with interpreters, followed by negotiations by delegations and 'a working breakfast.' The two leaders are expected to hold a joint news conference at the end, the Kremlin added. The New York Times plans to livestream the news conference. Mr. Trump was scheduled to be on the ground in Alaska for only a few hours, departing for Washington at 5:45 p.m. local time (9:45 p.m. Eastern), the White House said. Where is the summit? The leaders plan to meet at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. Mr. Trump has visited the base several times since he first took office in 2017, but Friday's trip will be the first stop in Alaska of his current term. A White House official familiar with the planning of the event told The New York Times that holding the meeting on the base would make it easier for Mr. Trump to make a one-day trip. An American military base offered extra security, the official said. Alaska has deep ties to Russia, which colonized the region in the 18th century. In 1867, Russia sold Alaska to the United States for $7.2 million, but Russian-speaking communities remain in the state. What is expected to come out of it? Mr. Trump dimmed expectations for a possible breakthrough with Mr. Putin, saying on Monday that he was going to see 'what he has in mind.' On Thursday, Mr. Trump said, 'We're going to find out where everybody stands,' adding: 'If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future.' Trans-Atlantic discussions on Wednesday that included President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine were held to close ranks with Mr. Trump before the Friday meeting. European leaders said that they had hammered out a strategy with Mr. Trump, including an insistence that any peace plan must start with a cease-fire and not be negotiated without Ukraine at the table. Will Zelensky be there? No, Mr. Zelensky was not invited. Mr. Zelensky and European leaders have cautioned that Mr. Putin could try to drive a wedge between the United States, Ukraine and its European allies. Mr. Trump said on Wednesday that he would call Mr. Zelensky, then European leaders, after the Alaska meeting. Who else is attending? Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin are expected to meet one on one, said Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. But each was bringing other officials to Alaska, including economic officials, a possible sign that their talks would extend beyond the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin said that the Russian delegation would include Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov; Yuri V. Ushakov, a foreign policy aide to Mr. Putin; Defense Minister Andrei R. Belousov; Finance Minister Anton G. Siluanov; and Kirill А. Dmitriev, the head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund and Mr. Putin's special representative for investment and economic cooperation. The White House said that among those traveling aboard Air Force One with Mr. Trump would be Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent; Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick; the C.I.A. director, John Ratcliffe; and Steve Witkoff, Mr. Trump's special envoy, who has held several meetings this year with Mr. Putin.

In his push for fairness in college admissions, Trump has been silent on legacy preferences
In his push for fairness in college admissions, Trump has been silent on legacy preferences

San Francisco Chronicle​

time4 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

In his push for fairness in college admissions, Trump has been silent on legacy preferences

WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump attempts to reshape college admissions, he's promising a new era of fairness, with an emphasis on merit and test scores and a blind eye toward diversity. Yet the Republican president's critics — and some allies — are questioning his silence on admissions policies that give applicants a boost because of their wealth or family ties. While he has pressed colleges to eliminate any possible consideration of a student's race, he has made no mention of legacy admissions, an edge given to the children of alumni, or similar preferences for the relatives of donors. Trump often rails against systems he describes as 'rigged,' but he has overlooked a glaring instance in higher education, said Richard Kahlenberg, a researcher at the Progressive Policy Institute think tank who has written about admissions. 'It's hard to think of a more flagrant way in which the system is rigged than legacy preferences,' Kahlenberg said. 'Rarely is a system of hereditary privilege so openly practiced without any sense of shame.' In recent weeks, Trump has taken several actions to scrub any vestiges of race from admissions decisions, suggesting that some schools are ignoring a 2023 Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action. His administration negotiated settlements with Brown and Columbia universities that included provisions to share admissions data. Last week, Trump issued a call for colleges nationwide to submit data to prove they do not consider race in admissions. Some are urging Trump to go further. Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., applauded the settlement with Brown requiring the university to turn a blind eye toward race — even in application essays. But 'restoring meritocracy warrants more,' said Young, who cosponsored legislation in 2023 aiming to end legacy admissions. 'Federally accredited institutions should eliminate ALL preferences grounded in arbitrary circumstances of ancestry that students have no control over, such as legacy status,' Young said on social media. Many selective colleges consider family ties Sometimes called 'affirmative action for the rich,' the practice of legacy admissions remains widespread among elite colleges even as it faces mounting bipartisan opposition. Virginia's Republican governor signed a bill last year barring legacy admissions at public institutions, following similar measures in Colorado, California and elsewhere. Some Republicans in Congress have worked with Democrats on proposals to end it nationwide. Roughly 500 universities consider legacy status when evaluating applicants, including more than half of the nation's 100 most selective U.S. schools, according to 2023 disclosures to the federal government. A few have abandoned the policy, but it remains in place at all eight Ivy League schools. Stanford University said in July it will continue considering legacy status, even after a California law barred it at institutions that receive state financial aid. Stanford opted to withdraw from the state's student financial aid program rather than end the practice. The university said it will replace the funding with internal money — even as it begins layoffs to close a $140 million budget deficit. Stanford officials declined to comment. Last year, as part of a state transparency law, the school reported that about 14% of its new students were relatives of alumni or donors. A push for merit, but no mention of legacy admissions The executive action signed by Trump last week requires universities to turn over more information about students who apply to and are accepted to their campuses. Taxpayers 'deserve confidence in the fairness and integrity' of decisions, his memorandum said, adding that more information is needed to ensure colleges are heeding the Supreme Court's decision. A week earlier, the Justice Department issued a memo clarifying what it considers illegal discrimination in admissions. It takes issue not only with overt racial considerations but also 'proxies' for race, including 'geographic targeting' or personal essays asking about obstacles applicants have overcome. Similar language requiring 'merit-based' admissions policies was included in the government's resolutions with Brown and Columbia universities. None of the actions made any mention of legacy admissions. Trump's silence caught the attention of the nonprofit Lawyers for Civil Rights, which has an open complaint with the Education Department alleging that Harvard University's use of donor and alumni preferences amounts to illegal racial discrimination. The group's 2023 complaint says the practice overwhelmingly benefits white students. If the Trump administration wants to make admissions a meritocracy, it should start by ending legacy preferences, said Oren Sellstrom, litigation director for the group. 'These deeply unmeritocratic preferences simply reward students based on who their parents are. It's hard to imagine anything more unfair or contrary to basic merit principles,' he said. Few Americans support legacy or donor preferences Colleges defend the practice by saying it builds community and encourages families to become donors. Some backers say it increasingly helps nonwhite students as campuses become more diverse. Then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, urged colleges to rethink legacy preferences in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, saying it expanded 'privilege instead of opportunity.' Some feared it would drive up white enrollment as affirmative action ended. Georgetown University reviewed the policy but kept it in place this year after concluding the pool of legacy applicants had a similar makeup to the wider admissions pool. An AP-NORC poll in 2023 found that most Americans have a dim view of legacy and donor preferences, with few saying either should play a strong role in decisions. Universities are required to tell the federal government whether they consider legacy status, but they don't have to divulge how far it tips the scale or how many legacy students they admit. Among the 20 most selective universities that say they employ the practice, none would tell The Associated Press what percentage of their incoming class has a family connection to alumni or donors. Trump's blitz to root out racial preferences has hinged on the argument that it undermines merit. New scrutiny is needed to ensure colleges are following the Supreme Court's order and 'recruiting and training capable future doctors, engineers, scientists' and other workers, he said in his executive action. That argument sends the message that minority students are 'intellectually suspect until proven otherwise,' said Justin Driver, a Yale law professor with a forthcoming book on affirmative action. He worries Trump's latest actions will intimidate colleges into limiting minority enrollment to avoid raising the suspicion of the government. 'I believe that the United States confronts a lot of problems today,' Driver said. 'Too many Black students on first-rate college campuses is not among them.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store